Mapping the star formation peak with LIGO A# and Next-Generation detectors

Divyajyoti; Mark Hannam; Mukesh Kumar Singh; Stephen Fairhurst

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Mapping the star formation peak with LIGO A# and Next-Generation detectors

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read LIGO A# can constrain the binary black hole merger rate peak to within 0.1 in redshift after one year of data.

desk verdict This is a standard simulation forecast showing A# could recover the BBH merger-rate peak redshift to ±0.1 under three chosen population models, with next-gen detectors doing better. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.05151 v1 pith:CRWP6PNV submitted 2026-06-03 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Divyajyoti , Stephen Fairhurst , Mark Hannam , Mukesh Kumar Singh This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE

keywords gravitationalwavesbinaryblackholesstarformationrateredshiftdistributionLIGOA#mergerpeak

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that gravitational wave signals from binary black hole mergers offer an independent way to track the redshift evolution of star formation rate density. It combines three population models with an inverse time-delay prescription and simulates detections to test how well detector networks recover the peak location of the merger rate. With one year of simulated data peaking at redshift 1.5, an A# network achieves ±0.1 precision on the peak while a next-generation network reaches ±0.02 on the full distribution. This sidesteps conversion factors needed in electromagnetic surveys such as initial mass function and dust extinction.

What carries the argument

The inverse time-delay model that converts star-formation histories into observable merger-rate distributions, applied to the detected redshifts of binary black holes.

What would settle it

Real LIGO A# data that recover a peak width larger than ±0.1 or a location inconsistent with the input z=1.5 population would show the claimed precision does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using simulated binary black hole signals drawn from three star-formation population models plus an inverse time-delay model, a LIGO A# network constrains the merger-rate peak at z_peak=1.5 to a precision of ±0.1 after one year of observation; a Cosmic Explorer plus Einstein Telescope network measures the full redshift distribution to ±0.02.

Load-bearing premise

The three population models together with the inverse time-delay prescription accurately capture how star formation maps onto the observable merger rate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Electromagnetic and gravitational-wave measurements of star formation history can be cross-checked without shared systematics.
The redshift distribution of mergers becomes a direct observable for testing galaxy evolution models at high redshift.
Next-generation detectors turn the merger-rate peak into a high-precision cosmological probe rather than a marginal constraint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same analysis framework could be extended to other compact-object populations to test whether all channels share the same star-formation peak.
If the measured peak shifts with detector sensitivity, it would indicate selection effects that current simulations under-estimate.
Combining the gravitational-wave peak measurement with electromagnetic data at low redshift could tighten the overall normalization of the star-formation rate density.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this simulation study forecasts that LIGO A# could constrain the peak of the binary black hole merger rate redshift distribution to ±0.1 with one year of data, and next-generation detectors to ±0.02, based on injecting signals from three specific population models with a peak at z=1.5.

The paper applies standard population synthesis and time-delay modeling to show how gravitational wave observations might independently measure the star formation rate peak. They demonstrate recovery of the injected peak location using simulated data for upgraded LIGO and for Cosmic Explorer plus Einstein Telescope networks. This is a practical forecast that ties detector sensitivities to an astrophysical parameter of interest.

It does a good job of being specific about the detector configurations and the resulting precisions. The approach is straightforward and the claims are modest.

The soft spot is the dependence on the chosen models. The precision assumes that the three population models and the inverse time-delay prescription accurately represent the mapping from star formation to observable mergers. The abstract does not mention marginalizing over uncertainties in the delay time distribution or other astrophysical variations. If the true redshift distribution differs in shape or if selection effects are more complex, the recovered constraints could shift. This is typical for forecast papers but means the quoted errors are conditional on the models.

Overall, this is the sort of work that would interest researchers in gravitational wave population studies who want to see how these measurements could complement electromagnetic data on galaxy evolution. A reader looking for concrete numbers on future constraints would find it useful.

I would send this to peer review. The simulation is internally consistent, and the topic is relevant enough that referees can assess the methods and assumptions in detail.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that simulated binary black hole merger signals drawn from three star-formation population models combined with an inverse time-delay prescription allow a LIGO A# network to recover the peak redshift z_peak of the merger-rate distribution to a precision of ±0.1 after one year of observation (injected at z_peak=1.5). It further claims that a next-generation network (Cosmic Explorer + Einstein Telescope) achieves a precision of ±0.02 on the redshift distribution.

Significance. If the quoted precisions prove robust, the work would demonstrate that gravitational-wave observations can serve as an independent probe of the star-formation-rate peak at high redshift, complementing electromagnetic methods. The forward-simulation-and-recovery approach supplies a concrete, falsifiable estimate of achievable precision and is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)

[population models and simulation setup] Population models and simulation setup (as referenced in the abstract): the quoted precisions (±0.1 for A# and ±0.02 for CE+ET) are obtained exclusively by injecting and recovering signals from the three chosen population models plus the inverse time-delay prescription. The manuscript does not marginalize over alternative delay-time distributions, metallicity evolutions, or redshift-dependent selection functions; if the true mapping from SFR to observable merger rate differs in functional form, the recovered posterior on z_peak will be biased or its width mis-estimated. This modeling assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.
[abstract and methods] Abstract and methods description: the simulation setup provides no indication that the inference includes a complete end-to-end treatment of detector selection effects, noise realizations, or a full error budget beyond the stated models. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the reported precisions remain valid under realistic systematics.

minor comments (1)

