REVIEW 2 cited by
Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs
read the original abstract
Question answering (QA) over knowledge bases (KBs) is challenging because of the diverse, essentially unbounded, types of reasoning patterns needed. However, we hypothesize in a large KB, reasoning patterns required to answer a query type reoccur for various entities in their respective subgraph neighborhoods. Leveraging this structural similarity between local neighborhoods of different subgraphs, we introduce a semiparametric model (CBR-SUBG) with (i) a nonparametric component that for each query, dynamically retrieves other similar $k$-nearest neighbor (KNN) training queries along with query-specific subgraphs and (ii) a parametric component that is trained to identify the (latent) reasoning patterns from the subgraphs of KNN queries and then apply them to the subgraph of the target query. We also propose an adaptive subgraph collection strategy to select a query-specific compact subgraph, allowing us to scale to full Freebase KB containing billions of facts. We show that CBR-SUBG can answer queries requiring subgraph reasoning patterns and performs competitively with the best models on several KBQA benchmarks. Our subgraph collection strategy also produces more compact subgraphs (e.g. 55\% reduction in size for WebQSP while increasing answer recall by 4.85\%)\footnote{Code, model, and subgraphs are available at \url{https://github.com/rajarshd/CBR-SUBG}}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Short-Duration Gamma-ray Burst and Afterglow Rates in the Rubin and Roman Era
Using a re-fitted BNS-sGRB population model and AfterglowPy simulations, the paper forecasts ~5 on-axis and ~11 orphan afterglows per year for LSST, and <1.4 joint optical-GW afterglows per year in LIGO O5.
-
Short-Duration Gamma-ray Burst and Afterglow Rates in the Rubin and Roman Era
Simulations predict LSST will detect roughly 5 on-axis and 11 orphan afterglows per year, Roman is suited for faint events, but fewer than 1.4 events per year are expected in the aLIGO O5 range across jet models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.