Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 1 cited by

Photo-ionizing laser-cooled MOT atoms generates an in-vacuum plasma that fully eliminates stray electric fields and restores coherent Rydberg excitation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Photo-ionizing laser-cooled atoms in a MOT generates plasma that eliminates stray electric fields exceeding 10 V/cm, recovering stable coherent Rydberg excitation in a strontium tweezer array.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-10 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid experimental fix for a real Rydberg bottleneck: use the Rydberg laser on the MOT to make plasma that kills stray fields and restores coherent control.

arxiv 2607.08418 v1 pith:3UDF4TS5 submitted 2026-07-09 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Efficient photo-ionizing elimination of detrimental electric fields for Rydberg atoms

Zhou-Chen Deng , Hao-Nan Lin , Yu-Cheng Duan , Qi Zhang , Xiang-Can Cheng , Yang Liu , Zhao-Yang Yuan , Jie Li
show 5 more authors
Peng Liu Zhan Wu Chao-Yang Lu Jun Rui Jian-Wei Pan
This is my paper
classification physics.atom-ph quant-ph
keywords Rydberg atomsstray electric fieldsphoto-ionizationmagneto-optical traptweezer arrayplasma neutralizationStark ionizationquantum control
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Rydberg atoms are so sensitive to electric fields that uncontrolled stray fields can Stark-ionize their levels into a continuum and destroy quantum control. This paper shows that photo-ionizing the steady-state excited-state population already present during magneto-optical-trap loading produces an in-vacuum plasma of ions and electrons that is drawn to nearby dielectric surfaces and neutralizes those fields. Starting from a continuum spectrum caused by a stray field larger than 10 V/cm, the authors recover narrow, uniform, temporally stable single-atom Rydberg resonances and coherent Rabi oscillations on high-n states. The protocol uses only lasers and cooling light already present in typical Rydberg experiments and also shields externally applied fields of several V/cm. A reader who cares about Rydberg-based quantum simulation, metrology or computation cares because surface charges and field drift have been a persistent, platform-limiting problem that previously required dedicated electrodes or surface-specific treatments.

Core claim

Photo-ionization of laser-cooled atoms in the excited states of a magneto-optical trap creates a continuous in-vacuum plasma source that fully eliminates large, uncontrolled stray electric fields (and can shield externally applied fields) on the surfaces surrounding a Rydberg-atom tweezer array, restoring stable, uniform, coherent excitation of individual high-n Rydberg states using only readily available resources.

What carries the argument

In-vacuum plasma generated by photo-ionizing the steady-state excited-state population (mainly the intermediate 1D2 state) during MOT loading; the resulting ion-electron pairs (~10^6 s^{-1} with the Rydberg laser) neutralize surface charges until the residual field at the atoms is zeroed.

Load-bearing premise

The observed field removal is caused by the photo-ionized plasma being drawn to the dielectric surfaces, rather than by some other concurrent process that happens whenever MOT loading and ionizing light are both present.

What would settle it

Measure ion or electron current to the glass-cell surfaces (or local surface-charge density) while the ionization pulse is applied; if the neutralization rate of the Rydberg Stark shift scales linearly with that measured flux, the plasma mechanism is confirmed, and if the field still zeros with zero measured flux the claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Existing Rydberg tweezer-array experiments can insert a short photo-ionization pulse (now ~100 ms) before each sequence and keep residual fields below the spectroscopic linewidth without new hardware.
  • The same protocol fully shields externally applied electric fields of several V/cm, allowing controlled Stark tuning only when desired.
  • The method applies directly to other atomic species, circular Rydberg states, and optical-cavity Rydberg platforms that suffer from surface charges.
  • After months of repeated treatment the residual-field rebuild rate drops sharply, reducing the required ionization time from hours to minutes.
  • A similar plasma-neutralization step may mitigate uncontrolled static fields in polar-molecule and trapped-ion experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The gradual slowing of field rebuild after months of operation is consistent with progressive strontium adsorbate coating that alters surface charge affinity, so intentional alkali deposition could be combined with the plasma method for still lower residual fields.
  • Platforms that already use UV LEDs for light-induced desorption can obtain a large efficiency gain simply by ensuring cold atoms are present in the MOT during illumination.
  • Direct surface-charge or ion-current diagnostics would cleanly separate plasma neutralization from residual desorption or thermal effects and could guide optimization of ionization wavelength and duration.
  • Once fields are stably zeroed, longer-lived circular Rydberg qubits near surfaces become more practical because the dominant electric-field dephasing channel is removed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental method for eliminating large stray electric fields in a strontium Rydberg-atom optical-tweezer array by photo-ionizing the steady-state excited-state population of laser-cooled atoms during blue-MOT loading. Starting from Stark-ionized continuum spectra of high-n states (attributed to residual fields exceeding ~10 V/cm), the authors show that the resulting in-vacuum plasma neutralizes surface charges, restoring narrow, uniform, and temporally stable Rydberg resonances and enabling coherent single-atom Rabi oscillations on the 5s5p 3P0 ↔ 5s61s 3S1 transition. The neutralization is quantified with calibrated external electrodes, a linear dependence of field-decay rate on ionization duration, and a clear contrast between a high-intensity Rydberg laser and a conventional UV LED; the protocol uses only resources already present in typical ultracold Rydberg setups.

