Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Rapid mixing of long-range Lindbladians forces polynomial decay of mutual and conditional mutual information in their fixed points.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 11:33 UTC pith:6D2T64R7

load-bearing objection Solid dynamical-to-static theorems for long-range open systems; the RM/FF hypotheses are load-bearing but honestly flagged, and the proofs hold under them. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.28054 v2 pith:6D2T64R7 submitted 2026-06-26 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Static features from mixing in short- and long-range Lindbladians: Markov property and correlations

Paul Rosa-Ruiz , Matteo Scandi , \'Angela Capel , \'Alvaro M. Alhambra This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP PACS 03.65.Yz05.30.-d03.67.-a
keywords mixed-state phasesLindbladianrapid mixingconditional mutual informationMarkov lengthlong-range interactionsGibbs statesfrustration-freeness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks when the fixed points of open quantum systems have the correlation structure needed to sit inside a mixed-state phase. It shows that two dynamical assumptions on a local Lindbladian—rapid mixing (fast return to equilibrium) and, for the stronger statement, frustration-freeness—already imply that the unique steady state has decaying mutual information and conditional mutual information. When interactions fall off as a power law of rate α, both quantities decay only polynomially with distance rather than exponentially; the usual finite Markov length is replaced by a power-law tail. The same polynomial local Markov property is proved for thermal states of long-range non-commuting Hamiltonians at every temperature, by constructing a quasi-local recovery map from a known Gibbs sampler. Numerical checks on the long-range Ising chain (with and without a transverse field) confirm regimes of polynomial CMI decay consistent with the bounds. The results supply the static criteria that phase classifications for dissipative and long-range systems have been missing.

Core claim

Local Lindbladians that are globally rapidly mixing and frustration-free have fixed points obeying a global Markov property: the conditional mutual information I(A:C|B) is bounded by a polynomial in the subsystem sizes times a power of the interaction F-function evaluated at the shielding distance R. For power-law interactions this becomes a pure polynomial decay once α is large enough. Independently, local rapid mixing plus primitivity and regularity imply global decay of mutual information, and Gibbs states of k-local long-range non-commuting Hamiltonians satisfy a local Markov property at every inverse temperature.

What carries the argument

A recovery map built from the finite-time evolution of a truncated Lindbladian (or of the CKG Gibbs sampler for thermal states). Rapid mixing supplies exponential convergence of the global dynamics to the fixed point; Lieb–Robinson bounds convert that into a spatially localized recovery error that decays with the buffer width R, which the Fawzi–Renner inequality then turns into a bound on conditional mutual information.

Load-bearing premise

The Lindbladian is assumed to mix globally and rapidly (or locally and rapidly), a dynamical hypothesis that is taken as given rather than proved for the systems under study and that forces polynomial prefactors in system size.

What would settle it

Compute the CMI of the fixed point of an explicitly constructed long-range, rapidly mixing, frustration-free Lindbladian (for example a long-range Davies or CKG generator known to mix) and check whether the observed decay rate with buffer size matches or violates the predicted power of α.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper shows that dynamical properties of Lindbladians imply static information-theoretic features of their fixed points, with emphasis on long-range interactions. Under global rapid mixing and frustration-freeness, fixed points of k-local Lindbladians satisfy a global Markov property: the CMI decays as a polynomial in |A|,|C| times a power of the F-function of the shielding distance R (Theorem 3.3 / informal 1.1); for power-law F_α this is polynomial decay once α exceeds a threshold set by the mixing rate and Lieb–Robinson velocity (Corollary 3.4). Independently, local rapid mixing plus primitivity and regularity yield global decay of mutual information without frustration-freeness (Theorem 3.8). The authors further extend the Chen–Rouzé local Markov property to Gibbs states of k-local long-range non-commuting Hamiltonians at all temperatures, via a quasi-local CKG recovery map and long-range imaginary-time and real-time Lieb–Robinson bounds (Theorem 4.6). Numerical exact diagonalization of the classical and transverse-field long-range Ising chains illustrates polynomial CMI decay in regimes consistent with the analytic bounds.

