Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Accounting for Source Uncertainties in Analyses of Astronomical Survey Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0409387 v1 pith:KZ4HVKMT submitted 2004-09-15 astro-ph physics.data-an

Accounting for Source Uncertainties in Analyses of Astronomical Survey Data

classification astro-ph physics.data-an
keywords sourceuncertaintiesaccountinginferencesincidentalsamplesizeanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

I discuss an issue arising in analyzing data from astronomical surveys: accounting for measurement uncertainties in the properties of individual sources detected in a survey when making inferences about the entire population of sources. Source uncertainties require the analyst to introduce unknown ``incidental'' parameters for each source. The number of parameters thus grows with the size of the sample, and standard theorems guaranteeing asymptotic convergence of maximum likelihood estimates fail in such settings. From the Bayesian point of view, the missing ingredient in such analyses is accounting for the volume in the incidental parameter space via marginalization. I use simple simulations, motivated by modeling the distribution of trans-Neptunian objects surveyed in the outer solar system, to study the effects of source uncertainties on inferences. The simulations show that current non-Bayesian methods for handling source uncertainties (ignoring them, or using an ad hoc incidental parameter integration) produce incorrect inferences, with errors that grow more severe with increasing sample size. In contrast, accounting for source uncertainty via marginalization leads to sound inferences for any sample size.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Population Properties of Binary Black Holes with Eccentricity

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 8.0

    First joint population inference on binary black hole eccentricity from GWTC-4 bounds the eccentric branching ratio below 5% at 90% confidence, with results consistent with quasi-circular models but highly model-dependent.

  2. Assessing the waveform systematics from parameter estimation to population inference with eccentricity

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Eccentric waveform-model differences, small per event, accumulate across the GWTC-4 catalog and alter inferred redshift evolution and effective-spin population distributions.

  3. Uncovering Hierarchical Sub-Population of Binary Black Holes

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A flexible six-component fit to 259 LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA black-hole mergers finds a roughly geometric sequence of mass peaks but no aligned-spin signal except in the lowest-mass component.

  4. Joint population and strong-lensing inference for resolved gravitational-wave events probes the black-hole merger rate beyond the peak of star formation

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Joint strong-lensing and population inference on resolved gravitational-wave events finds no lensed events and tightens constraints on the black-hole merger rate peak redshift and high-redshift tail.

  5. Radio sirens: inferring $H_0$ with binary black holes and neutral hydrogen in the era of the Einstein Telescope and the SKA Observatory

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using simulated binary black hole mergers and neutral hydrogen maps, the radio sirens method constrains H0 to 8% precision with 3000 high-SNR events, offering a 90% improvement over standard dark siren analyses.

  6. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Single-event GW parameter estimates under reference priors are population-biased; hierarchical, population-informed re-analysis is needed and changes the identification of the most extreme black holes in the catalog.

  7. Disentangling spinning and nonspinning binary black hole populations with spin sorting

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Spin sorting with the default spin model distinguishes spinning and nonspinning binary black hole populations in simulations and shows real data rule out a fully nonspinning population but allow mixed ones with up to ...

  8. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  9. When the black holes align: a subpopulation of aligned massive binary black holes observed via gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Non-parametric analysis of GWTC-5.0 data supports multiple subpopulations of binary black holes distinguished by effective spin, with one aligned subpopulation suggesting dynamical formation.

  10. Mapping the star formation peak with LIGO A# and Next-Generation detectors

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations show LIGO-A# constrains the peak redshift of binary black hole merger rate (tracing star formation) to ±0.1 in one year, improving to ±0.02 with next-generation detectors.

  11. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population-informed hierarchical parameter estimation is required for unbiased astrophysical interpretation of gravitational-wave events rather than using standard individual posteriors with reference priors.