A Supernova Brane Scan

2); 3; 4) ((1) CAUP; Cambridge; (4) IAP; C.J.A.P. Martins (1; Paris); Porto; (2) DF-FCUP; Porto; (3) DAMTP; P.P. Avelino (1

A Supernova Brane Scan

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0106274 v3 pith:RGPE7FX2 submitted 2001-06-15 astro-ph gr-qchep-phhep-th

A Supernova Brane Scan

P.P. Avelino (1 , 2) , C.J.A.P. Martins (1 , 3 , 4) ((1) CAUP , Porto; (2) DF-FCUP , Porto; (3) DAMTP , Cambridge; (4) IAP

show 1 more author

Paris)

This is my paper

classification astro-ph gr-qchep-phhep-th

keywords accelerationalreadyalternativeavailablebackgroundbranebrane-worldclaims

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

We consider a `brane-world scenario' recently introduced by Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati, and subsequently proposed as an alternative to a cosmological constant in explaining the current acceleration of the universe. We show that, contrary to these claims, this proposal is already strongly disfavoured by the available Type Ia Supernovae, Cosmic Microwave Background and cluster data.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Cosmological Constraints on the DGP Model in light of DESI DR2 2025 Data
astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0

DESI DR2 combined with CC, SNIa and CMB priors give H0≈63–64 km s−1 Mpc−1 for flat/non-flat DGP and ΔAIC>100 against ΛCDM, strongly disfavoring the model.