Significance. If the theorems hold as stated, the work supplies a clean dynamical-to-static dictionary for mixed-state phase criteria (Markov length / CMI and MI) that is especially useful for long-range platforms (Rydberg arrays, trapped ions, dipolar gases) where exponential clustering is not expected. The CMI result under rapid mixing plus frustration-freeness, the global MI decay under weaker hypotheses, and the all-temperature local Markov property for long-range non-commuting Gibbs states are concrete advances beyond short-range and commuting settings. Strengths include explicit recovery-map constructions, careful long-range boundary-term splitting (Theorems 3.5–3.7), and transparent α-thresholds collected in Table 1.1. The authors themselves flag non-optimality of the thresholds and the open status of removing frustration-freeness, which is appropriate. The numerics, though small, give a concrete classical example of polynomial CMI decay.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 3.3, Definition 2.8] Theorem 3.3 and Definition 2.8: the CMI bound relies on global rapid mixing RM(n,λ), which supplies a prefactor p(|Λ|) and, after |B|∼ R^D, an R^{nD} factor that is square-rooted into the final CMI estimate. Global RM is vacuous in the thermodynamic limit and is a strictly stronger hypothesis than the local RM used for MI (Theorem 3.8). The manuscript should state more sharply for which finite-volume scalings (e.g. |Λ| poly in R, or fixed |Λ| with R growing) the “global Markov property” claim is intended, and whether a local-RM route to CMI under frustration-freeness is expected or blocked.
  2. [Section 4.4.2, Figure 4.2, Abstract] Section 4.4.2 and Figure 4.2: for the long-range TFIM at N=10 the maximum buffer is R_max=8, and the text itself notes that power-law versus exponential fits cannot be distinguished quantitatively. The abstract and conclusions nevertheless state that regimes of polynomial CMI decay are found “in accordance with the bounds proven.” That claim is well-supported for the classical Ising chain (Sec. 4.4.1) but overstated for the quantum TFIM data; the wording should be restricted to the classical case or qualified as qualitative only.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1.1] Table 1.1 is very useful; consider adding a column that records whether frustration-freeness is required, so the contrast between the CMI and MI rows is immediate.
  2. [Theorem 3.7, Eqs. 3.57–3.58] In the proof of Theorem 3.7, the condition α>3D−1 arises from needing F_{α−2D+1} to be an F-function for the convolution step (around Eqs. 3.57–3.58). A short remark pointing to this step would help readers who only consult the informal statements.
  3. [Lemma 4.1] Lemma 4.1 / Appendix A.1: the temperature threshold β_max=1/(8guk) is stated clearly, but a one-line comparison with the short-range threshold of Chen–Rouzé would orient the reader.
  4. [Figures 1.1, 3.1] Figure 1.1 and Figure 3.1: the geometry of the tripartition and of ∂AC is clear, but labeling R=d(A,C) on the figures themselves would reduce cross-referencing.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typos: “I is introduced” (p. 13, after Def. 2.7); “appplied” (Lemma 3.2 statement); “Duhamell’s” (Eq. 3.36); “Additionaly” (p. 6). Standard copy-edit pass will catch these.
  6. [Section 1.2, Table 1.2] References: the comparison table (Table 1.2) is helpful; ensuring that the most recent concurrent works on long-range thermalization and CMI (if any appeared after the arXiv posting) are noted in the final version would strengthen the related-work section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: CMI/MI bounds are conditional implications from stated dynamical hypotheses (RM, FF, primitivity) via standard recovery maps and LR estimates; numerics are post-hoc illustrations only.

