pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them

Baseline reference. 55% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

110 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 55% of classified citations
abstract

BIG-Bench (Srivastava et al., 2022) is a diverse evaluation suite that focuses on tasks believed to be beyond the capabilities of current language models. Language models have already made good progress on this benchmark, with the best model in the BIG-Bench paper outperforming average reported human-rater results on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks via few-shot prompting. But on what tasks do language models fall short of average human-rater performance, and are those tasks actually unsolvable by current language models? In this work, we focus on a suite of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which we call BIG-Bench Hard (BBH). These are the task for which prior language model evaluations did not outperform the average human-rater. We find that applying chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to BBH tasks enables PaLM to surpass the average human-rater performance on 10 of the 23 tasks, and Codex (code-davinci-002) to surpass the average human-rater performance on 17 of the 23 tasks. Since many tasks in BBH require multi-step reasoning, few-shot prompting without CoT, as done in the BIG-Bench evaluations (Srivastava et al., 2022), substantially underestimates the best performance and capabilities of language models, which is better captured via CoT prompting. As further analysis, we explore the interaction between CoT and model scale on BBH, finding that CoT enables emergent task performance on several BBH tasks with otherwise flat scaling curves.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 12 background 9 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract BIG-Bench (Srivastava et al., 2022) is a diverse evaluation suite that focuses on tasks believed to be beyond the capabilities of current language models. Language models have already made good progress on this benchmark, with the best model in the BIG-Bench paper outperforming average reported human-rater results on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks via few-shot prompting. But on what tasks do language models fall short of average human-rater performance, and are those tasks actually unsolvable by current language models? In this work, we focus on a suite of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which we

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Large Language Diffusion Models

cs.CL · 2025-02-14 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.

PAL: Program-aided Language Models

cs.CL · 2022-11-18 · conditional · novelty 8.0

PAL improves few-shot reasoning accuracy by having LLMs generate executable programs rather than text-based chains of thought, outperforming much larger models on math and logic benchmarks.

Will Scaling Improve Social Simulation with LLMs?

cs.CL · 2026-07-02 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Scaling improves LLM social simulation fidelity in most opinion and behavior tasks but not for human cognitive bias calibration or low-resource domains.

Meta-Benchmarks for Financial-Services LLM Evaluation

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.

Whose Side Is Your Agent On? Multi-Party Principal Loyalty in LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.

Beyond Prediction: Tail-Aware Scheduling for LLM Inference

cs.LG · 2026-06-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Presents a distribution-aware scheduling framework for LLM inference that reduces P99 TTLT by 35-50% and TTFT by 34-47% versus SRPT with perfect length knowledge using statistical signals instead of predictions.

Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotations

cs.CL · 2026-05-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

SELECT-LLM is the first active model selection framework for LLMs that uses expected information gain from pairwise output similarities to minimize required annotations, reporting up to 84.78% cost reduction across 23 datasets and 156 models.

Verifiable Counterfactual Supervision for Process Reward Models

cs.AI · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Presents verifiable counterfactual process supervision that generates annotated trajectories via template-aware error injection on symbolic chains, improving Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks with preliminary math transfer.

Large Language Models Exhibit Normative Conformity

cs.AI · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Large language models exhibit normative conformity in addition to informational conformity, and subtle social context can direct which group they conform to.

MARS: Enabling Autoregressive Models Multi-Token Generation

cs.CL · 2026-04-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

MARS fine-tunes autoregressive models to predict multiple tokens per step via continued training on instruction data, achieving 1.5-1.7x throughput while matching baseline accuracy and supporting real-time speed adjustment.

Large Language Models as Optimizers

cs.LG · 2023-09-07 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 110 citing papers.