The phrase 'inverse time-delay model' is introduced without a clear definition or comparison to the standard forward time-delay distribution used in the literature; a brief explanatory paragraph would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [population models and simulation setup] Population models and simulation setup (as referenced in the abstract): the quoted precisions (±0.1 for A# and ±0.02 for CE+ET) are obtained exclusively by injecting and recovering signals from the three chosen population models plus the inverse time-delay prescription. The manuscript does not marginalize over alternative delay-time distributions, metallicity evolutions, or redshift-dependent selection functions; if the true mapping from SFR to observable merger rate differs in functional form, the recovered posterior on z_peak will be biased or its width mis-estimated. This modeling assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the reported precisions are obtained under the specific assumptions of the three population models combined with the inverse time-delay prescription, without marginalization over alternative delay-time distributions, metallicity evolutions, or other functional forms. The three models were chosen to span a representative range of star-formation scenarios, but this does not constitute a full exploration of modeling uncertainties. We will revise the manuscript to state this limitation explicitly in the abstract and methods, and add a discussion paragraph on possible biases to the recovered z_peak if the true mapping differs. revision: partial
Referee: [abstract and methods] Abstract and methods description: the simulation setup provides no indication that the inference includes a complete end-to-end treatment of detector selection effects, noise realizations, or a full error budget beyond the stated models. Without these details it is not possible to verify whether the reported precisions remain valid under realistic systematics.

Authors: The methods section outlines the injection of simulated binary black hole signals drawn from the population models into the detector network, with recovery that accounts for selection effects through the network sensitivity. However, we acknowledge that the description of noise realizations and the complete error budget could be expanded for clarity. We will revise the methods section to provide additional details on the noise modeling, selection function implementation, and error budget assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; simulation-based recovery is self-contained

full rationale

The paper conducts a forward simulation study: signals are drawn from three specified population models plus an inverse time-delay prescription with an injected z_peak=1.5, then recovered via Bayesian inference on detector networks. The quoted precisions (±0.1 for A#; ±0.02 for CE+ET) are the resulting posterior widths under those explicit modeling choices, not quantities forced to equal the inputs by algebraic identity, parameter renaming, or self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces the central claim to a tautology or prior author result; the derivation remains independent of the target constraints once the population models and selection effects are stated.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the validity of the three population models and the inverse time-delay prescription linking mergers to star formation; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

free parameters (1)

z_peak
The target parameter whose recovery precision is being quantified; its value is injected at 1.5 in the simulations.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption Binary black hole merger rate traces star formation rate density after an inverse time delay
Invoked to connect the observed merger distribution to the underlying star-formation history.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping the star formation peak with LIGO A# and Next-Generation detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CRWP6PNV

@misc{pith2026260605151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping the star formation peak with LIGO A# and Next-Generation detectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CRWP6PNV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.05151}
}

abstract

Measuring the redshift evolution of star formation rate density is crucial in understanding the origin and evolution of galaxies and large scale structure in the universe. It is currently measured with electromagnetic probes, however, these probes often track luminosity, which is then converted to star formation rate (SFR) depending on various factors such as initial mass function, dust extinction, etc. Gravitational waves provide an independent method to constrain SFR at high redshifts by tracking the redshift evolution obtained from analysis of binary black hole mergers. In this study we explore three population models for star-formation combined with an \textit{inverse} time-delay model and demonstrate that it is possible to obtain bounds on the peak of redshift distribution with a network of upgraded LIGO detectors (such as LIGO-A#). For a year of observation, using simulated signals with a merger rate peak at $z_\text{peak}=1.5$, a network of LIGO detectors at A# sensitivity is able to constrain the peak of merger rate with a precision of $\pm 0.1$. Further, we obtain the results with a next-generation network (of Cosmic Explorer and Einstein Telescope) and conclude that the redshift distribution will be extremely well measured, with a precision of $\pm 0.02$, with future detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05151 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Left: Input population for MD population model. The histogram in grey shows all the simulated BBH systems for 1 year of data up to redshift of 10. The detected events for XG and A# networks have been plotted in orange and green histograms, respectively. For reference, the events observable with A+ sensitivity are shown in pink. The numbers given in the parentheses are the total number of events for ‘All’ and the det… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Network optimal SNR (ρ opt) plotted as a function of redshift for MD population in A# (left) and XG (right) networks for 1 year of data. The events below the SNR of 12 have been greyed out, and the colour gradient for the detected events shows increasing point density from darker to lighter hues. masses, spins, luminosity distance, inclination angle, and the sky location as well as the sensitivity of the detectors i… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** 90% uncertainty intervals for redshift posteriors relative to median values of the posteriors, plotted as a function of the median values, for A# and XG networks, for MD population. The shaded regions represent the minimum and maximum regions of the respective redshift error bin, and the solid lines denote the mean values for the errors in each bin. The time interval mentioned in the labels indicates the equivalen… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Left: Posteriors on zpeak for MDlow (top), MD (middle), and MDhigh (bottom) populations for the XG (green) and A# (orange) networks. The middle and right columns show the reconstructed redshift distribution p(z) [Eq. (9)] after population inference for A# and XG networ…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: 90% confidence intervals for zpeak posteriors for A# (shown in green) and XG (shown in brown and blue). The error interval plotted in brown corresponds to the 90% interval obtained when same number of events are analylsed in XG network as A# which corresponds to 9, 8, …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: 90% confidence intervals for zpeak posteriors for A# (shown in green) and XG (shown in brown and blue) for various mass bands in MD population. The error intervals plotted in brown corresponds to the 90% interval obtained when an equivalent of eight weeks of data is an…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Efficiency curve for A# network for various mass bands. 3.3 Specific mass ranges Next, we wish to explore the contribution of BBH mergers from different mass ranges in constraining the merger peak. While the low mass BBH mergers dominate the population in number, the h…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