full rationale

The central claims (Theorems 3.3/3.8/4.6 and informal 1.1–1.4) are one-directional implications: global/local rapid mixing + frustration-freeness/primitivity/regularity imply polynomial (or local) decay of CMI/MI for fixed points, and the same for long-range Gibbs states via an adapted CKG recovery map. The proofs construct an explicit recovery map (time-averaged or truncated evolution), control its locality error with long-range Lieb–Robinson bounds (Thms 2.7–2.9, Lems 3.1–3.2, A.3–A.4), and convert the resulting 1-norm error into CMI/MI via Fawzi–Renner and Hiai–Ohya–Tsukada; none of these steps redefine the target quantities in terms of themselves or fit free parameters to the claimed decay. Numerical q(α) fits in Sec. 4.4 are measured from exact diagonalization of the classical/long-range TFIM and are never fed back into the theorems. Self-citations (e.g. to prior mixing/MLSI or CKG work by overlapping authors) supply background tools or known high-T rapid-mixing regimes; they are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems that force the present statements. The α thresholds and polynomial prefactors are method artefacts that the authors themselves flag as non-optimal (Conclusions, open problems 1 and 3). The derivation is therefore self-contained under its explicit hypotheses and exhibits no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 9 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard open-system and many-body tools (Lindblad generators, F-functions, Lieb–Robinson bounds, Fawzi–Renner) plus three domain assumptions that are not derived here: global/local rapid mixing, frustration-freeness (for CMI), and primitivity/regularity (for MI). No free parameters enter the theorems; numerical β, α, h are simulation choices. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • numerical inverse temperature β and transverse field h in §4.4
    Chosen for illustration (β=5, various h); not used in the theorems. Fit coefficients a,b in q(α)=aα+b are post-hoc descriptions of numerics only.
axioms (9)
  • domain assumption Global rapid mixing RM(n,λ): η(T_t^Λ) ≤ p(|Λ|) e^{-λt} (Def. 2.8)
    Assumed for Theorem 3.3 / CMI; not proved for general long-range Lindbladians in this paper.
  • domain assumption Local rapid mixing LRM(λ) (Def. 2.9)
    Assumed for MI decay (Theorem 3.8) and for local dynamical fixed points.
  • domain assumption Frustration-freeness: L_Z^*(σ)=0 for every local term and every fixed point σ (Def. 2.10)
    Load-bearing for CMI localization lemmas 3.1–3.2; authors list it as an open problem to weaken.
  • domain assumption Primitivity and regularity of the Lindbladian (Defs. 2.11–2.12)
    Needed for unique full-rank fixed point and for boundary-term removal in the MI proof.
  • domain assumption Doubly-anchored interactions governed by an F-function with finite ||L||_F and C_F (Defs. 2.2–2.3)
    Standard long-range locality encoding; used throughout LR and convolution estimates.
  • standard math Open-system and long-range Lieb–Robinson bounds (Theorems 2.7–2.9, after Nachtergaele et al., Hastings–Koma, Kuwahara–Saito)
    Cited external theorems used as black boxes for localization of recovery maps.
  • standard math Fawzi–Renner bound relating CMI to recovery fidelity (Prop. 2.5)
    Standard information-theoretic inequality used to convert recovery-map error into CMI decay.
  • domain assumption CKG Lindbladian has the Gibbs state as fixed point and is quasi-local for long-range H (Chen–Kastoryano–Gilyén; Lemmas 4.4–4.5)
    Background construction for the thermal-state section; quasi-locality is re-proved for power-law H.
  • ad hoc to paper Imaginary-time LR bound with temperature threshold β_max = 1/(8 g u k) for long-range H (Lemma 4.1)
    Adapted polymer/nested-commutator estimate needed to push Chen–Rouzé’s recovery map to long-range; threshold depends on locality k and F-norm.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 52947 in / 4022 out tokens · 41030 ms · 2026-07-12T11:33:24.318461+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Static features from mixing in short- and long-range Lindbladians: Markov property and correlations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6D2T64R7

@misc{pith2026260628054,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Static features from mixing in short- and long-range Lindbladians: Markov property and correlations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6D2T64R7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.28054}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The classification of mixed-state phases requires criteria beyond two-point correlation functions, such as the decay of the mutual information (MI) and the conditional mutual information (CMI), with the latter encapsulated in the notion of Markov length. Here we show how such static properties of the fixed point of a Lindbladian follow from natural dynamical features of its generators: rapid mixing and frustration-freeness. We focus on systems with long-range interactions, and prove (i) that local Lindbladians satisfying (global) rapid mixing and frustration-freeness have fixed-points whose CMI decays with the shielding distance, and (ii) that (local) rapid mixing together with primitivity and regularity implies global decay of MI. For long-range interactions decaying with a power law with rate $\alpha$, both quantities decay polynomially rather than exponentially, in contrast to the finite- and short-range regimes where exponential decay (a finite Markov length) is expected within a phase. We further show that Gibbs states of long-range, non-commuting Hamiltonians satisfy a local Markov property at any temperatures, extending the recent results (Chen--Rouz\'e, 2025) for short-range systems to the long-range regime relevant to a variety of experimental platforms. As a numerical example, we study the long-range Ising model both with and without a transverse field. We find regimes in which the polynomial decay of the CMI holds, in accordance with the bounds proven.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28054 by \'Alvaro M. Alhambra, \'Angela Capel, Matteo Scandi, Paul Rosa-Ruiz.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Geometry of the tripartition A ⊔ B ⊔ C = Λ. makes the system behave akin to a short-range system (for which an exponential decay of the CMI is expected [45]). The details of the numerical simulations are in Section 4.4. 1.1 Summary of Main results First of all, consider a general dissipative process generated by a local Lindbladian L = X Z⊂Λ LZ, ∥LZ∥cb ≲ F(diam(Z)), for an F-function F (see Definition 2.… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Geometry considered for the MI: A and C and their frontier ∂AC Theorem 3.7. Let (Γ, d) be a countable metric space equipped with the F-function Fα(r) := 1 (1 + r) α , for r ≥ 0 and α > 3D − 1. Let L = {LZ}Z∈P0(Γ) be a local and primitive dissipative interaction with ∥L∥F < ∞, satisfying local rapid mixing. Fix A, C ∈ P0(Γ) with A ∩ C = ∅ (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Decay exponent q(α) of the conditional mutual information at β = 5 for different system sizes N. The dashed line indicates the linear fit for N = 18 (α ≥ 2). whose Gibbs state is diagonal in the computational basis and therefore identical to the classical distribution above. For each interaction exponent α and system size N, we compute numerically the conditional mutual information I(A : C|Bℓ) as a funct… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: CMI decay I(A : C|Bℓ) as a function of buffer size ℓ for selected values of α and transverse field h, at inverse temperature β = 5, N = 10. Power-law (PL) and exponential (EXP) fits are shown; R2 values quantify the relative quality of each ansatz. The running effective exponent qeff(ℓ) is shown in the legend [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_4_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When quantum thermal states look classical

