Chain-of-thought prompting, by including intermediate reasoning steps in few-shot examples, elicits strong reasoning abilities in large language models on arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic tasks.
super hub Canonical reference
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
220
Pith papers citing it
Background
93% of classified citations
abstract
Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we use to fine-tune GPT-3 using supervised learning. We then collect a dataset of rankings of model outputs, which we use to further fine-tune this supervised model using reinforcement learning from human feedback. We call the resulting models InstructGPT. In human evaluations on our prompt distribution, outputs from the 1.3B parameter InstructGPT model are preferred to outputs from the 175B GPT-3, despite having 100x fewer parameters. Moreover, InstructGPT models show improvements in truthfulness and reductions in toxic output generation while having minimal performance regressions on public NLP datasets. Even though InstructGPT still makes simple mistakes, our results show that fine-tuning with human feedback is a promising direction for aligning language models with human intent.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 54
method 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we u
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
RefusalBench shows strict refusal rates fail to rank frontier LLMs correctly on biological safety, with provider effects and partial-compliance patterns that binary metrics miss.
Prompt injection attacks can self-replicate across LLM agents in multi-agent systems, enabling data theft, misinformation, and system disruption while propagating silently.
ORPO performs preference alignment during supervised fine-tuning via a monolithic odds ratio penalty, allowing 7B models to outperform larger state-of-the-art models on alignment benchmarks.
DSPy compiles short declarative programs into LM pipelines that self-optimize and outperform both standard few-shot prompting and expert-written chains on math, retrieval, and QA tasks.
Generative agents with memory streams, reflection, and planning using LLMs exhibit believable individual and emergent social behaviors in a simulated town.
An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
Low-resource safety failures are action failures because the harmfulness representation transfers but the decision calibration does not; this is fixed by recalibrating a high-resource gate with 1-4 target-language examples.
EST-PRM stress-tests five PRM models on 4,687 reasoning chains from MATH-500, GSM8K, and PRMBench using three label-preserving transformations and reports model-specific vulnerability patterns.
Introduces (ε,q,t,A)-behavioral indistinguishability and shows via Qwen/Llama experiments that LoRA distillation boosts semantic similarity but leaves detectable behavioral differences under adversarial evaluation.
A hybrid first-order then zeroth-order optimization approach improves robustness of safety-aligned LLMs while preserving utility, with layer-wise sensitivity estimation for efficiency.
Distribution-Aware Reward optimizes LLM regression by treating rollouts as empirical predictive distributions and rewarding marginal improvements in CRPS quality rather than point accuracy alone.
The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.
DecisionBench supplies a fixed task suite, model pool, delegation interface, and multi-axis metrics to evaluate emergent delegation, showing similar quality across awareness conditions but 15-31 point headroom under perfect delegation.
PluRule is a new multimodal multilingual benchmark showing that state-of-the-art vision-language models perform only marginally better than a trivial baseline at detecting specific rule violations in pluralistic online communities.
Fast-Slow Training uses context optimization as fast weights alongside parameter updates as slow weights to achieve up to 3x better sample efficiency, higher performance, and less catastrophic forgetting than standard RL in continual LLM learning.
LLM multi-agent systems on lattices show bias-driven order-disorder crossovers instead of true phase transitions, with extracted effective couplings and fields serving as model-specific fingerprints.
Optimistic bilevel optimization with manifold lower-level minimizers is differentiable if the optimistic selection is unique, yielding a pseudoinverse hyper-gradient and a convergent HG-MS algorithm whose rate depends on intrinsic manifold dimension.
Pretrained language models are used as energy functions for Glauber dynamics in discrete text diffusion, improving generation quality over prior diffusion LMs and matching autoregressive models on benchmarks and reasoning tasks.
ContextualJailbreak uses evolutionary search over simulated primed dialogues with novel mutations to reach 90-100% attack success on open LLMs and transfers to some closed frontier models at 15-90% rates.
VAnim creates open-domain text-to-SVG animations via sparse state updates on a persistent DOM tree, identification-first planning, and rendering-aware RL with a new 134k-example benchmark.
Political bias audits of LLMs largely capture sycophantic accommodation to the inferred political identity of the asker rather than any fixed model ideology.
A new 7x4 taxonomy organizes agentic AI security threats by architectural layer and persistence timescale, revealing under-explored upper layers and missing defenses after surveying 116 papers.
citing papers explorer
-
RefusalBench: Why Refusal Rate Misranks Frontier LLMs on Biological Research Prompts
RefusalBench shows strict refusal rates fail to rank frontier LLMs correctly on biological safety, with provider effects and partial-compliance patterns that binary metrics miss.
-
EyeMulator: Improving Code Language Models by Mimicking Human Visual Attention
EyeMulator augments CodeLLM fine-tuning loss with token weights derived from human eye-tracking scan paths, producing large gains on code translation and summarization across StarCoder, Llama-3.2 and DeepSeek-Coder.
-
InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis
InCoder is the first generative model to directly perform zero-shot code infilling via bidirectional context from a masked-then-appended training scheme, matching left-to-right models on synthesis while improving on type inference, comment generation, and variable renaming.
-
Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code
A review of 114 studies creates taxonomies for code and data quality issues, formalizes 18 propagation mechanisms from training data defects to LLM-generated code defects, and synthesizes detection and mitigation techniques.
-
Structural Quality Gaps in Practitioner AI Governance Prompts: An Empirical Study Using a Five-Principle Evaluation Framework
A new five-principle framework applied to 34 practitioner AI governance prompts finds 37% lack key structural elements such as data classification and rubrics.
-
SysTradeBench: An Iterative Build-Test-Patch Benchmark for Strategy-to-Code Trading Systems with Drift-Aware Diagnostics
SysTradeBench evaluates 17 LLMs on 12 trading strategies, finding over 91.7% code validity but rapid convergence in iterative fixes and a continued need for human oversight on critical strategies.
-
Reinforcement learning to improve large language model-based automated code compliance systems
P4IR applies supervised fine-tuning followed by GRPO reinforcement learning to reduce tree edit distance by up to 23.8% and Levenshtein distance by up to 38.6% versus SFT baselines while outperforming several frontier LLMs on code structure and semantics for automated building code compliance.
-
Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution
Bounded autonomy using typed action contracts and consumer-side execution lets LLMs safely operate enterprise systems, achieving 23 of 25 tasks with zero unsafe executions versus 17 for unconstrained AI across 25 trials.
-
What makes a harness a harness: necessary and sufficient conditions for an agent harness
Proposes and tests a constitutive definition of 'agent harness' via conceptual analysis of literature and six real systems.
-
Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review
A systematic review that categorizes prompting strategies for LLM-based code summarization, assesses their effectiveness, and identifies gaps in research and evaluation practices.
-
LLM4Log: A Systematic Review of Large Language Model-based Log Analysis
Systematic review of 145 papers on LLM-based log analysis, providing a unified taxonomy, common design patterns, evaluation practices, and challenges for deployment under drift and limited labels.