LIGO A$^\sharp$: Detector Design and Science Prospects Beyond A+
astro-ph.IM 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

LIGO A#, a room-temperature upgrade of the LIGO detectors proposed for the 2030s, would broaden sensitivity and increase projected compact-binary detection rates by factors of four to eight relative to A+.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 277 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90758-R , journal =

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90758-r
[2]

Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

Mandel, Ilya and Farr, Will M. and Gair, Jonathan R. Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz896. arXiv:1809.02063

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz896 2019
[3]

and Taylor, Stephen R

Inferring the Properties of a Population of Compact Binaries in Presence of Selection Effects. Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 , adsurl =

work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 2022
[4]

Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

On some relations in stellar statistics. Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

1922
[5]

Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1925, month = feb, volume =

A contribution to the problem of determining the distribution in space of the stars. Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1925, month = feb, volume =

1925
[6]

Accuracy Requirements for Empirically-Measured Selection Functions

Farr, Will M. Accuracy Requirements for Empirically-Measured Selection Functions. Research Notes of the AAS. 2019. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f. arXiv:1904.10879

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f 2019
[7]

Precision Requirements for Monte Carlo Sums within Hierarchical Bayesian Inference

Precision Requirements for Monte Carlo Sums within Hierarchical Bayesian Inference. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.00461 , archivePrefix =. 2204.00461 , primaryClass =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.00461
[8]

2023, Mon

Talbot, Colm and Golomb, Jacob. Growing pains: understanding the impact of likelihood uncertainty on hierarchical Bayesian inference for gravitational-wave astronomy. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2023. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2968. arXiv:2304.06138

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2968 2023

Show all 300 references

[9]

GWPopulation: Hardware agnostic population inference for compact binaries and beyond

Talbot, Colm and Farah, Amanda and Galaudage, Shanika and Golomb, Jacob and Tong, Hui. GWPopulation: Hardware agnostic population inference for compact binaries and beyond. J. Open Source Softw. 2025. doi:10.21105/joss.07753. arXiv:2409.14143

2025 doi
[10]

Cosmic Star Formation History

Madau, Piero and Dickinson, Mark. Cosmic Star Formation History. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615. arXiv:1403.0007

2014 doi arXiv
[11]

Double Compact Objects I: The Significance of the Common Envelope on Merger Rates

Dominik, Michal and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard. Double Compact Objects I: The Significance of the Common Envelope on Merger Rates. Astrophys. J. 2012. doi:10.10...

2012 doi arXiv
[12]

and others

P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, Pablo G. and others. The Rise of the Galactic Empire: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions at z 17 and z 25 Estimated with the MIDIS+NGDEEP Ultra-deep JWST/NIRCam Data Set. Astrophys. J. 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf8c9. arXiv:2503.15594

2025 doi
[13]

Botticella, M. T. and Smartt, S. J. and Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. and Cappellaro, E. and Sereno, M. and Lee, J. C. A comparison between star formation rate diagnostics and rate of core collapse supernovae within 11 Mpc. Astron. Astrophys. 2012. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117343. arX...

2012 doi arXiv
[14]

, keywords =

Gravitationally bound gas determines star formation in the Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453608 , archivePrefix =. 2505.07763 , primaryClass =

doi
[15]

The galaxy stellar mass-star formation rate relation: Evidence for an evolving stellar initial mass function?

Dave, Romeel. The galaxy stellar mass-star formation rate relation: Evidence for an evolving stellar initial mass function?. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12866.x. arXiv:0710.0381

2008 doi
[16]

, keywords =

The Prevalence of Bursty Star Formation in Low-mass Galaxies at z = 1─7 from H -to-UV Diagnostics. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae102f , archivePrefix =. 2510.05388 , primaryClass =

doi
[17]

, keywords =

The JWST EXCELS survey: A spectroscopic investigation of the ionizing properties of star-forming galaxies at 1<z<8. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1995 , archivePrefix =. 2509.26591 , primaryClass =

doi
[18]

An Analytic Model for the Evolution of the Stellar, Gas, and Metal Content of Galaxies

Dave, Romeel and Finlator, Kristian and Oppenheimer, Benjamin D. An Analytic Model for the Evolution of the Stellar, Gas, and Metal Content of Galaxies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x. arXiv:1108.0426

2012 doi
[19]

and others

Finkelstein, Steven L. and others. The Evolution of the Galaxy Rest-frame Ultraviolet Luminosity Function Over the First two Billion Years. Astrophys. J. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/71. arXiv:1410.5439

2015 doi arXiv
[20]

, keywords =

The first GLIMPSE of the faint galaxy population at Cosmic Dawn with JWST: The evolution of the ultraviolet luminosity function across z 9 - 15. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2267 , archivePrefix =. 2509.24881 , primaryClass =

doi
[21]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Constraining Cosmological and Astrophysical Parameters with the Cosmic Star Formation History. arXiv e-prints , keywords =
[22]

and Naab, Thorsten and White, Simon D

Moster, Benjamin P. and Naab, Thorsten and White, Simon D. M. Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261. arXiv:1205.5807

2013 doi arXiv
[23]

and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard

Dominik, Michal and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel E. and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O'Shaughnessy, Richard. Double Compact Objects II: Cosmological Merger Rates. Astrophys. J. 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/72. arX...