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Long-range Pauli Gibbs states lose entanglement, magic, and infinite-temperature analyticity at distinct constant inverse temperatures Θ(1/sk), Θ(log(1/ε)/sk), and Θ(1/s√k), with matching classical algorithms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 28 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hastings, M. B. & Koma, T. Spectral Gap and Exponential Decay of Correlations. en. Communications in Mathematical Physics265.arXiv:math-ph/0507008, 781–804.issn: 0010-3616, 1432-0916.http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0507008(2026) (Aug. 2006)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    & Sims, R

    Nachtergaele, B. & Sims, R. Lieb-Robinson bounds and the exponential clustering theorem.Communications in Mathematical Physics265,119–130 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Cramer, M., Eisert, J., Plenio, M. B. & Dreißig, J. Entanglement-area law for general bosonic harmonic lattice systems.Physical Review A73.issn: 1094-1622. http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012309(Jan. 2006)

    doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012309(jan 2006

  4. [4]

    Hastings, M. B. An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007,P08024 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    & Vazirani, U.An area law and sub-exponential algorithm for 1D systems2013

    Arad, I., Kitaev, A., Landau, Z. & Vazirani, U.An area law and sub-exponential algorithm for 1D systems2013. arXiv: 1301.1162 [quant-ph]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301. 1162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Anshu, A., Arad, I. & Gosset, D.An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systemsin Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, 2022), 12–18.http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3519935.3519962

    doi:10.1145/3519935.3519962 2022

  7. [7]

    & Altman, E

    Bao, Y., Fan, R., Vishwanath, A. & Altman, E. Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield double formulation of decoherence-induced transitions. arXiv:2301.05687 [quant-ph](2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Y., Jian, C.-M

    Lee, J. Y., Jian, C.-M. & Xu, C. Quantum Criticality Under Decoherence or Weak Measurement.PRX Quantum4.issn: 2691-3399. http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1103 / PRXQuantum.4.030317(Aug. 2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    & Vishwanath, A

    Fan, R., Bao, Y., Altman, E. & Vishwanath, A. Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory.PRX Quantum5,020343 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    & Grover, T

    Chen, Y.-H. & Grover, T. Separability Transitions in Topological States Induced by Local Decoherence.Physical Review Letters132.issn: 1079-7114. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.170602(Apr. 2024)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.170602(apr 2024

  11. [11]

    & Hsieh, T

    Sang, S., Zou, Y. & Hsieh, T. H.Mixed-state Quantum Phases: Renormalization and Quantum Error Correction2026. arXiv:2310.08639 [quant-ph]. https://arxiv.org/ abs/2310.08639

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Wang, Z., Fan, R., Wang, T., Garratt, S. J. & Altman, E.Fractional quantum Hall states under density decoherence2025. arXiv:2510.08490 [cond-mat.str-el]. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2510.08490

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    & Prosen, T

    Buča, B. & Prosen, T. A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains.New Journal of Physics14,073007.issn: 1367-2630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073007(2012)

