Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

A shared fact graph lets many AI workers build long research-level math proofs in parallel without losing track of what has been checked.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 00:24 UTC pith:UTV2I2Z5

load-bearing objection Fact-graph orchestration is a real systems advance for parallel research-level math search; the load-bearing risk is informal LLM verification, which the paper mostly owns rather than hides. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06447 v2 pith:UTV2I2Z5 submitted 2026-07-07 cs.AI cs.CLcs.MA

Danus: Orchestrating Mathematical Reasoning Agents with Fact-Graph Memory

Jihao Liu , Guoxiong Gao , Zeming Sun , Bin Wu , Shurui Liu , Jiedong Jiang , Haocheng Ju , Leheng Chen
show 3 more authors
Ronnie Cheng Xiping Zhang Bin Dong
This is my paper
classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.MA MSC 68T2068T0500A35
keywords mathematical reasoning agentsfact graphmulti-agent orchestrationproof verificationlong-horizon reasoningalgebraic geometrycombinatoricstest-time scaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Scaling AI agents on hard mathematics is hard not mainly because models are weak, but because parallel search quickly muddles intermediate claims. Danus answers that problem with a shared fact graph: only statements that pass a separate verifier enter the graph, each stored with its proof and dependency edges, so the graph becomes the single source of truth. A main agent plans and reassigns workers; the workers propose local claims; the verifier alone decides correctness. Across six research-level problems in algebraic geometry, singularity theory, and combinatorics, the system assembled proofs spanning hundreds to thousands of verified facts, sometimes with little human guidance and sometimes after a short expert hint. The paper argues that this memory design is what makes long-horizon, multi-agent mathematical reasoning workable.

Core claim

Danus shows that orchestrating parallel LLM proof search around a shared directed acyclic fact graph—nodes are verifier-checked statements with proofs, edges are logical dependencies—lets many workers contribute to one long argument without context explosion or mutual interference, and that this design can produce research-level proofs that single-line or single-blueprint agents fail to complete.

What carries the argument

The fact graph: a DAG of verified mathematical statements, each carrying a checked proof and dependency edges, serving as the system's only source of truth and the shared memory that supports both parallel search and deep chains of reasoning.

Load-bearing premise

The separate, stateless verifier almost never accepts a wrong proof, so later workers can safely stand on earlier facts without re-checking them.

What would settle it

Run the same research problems with workers and verifier held fixed but the fact graph replaced by a single shared blueprint or unstructured memory; if long verified proofs still appear at comparable depth and reliability, the fact-graph claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Danus, an orchestration system for research-level mathematical reasoning built around a shared fact graph (a DAG of verifier-checked claims with proofs and dependency edges). A main agent plans and coordinates; multiple worker agents explore proof search in parallel; and a stateless LLM verifier is the sole gate for admitting facts. Global and local memory record plans, dead ends, and consultations. The system is evaluated through six research-level case studies in algebraic geometry, singularity theory, and combinatorics, with reported fact counts, dependency depths, human-input logs, and a limited comparison to Rethlas and GPT-5.5-pro. The authors argue that fact-graph memory enables long-horizon parallel proof construction while keeping intermediate state organized, and they release the system as open source.