2013 doi arXiv
[24]

and Ng, Ken and Rodriguez, Carl L

Vitale, Salvatore and Farr, Will M. and Ng, Ken and Rodriguez, Carl L. Measuring the star formation rate with gravitational waves from binary black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c0. arXiv:1808.00901

2019 doi
[25]

gwforge: a user-friendly package to generate gravitational-wave mock data

Chandra, Koustav. gwforge: a user-friendly package to generate gravitational-wave mock data. Class. Quant. Grav. 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad9b68. arXiv:2407.21109

2025 doi
[26]

A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope

Regimbau, Tania and others. A Mock Data Challenge for the Einstein Gravitational-Wave Telescope. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.122001. arXiv:1201.3563

2012 doi arXiv
[27]

Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference

Wilson, Edwin B. Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1927. doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953

1927 doi
[28]

and Wechsler, Risa H

Behroozi, Peter S. and Wechsler, Risa H. and Conroy, Charlie. The Average Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos from z= 0-8. Astrophys. J. 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57. arXiv:1207.6105

2013 doi arXiv
[29]

Ensuring Consistency between Noise and Detection in Hierarchical Bayesian Inference

Essick, Reed and Fishbach, Maya. Ensuring Consistency between Noise and Detection in Hierarchical Bayesian Inference. Astrophys. J. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1604. arXiv:2310.02017

2024 doi
[30]

Romero-Shaw, I. M. and others. Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: validation and application to the first LIGO Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2850. arXiv:2006.00714

2020 doi arXiv
[31]

PESummary , year =

Hoy, Charlie. PESummary , year =
[32]

Probing the Peak of Star Formation with the Stochastic Background of Binary Black Hole Mergers

Bers, Nico and Biscoveanu, Sylvia. Probing the Peak of Star Formation with the Stochastic Background of Binary Black Hole Mergers. Astrophys. J. 2026. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2319. arXiv:2506.21868

2026 doi arXiv
[33]

The cosmic merger rate of stellar black hole binaries from the Illustris simulation

Mapelli, Michela and Giacobbo, Nicola and Ripamonti, Emanuele and Spera, Mario. The cosmic merger rate of stellar black hole binaries from the Illustris simulation. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2123. arXiv:1708.05722

2017 doi arXiv
[34]

Santoliquido, Filippo and Mapelli, Michela and Giacobbo, Nicola and Bouffanais, Yann and Artale, M. Celeste. The cosmic merger rate density of compact objects: impact of star formation, metallicity, initial mass function and binary evolution. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021. ...

2021 doi
[35]

Celeste and Iorio, Giuliano and Lapi, Andrea and Spera, Mario

Sgalletta, Cecilia and Mapelli, Michela and Boco, Lumen and Santoliquido, Filippo and Artale, M. Celeste and Iorio, Giuliano and Lapi, Andrea and Spera, Mario. The more accurately the metal-dependent star formation rate is modeled, the larger the predicted excess of binary bla...

2025 doi
[36]

and Farr, Will M

Fishbach, Maya and Holz, Daniel E. and Farr, Will M. Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2018. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad800. arXiv:1805.10270

2018 doi arXiv
[37]

and Vijaykumar, Aditya and Ajith, Parameswaran

Singh, Mukesh Kumar and Kapadia, Shasvath J. and Vijaykumar, Aditya and Ajith, Parameswaran. Impact of Higher Harmonics of Gravitational Radiation on the Population Inference of Binary Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad499b. arXiv:2312.07376

2024 doi
[38]

Semianalytic sensitivity estimates for catalogs of gravitational-wave transients

Essick, Reed. Semianalytic sensitivity estimates for catalogs of gravitational-wave transients. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043011. arXiv:2307.02765

2023 doi
[39]

Accounting for source uncertainties in analyses of astronomical survey data

Loredo, Thomas J. Accounting for source uncertainties in analyses of astronomical survey data. AIP Conf. Proc. 2004. doi:10.1063/1.1835214. arXiv:astro-ph/0409387

2004 doi arXiv
[40]

gwfish: A simulation software to evaluate parameter-estimation capabilities of gravitational-wave detector networks

Dupletsa, Ulyana and Harms, Jan and Banerjee, Biswajit and Branchesi, Marica and Goncharov, Boris and Maselli, Andrea and Oliveira, Ana Carolina Silva and Ronchini, Samuele and Tissino, Jacopo. gwfish: A simulation software to evaluate parameter-estimation capabilities of grav...

2023 doi
[41]

and Bose, Sukanta

Ajith, P. and Bose, Sukanta. Estimating the parameters of non-spinning binary black holes using ground-based gravitational-wave detectors: Statistical errors. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084032. arXiv:0901.4936

2009 doi arXiv
[42]

Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects

Vallisneri, Michele. Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects. Phys. Rev. D. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.042001. arXiv:gr-qc/0703086

2008 doi arXiv
[43]

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/4/009 , journal =

doi
[44]

doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , journal =

2007 doi
[45]

Phys. Rev. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064035 , eprint =

doi
[46]

arXiv , author =:1602.03837 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1602.03837 , journal =

doi arXiv
[47]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103 , eprint =

doi
[48]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa6854 , eprint =

doi
[49]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.112004 , eprint =

doi
[50]

doi:10.1038/nature24471 , eprint =

Nature , number =. doi:10.1038/nature24471 , eprint =

doi
[51]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , number =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f , eprint =

doi
[52]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , number =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba493 , eprint =

doi
[53]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102 , eprint =

doi
[54]

arXiv , author =:2010.14550 , month =

2010
[55]