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073007(2012 2012

  14. [14]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett

    Lieu, S.et al.Symmetry Breaking and Error Correction in Open Quantum Systems.Phys- ical Review Letters125.issn: 1079-7114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 125.240405(Dec. 2020)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2020

  15. [15]

    & Schuch, N

    De Groot, C., Turzillo, A. & Schuch, N. Symmetry Protected Topological Order in Open Quantum Systems.Quantum6,856.issn: 2521-327X. http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q- 2022-11-10-856(Nov. 2022)

    doi:10.22331/q- 2022

  16. [16]

    & You, Y

    Sala, P., Gopalakrishnan, S., Oshikawa, M. & You, Y. Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective.Phys. Rev. B110,155150. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155150(15 Oct. 2024). 43

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.155150(15 2024

  17. [17]

    & Wang, C

    Ma, R., Zhang, J.-H., Bi, Z., Cheng, M. & Wang, C. Topological Phases with Average Symmetries: The Decohered, the Disordered, and the Intrinsic.Physical Review X15. issn: 2160-3308.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021062(May 2025)

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021062(may 2025

  18. [18]

    A.et al.Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Mixed Quantum States.PRX Quantum6.issn: 2691-3399

    Lessa, L. A.et al.Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Mixed Quantum States.PRX Quantum6.issn: 2691-3399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum. 6.010344(Mar. 2025)

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv:2606.02555 [quant-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02555

    Wang, C.Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking2026. arXiv:2606.02555 [quant-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02555

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    & Preskill, J

    Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A. & Preskill, J. Topological quantum memory.Journal of Mathematical Physics43,4452–4505. arXiv:quant-ph/0110143(2002)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  21. [21]

    & Hsieh, T

    Sang, S., Zou, Y. & Hsieh, T. H. Mixed-State Quantum Phases: Renormalization and Quantum Error Correction.Phys. Rev. X14,031044. https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.14.031044(3 Sept. 2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Observation of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in a Dephased Fermi Gas2026

    Wang, S.et al. Observation of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in a Dephased Fermi Gas2026. arXiv:2604.16137 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. https://arxiv. org/abs/2604.16137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    H., Kim, Y

    Zhang, Y., Hsieh, T. H., Kim, Y. B. & Zou, Y.Probing mixed-state phases on a quantum computer via Renyi correlators and variational decoding2025. arXiv: 2505 . 02900 [quant-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02900

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    & Perez-Garcia, D

    Coser, A. & Perez-Garcia, D. Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution. en.Quantum3.arXiv:1810.05092 [quant-ph], 174.issn: 2521-327X. http: //arxiv.org/abs/1810.05092(2025) (Aug. 2019)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    & Von Keyserlingk, C

    Rakovszky, T., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Von Keyserlingk, C. Defining Stable Phases of Open Quantum Systems. en.Physical Review X14.Publisher: American Physical Society (APS).issn: 2160-3308. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041031 (2025) (Nov. 2024)

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041031 2025

  26. [26]

    Mixed-state phases from local reversibilityarXiv:2507.02292 [quant-ph]

    Sang, S.et al. Mixed-state phases from local reversibilityarXiv:2507.02292 [quant-ph]. July 2025.http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02292(2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    & Hsieh, T

    Li, Z., Firanko, R. & Hsieh, T. H.A Unified Framework for Locally Stable Phases arXiv:2605.00088 [quant-ph]. Apr. 2026.http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00088(2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    & Turzillo, A

    Ma, R. & Turzillo, A. Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Mixed States in the Doubled Space.PRX Quantum6,010348. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.6.010348(1 Mar. 2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    & Sun, K.Universal Dynamical Scaling of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Open Quantum Systems2026

    Shu, C., Zhang, K., Luo, Z.-X., You, Y. & Sun, K.Universal Dynamical Scaling of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Open Quantum Systems2026. arXiv: 2603.06363 [cond-mat.mes-hall].https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06363

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Efficient Detection of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the Rényi-1 Correlator.Physical Review Letters134.issn: 1079-7114

    Weinstein, Z. Efficient Detection of Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the Rényi-1 Correlator.Physical Review Letters134.issn: 1079-7114. http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.150405(Apr. 2025)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.150405(apr 2025

  31. [31]

    & Zhang, P

    Liu, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S. & Zhang, P. Diagnosing strong-to-weak symmetry breaking via Wightman correlators.Communications Physics8,274.issn: 2399-3650. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02199-7(July 2025)

    doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02199-7(july 2025

  32. [32]