Significance. Stray electric fields remain a persistent, often apparatus-specific obstacle for Rydberg coherence, especially near dielectric surfaces, chips, and cavities. A practical, resource-light neutralization protocol that demonstrably recovers continuum-to-discrete spectra, nulls both residual and externally applied fields of several V/cm, and restores coherent single-atom control is therefore of immediate operational value to the Rydberg-tweezer community and potentially to other charge-sensitive platforms. Strengths include multiple independent diagnostics (MOT lifetime collapse, Stark-shift calibration, rate-vs-duration linearity, UV-vs-Rydberg contrast, long-term stability, and post-treatment Rabi oscillations), use of an independent Stark-map package (PairInteraction), and open data intent. The result is an experimental demonstration rather than a parameter-tuned derivation, which strengthens its transferability claim.

minor comments (7)
  1. Data Availability currently states that the supporting data link 'will be added later.' For acceptance this should be replaced by a permanent repository DOI or equivalent before final publication.
  2. Appendix A, population ratios (Eq. A4): the branching ratio b and the neglect of 3P0/3P2 populations are stated clearly, but a short numerical check of the absolute excited-state fraction under the experimental MOT intensity/detuning would help readers estimate ion yield without re-deriving the rate equations.
  3. Fig. 3(a) and the accompanying text estimate ~10^3 ion-electron pairs per ms from the MOT lifetime reduction; the conversion from loading-rate decay to absolute ion production rate should be stated more explicitly (atom number, ionization branching, collection volume) so the later ~10^6 s^-1 figure can be traced.
  4. Fig. 4(c): the linear fit of neutralization rate versus Rydberg-laser duration is central; reporting the fit slope with uncertainty and the reduced-χ^{2} (or equivalent) would strengthen the quantitative claim.
  5. The manuscript occasionally uses 'fully eliminating' while also documenting residual-field rebuild after interruption (Fig. 3d). A single clarifying sentence that operational stability is maintained by a short pre-sequence ionization pulse (~100 ms) would avoid any apparent tension.
  6. Several compound words appear concatenated in the supplied text (e.g., 'quantumcontrol', 'Rydberg-atomtweezer'); if these are present in the source PDF they should be corrected for readability.
  7. Applicability to other species is asserted in the summary and conclusion; a brief remark on the required photo-ionization wavelength relative to common MOT excited states (alkalis, Yb, etc.) would make the 'universal' claim more concrete without additional experiments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independent spectroscopic observables, external Stark maps, and no fitted-input-as-prediction or self-definitional steps.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental protocol (photo-ionization of MOT excited-state population to generate neutralizing plasma) and documents its effects via direct measurements: continuum-to-resolved spectral recovery, calibrated Stark-shift nulling of residual and externally applied fields, linear neutralization rate vs. ionization duration, MOT lifetime collapse under the ionizing beam, and post-treatment Rabi oscillations. Stark maps are taken from the independent PairInteraction package; resonance frequencies and field strengths are extracted from spectroscopic scans against external frequency references; neutralization rates are fitted to independent time series. There is no derivation chain that reduces a claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. Self-citations (atom source, SLM assembly) are peripheral and non-load-bearing. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is an experimental demonstration. It rests on standard atomic-physics facts (photo-ionization cross-sections of Sr excited states, Stark maps from PairInteraction, MOT rate equations) and on the empirical observation that the generated plasma neutralizes surface charges. No free parameters are fitted to produce the central claim; the only numbers extracted are measured time constants and rates.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The Rydberg laser (317 nm) has sufficient single-photon energy to ionize the 1P1, 1D2 and 3P1 states populated in the blue MOT, while the ground state is not efficiently ionized.
    Stated in Appendix A and used to explain why MOT loading + Rydberg light produces ions (Fig. 3a).
  • domain assumption Stark maps calculated with PairInteraction correctly predict the field strengths at which the 44s and 61s states mix into a continuum.
    Used to convert observed continuum spectra into a lower bound >10 V/cm and to calibrate applied electrode voltages (Figs. 1c, A3).
  • ad hoc to paper Ions and electrons produced by photo-ionization are drawn to nearby dielectric surfaces and neutralize the surface charges responsible for the stray field.
    Inferred from the joint necessity of MOT atoms + ionizing light and from the linear rate dependence; not independently verified by surface-charge or current measurements.