, collaboration =

Acernese, F. , collaboration =. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , number =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/610/1/012014 , editor =

doi
[56]

General relativistic celestial mechanics of binary systems

Damour, Thibault and Deruelle, Nathalie , journal =. General relativistic celestial mechanics of binary systems. 1985 , zbl =

1985
[57]

arXiv , author =:0704.3764 , journal =

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/19/S31 , editor =. arXiv , author =:0704.3764 , journal =

doi arXiv
[58]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101 , eprint =

doi
[59]

arXiv , author =:1201.5319 , journal =

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/12/124001 , editor =. arXiv , author =:1201.5319 , journal =

doi arXiv
[60]

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 , eprint =

PTEP , month =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 , eprint =

doi
[61]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L121503 , eprint =

doi
[62]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.104031 , eprint =

doi
[63]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084037 , eprint =

doi
[64]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044022 , eprint =

doi
[65]

gwastro/pycbc: PyCBC release v1.16.11 , url =

Alex Nitz and others , doi =. gwastro/pycbc: PyCBC release v1.16.11 , url =
[66]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.062003 , eprint =

doi
[67]

The LVK Collaboration , howpublished =
[68]

A\# Strain Sensitivity , url =
[69]

A+/O5 strain curve projections , url =
[70]

Cosmic Explorer Strain Sensitivity , url =
[71]

ET sensitivity curves used for CoBA Science Study , url =
[72]

and others

Soni, S. and others. LIGO Detector Characterization in the first half of the fourth Observing run. Class. Quant. Grav. 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adc4b6. arXiv:2409.02831

2025 doi
[73]

and others

Capote, E. and others. Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.062002. arXiv:2411.14607

2025 doi
[74]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122006 , eprint =

doi
[75]

arXiv , author =:1702.00786 , journal =

arXiv
[76]

Gen. Rel. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1007/s10714-019-2546-x , eprint =

doi
[77]

Astrophys. J. , number =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e , eprint =

doi
[78]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.011401 , eprint =

doi
[79]

arXiv , author =:2509.04637 , month =

arXiv
[80]

and Cutler, Curt and Sussman, Gerald J

Apostolatos, Theocharis A. and Cutler, Curt and Sussman, Gerald J. and Thorne, Kip S. , doi =. Phys. Rev. D , pages =
[81]

Apostolatos, T. A. , doi =. Phys. Rev. D , pages =
[82]

Class. Quant. Grav. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/010 , eprint =

doi
[83]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104016 , eprint =

doi
[84]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.124002 , eprint =

doi
[85]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064035 , eprint =

doi
[86]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.104023 , eprint =

doi
[87]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/15/155002 , eprint =

doi
[88]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024060 , eprint =

doi
[89]

Astrophys. J. Suppl. , number =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc , eprint =

doi
[90]

arXiv , author =:0806.1591 , month =

arXiv
[91]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/19/195011 , eprint =

doi
[92]

arXiv , author =:2108.01167 , month =
[93]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.064060 , eprint =

doi
[94]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102 , eprint =

doi
[95]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6080 , eprint =

doi
[96]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2347 , eprint =

doi
[97]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.064003 , eprint =

doi
[98]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024009 , eprint =

doi
[99]

Living Rev. Rel. , pages =. doi:10.1007/s41114-016-0001-9 , eprint =

doi
[100]

Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. , number =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaef0b , eprint =

doi
[101]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.121102 , eprint =

doi
[102]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024058 , eprint =

doi
[103]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3515 , eprint =

doi
[104]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5360 , eprint =

doi
[105]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/4/002 , eprint =

doi
[106]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.129904 , eprint =

doi
[107]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.062005 , eprint =

doi
[108]

Gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries: Energy flux to third post-Newtonian order , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.064005 , eprint =

doi
[109]

Gravitational-wave inspiral of compact binary systems to 7/2 post-Newtonian order , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.129902 , eprint =

doi
[110]

Living Rev. Rel. , pages =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2002-3 , eprint =

2002 doi
[111]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.124007 , eprint =

doi
[112]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.024004 , eprint =

doi
[113]

Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries completed at the third post-Newtonian order , volume =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.091101 , eprint =

doi
[114]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.124004 , eprint =

doi
[115]

II: Radiation field , volume =

Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. II: Radiation field , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.089901 , eprint =

doi
[116]

arXiv , author =:0802.1249 , journal =

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003 , eid =. arXiv , author =:0802.1249 , journal =

doi arXiv
[117]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064041 , eprint =

doi
[118]

Living Rev. Rel. , pages =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-2 , eprint =

2014 doi
[119]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064041 , eprint =

doi
[120]

arXiv , author =:1707.02088 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044011 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1707.02088 , journal =

doi arXiv
[121]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044018 , eprint =

doi
[122]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/7/075017 , eprint =

doi
[123]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/13/135009 , eprint =

doi
[124]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/19/195010 , eprint =

doi
[125]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044028 , eprint =

doi
[126]

arXiv , author =:2207.10474 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064024 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2207.10474 , journal =

doi
[127]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab6a21 , eprint =

doi
[128]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abcaf5 , eprint =

doi
[129]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1618 , eprint =

doi
[130]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab34e2 , eprint =

doi
[131]

arXiv , author =:0705.1514 , month =

arXiv
[132]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.024007 , eprint =

doi
[133]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.082004 , eprint =

doi
[134]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024027 , eprint =

doi
[135]

Phys. Rev. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.084033 , eprint =

doi
[136]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006 , eprint =

doi
[137]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064015 , eprint =

doi
[138]