    Zhang, J.-H., Qi, Y. & Bi, Z. Fidelity strange correlators for average symmetry-protected topological phases.Science Bulletin71,688–691.issn: 2095-9273. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scib.2025.12.041(Feb. 2026). 44

    doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.12.041(feb 2095

  33. [33]

    & Winter, A

    Groisman, B., Popescu, S. & Winter, A. Quantum, classical, and total amount of correlations in a quantum state.Physical Review A72.issn: 1094-1622. http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032317(2005)

    doi:10.1103/physreva.72.032317(2005 2005

  34. [34]

    G., Kallin, A

    Melko, R. G., Kallin, A. B. & Hastings, M. B. Finite-size scaling of mutual information in Monte Carlo simulations: Application to the spin-1 2 XXZ model.Phys. Rev. B82, 100409(R). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.100409 (10 Sept. 2010)

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.100409 2010

  35. [35]

    O., Alhambra, Á

    Scalet, S. O., Alhambra, Á. M., Styliaris, G. & Cirac, J. I. Computable Rényi mutual information: Area laws and correlations.Quantum5,541.issn: 2521-327X. http : //dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-09-14-541(2021)

    doi:10.22331/q-2021-09-14-541(2021 2021

  36. [36]

    & Pérez-Hernández, A

    Bluhm, A., Capel, Á. & Pérez-Hernández, A. Exponential decay of mutual information for Gibbs states of local Hamiltonians.Quantum6,650.issn: 2521-327X. http://dx. doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-02-10-650(Feb. 2022)

    doi:10.22331/q-2022-02-10-650(feb 2022

  37. [37]

    & Zou, L

    Yi, J., Li, K., Liu, C., Li, Z. & Zou, L. Universal Decay of Mutual Information and Conditional Mutual Information in Gapped Pure- and Mixed-State Quantum Matter. Physical Review Letters136.issn: 1079-7114.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/mqp8-y1m7 (Mar. 2026)

    doi:10.1103/mqp8-y1m7 2026

  38. [38]

    M., Verstraete, F., Hastings, M

    Wolf, M. M., Verstraete, F., Hastings, M. B. & Cirac, J. I. Area Laws in Quantum Systems: Mutual Information and Correlations.Physical Review Letters100,070502 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    Hastings, M. B. Entropy and entanglement in quantum ground states.Phys. Rev. B76, 035114 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    Hayden, P., Leung, D., Shor, P. W. & Winter, A. Randomizing quantum states: Con- structions and applications.Commun. Math. Phys.250,371–391 (2004)

    2004

  41. [41]

    & Renner, R

    Sutter, D. & Renner, R. Necessary criterion for approximate recoverability.Ann. Henri Poincaré19,3007–3029 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    & Renner, R

    Fawzi, O. & Renner, R. Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate Markov chains.Communications in Mathematical Physics340,575–611 (2015)

    2015

  43. [43]

    & Hsieh, T

    Sang, S. & Hsieh, T. H. Stability of Mixed-State Quantum Phases via Finite Markov Length.Physical Review Letters134.issn: 1079-7114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.070403(Feb. 2025)

    2025

  44. [45]

    & Rouzé, C.Quantum Gibbs states are locally MarkovianarXiv:2504.02208 [quant-ph]

    Chen, C.-F. & Rouzé, C.Quantum Gibbs states are locally MarkovianarXiv:2504.02208 [quant-ph]. Apr. 2025.http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02208(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    & Grover, T.Local Reversibility and Divergent Markov Length in 1+1-D Directed Percolation2026

    Chen, Y.-H. & Grover, T.Local Reversibility and Divergent Markov Length in 1+1-D Directed Percolation2026. arXiv:2512.07220 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. https://arxiv. org/abs/2512.07220

    arXiv

  46. [47]

    & Sang, S.Circuit-based characterization of finite-temperature quan- tum phases and self-correcting quantum memory2025

    Ma, R., Khemani, V. & Sang, S.Circuit-based characterization of finite-temperature quan- tum phases and self-correcting quantum memory2025. arXiv:2509.15204 [quant-ph]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15204

    arXiv

  47. [48]

    arXiv:2407.05835 [quant-ph]

    Kuwahara, T.Clustering of conditional mutual information for quantum Gibbs states above a threshold temperature2024. arXiv:2407.05835 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [49]