Significance. If the systems claims hold, Danus is a concrete advance over single-line generate–verify–revise agents (including Rethlas) for long research proofs: it shows how to scale test-time compute in both width (parallel workers) and depth (trusted dependency chains) without collapsing shared state. Strengths that should be credited include: a clearly specified architecture with separation of planning, search, and verification; open-source release; unusually detailed case documentation (fact counts, depths up to 54, human-input inventories); and honest reporting of residual gaps and human interventions. The six case studies, several of which produced independent arXiv manuscripts, are strong existence evidence that such orchestration can contribute to research-level mathematics under human–AI collaboration.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.5, §4.3, §3.6] §2.5 and §4.3 make the reliability of the stateless LLM verifier load-bearing: the fact graph is the sole source of truth, and later workers may depend on earlier facts without re-derivation. The paper reports that the verifier can accept skipped steps and erroneous literature citations, that revocation was needed after a flawed reference (§3.5), and that in the largest run the theorem rests on 664 supporting facts in chains up to depth 54 (§3.6, Fig. 2). “Essentially no false positives” is supported only by post-hoc expert review of final manuscripts, not by a quantified audit of intermediate facts or measured false-positive rates. Without such an audit (or a clearly weakened claim that the graph is a collaborative working memory rather than independently reliable truth), the central scaling argument remains under-supported at the depths claimed.
  2. [§3.6] §3.6 is presented as the strongest controlled comparison (Rethlas failed three times; Danus produced a verified solution) and the deepest fact graph. Yet after the full pipeline—including manuscript verification and human review—the authors still report that the justification of Lemma 8.7 is incomplete as written. This residual gap in the showcase case should be resolved or more carefully scoped when claiming that the system constructs long, correct proofs and that writing-stage verification catches seam errors. As written, it weakens the inference from “fact entered the graph” to “argument is sound end-to-end.”
  3. [§3, §4.1, §4.4] The evaluation is almost entirely qualitative case studies. Beyond the single Rethlas comparison in §3.6, there is no ablation that isolates the fact graph from other design choices (main-agent summarization, global memory, worker count/effort split, GPT-5.5-pro consultations). Free parameters (3–9 workers; high vs xhigh split; ≤1/hour expert consultation) are stated but not systematically varied. For a systems claim that fact-graph orchestration is the effective route, the manuscript needs either additional controlled comparisons or a clearer statement that the contribution is an existence demonstration of human–AI collaborative proof construction rather than a measured superiority of the memory mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 is informative but hard to read in grayscale print; a short caption table of cluster meanings (conditional scaffolding / Chern re-derivation / integral lift) would help.
  2. [§2.2, §2.5] The term “verified” is used for LLM-checked informal proofs throughout; a brief terminology note distinguishing this from formal (Lean/Isabelle) verification would reduce ambiguity for mixed AI/math audiences.
  3. [§2.7, §4.2, §4.5] §4.5 lists writing and citation-format issues as residual human cleanup; quantifying how often writing-stage verification rejected drafts (beyond §3.3 and §3.6) would strengthen the writing-loop claim in §2.7 and §4.2.
  4. [§1] Related-work coverage of other multi-agent math systems (Aletheia, QED, ProofCouncil, AI co-mathematician) is useful; a compact table comparing memory model, parallel proof search, and verification authority would make the positioning sharper.
  5. [References] Several arXiv identifiers and dates in the reference list are very recent relative to the manuscript date; ensure all cited companion papers are stably available or mark them as concurrent work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the systems claim is evaluated by independent, human-checkable mathematical artifacts rather than by construction from its own inputs.

full rationale

Danus is an empirical systems paper whose central claim (fact-graph orchestration enables long-horizon research-level proofs) is supported by six case studies that produce mathematical manuscripts. Those manuscripts are external objects that human experts can (and did) inspect for correctness; they are not fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or uniqueness results imported from the authors to force the architecture. Citations to Rethlas and Matlas describe engineering inheritance of the worker–verifier loop and literature search; the performance difference is shown by a controlled comparison that runs the same models under both systems (Section 3.6), not assumed by self-citation. There are no equations in which a quantity is defined from data and then “predicted,” no ansatz smuggled via prior author papers, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern as a new derivation. Residual gaps admitted in the case studies (skipped steps, one flawed reference later revoked, an incomplete local justification for Lemma 8.7) are soundness/reliability issues for the verifier, not circular reductions of the claimed result to its inputs. The evaluation is therefore self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

