Promptbreeder evolves both task prompts and the mutation prompts that improve them using LLMs, outperforming Chain-of-Thought and Plan-and-Solve on arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks.
hub Mixed citations
Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models
Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (60%).
92
Pith papers citing it
Background
60% of classified citations
abstract
Chain-of-thought prompting has demonstrated remarkable performance on various natural language reasoning tasks. However, it tends to perform poorly on tasks which requires solving problems harder than the exemplars shown in the prompts. To overcome this challenge of easy-to-hard generalization, we propose a novel prompting strategy, least-to-most prompting. The key idea in this strategy is to break down a complex problem into a series of simpler subproblems and then solve them in sequence. Solving each subproblem is facilitated by the answers to previously solved subproblems. Our experimental results on tasks related to symbolic manipulation, compositional generalization, and math reasoning reveal that least-to-most prompting is capable of generalizing to more difficult problems than those seen in the prompts. A notable finding is that when the GPT-3 code-davinci-002 model is used with least-to-most prompting, it can solve the compositional generalization benchmark SCAN in any split (including length split) with an accuracy of at least 99% using just 14 exemplars, compared to only 16% accuracy with chain-of-thought prompting. This is particularly noteworthy because neural-symbolic models in the literature that specialize in solving SCAN are trained on the entire training set containing over 15,000 examples. We have included prompts for all the tasks in the Appendix.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 14
method 4
dataset 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Chain-of-thought prompting has demonstrated remarkable performance on various natural language reasoning tasks. However, it tends to perform poorly on tasks which requires solving problems harder than the exemplars shown in the prompts. To overcome this challenge of easy-to-hard generalization, we propose a novel prompting strategy, least-to-most prompting. The key idea in this strategy is to break down a complex problem into a series of simpler subproblems and then solve them in sequence. Solving each subproblem is facilitated by the answers to previously solved subproblems. Our experimental
co-cited works
representative citing papers
Tree of Thoughts enables language models to solve complex planning tasks by generating, evaluating, and searching over coherent intermediate thoughts in a tree, raising Game of 24 success from 4% to 74% with GPT-4.
PAL improves few-shot reasoning accuracy by having LLMs generate executable programs rather than text-based chains of thought, outperforming much larger models on math and logic benchmarks.
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
LEAD uses online adaptive mechanisms including Potential-Scaled Instability and symmetric efficiency rewards based on correct rollouts to achieve higher accuracy-efficiency scores with substantially shorter reasoning outputs than base models on math benchmarks.
Think-with-Rubrics has LLMs generate rubrics internally before responding, outperforming external rubric-as-reward baselines by 3.87 points on average across benchmarks.
Presents MBFC-2025 dataset and multi-view embeddings with fusion methods for media bias and factuality, reporting SOTA results on ACL-2020 and new benchmarks on MBFC-2025.
Incisor uses program analysis and frontier LLMs to select working AWS EC2 instances ex ante for 100% of first-time HPC runs of C/C++/Fortran and Python codes, cutting runtime 54% and costs 44% versus an expert-constrained SkyPilot baseline.
Applying Canonical Correlation Analysis to paired residual activations from natural-language and symbolic reasoning chains in LLMs reveals a low-dimensional shared logical subspace that can steer the model's reasoning for up to 11 percentage point accuracy gains on logical benchmarks.
Self-Correcting RAG formalizes retrieval as MMKP to maximize information density under token limits and uses NLI-guided MCTS to validate faithfulness, raising accuracy and cutting hallucinations on six multi-hop QA and fact-checking datasets.
iTAG generates natural text paired with accurate causal graph annotations by framing concept assignment as an inverse problem and refining selections via chain-of-thought reasoning until the text's relations align with the target causal structure.
Chain-of-Thought prompting balances high accuracy with low energy use in small language models for code generation, while multi-sampling strategies add high energy costs for small accuracy gains.
LEAD lets LLMs solve checkers jumping puzzles up to size 13 by using lookahead to recover from irreversible errors on hard steps that break extreme decomposition.