    & Vazirani, U.A Structural Theory of Quantum Metasta- bility: Markov Properties and Area Laws2025

    Bergamaschi, T., Chen, C.-F. & Vazirani, U.A Structural Theory of Quantum Metasta- bility: Markov Properties and Area Laws2025. arXiv:2510.08538 [quant-ph].https: //arxiv.org/abs/2510.08538. 45

    arXiv

  49. [50]

    & Kuwahara, T.On the Clustering of Conditional Mutual Information via Dissipative Dynamicsen

    Kato, K. & Kuwahara, T.On the Clustering of Conditional Mutual Information via Dissipative Dynamicsen. arXiv:2504.02235 [quant-ph]. Apr. 2025.http://arxiv.org/ abs/2504.02235(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    & Tang, E.A Dobrushin condition for quantum Markov chains: Rapid mixing and conditional mutual information at high tempera- tureen

    Bakshi, A., Liu, A., Moitra, A. & Tang, E.A Dobrushin condition for quantum Markov chains: Rapid mixing and conditional mutual information at high tempera- tureen. arXiv:2510.08542 [quant-ph]. Oct. 2025.http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08542 (2026)

    arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    & Brandão, F

    Kato, K. & Brandão, F. G. S. L. Quantum Approximate Markov Chains are Thermal. Commun. Math. Phys.370,117–149 (2019)

    2019

  52. [53]

    arXiv: 2605

    Chen, C.-F.Note on Strong Quantum Markov Properties2026. arXiv: 2605 . 02877 [quant-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02877

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    Scalet, S. O.et al. Classical Estimation of the Free Energy and Quantum Gibbs Sampling from the Markov Entropy Decomposition2025. arXiv:2504.17405 [quant-ph]. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2504.17405

    arXiv

  54. [55]

    & Pérez-Hernández, A

    Bluhm, A., Capel, Á. & Pérez-Hernández, A. Strong decay of correlations for Gibbs states in any dimension.J. Stat. Phys.192(2025)

    2025

  55. [56]

    Gibbs states of a one dimensional quantum lattice.Communications in Mathematical Physics14,120–157 (1969)

    Araki, H. Gibbs states of a one dimensional quantum lattice.Communications in Mathematical Physics14,120–157 (1969)

    1969

  56. [57]

    M., Capel, Á., Gondolf, P., Ruiz-de-Alarcón, A

    Alhambra, A. M., Capel, Á., Gondolf, P., Ruiz-de-Alarcón, A. & Scalet, S. O. Conditional Independence of 1D Gibbs States with Applications to Efficient Learning.Annales Henri Poincaré.issn: 1424-0661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-026-01655-6 (May 2026)

    doi:10.1007/s00023-026-01655-6 2026

  57. [58]

    Kliesch,M.,Gogolin,C.,Kastoryano,M.J.,Riera,A.&Eisert,J.LocalityofTemperature. Phys. Rev. X4,031019 (2014)

    2014

  58. [59]

    Cluster expansions&correlation functions.Mosc

    Ueltschi, D. Cluster expansions&correlation functions.Mosc. Math. J.4,511–522 (2004)

    2004

  59. [60]

    & Kuwahara, T

    Kimura, Y. & Kuwahara, T. Clustering theorem in 1D long-range interacting sys- tems at arbitrary temperatures. en.Communications in Mathematical Physics406. arXiv:2403.11431 [quant-ph], 65.issn: 0010-3616, 1432-0916.http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2403.11431(2026) (Mar. 2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [61]

    & Wessel, T.Uniform-in-temperature locality estimates for weakly interacting quantum systems2026

    Adhikari, A., Henheik, J., Lemm, M. & Wessel, T.Uniform-in-temperature locality estimates for weakly interacting quantum systems2026. arXiv:2508.15907 [math-ph]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15907

    arXiv

  61. [62]

    & Petruccione, F.The Theory of Open Quantum Systemsisbn: 978-0-19-852063-4 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, June 2002)

    Breuer, H.-P., Petruccione, F., Breuer, H.-P. & Petruccione, F.The Theory of Open Quantum Systemsisbn: 978-0-19-852063-4 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, June 2002)

    2002

  62. [63]

    A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation

    Manzano, D. A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation. en.AIP Advances 10,025106.issn: 2158-3226. https://pubs.aip.org/adv/article/10/2/025106/ 1021638/A-short-introduction-to-the-Lindblad-master(2025) (Feb. 2020)