reviewed 2026-07-10 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient photo-ionizing elimination of detrimental electric fields for Rydberg atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3UDF4TS5

@misc{pith2026260708418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient photo-ionizing elimination of detrimental electric fields for Rydberg atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3UDF4TS5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08418}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Rydberg atoms are highly sensitive to external electric fields due to their exaggerated electronic properties. This unique feature lays the foundation for many of their applications in quantum science. However, an uncontrolled stray electric field can be detrimental, severely degrading their quantum control. In this work, we demonstrate a universal scheme that relies on the efficient creation of an in-vacuum plasma source by photo-ionizing laser-cooled atoms to eliminate detrimental electric fields in a Rydberg-atom tweezer array platform, requiring only readily available resources. With this method, we began with a Stark-ionized Rydberg continuum spectrum caused by a large, unknown stray electric field and ultimately recovered stable, coherent excitation of an individual Rydberg state after fully eliminating the field. Our method is directly applicable to existing Rydberg-atom platforms and can also be useful in other experiments sensitive to stray electric fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08418 by Chao-Yang Lu, Hao-Nan Lin, Jian-Wei Pan, Jie Li, Jun Rui, Peng Liu, Qi Zhang, Xiang-Can Cheng, Yang Liu, Yu-Cheng Duan, Zhan Wu, Zhao-Yang Yuan, Zhou-Chen Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the neutralization protocol by ionizing laser-cooled atoms. (a) Relevant energy levels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Efficient stray electric field removal with photo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Benchmark of the photo-ionization neutralization of an externally applied electric field using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Single-atom Rabi oscillation on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Three-dimensional three-photon Stark spectroscopy of a single Rb Rydberg atom in an ultrahigh-vacuum glass cell with eight electrodes

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A single Rb Rydberg atom in an optical dipole trap was used to map Stark shifts in all three spatial directions, calibrating and compensating electric fields inside a glass cell.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P. Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with 9 FIG. A6. Uniform site-resolved5s61s 3S1 Rydberg spectra after field neutralization. The horizontal axis spans a total frequency interval of 4 MHz, and the vertical axis shows the atom survival rate from 0 to 1. Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using ...

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Facon, E.-K

    A. Facon, E.-K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, A sensitive elec- trometer based on a Rydberg atom in a Schrödinger-cat state, Nature535, 262 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    M. Jing, Y. Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nature Physics16, 911 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Šibalić and C

    N. Šibalić and C. S. Adams, Rydberg physics, inRydberg Physics(IOP Publishing, 2018) pp. 1–27

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity control and entanglement of Rydberg-atom qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth Rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    A. Muni, A. AU Couto, M. Poirier, R. C. Teixeira, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, Optical coherent manipulation of alkaline-earth circular Rydberg states, Nature Physics18, 502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Anand, C

    S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, andH.Bernien,Adual-speciesRydbergarray,Nat.Phys. 20, 1744 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Liang, A

    Q.-Y. Liang, A. V. Venkatramani, S. H. Cantu, T. L. Nicholson, M. J. Gullans, A. V. Gorshkov, J. D. Thomp- son, C. Chin, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Observation of three-photon bound states in a quantum nonlinear medium, Science359, 783 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Lampen, A

    J. Lampen, A. Duspayev, H. Nguyen, H. Tamura, P. R. Berman, and A. Kuzmich, Hanbury Brown–Twiss cor- relations for a driven superatom, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 203603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Lu, C.-W

    B.-W. Lu, C.-W. Yang, R.-Q. Wang, B.-F. Gao, Y.-Z. Zhen, Z.-G. Wang, J.-K. Shi, Z.-Q. Ren, T. A. Hahn, E. Y.-Z. Tan, X.-P. Xie, M.-Y. Zheng, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, F. Xu, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Device- independent quantum key distribution over 100 km with single atoms, Science391, 592 (2026)

    work page 2026

  14. [14]

    Gefen, J

    R.Finkelstein, R.B.-S.Tsai, X.Sun, P.Scholl, S.Direkci, T. Gefen, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, and M. Endres, Univer- sal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks, Nature634, 321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Dark- wah Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Multi-qubit gates and Schrödinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature634, 315 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Zhang, D.-S

