pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework

Canonical reference. 92% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

162 Pith papers citing it
Background 92% of classified citations
abstract

Remarkable progress has been made on automated problem solving through societies of agents based on large language models (LLMs). Existing LLM-based multi-agent systems can already solve simple dialogue tasks. Solutions to more complex tasks, however, are complicated through logic inconsistencies due to cascading hallucinations caused by naively chaining LLMs. Here we introduce MetaGPT, an innovative meta-programming framework incorporating efficient human workflows into LLM-based multi-agent collaborations. MetaGPT encodes Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) into prompt sequences for more streamlined workflows, thus allowing agents with human-like domain expertise to verify intermediate results and reduce errors. MetaGPT utilizes an assembly line paradigm to assign diverse roles to various agents, efficiently breaking down complex tasks into subtasks involving many agents working together. On collaborative software engineering benchmarks, MetaGPT generates more coherent solutions than previous chat-based multi-agent systems. Our project can be found at https://github.com/geekan/MetaGPT

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 35 method 2 dataset 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Remarkable progress has been made on automated problem solving through societies of agents based on large language models (LLMs). Existing LLM-based multi-agent systems can already solve simple dialogue tasks. Solutions to more complex tasks, however, are complicated through logic inconsistencies due to cascading hallucinations caused by naively chaining LLMs. Here we introduce MetaGPT, an innovative meta-programming framework incorporating efficient human workflows into LLM-based multi-agent collaborations. MetaGPT encodes Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) into prompt sequences for mor

authors

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?

cs.AI · 2025-03-17 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

The authors create the first large-scale dataset and taxonomy of failure modes in multi-agent LLM systems to explain their limited performance gains.

Glite ARF: Verifier-Driven Research with Parallel LLM Coding Agents

cs.MA · 2026-06-25 · accept · novelty 7.0

Glite ARF introduces a verifier-driven three-role framework for parallel LLM coding agents, demonstrated by first- and second-place finishes in the BEA 2026 vocabulary-difficulty shared task across three languages with 29.9-35.9% RMSE reduction at ~$450 API cost.

RTSGameBench: An RTS Benchmark for Strategic Reasoning by Vision-Language Models

cs.AI · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RTSGameBench is a new extensible benchmark for VLMs using diverse RTS matchups, diagnostic mini-games targeting individual competencies, and a self-evolving query-to-game generator, with results showing poor VLM performance on tight coordination and large-scale tasks.

ADK Arena: Evaluating Agent Development Kits via LLM-as-a-Developer

cs.SE · 2026-06-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ADK Arena evaluates 51 Python ADKs by having an LLM learn each framework's API, write and repair agent code, and run on benchmarks, finding 57% success rate, 5.6x cost variation, no dominant framework, and substitutable information sources.

OctoT2I: A Self-Evolving Agentic Text-to-Image Router

cs.AI · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

OctoT2I uses a no-supervision PSEL loop to discover model capability frontiers and route T2I tasks, reaching 0.96 GenEval score with 90.3% speedup over Flow-GRPO.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers after filters.

  • AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation cs.CL · 2023-12-20 · accept · none · ref 17 · internal anchor

    A three-agent loop of code generation, test creation, and execution feedback lifts pass@1 to 96.3% on HumanEval and 91.8% on MBPP for GPT-4 while using roughly half the tokens of prior state-of-the-art.

  • GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants cs.CL · 2023-11-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 51 · internal anchor

    GAIA benchmark shows humans at 92% accuracy on simple real-world questions far outperform current AI systems at 15%, proposing this gap as a key milestone for general AI.

  • Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents cs.AI · 2023-09-05 · accept · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    CoALA is a modular cognitive architecture for language agents that organizes memory components, action spaces for internal and external interaction, and a generalized decision-making loop to support more systematic development of capable agents.

  • A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents cs.AI · 2023-08-22 · accept · none · ref 23 · internal anchor

    A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future directions.

  • AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users cs.CV · 2023-12-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 9 · internal anchor

    AppAgent lets large language models operate diverse smartphone apps via visual interactions and learns app usage from exploration or demonstrations.

  • A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models cs.CL · 2023-07-12 · unverdicted · none · ref 229 · internal anchor

    A survey paper providing an overview of Large Language Models, their background, and recent advances in the field.