    2025

  63. [64]

    & Lahaye, T

    Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms.Nature Physics16,132–142 (2020)

    2020

  64. [65]

    Foss-Feig, M., Pagano, G., Potter, A. C. & Yao, N. Y. Progress in Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulation. en.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics16.Publisher: Annual Reviews, 145–172.issn: 1947-5454, 1947-5462.https://www.annualreviews.org/ content / journals / 10 . 1146 / annurev - conmatphys - 032822 - 045619(2025) (Mar. 2025). 46

    1947

  65. [66]

    Reports on Progress in Physics86,026401 (2023)

    Chomaz, L.et al.Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases. Reports on Progress in Physics86,026401 (2023)

    2023

  66. [67]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130

    Bardet, I.et al.Rapid Thermalization of Spin Chain Commuting Hamiltonians.Physical Review Letters130.issn: 1079-7114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130. 060401(Feb. 2023)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130 2023

  67. [68]

    http://dx

    Bardet, I.et al.Entropy Decay for Davies Semigroups of a One Dimensional Quantum Lattice.Communications in Mathematical Physics405.issn: 1432-0916. http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04869-5(Feb. 2024)

    doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04869-5(feb 2024

  68. [69]

    M., Capel, Á

    Kochanowski, J., Alhambra, Á. M., Capel, Á. & Rouzé, C. Rapid Thermalization of Dissipative Many-Body Dynamics of Commuting Hamiltonians. en.Communications in Mathematical Physics406,176.issn: 1432-0916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220- 025-05353-y(2025) (July 2025)

    doi:10.1007/s00220- 2025

  69. [70]

    & Rouzé, C

    Capel, A., Gondolf, P., Kochanowski, J. & Rouzé, C. Quasi-optimal sampling from Gibbs states via non-commutative optimal transport metrics.Ann. Henri Poincaré(2025)

    2025

  70. [71]

    Kastoryano, M. J. & Brandão, F. G. S. L. Quantum Gibbs samplers: the commuting case.Communications in Mathematical Physics344,915–957. arXiv: 1409.3435 (2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [72]

    & França, D

    Capel, Á., Rouzé, C. & França, D. S. The modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for quantum spin systems: classical and commuting nearest neighbour interactions. arXiv:2009.11817.https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11817(2020)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [73]

    & Rouzé, C

    Bardet, I., Capel, Á., Lucia, A., Pérez-García, D. & Rouzé, C. On the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems.Journal of Mathematical Physics62,061901 (2021)

    2021

  73. [74]

    & Chen, C.-F.Fast Mixing of Quantum Spin Chains at All Temperatures

    Bergamaschi, T. & Chen, C.-F.Fast Mixing of Quantum Spin Chains at All Temperatures

  74. [75]

    arXiv:2510.08533 [quant-ph].https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08533

    arXiv

  75. [76]

    Roon, E. B. & Sims, R. On quasi-locality and decay of correlations for long-range models of open quantum spin systems. en.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57.Publisher: IOP Publishing, 445206.issn: 1751-8121. https://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1751-8121/ad8609(2025) (Oct. 2024)

    2025

  76. [77]

    Kastoryano, M. J. & Eisert, J. Rapid mixing implies exponential decay of correlations. Journal of Mathematical Physics54,102201.issn: 0022-2488. https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4822481(2025) (Oct. 2013)

    2025

  77. [78]

    Brandão, F. G. S. L., Cubitt, T. S., Lucia, A., Michalakis, S. & Perez-Garcia, D. Area law for fixed points of rapidly mixing dissipative quantum systems.Journal of Mathematical Physics56,102202.issn: 0022-2488. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932612 (2025) (Oct. 2015)

    doi:10.1063/1.4932612 2025

  78. [79]

    S., Lucia, A., Michalakis, S

    Cubitt, T. S., Lucia, A., Michalakis, S. & Perez-Garcia, D. Stability of Local Quantum Dissipative Systems. en.Communications in Mathematical Physics337,1275–1315.issn: 1432-0916.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-015-2355-3(2025) (Aug. 2015)

    doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2355-3(2025 2025

  79. [80]

    Gleason, A. M. Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space.Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics6,885–893.issn: 0095-9057. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/24900629(2026) (1957)

    arXiv 2026

  80. [81]

    & Sudarshan, E

    Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems.J. Math. Phys.17,821 (1976)

    1976

Showing first 80 references.