Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback

Canonical reference. 92% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

57 Pith papers citing it
67 external citations · Pith
Background 92% of classified citations
abstract

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, but gathering high-quality preference labels is expensive. RL from AI Feedback (RLAIF), introduced in Bai et al., offers a promising alternative that trains the reward model (RM) on preferences generated by an off-the-shelf LLM. Across the tasks of summarization, helpful dialogue generation, and harmless dialogue generation, we show that RLAIF achieves comparable performance to RLHF. Furthermore, we take a step towards "self-improvement" by demonstrating that RLAIF can outperform a supervised fine-tuned baseline even when the AI labeler is the same size as the policy, or even the exact same checkpoint as the initial policy. Finally, we introduce direct-RLAIF (d-RLAIF) - a technique that circumvents RM training by obtaining rewards directly from an off-the-shelf LLM during RL, which achieves superior performance to canonical RLAIF. Our results suggest that RLAIF can achieve performance on-par with using human feedback, offering a potential solution to the scalability limitations of RLHF.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10 dataset 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

polarities

background 11 extend 1

representative citing papers

What Drives Interactive Improvement from Feedback?

cs.AI · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Controlled student-teacher experiments across four benchmarks show interactive gains are driven more by the student's ability to use feedback than by teacher quality, with self-feedback adding little beyond unguided retries.

Self-Rewarding Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-01-18 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.

TeamTR: Trust-Region Fine-Tuning for Multi-Agent LLM Coordination

cs.LG · 2026-05-01 · accept · novelty 6.5

Stale-occupancy sequential fine-tuning of multi-agent LLMs incurs an O(n²) certificate penalty; TeamTR resamples under intermediate occupancy and enforces token-level trust regions to restore O(n) scaling and stable gains.

RLVP: Penalize the Path, Reward the Outcome

cs.LG · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Pairing outcome rewards with verifiable per-action path penalties reduces constraint violations nearly sixfold at equal task success, while a progress potential accelerates learning only where partial progress is reachable.

Online Data Selection Is Implicit Alignment

cs.LG · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Online SFT data selection acts as an implicit preference model, shifting refusal rates, verbosity, and sycophancy in directions predictable from the selected data's attribute mixture.

MAPL: Multi-Objective Preference Learning for Robot Locomotion

cs.RO · 2026-06-24 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

MAPL trains quadruped locomotion policies from LLM-generated multi-objective trajectory preferences and matches or exceeds expert-designed reward performance in four environments without manual reward engineering.

A Unifying Lens on Reward Uncertainty in RLHF

cs.LG · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A distributional reward model p(r|x,y) yields the closed-form effective reward ilde r(x,y) = eta ext{log} ext{E}_p[e^{r/eta}] (pessimistic branch) that unifies prior RLHF aggregation heuristics under Bayesian or KL-DRO views.

Alignment Dynamics in LLM Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The paper introduces a dynamical model that decomposes alignment updates in LLM fine-tuning into rebound and driving forces and predicts a rehearsal priming effect.

Deep Pre-Alignment for VLMs

cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Deep Pre-Alignment uses a small VLM perceiver instead of ViT to pre-align visual features with LLM text space, yielding 1.9-3.0 point gains on multimodal benchmarks and 32.9% less language forgetting.

STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

STRIDE co-trains generator and verifier on outcome rewards alone to deliver learnable stepwise language feedback that redirects LLM reasoning trajectories and outperforms scalar-reward baselines.

BalCapRL: A Balanced Framework for RL-Based MLLM Image Captioning

cs.CV · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

BalCapRL applies balanced multi-objective RL with GDPO-style normalization and length-conditional masking to improve MLLM image captioning, reporting gains of up to +13.6 DCScore, +9.0 CaptionQA, and +29.0 CapArena on LLaVA and Qwen models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 57 citing papers.