Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models

Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

51 Pith papers citing it
17 external citations · Pith
Background 100% of classified citations
abstract

Language has long been conceived as an essential tool for human reasoning. The breakthrough of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked significant research interest in leveraging these models to tackle complex reasoning tasks. Researchers have moved beyond simple autoregressive token generation by introducing the concept of "thought" -- a sequence of tokens representing intermediate steps in the reasoning process. This innovative paradigm enables LLMs' to mimic complex human reasoning processes, such as tree search and reflective thinking. Recently, an emerging trend of learning to reason has applied reinforcement learning (RL) to train LLMs to master reasoning processes. This approach enables the automatic generation of high-quality reasoning trajectories through trial-and-error search algorithms, significantly expanding LLMs' reasoning capacity by providing substantially more training data. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that encouraging LLMs to "think" with more tokens during test-time inference can further significantly boost reasoning accuracy. Therefore, the train-time and test-time scaling combined to show a new research frontier -- a path toward Large Reasoning Model. The introduction of OpenAI's o1 series marks a significant milestone in this research direction. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review of recent progress in LLM reasoning. We begin by introducing the foundational background of LLMs and then explore the key technical components driving the development of large reasoning models, with a focus on automated data construction, learning-to-reason techniques, and test-time scaling. We also analyze popular open-source projects at building large reasoning models, and conclude with open challenges and future research directions.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10

citation-polarity summary

polarities

background 10

representative citing papers

Bayesian Social Deduction with Graph-Informed Language Models

cs.AI · 2025-06-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Hybrid Bayesian-graph LLM agent reaches competitive performance against large models and achieves 67% win rate against humans in controlled Avalon play, outperforming baselines and human teammates.

ToxiREX: A Dataset on Toxic REasoning in ConteXt

cs.CL · 2026-06-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ToxiREX is a new dataset of 128k Reddit comments in six languages with hierarchical annotations for implicit toxicity in conversational context based on an existing reasoning schema.

ThoughtFold: Folding Reasoning Chains via Introspective Preference Learning

cs.AI · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ThoughtFold applies introspective redundancy detection within correct CoT trajectories to create sub-trajectory spectra, then uses masked preference optimization to penalize redundant explorations, yielding 56% token reduction on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B while preserving accuracy.

CA-BED: Conversation-Aware Bayesian Experimental Design

cs.CL · 2026-05-31 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CA-BED uses Bayesian experimental design and simulated conversation trees with LLM likelihoods to optimize multi-turn question selection, reporting 21.8% higher success rates than direct prompting on entity-deduction benchmarks.

Reasoning Fails Where Step Flow Breaks

cs.AI · 2026-04-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Step-Saliency identifies shallow lock-in and deep decay in reasoning model attention flows, and StepFlow intervention repairs them to improve accuracy across LRMs.

Retrieval-of-Thought: Efficient Reasoning via Reusing Thoughts

cs.AI · 2025-09-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Retrieval-of-Thought organizes prior reasoning into a thought graph for retrieval and reward-guided recombination, reducing output tokens by up to 40% and latency by 82% while preserving accuracy on reasoning benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 51 citing papers.