As a systems paper the central claim rests on engineering design choices and on the empirical reliability of the underlying LLMs and the inherited Rethlas verifier, not on free numerical parameters or new physical entities. The ledger therefore records the key domain assumptions that make the fact graph trustworthy and the orchestration effective.

free parameters (3)
  • number of workers (typically 3–9)
    Chosen by the experimenters per project; affects exploration breadth but is not fitted to a performance metric in a closed loop.
  • worker effort split (high vs xhigh)
    Hand-chosen allocation of reasoning effort; influences diversity of search but is not data-fitted.
  • main-agent consultation frequency (≤1/hour to GPT-5.5-pro)
    Operational limit set by cost; not optimized against a held-out score.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The Rethlas-derived LLM verifier produces essentially no false positives on the tested research-level problems, so every admitted fact may be treated as correct for subsequent workers.
    Stated in §2.5 and §4.3; load-bearing for the claim that the fact graph is a reliable source of truth.
  • domain assumption Frontier LLMs (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5-pro) possess sufficient mathematical competence that, when orchestrated, they can generate and check multi-step research proofs.
    Implicit throughout the methodology and case studies; without it the system cannot produce the reported proofs.
  • ad hoc to paper A directed acyclic graph of verified statements plus dependency edges is an adequate global memory for long-horizon parallel proof search.
    Core design hypothesis of Danus (§2.2); evaluated empirically by the six case studies.
  • standard math Standard mathematical background (algebraic geometry, singularity theory, combinatorics) and the cited literature results used by workers are correct except where later revoked.
    Assumed by both the agents and the human experts who check the final manuscripts.
invented entities (1)
  • fact graph (shared DAG of verifier-checked mathematical claims with proofs and dependency edges) independent evidence
    purpose: Serve as the single source of truth and global memory that lets many workers contribute to one long proof without context explosion or mutual interference.
    The central architectural invention; independent evidence is the successful construction of the six case-study proofs and the open-source implementation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23299 in / 2822 out tokens · 37879 ms · 2026-07-11T00:24:49.489339+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent LLM-based mathematical reasoning agents have begun to tackle research-level problems and, in several cases, have contributed to the resolution of open problems. However, scaling and orchestrating such agents effectively remains challenging, due to the difficulty of coordinating parallel proof search while keeping intermediate claims organized and reliable. In this paper, we propose Danus, an orchestration system for research-level mathematical reasoning centered on a shared fact graph as a global memory-management mechanism. Danus consists of a main agent that performs planning and coordination, multiple worker agents that carry out proof search in parallel, and a stateless verifier that checks proposed mathematical claims before they are admitted into the fact graph. Each verified fact is stored together with its proof and logical dependencies, allowing the system to build long arguments incrementally while keeping the shared proof state organized. The main agent periodically summarizes the evolving proof state, redirects workers across promising directions, and supports interaction with human mathematicians through progress reports. We evaluate Danus through six research-level case studies in algebraic geometry, singularity theory, and combinatorics, illustrating how the fact-graph memory mechanism enables Danus to construct long, detailed mathematical proofs. Our results suggest that fact-graph-based orchestration provides an effective route toward scaling mathematical reasoning agents for long-horizon research problems. Danus is open source at https://github.com/frenzymath/Danus.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Albilich: Steerable Proof-State Orchestration for LLM-Based Mathematical Research with CAS Integration

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    Albilich, an agentic math-research harness with persistent proof state, CAS integration, and an advisor role, reports 10/10 RealMath solves and two Kourovka results, but with no public artifacts or independent verification.

  2. Tangent classes of matroids and wonderful compactifications

    math.AG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Danus constructs an integral matroid tangent class in K_Z(M,G) that matches wonderful-model tangents, recovers Chow Hilbert series via HRR, and obeys Chern-alpha bounds, reproducing Cheng's concurrent work.