    Y.-W. Zhang, D.-S. Xiang, R. Liao, H.-X. Liu, B. Xu, P. Zhou, Y. Zhou, K. Zhang, and L. Li, Microwave elec- trometry with quantum-limited resolutions in a Rydberg- atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 110802 (2026)

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. Läuchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, I. Velkovsky, T. Ozawa, H. Price, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Interaction-driven break- down of Aharonov–Bohm caging in flat-band Rydberg lattices, Nature Physics21, 221 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    de Léséleuc, D

    S. de Léséleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Analysis of imperfections in the coher- ent optical excitation of single atoms to Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A97, 053803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Hattermann, M

    H. Hattermann, M. Mack, F. Karlewski, F. Jessen, D. Cano, and J. Fortágh, Detrimental adsorbate fields in experiments with cold Rydberg gases near surfaces, Phys. Rev. A86, 022511 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    A. M. Hankin, Y.-Y. Jau, L. P. Parazzoli, C. W. Chou, D. J. Armstrong, A. J. Landahl, and G. W. Biedermann, Two-atom Rydberg blockade using direct 6stonpexci- tation, Phys. Rev. A89, 033416 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    N. Jia, A. Georgakopoulos, A. Ryou, N. Schine, A. Som- mer, and J. Simon, Observation and characterization of cavity Rydberg polaritons, Phys. Rev. A93, 041802(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Sheng, Y

    J. Sheng, Y. Chao, S. Kumar, H. Fan, J. Sedlacek, and J. P. Shaffer, Intracavity Rydberg-atom electromagnet- ically induced transparency using a high-finesse optical cavity, Phys. Rev. A96, 033813 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Mamat, C

    B. Mamat, C. Sheng, Y.-Q. Zhang, J.-Y. Hou, P. Xu, K.-P. Wang, J. Zhuang, M.-R. Wei, M. Liu, J. Wang, X.-D. He, and M.-S. Zhan, Mitigating the noise of resid- ual electric fields for single Rydberg atoms with electron photodesorption, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064021 (2024). 10

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    P. L. Ocola, I. Dimitrova, B. Grinkemeyer, E. Guardado- Sanchez, T. Ðorđević, P. Samutpraphoot, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Control and entanglement of individual Ry- dberg atoms near a nanoscale device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    T. W. Ducas, M. G. Littman, R. R. Freeman, and D. Kleppner, Stark ionization of high-lying states of sodium, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 366 (1975)

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    T. H. Jeys, G. W. Foltz, K. A. Smith, E. J. Beiting, F. G. Kellert, F. B. Dunning, and R. F. Stebbings, Diabatic field ionization of highly excited sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 390 (1980)

    work page 1980

  30. [30]

    Millen, G

    J. Millen, G. Lochead, G. R. Corbett, R. M. Potvliege, and M. P. A. Jones, Spectroscopy of a cold strontium Rydberg gas, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 184001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Ravets, H

    S. Ravets, H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, L. Béguin, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Coherent dipole–dipole coupling be- tween two single Rydberg atoms at an electrically-tuned Förster resonance, Nature Physics10, 914 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    D. L. Rousseau, G. E. Leroi, and W. E. Falconer, Charged-particle emission upon ruby laser irradiation of transparent dielectric materials, Journal of Applied Physics39, 3328 (1968)

    work page 1968

  33. [33]

    Duspayev, R

    A. Duspayev, R. Cardman, D. A. Anderson, and G. Raithel, High-angular-momentum Rydberg states in a room-temperature vapor cell for dc electric-field sensing, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023138 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Tauschinsky, R

    A. Tauschinsky, R. M. T. Thijssen, S. Whitlock, H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell, and R. J. C. Spreeuw, Spa- tially resolved excitation of Rydberg atoms and surface effects on an atom chip, Phys. Rev. A81, 063411 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    J. D. Carter, O. Cherry, and J. D. D. Martin, Electric- field sensing near the surface microstructure of an atom chip using cold Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A86, 053401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Panja, Y

    A. Panja, Y. Wang, X. Wang, J. Wang, S. Subhankar, and Q.-Y. Liang, Electric field control for experiments with atoms in Rydberg states, AIP Advances14, 125013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Davtyan, S

