pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models

Canonical reference. 71% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

61 Pith papers citing it
Background 71% of classified citations
abstract

The aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful language understanding and decision-making tools that are created through extensive alignment with human feedback. However, these large models remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, where adversaries manipulate prompts to elicit malicious outputs that should not be given by aligned LLMs. Investigating jailbreak prompts can lead us to delve into the limitations of LLMs and further guide us to secure them. Unfortunately, existing jailbreak techniques suffer from either (1) scalability issues, where attacks heavily rely on manual crafting of prompts, or (2) stealthiness problems, as attacks depend on token-based algorithms to generate prompts that are often semantically meaningless, making them susceptible to detection through basic perplexity testing. In light of these challenges, we intend to answer this question: Can we develop an approach that can automatically generate stealthy jailbreak prompts? In this paper, we introduce AutoDAN, a novel jailbreak attack against aligned LLMs. AutoDAN can automatically generate stealthy jailbreak prompts by the carefully designed hierarchical genetic algorithm. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that AutoDAN not only automates the process while preserving semantic meaningfulness, but also demonstrates superior attack strength in cross-model transferability, and cross-sample universality compared with the baseline. Moreover, we also compare AutoDAN with perplexity-based defense methods and show that AutoDAN can bypass them effectively.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 18 method 2 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract The aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful language understanding and decision-making tools that are created through extensive alignment with human feedback. However, these large models remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, where adversaries manipulate prompts to elicit malicious outputs that should not be given by aligned LLMs. Investigating jailbreak prompts can lead us to delve into the limitations of LLMs and further guide us to secure them. Unfortunately, existing jailbreak techniques suffer from either (1) scalability issues, where attacks heavily rely on manual crafting of

co-cited works

representative citing papers

RouteHijack: Routing-Aware Attack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

cs.LG · 2026-05-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RouteHijack is a routing-aware jailbreak that identifies safety-critical experts via activation contrast and optimizes suffixes to suppress them, reaching 69.3% average attack success rate on seven MoE LLMs with strong transfer to variants and VLMs.

Babel: Jailbreaking Safety Attention via Obfuscation Distribution Optimized Sampling

cs.CR · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Babel is an efficient black-box jailbreaking framework that formalizes sparse safety attention heads via a mathematical obfuscation model and uses iterative distribution refinement to achieve higher attack success rates on models like GPT-4o and Claude-3-5-haiku with around 40 queries.

Leveraging RAG for Training-Free Alignment of LLMs

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RAG-Pref is a training-free RAG-based alignment technique that conditions LLMs on contrastive preference samples during inference, yielding over 3.7x average improvement in agentic attack refusals when combined with offline methods across five LLMs.

ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection

cs.CR · 2026-05-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ARGUS defends LLM agents from context-aware prompt injections by tracking information provenance and verifying decisions against trustworthy evidence, reducing attack success to 3.8% while retaining 87.5% task utility.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 61 citing papers.