Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Achieving Verified Robustness to Symbol Substitutions via Interval Bound Propagation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.01492 v2 pith:HLRUAN2J submitted 2019-09-03 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LGstat.ML

Achieving Verified Robustness to Symbol Substitutions via Interval Bound Propagation

classification cs.CL cs.CRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords perturbationsadversarialcomeverifiedaccuracyadversariesattacksbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks are part of many contemporary NLP systems, yet their empirical successes come at the price of vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Previous work has used adversarial training and data augmentation to partially mitigate such brittleness, but these are unlikely to find worst-case adversaries due to the complexity of the search space arising from discrete text perturbations. In this work, we approach the problem from the opposite direction: to formally verify a system's robustness against a predefined class of adversarial attacks. We study text classification under synonym replacements or character flip perturbations. We propose modeling these input perturbations as a simplex and then using Interval Bound Propagation -- a formal model verification method. We modify the conventional log-likelihood training objective to train models that can be efficiently verified, which would otherwise come with exponential search complexity. The resulting models show only little difference in terms of nominal accuracy, but have much improved verified accuracy under perturbations and come with an efficiently computable formal guarantee on worst case adversaries.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.

  2. Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Learning a margin-based confidence ranker for LLM judges improves agreement-target success in cascaded selective evaluation compared to heuristic confidence scores.

  3. Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Develops a margin-adaptive learned confidence estimator for LLMs with generalization guarantees to improve agreement rates with human judgments over heuristic baselines.