    D. Davtyan, S. Machluf, M. L. Soudijn, J. B. Naber, N. J. van Druten, H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell, and R. J. C. Spreeuw, Controlling stray electric fields on an atom chip for experiments on Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A97, 023418 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    M. T. Ziemba, J. Phrompao, F. Jung, I. M. Rabey, and G. Rempe, Removal of high-voltage-induced surface charges by ultraviolet light, Review of Scientific Instru- ments96, 073201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    J. A. Sedlacek, E. Kim, S. T. Rittenhouse, P. F. Weck, H. R. Sadeghpour, and J. P. Shaffer, Electric field cancel- lation on quartz by Rb adsorbate-induced negative elec- tron affinity, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    K. S. Chan, M. Siercke, C. Hufnagel, and R. Dumke, Adsorbate electric fields on a cryogenic atom chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 026101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Inaba, T

    H. Inaba, T. Ohmi, T. Yoshida, and T. Okada, Neutral- ization of static electricity by soft X-rays and vacuum UV radiation, Journal of Electrostatics33, 15 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Kim, J.-H

    D. Kim, J.-H. Joo, and W. Ho, Characteristics of VUV ionizer in a vacuum chamber of flat panel displays, Jour- nal of Electrostatics90, 54 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. Büchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of Ryd- berginteractionpotentials,JournalofPhysicsB:Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics50, 133001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    K. M. Jones, E. Tiesinga, P. D. Lett, and P. S. Juli- enne, Ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy: Long- range molecules and atomic scattering, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 483 (2006)

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    Henkel, M

    F. Henkel, M. Krug, J. Hofmann, W. Rosenfeld, M. Weber, and H. Weinfurter, Highly efficient state- selective submicrosecond photoionization detection of single atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 253001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Li, Z.-P

    J. Li, Z.-P. Jia, P. Liu, X.-Y. Liu, D.-Z. Wang, D.-Q. Kong, S.-P. Li, X.-Y. Cui, H.-N. Dai, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, An integrated high-flux cold atomic beam sourceforstrontium,ReviewofScientificInstruments94, 093202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    $^{88}$Sr Reference Data

    S. Pucher, S. L. Kristensen, and R. M. Kroeze,88Sr ref- erence data (2025), arXiv:2507.10487

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    S.-u. Haq, S. Mahmood, N. Amin, Y. Jamil, R. Ali, and M. A. Baig, Measurements of photoionization cross sec- tions from the 5s5p 1P1 and 5s6s 1S0 excited states of strontium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics39, 1587 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    S.-U. Haq, S. Mahmood, M. A. Kalyar, M. Rafiq, R. Ali, and M. A. Baig, Photoionization cross section and oscil- lator strength distribution in the near-threshold region of strontium, The European Physical Journal D44, 439 (2007)

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, and M. En- dres, 2000-times repeated imaging of strontium atoms in clock-magic tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 173201 (2019)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Lin, H.-S

    R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, Y.-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y.-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.- C. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, AI-enabled parallel assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    I. S. Madjarov,Entangling, controlling, and detecting in- dividual strontium atoms in optical tweezer arrays, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Couturier, I

    L. Couturier, I. Nosske, F. Hu, C. Tan, C. Qiao, Y. H. Jiang, P. Chen, and M. Weidemüller, Measurement of the strontium triplet Rydberg series by depletion spec- troscopy of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A99, 022503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Tonoyan, and M

    M.Witkowski, S.Bilicki, M.Bober, D.Kovačić, V.Singh, A. Tonoyan, and M. Zawada, Photoionization cross sec- tions of ultracold88Srin 1P1 and 3S1 states at 390 nm and the resulting blue-detuned magic wavelength optical lattice clock constraints, Opt. Express30, 21423 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Hölzl, A

    C. Hölzl, A. Götzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-lived circular Rydberg qubits of alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021024 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Zenesini, and S

    M.W.Gempel, T.Hartmann, T.A.Schulze, K.K.Voges, A. Zenesini, and S. Ospelkaus, Versatile electric fields for the manipulation of ultracoldNaKmolecules, New Journal of Physics18, 045017 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Seeßelberg, X.-Y

    F. Seeßelberg, X.-Y. Luo, M. Li, R. Bause, S. Ko- tochigova, I. Bloch, and C. Gohle, Extending rota- tional coherence of interacting polar molecules in a spin- decoupled magic trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 253401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Data link to support the finding will be added later. 11

    work page

  59. [59]

    R. Tao, O. Lib, F. Gyger, H. Timme, M. Ammenwerth, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Universal global gates for a fine- structure qubit in strontium-88, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 153602 (2026)

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    C. L. Holloway, N. Prajapati, J. A. Sherman, A. Rüfe- nacht, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, M. T. Simons, A. K. Robinson, D. S. La Mantia, and E. B. Norrgard, Electro- magnetically induced transparency based Rydberg-atom sensor for traceable voltage measurements, AVS Quan- tum Science4, 034401 (2022)

    work page 2022

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 10, 2026.