Pith. sign in

super hub Mixed citations

Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (68%).

148 Pith papers citing it
Background 68% of classified citations
abstract

Like humans, large language models (LLMs) do not always generate the best output on their first try. Motivated by how humans refine their written text, we introduce Self-Refine, an approach for improving initial outputs from LLMs through iterative feedback and refinement. The main idea is to generate an initial output using an LLMs; then, the same LLMs provides feedback for its output and uses it to refine itself, iteratively. Self-Refine does not require any supervised training data, additional training, or reinforcement learning, and instead uses a single LLM as the generator, refiner, and feedback provider. We evaluate Self-Refine across 7 diverse tasks, ranging from dialog response generation to mathematical reasoning, using state-of-the-art (GPT-3.5, ChatGPT, and GPT-4) LLMs. Across all evaluated tasks, outputs generated with Self-Refine are preferred by humans and automatic metrics over those generated with the same LLM using conventional one-step generation, improving by ~20% absolute on average in task performance. Our work demonstrates that even state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 can be further improved at test time using our simple, standalone approach.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 23 baseline 2 method 2 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Like humans, large language models (LLMs) do not always generate the best output on their first try. Motivated by how humans refine their written text, we introduce Self-Refine, an approach for improving initial outputs from LLMs through iterative feedback and refinement. The main idea is to generate an initial output using an LLMs; then, the same LLMs provides feedback for its output and uses it to refine itself, iteratively. Self-Refine does not require any supervised training data, additional training, or reinforcement learning, and instead uses a single LLM as the generator, refiner, and f

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

AlgoBench: Benchmarking Algorithmic Adaptation in Code Generation

cs.SE · 2026-06-30 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AlgoBench creates traceable variants of competitive programming problems via constraint shifts that invalidate original algorithms, paired with complexity metrics that reveal LLMs often produce functionally correct but asymptotically unsuitable solutions.

Weak-to-Strong Elicitation via Mismatched Wrong Drafts

cs.CL · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Mismatched wrong drafts from Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B improve Mathstral-7B GRPO training, reaching 71.98% greedy pass@1 on MATH-500 and lifting AIME 2025/2026 pass@k over baselines and other draft variants.

Test-Time Hinting for Black-Box Vision-Language Models

cs.CV · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Test-Time Hinting trains a hint generator to prepend contextual guidance to VLM prompts, improving accuracy on natural-image VQA benchmarks with generalization to unseen tasks and models.

Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Fast-Slow Training uses context optimization as fast weights alongside parameter updates as slow weights to achieve up to 3x better sample efficiency, higher performance, and less catastrophic forgetting than standard RL in continual LLM learning.

Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discovery

cs.CR · 2026-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AgentFlow uses a typed graph DSL covering roles, prompts, tools, topology and protocol plus a runtime-signal feedback loop to optimize multi-agent harnesses, reaching 84.3% on TerminalBench-2 and discovering ten new zero-days in Chrome including two critical sandbox escapes.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 148 citing papers.