Video-R1 uses temporal-aware RL and mixed datasets to boost video reasoning in MLLMs, with a 7B model reaching 37.1% on VSI-Bench and surpassing GPT-4o.
Coconut lets LLMs perform reasoning directly in continuous latent space by recycling hidden states as inputs, outperforming standard chain-of-thought on search-intensive logical tasks with better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs.
Medusa augments LLMs with multiple decoding heads and tree-based attention to predict and verify several tokens in parallel, yielding 2.2-3.6x inference speedup via two fine-tuning regimes.
Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.
Visual ChatGPT integrates visual foundation models with ChatGPT via prompts to enable multi-step image understanding, generation, and editing in conversational interactions.
The authors present a catalog of prompt patterns that provide reusable solutions to common problems in generating and interacting with outputs from LLMs.
PoT prompting improves numerical reasoning by having language models write programs executed by a computer instead of performing calculations in natural language chains of thought, with an average 12% gain over CoT.
LRS trains a latent reward model on final-answer correctness to steer SAE states during inference, improving reasoning performance and implicitly encouraging better cognitive behaviors.
Introduces TableGrid Navigation (TGN) and Progressive Inference Prompting (PIP) as training-free structured prompting frameworks that improve LLM performance on table question answering over baselines on TableBench and achieve SOTA on FeTaQa.
MT-JailBench is a modular benchmark that standardizes evaluation of multi-turn jailbreaks to identify key success drivers and enable stronger combined attacks.
PaT defers planning until after failed trials in LLM code generation, enabling heterogeneous cheap-plus-powerful model setups that match large-model performance at roughly 69% lower cost.
citing papers explorer
-
Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Tree of Thoughts enables language models to solve complex planning tasks by generating, evaluating, and searching over coherent intermediate thoughts in a tree, raising Game of 24 success from 4% to 74% with GPT-4.
-
Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
-
LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models
LEAD uses online adaptive mechanisms including Potential-Scaled Instability and symmetric efficiency rewards based on correct rollouts to achieve higher accuracy-efficiency scores with substantially shorter reasoning outputs than base models on math benchmarks.
-
Think-with-Rubrics: From External Evaluator to Internal Reasoning Guidance
Think-with-Rubrics has LLMs generate rubrics internally before responding, outperforming external rubric-as-reward baselines by 3.87 points on average across benchmarks.
-
Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMs
Video-R1 uses temporal-aware RL and mixed datasets to boost video reasoning in MLLMs, with a 7B model reaching 37.1% on VSI-Bench and surpassing GPT-4o.
-
Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Models
Visual ChatGPT integrates visual foundation models with ChatGPT via prompts to enable multi-step image understanding, generation, and editing in conversational interactions.
-
PaT: Planning-after-Trial for Efficient Test-Time Code Generation
PaT defers planning until after failed trials in LLM code generation, enabling heterogeneous cheap-plus-powerful model setups that match large-model performance at roughly 69% lower cost.
-
Measuring Representation Robustness in Large Language Models for Geometry
LLMs display accuracy gaps of up to 14 percentage points on the same geometry problems solely due to representation choice, with vector forms consistently weakest and a convert-then-solve prompt helping only high-capacity models.
-
Oblivion: Self-Adaptive Agentic Memory Control through Decay-Driven Activation
Oblivion is a decay-driven memory framework that decouples read and write paths in LLM agents to enable adaptive forgetting and reinforcement for better long-horizon reasoning.
-
CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society
CAMEL proposes a role-playing framework with inception prompting that enables autonomous multi-agent cooperation among LLMs and generates conversational data for studying their behaviors.
-
From Agent Loops to Deterministic Graphs: Execution Lineage for Reproducible AI-Native Work
Execution lineage models AI-native work as a DAG of computations with explicit dependencies, achieving perfect state preservation in controlled update tasks where loop-based agents introduce churn and contamination.
-
Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models
The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applications across domains.
-
From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models
The survey organizes the shift of LLMs toward deliberate System 2 reasoning, covering model construction techniques, performance on math and coding benchmarks, and future research directions.
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey of RAG paradigms, components, benchmarks, and challenges for improving LLMs on knowledge-intensive tasks.