Phys. Rev. D , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104025 , eprint =

doi
[139]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084043 , eprint =

doi
[140]

Phys. Rev. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044009 , eprint =

doi
[141]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084019 , eprint =

doi
[142]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.104038 , eprint =

doi
[143]

arXiv , author =:2009.05376 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.081101 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2009.05376 , journal =

2009 doi
[144]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101 , eprint =

doi
[145]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044028 , eprint =

doi
[146]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124070 , eprint =

doi
[147]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.101401 , eprint =

doi
[148]

doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/061 , eprint =

JCAP , pages =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/061 , eprint =

2024 doi
[149]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084039 , eprint =

doi
[150]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.124008 , eprint =

doi
[151]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063011 , eprint =

doi
[152]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104015 , eprint =

doi
[153]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104016 , eprint =

doi
[154]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084018 , eprint =

doi
[155]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.101501 , eprint =

doi
[156]

Phys. Rev. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124051 , eprint =

doi
[157]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/16/165001 , eprint =

doi
[158]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2965 , eprint =

doi
[159]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/4/045013 , eprint =

doi
[160]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.104016 , eprint =

doi
[161]

corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python , volume =

Daniel Foreman-Mackey , doi =. corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python , volume =. The Journal of Open Source Software , month =
[162]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084028 , eprint =

doi
[163]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.124040 , eprint =

doi
[164]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.043007 , eprint =

doi
[165]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2984 , eprint =

doi
[166]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2658 , eprint =

doi
[167]

Astrophys

Astron. Astrophys. , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348745 , eprint =

doi
[168]

and Schaefer, Gerhard , doi =

Damour, T. and Schaefer, Gerhard , doi =. Nuovo Cim. B , pages =
[169]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084011 , eprint =

doi
[170]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.124013 , eprint =

doi
[171]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.027502 , eprint =

doi
[172]

arXiv , author =:gr-qc/0404128 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.064028 , eid =. arXiv , author =:gr-qc/0404128 , journal =

doi arXiv
[173]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064058 , eprint =

doi
[174]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084024 , eprint =

doi
[175]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/3rmv-b2cq , eprint =

doi
[176]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104056 , eprint =

doi
[177]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103035 , eprint =

doi
[178]

arXiv , author =:2311.00242 , month =
[179]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1453 , eprint =

doi
[180]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084080 , eprint =

doi
[181]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043037 , eprint =

doi
[182]

arXiv , author =:2507.23212 , month =
[183]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17040.x , eprint =

2010 doi
[184]

Phys. Rev. D , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.082001 , eprint =

doi
[185]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084043 , eprint =

doi
[186]

Prasad, Vaishak and others , title =
[187]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.124060 , eprint =

doi
[188]

Einstein gravitational wave Telescope conceptual design study , year =

The ET science team , howpublished =. Einstein gravitational wave Telescope conceptual design study , year =
[189]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Evans, Matthew and others , title = ". arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.09882 , archivePrefix =. 2109.09882 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[190]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002 , eprint =

doi
[191]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.101101 , eprint =

doi
[192]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023003 , eprint =

doi
[193]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.104033 , eprint =

doi
[194]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175004 , eprint =

doi
[195]

arXiv , author =:1210.2339 , journal =

arXiv
[196]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/4/045016 , eprint =

doi
[197]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/4/043001 , eprint =

doi
[198]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064007 , eprint =

doi
[199]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1651 , eprint =

doi
[200]

Fujita, Ryuichi , title =
[201]

Fujita, Ryuichi , doi =. Exp. Phys , pages =
[202]

Prog. Theor. Phys. , pages =. doi:10.1143/PTP.128.971 , eprint =

doi
[203]

, number =

Nature Astron. , number =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01813-w , eprint =

doi
[204]

arXiv , author =:2412.12823 , journal =

doi:10.1103/jxrc-z298 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2412.12823 , journal =

doi
[205]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064002 , eprint =

doi
[206]

, number =

Nature Astron. , number =. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01568-w , eprint =

doi
[207]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , number =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 , eprint =

doi
[208]

, number =

Nature Astron. , number =. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w , eprint =

doi
[209]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064056 , eprint =

doi
[210]

arXiv , author =:2210.09541 , month =
[211]

and MacFarlane, A.J

Goldberg, J.N. and MacFarlane, A.J. and Newman, E.T. and Rohrlich, F. and Sudarshan, E.C.G. , doi =. J. Math. Phys. , pages =
[212]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104029 , eprint =

doi
[213]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.022002 , eprint =

doi
[214]

Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , number =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2385 , eprint =

doi
[215]

arXiv , author =:2404.14286 , month =

arXiv
[216]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044016 , eprint =

doi
[217]

arXiv , author =:2012.03608 , month =

2012
[218]

Phys. Rev. Lett. , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151101 , eprint =

doi
[219]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , pages =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L14 , eprint =

doi
[220]

doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , eprint =

Nature , number =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , eprint =

doi
[221]

Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies

Di Matteo, Tiziana and Springel, Volker and Hernquist, Lars. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies. Nature. 2005. doi:10.1038/nature03335. arXiv:astro-ph/0502199

2005 doi arXiv
[222]

Self-Regulated Black Hole Growth via Momentum Deposition in Galaxy Merger Simulations

DeBuhr, Jackson and Quataert, Eliot and Ma, Chung-Pei and Hopkins, Philip. Self-Regulated Black Hole Growth via Momentum Deposition in Galaxy Merger Simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00881.x. arXiv:0909.2872