  3. Removing the Torsion-free Hypothesis in a Positivity Theorem on Deligne-Mumford Stacks

    math.AG 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5

    Every coherent quotient of a tensor power of the log cotangent sheaf on a smooth proper DM stack has pseudo-effective first Chern class once a big-determinant subsheaf exists, without needing the quotient to be torsion-free.

  4. Tangent classes of matroids and wonderful compactifications

    math.AG 2026-07 conditional novelty 2.0

    An integral tangent class is constructed in the combinatorial K-ring of every loopless matroid with a Feichtner–Yuzvinsky building set, reproducing the tangent class and its key properties from [Che26].

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    First Proof Second Batch

    Mohammed Abouzaid, Nikhil Srivastava, Rachel Ward, and Lauren Williams. First proof second batch.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.18119, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Hodge theory for combinatorial geometries.Annals of Mathematics, 188(2):381–452, 2018

    Karim Adiprasito, June Huh, and Eric Katz. Hodge theory for combinatorial geometries.Annals of Mathematics, 188(2):381–452, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Two two-dimensional terminations.Duke Mathematical Journal, 69(3):527–545, 1993

    Valery Alexeev. Two two-dimensional terminations.Duke Mathematical Journal, 69(3):527–545, 1993

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    Boundedness andK2 for log surfaces.International Journal of Mathematics, 5(6):779–810, 1994

    Valery Alexeev. Boundedness andK2 for log surfaces.International Journal of Mathematics, 5(6):779–810, 1994

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    QED: An Open-Source Multi-Agent System for Generating Mathematical Proofs on Open Problems

    Chenyang An, Qihao Ye, Minghao Pan, and Jiayaun Zhang. Qed: An open-source multi-agent system for generating mathematical proofs on open problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.24021, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Combinatorics of the cosmohedron

    Federico Ardila-Mantilla, Nima Arkani-Hamed, Carolina Figueiredo, and Francisco Vazão. Combinatorics of the cosmohedron. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.03425, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Cosmohedra.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2025(11):Paper No

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Carolina Figueiredo, and Francisco Vazão. Cosmohedra.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2025(11):Paper No. 29, 58 pp., 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Rational curves on foliated varieties

    Fedor Bogomolov and Michael McQuillan. Rational curves on foliated varieties. InFoliationtheory in algebraic geometry, pages 21–51. Springer, 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Foliations with positive slopes and birational stability of orbifold cotangent bundles

    Frédéric Campana and Mihai Păun. Foliations with positive slopes and birational stability of orbifold cotangent bundles. Publications mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 129:1–49, 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Tangent classes for matroid building sets

    Ronnie Cheng. Tangent classes for matroid building sets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.22650, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Tangent classes of matroids and wonderful compactifications

    Ronnie Cheng, Shurui Liu, and Guoxiong Gao. Tangent classes of matroids and wonderful compactifications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.05835, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Wonderful models of subspace arrangements.Selecta Mathematica, 1 (3):459–494, 1995

    Corrado De Concini and Claudio Procesi. Wonderful models of subspace arrangements.Selecta Mathematica, 1 (3):459–494, 1995. 17

    work page 1995

  13. [13]

    Degenerate constants in degree inequalities for Sobolev circle maps: on some problems posed by Brezis

    Xu’an Dou and Zeyu Jin. Degenerate constants in degree inequalities for sobolev circle maps: on some problems posed by brezis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.24626, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Chow rings of toric varieties defined by atomic lattices.Inventiones mathematicae, 155(3):515–536, 2004

    Eva Maria Feichtner and Sergey Yuzvinsky. Chow rings of toric varieties defined by atomic lattices.Inventiones mathematicae, 155(3):515–536, 2004

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Eigenweights for arithmetic Hirzebruch proportionality.PNAS Nexus, 5(5):pgag143, 2026

    Tony Feng. Eigenweights for arithmetic Hirzebruch proportionality.PNAS Nexus, 5(5):pgag143, 2026

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Towards autonomous mathematics research.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10177, 2026

