EGLR adds a deterministic layer-recursion axis gated by entropy that is complementary to temperature sampling, raising joint oracle accuracy on MATH-500 from 83.4% to 91.6% for a 3B model.
super hub Canonical reference
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
Canonical reference. 85% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
278
Pith papers citing it
Background
85% of classified citations
abstract
Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time computation is a critical step towards building generally self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering the question: if an LLM is allowed to use a fixed but non-trivial amount of inference-time compute, how much can it improve its performance on a challenging prompt? Answering this question has implications not only on the achievable performance of LLMs, but also on the future of LLM pretraining and how one should tradeoff inference-time and pre-training compute. Despite its importance, little research attempted to understand the scaling behaviors of various test-time inference methods. Moreover, current work largely provides negative results for a number of these strategies. In this work, we analyze two primary mechanisms to scale test-time computation: (1) searching against dense, process-based verifier reward models; and (2) updating the model's distribution over a response adaptively, given the prompt at test time. We find that in both cases, the effectiveness of different approaches to scaling test-time compute critically varies depending on the difficulty of the prompt. This observation motivates applying a "compute-optimal" scaling strategy, which acts to most effectively allocate test-time compute adaptively per prompt. Using this compute-optimal strategy, we can improve the efficiency of test-time compute scaling by more than 4x compared to a best-of-N baseline. Additionally, in a FLOPs-matched evaluation, we find that on problems where a smaller base model attains somewhat non-trivial success rates, test-time compute can be used to outperform a 14x larger model.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 48
dataset 3
method 3
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time computation is a critical step towards building generally self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering the question: if an LLM is allowed to use a fixed but non-trivial amount of inference-time compute, how much can it improve its performance on a challenging prompt? Answering this question has implications not only on the achievable performance of LLMs, but also on the future of LLM pretraining and how one
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
UniQL is a human-verified benchmark providing aligned natural language questions and dialect-specific SQL queries for 16 SQL systems to evaluate cross-dialect generalization.
AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.
Test-time training with KV binding reduces to learned linear attention.
Physics-IQ benchmark reveals that generative video models exhibit limited physical understanding unrelated to their visual quality.
MedPRMBench is the first fine-grained benchmark for process reward models in medical reasoning, featuring 6500 questions, 13000 chains, 113910 step labels, and a baseline that improves downstream QA accuracy by 3.2-6.7 points.
Multi-agent LLMs generate and verify 14,073 deterministic reaction rules from 665,901 patents, enabling 97.7% classification of unseen reactions with finer resolution than fixed proprietary systems.
MSQA benchmark shows LLMs exhibit cultural degradation and a locality effect where competence tracks pre-training exposure more than reasoning, and common inference-time fixes do not resolve it.
Preregistered placebo-controlled decomposition shows external executable counterexamples drive self-repair gains in small code models more than re-exposure or self-critique.
LBR performs token-level test-time scaling via local branch routing on hidden states, enabling end-to-end RL training and improving Pass@1 and Pass@32 on math benchmarks over CoT and RLVR baselines.
KCSAT-ML benchmark supplies human error rates for math problems and DRG metric exposes that model accuracy collapses on high-human-error items while test-time scaling shows non-monotonic gains and alignment failures.
Three problem-level trajectory features derived from the distributional signature of failed LLM rollouts enable failure clustering at 84.3% accuracy and a training-free routing rule that improves rescue by 12.2% on hard cases.
TTT-RTL performs per-design test-time RL on an LLM policy with EDA-derived PPA rewards and an adaptive KL controller, reducing geometric-mean PPA product by 65.1% on RTLLM v2.0 and ADP by 59.4% on an industrial FPU unit.
LLMs achieve up to 78.8% accuracy and r=0.590 correlation mimicking individual SOEP respondents using cumulative microdata, with gains from more information but diminishing returns past the 75% entropy point.
Consequence-aware scheduler using an issue-text predictor routes more compute to high-cost failures and cuts cost-weighted loss by 22-33% versus difficulty-based allocation on SWE-bench tasks.
Rotate2Think estimates an orthogonal rotation from input to thinking embeddings via Procrustes analysis on a few examples and injects the resulting vector to prime reasoning traces, raising accuracy in 30 of 32 model-benchmark settings.
VLMs formulate differentiable rewards from task-specific rules to enable test-time online LoRA optimization of VGMs, delivering 16.7-point gains on symbolic and general video reasoning benchmarks over VLM-as-solver and Best-of-N baselines.
ATLAS introduces an LLM-orchestrated agentic framework for dynamic test-time scaling via extensible 'explore' actions, achieving higher accuracy with fewer API calls than fixed-workflow baselines on four benchmarks.
RiM trains LLMs to perform latent reasoning via fixed memory blocks processed in one forward pass using a two-stage curriculum, matching or exceeding prior latent methods on benchmarks.
The paper identifies unfaithful capitulation, a failure mode where chain-of-thought remains correct but the emitted answer flips wrong under sustained adversarial pressure in multi-turn dialogue.
LaneRoPE adds an inter-sequence attention mask and extended RoPE to enable collaborative parallel sequence generation in LLMs, yielding accuracy gains on math reasoning under length limits.
Co-ReAct adds step-level rubric guidance to ReAct agents via a GRPO-trained generator using list-wise ranking rewards, yielding consistent gains on DeepResearchBench and SQA-CS-V2.
HIDBench unifies DARPA-E3, DARPA-E5, and NodLink datasets with a data pipeline to benchmark LLMs for host-based intrusion detection, showing high precision on simple logs but sharp drops in MCC and rises in false positives on complex noisy data.
Anchored Tree Sampling converts horizon-compounding drift into anchor-bounded drift by organizing video generation as a sparse-to-dense tree of imputations instead of left-to-right autoregressive rollout.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.