2010 doi
[223]

and Bulik, Tomasz and O'Shaughnessy, Richard

Belczynski, Krzysztof and Holz, Daniel E. and Bulik, Tomasz and O'Shaughnessy, Richard. The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars. Nature. 2016. doi:10.1038/nature18322. arXiv:1602.04531

2016 doi arXiv
[224]

Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background due to Primordial Binary Black Hole Mergers

Mandic, Vuk and Bird, Simeon and Cholis, Ilias. Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background due to Primordial Binary Black Hole Mergers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.201102. arXiv:1608.06699

2016 doi arXiv
[225]

Dvali, G. R. and Gabadadze, Gregory and Porrati, Massimo. 4-D gravity on a brane in 5-D Minkowski space. Phys. Lett. B. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00669-9. arXiv:hep-th/0005016

doi arXiv
[226]

and Spergel, David N

Pardo, Kris and Fishbach, Maya and Holz, Daniel E. and Spergel, David N. Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817. JCAP. 2018. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/048. arXiv:1801.08160

2018 doi arXiv
[227]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Reinterpreting Low Frequency LIGO/Virgo Events as Magnified Stellar-Mass Black Holes at Cosmological Distances. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1802.05273 , archivePrefix =. 1802.05273 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[228]

Smith, G. P. and others. Strong-lensing of Gravitational Waves by Galaxy Clusters. IAU Symp. 2017. doi:10.1017/S1743921318003757. arXiv:1803.07851

2017 doi arXiv
[229]

Evolution of Galaxy Star Formation and Metallicity: Impact on Double Compact Objects Mergers

Boco, Lumen and Lapi, Andrea and Chruslinska, Martyna and Donevski, Darko and Sicilia, Alex and Danese, Luigi. Evolution of Galaxy Star Formation and Metallicity: Impact on Double Compact Objects Mergers. Astrophys. J. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd3a0. arXiv:2012.02800

2021 doi
[230]

, keywords =

Metallicity of stars formed throughout the cosmic history based on the observational properties of star-forming galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2057 , archivePrefix =. 1907.11243 , primaryClass =

1907 doi arXiv
[231]

, keywords =

The impact of the FMR and starburst galaxies on the (low metallicity) cosmic star formation history. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2690 , archivePrefix =. 2109.06187 , primaryClass =

doi
[232]

The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments

Schaye, Joop and others. The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2015. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058. arXiv:1407.7040

2015 doi arXiv
[233]

and others

Crain, Robert A. and others. The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2015. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv725. arXiv:1501.01311

2015 doi arXiv
[234]

First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies

Pillepich, Annalisa and others. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112. arXiv:1707.03406

2018 doi arXiv
[235]

The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release

Nelson, Dylan and others. The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release. Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol. 2019. doi:10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x. arXiv:1812.05609

2019 doi
[236]

and van de Voort, Freeke and Hernquist, Lars and van Son, Lieke and Chru \'s li \'n ska, Martyna and Bieri, Rebekka and de Mink, Selma E

Pakmor, Ruediger and Simpson, Christine M. and van de Voort, Freeke and Hernquist, Lars and van Son, Lieke and Chru \'s li \'n ska, Martyna and Bieri, Rebekka and de Mink, Selma E. and Springel, Volker. Formation and fate of low-metallicity stars in TNG50. Mon. Not. Roy. Astro...

2022 doi
[237]

Chemical Evolution of the Universe and its Consequences for Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics

Chru \'s li \'n ska, Martyna. Chemical Evolution of the Universe and its Consequences for Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics. Annalen Phys. 2024. doi:10.1002/andp.202200170. arXiv:2206.10622

2024 doi
[238]

and van Remortel, Nick

Turbang, Kevin and Lalleman, Max and Callister, Thomas A. and van Remortel, Nick. The Metallicity Dependence and Evolutionary Times of Merging Binary Black Holes: Combined Constraints from Individual Gravitational-wave Detections and the Stochastic Background. Astrophys. J. 20...

2024 doi
[239]

LIGO Virgo KAGRA's Oldest Black Holes: Probing Star Formation at Cosmic Noon With GWTC-3

Fishbach, Maya and van Son, Lieke. LIGO Virgo KAGRA's Oldest Black Holes: Probing Star Formation at Cosmic Noon With GWTC-3. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0560. arXiv:2307.15824

2023 doi
[240]

Reconstructing the star formation rate for compact binary populations with the Einstein telescope

Singh, Neha and Bulik, Tomasz and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Cieslar, Marek and Calore, Francesca. Reconstructing the star formation rate for compact binary populations with the Einstein telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346588. arXiv:2304.01341

2024 doi
[241]

, keywords =

Merging Rates of Compact Binaries in Galaxies: Perspectives for Gravitational Wave Detections. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab328e , archivePrefix =. 1907.06841 , primaryClass =

1907 doi
[242]

Probing Gravity with Spacetime Sirens

Deffayet, Cedric and Menou, Kristen. Probing Gravity with Spacetime Sirens. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2007. doi:10.1086/522931. arXiv:0709.0003

2007 doi arXiv
[243]

and Loeb, Abraham

Koushiappas, Savvas M. and Loeb, Abraham. Maximum redshift of gravitational wave merger events. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.221104. arXiv:1708.07380

2017 doi arXiv
[244]

and Kalogera, Vicky and Rasio, Frederic A

Chatterjee, Sourav and Rodriguez, Carl L. and Kalogera, Vicky and Rasio, Frederic A. Dynamical Formation of Low-Mass Merging Black Hole Binaries like GW151226. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa5caa. arXiv:1609.06689

2017 doi arXiv
[245]

Werner, M. W. and others. The Spitzer Space Telescope mission. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2004. doi:10.1086/422992. arXiv:astro-ph/0406223

2004 doi arXiv
[246]

and Bulik, Tomasz and Pannarale, Francesco

Dominik, Michal and Berti, Emanuele and O'Shaughnessy, Richard and Mandel, Ilya and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel E. and Bulik, Tomasz and Pannarale, Francesco. Double Compact Objects III: Gravitational Wave Detection Rates. Astrophys. J. 2015. ...