    Tony Feng, Trieu H Trinh, Garrett Bingham, Dawsen Hwang, Yuri Chervonyi, Junehyuk Jung, Joonkyung Lee, Carlo Pagano, Sang-hyun Kim, Federico Pasqualotto, et al. Towards autonomous mathematics research.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10177, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Total cartier index of a bounded family.Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 22(1):171–179, 2026

    Jingjun Han and Chen Jiang. Total cartier index of a bounded family.Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 22(1):171–179, 2026

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    On some open problems in commutative algebra resolved by Rethlas

    Jiedong Jiang, Yixiao Li, Zeming Sun, Yuefeng Wang, Liang Xiao, and Jiahong Yu. On some open problems in commutative algebra resolved by rethlas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.25259, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Optimal bounds in bend-and-break.Forum of Mathematics, Pi, 14:e16, 2026

    Eric Jovinelly, Brian Lehmann, and Eric Riedl. Optimal bounds in bend-and-break.Forum of Mathematics, Pi, 14:e16, 2026

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    Matlas: A Semantic Search Engine for Mathematics

    Haocheng Ju, Leheng Chen, Peihao Wu, Bryan Dai, and Bin Dong. Matlas: A semantic search engine for mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17484, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Automated Conjecture Resolution with Formal Verification

    Haocheng Ju, Guoxiong Gao, Jiedong Jiang, Bin Wu, Zeming Sun, ShuRui Liu, Leheng Chen, Yutong Wang, Yuefeng Wang, Zichen Wang, Wanyi He, et al. Automated conjecture resolution with formal verification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.03789, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Rationally connected foliations after bogomolov and mc- quillan

    Stefan Kebekus, Luis Sol’a Conde, and Matei Toma. Rationally connected foliations after bogomolov and mc- quillan. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 16(1):65–81, 2007

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Maps between local picard groups.Algebraic Geometry, 3(4):461–495, 2016

    János Kollár. Maps between local picard groups.Algebraic Geometry, 3(4):461–495, 2016

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Threefolds and deformations of surface singularities.Inventiones mathematicae, 91(2):299–338, 1988

    János Kollár and Nicholas I Shepherd-Barron. Threefolds and deformations of surface singularities.Inventiones mathematicae, 91(2):299–338, 1988

    work page 1988

  25. [25]

    K-rings of wonderful varieties and matroids

    Matt Larson, Shiyue Li, Sam Payne, and Nicholas Proudfoot. K-rings of wonderful varieties and matroids. Advancesin Mathematics, 441:109554, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Lower bounds for multivariate independence polynomials and their generali- sations

    Joonkyung Lee and Jaehyeon Seo. Lower bounds for multivariate independence polynomials and their generali- sations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02450, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses

    Yoonho Lee, Roshen Nair, Qizheng Zhang, Kangwook Lee, Omar Khattab, and Chelsea Finn. Meta-harness: End-to-end optimization of model harnesses.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28052, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    On Injectivity of Phase Retrieval

    Zhangsong Li. On injectivity of phase retrieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.17922, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Factorial asymptotics of the Matryoshka numbers

    Jihao Liu. Factorial asymptotics of the Matryoshka numbers. Note,https://jihaoliu.org/notes/Matryoshka. pdf, 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Shokurov's global index conjecture for threefold foliations

    Jihao Liu and Sheng Qin. Shokurov’s global index conjecture for threefold foliations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22735, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Criteria of isolated weighted homogeneous hypersurface singularities using Logarithmic vector fields

    Jihao Liu and Xiping Zhang. Criteria of isolated weighted homogeneous hypersurface singularities using logarith- mic vector fields.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.29891, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    A Criteria of Weighted Homogeneity via Logarithmic Vector Fields

    Jihao Liu and Xiping Zhang. A criteria of weighted homogeneity via logarithmic vector fields.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.29886, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Complements, index theorem, and minimal log discrepancies of foliated surface singularities.European Journal of Mathematics, 10(1):Paper No

    Jihao Liu, Fanjun Meng, and Lingyao Xie. Complements, index theorem, and minimal log discrepancies of foliated surface singularities.European Journal of Mathematics, 10(1):Paper No. 6, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Boundedness of total Cartier indices for rational singularities in families

    Jihao Liu, Ruicheng Hu, and Sheng Qin. Boundedness of total cartier indices for rational singularities in families. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22782, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Optimal bend-and-break for foliations

    Jihao Liu, Zeming Sun, and Jiedong Jiang. Optimal bend-and-break for foliations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20754, 2026. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Generic vector fields on isolated complex hypersurface germs

    Diogo da Silva Machado and Jose Seade. Generic vector fields on isolated complex hypersurface germs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.09210, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    A numerical criterion for uniruledness.Annals of Mathematics, 124(1): 65–69, 1986

    Yoichi Miyaoka and Shigefumi Mori. A numerical criterion for uniruledness.Annals of Mathematics, 124(1): 65–69, 1986

    work page 1986

  38. [38]

    Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective.Annals of Mathematics, 116: 133–176, 1982

    Shigefumi Mori. Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective.Annals of Mathematics, 116: 133–176, 1982

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    Entry A177384

    OEIS Foundation Inc. Entry A177384. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences,https://oeis.org/ A177384, 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Lift-independence problem in the $P$-adic Simpson correspondence for curves

    Xiangyu Pan and Jiahong Yu. Lift-independence problem in thep-adic simpson correspondence for curves.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.29947, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    The simplicity of the hodge bundle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(21): e2610183123, 2026

    Anand Patel. The simplicity of the hodge bundle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(21): e2610183123, 2026

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    On the height of foliated surfaces with vanishing kodaira dimension

    Jorge Vitório Pereira. On the height of foliated surfaces with vanishing kodaira dimension. Publicacions matematiques, 49(2):363–373, 2005

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Quasihomogene isolierte Singularitäten von Hyperflächen.Inventionesmathematicae, 14(2):123–142, 1971

    Kyoji Saito. Quasihomogene isolierte Singularitäten von Hyperflächen.Inventionesmathematicae, 14(2):123–142, 1971

    work page 1971

  44. [44]

    Proof- Council: An llm agent for solving open mathematical problems.https://github.com/eth-sri/proof-council, 2026

    Johannes Schmitt, Tim Gehrunger, Jasper Dekoninck, Gergely Bérczi, Uri Kreitner, and Liam Price. Proof- Council: An llm agent for solving open mathematical problems.https://github.com/eth-sri/proof-council, 2026

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Miyaoka’s theorems on the generic seminegativity oftx and on the kodaira dimension of minimal regular threefolds.Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds, pages 103–114, 1992

    NI Shepherd-Barron. Miyaoka’s theorems on the generic seminegativity oftx and on the kodaira dimension of minimal regular threefolds.Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds, pages 103–114, 1992

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    Higher-dimensional foliated mori theory.Compositio Mathematica, 156(1):1–38, 2020

    Calum Spicer. Higher-dimensional foliated mori theory.Compositio Mathematica, 156(1):1–38, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Complements on log canonical Fano varieties and index conjecture of log Calabi–Yauvarieties

    Yanning Xu. Complements on log canonical Fano varieties and index conjecture of log Calabi–Yauvarieties. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2020

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:50528–50652, 2024

    John Yang, Carlos Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Ofir Press. Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:50528–50652, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    AI co-mathematician: Accelerating mathematicians with agentic AI

    Daniel Zheng, Ingrid von Glehn, Yori Zwols, Iuliya Beloshapka, Lars Buesing, Daniel M Roy, Martin Wattenberg, Bogdan Georgiev, Tatiana Schmidt, Andrew Cowie, et al. Ai co-mathematician: Accelerating mathematicians with agentic ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.06651, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026