2015 doi arXiv
[247]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.104014 , eprint =

doi
[248]

Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors , url =

Gregory M Harry and (forthe LIGO Scientific Collaboration) , doi =. Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors , url =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =
[249]

, pages =

Annalen Phys. , pages =. doi:10.1002/andp.201100163 , eprint =

doi
[250]

, pages =

Annalen Phys. , pages =. doi:10.1002/andp.201100094 , eprint =

doi
[251]

, edition =

Helstr\"om, C.W. , edition =. Statistical Theory of Signal Detection , volume =
[252]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/11/115001 , eprint =

doi
[253]

Phys. Rev. , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064014 , eprint =

doi
[254]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044033 , eprint =

doi
[255]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1850 , eprint =

doi
[256]

arXiv , author =:2209.00374 , month =
[257]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.104016 , eprint =

doi
[258]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 , eprint =

doi
[259]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.024033 , eprint =

doi
[260]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/2/025012 , eprint =

doi
[261]

arXiv , author =:1709.02007 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044015 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1709.02007 , journal =

doi arXiv
[262]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104048 , eprint =

doi
[263]

arXiv , author =:astro-ph/9905116 , month =

arXiv
[264]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.127501 , eprint =

doi
[265]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084016 , eprint =

doi
[266]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024038 , eprint =

doi
[267]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.024031 , eprint =

doi
[268]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006 , eprint =

doi
[269]

arXiv , author =:2208.01766 , month =
[270]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024032 , eprint =

doi
[271]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064022 , eprint =

doi
[272]

Class. Quant. Grav. , number =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/20/204001 , eprint =

doi
[273]

arXiv , author =:2210.01852 , month =
[274]

Living Rev. Rel. , number =. doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 , eprint =

doi
[275]

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa120 , eprint =

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , month =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa120 , eprint =

doi
[276]

Phys. Rev. X , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 , eprint =

doi
[277]

arXiv , author =:2111.03606 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2111.03606 , journal =

doi arXiv
[278]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103004 , eprint =

doi
[279]

arXiv , author =:1903.09220 , month =

1903 arXiv
[280]

Astrophys. J. Lett. , number =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba42d , eprint =

doi
[281]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.124033 , eprint =

doi
[282]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044007 , eprint =

doi
[283]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024046 , eprint =

doi
[284]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007 , eprint =

doi
[285]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024059 , eprint =

doi
[286]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024056 , eprint =

doi
[287]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.821 , eprint =

doi
[288]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084026 , eprint =

doi
[289]

Class. Quant. Grav. , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/20/N01 , eprint =

doi
[290]

arXiv , author =:0710.0614 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044016 , eid =. arXiv , author =:0710.0614 , journal =

doi arXiv
[291]

Kim, JeongCho and Kim, Chunglee and Lee., Hyung Won and Favata, Marc and Arun, K. G. , howpublished =
[292]

arXiv , author =:2011.05332 , journal =

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef , eid =. arXiv , author =:2011.05332 , journal =

doi
[293]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124001 , eprint =

doi
[294]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124015 , eprint =

doi
[295]

Phys. Rev. D , number =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104043 , eprint =

doi
[296]

arXiv , author =:2106.10291 , month =
[297]

Phys. Rev. D , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.122002 , eprint =

doi
[298]

Astrophys. J. , number =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b02 , eprint =

doi
[299]

arXiv , author =:gr-qc/0603056 , journal =

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.124012 , eid =. arXiv , author =:gr-qc/0603056 , journal =

doi arXiv
[300]

Astrophys

Astron. Astrophys. , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015777 , eprint =

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90758-R , journal =

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90758-r

[2] [2]

Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

Mandel, Ilya and Farr, Will M. and Gair, Jonathan R. Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz896. arXiv:1809.02063

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz896 2019

[3] [3]

and Taylor, Stephen R

Inferring the Properties of a Population of Compact Binaries in Presence of Selection Effects. Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 , adsurl =

work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 2022

[4] [4]

Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

On some relations in stellar statistics. Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

1922

[5] [5]

Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1925, month = feb, volume =

A contribution to the problem of determining the distribution in space of the stars. Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1925, month = feb, volume =

1925

[6] [6]

Accuracy Requirements for Empirically-Measured Selection Functions

Farr, Will M. Accuracy Requirements for Empirically-Measured Selection Functions. Research Notes of the AAS. 2019. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f. arXiv:1904.10879

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f 2019

[7] [7]

Precision Requirements for Monte Carlo Sums within Hierarchical Bayesian Inference

Precision Requirements for Monte Carlo Sums within Hierarchical Bayesian Inference. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.00461 , archivePrefix =. 2204.00461 , primaryClass =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.00461

[8] [8]

2023, Mon

Talbot, Colm and Golomb, Jacob. Growing pains: understanding the impact of likelihood uncertainty on hierarchical Bayesian inference for gravitational-wave astronomy. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2023. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2968. arXiv:2304.06138

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2968 2023