Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with varepsilon--perturbation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.16589 v1 pith:CTHOE5OZ submitted 2022-10-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.ITmath.OC

Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with varepsilon--perturbation

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.ITmath.OC
keywords perturbationstrongnetworkneuralvarepsilonweightanswerchange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) claims the existence of a subnetwork in a sufficiently large, randomly initialized neural network that approximates some target neural network without the need of training. We extend the theoretical guarantee of the strong LTH literature to a scenario more similar to the original LTH, by generalizing the weight change in the pre-training step to some perturbation around initialization. In particular, we focus on the following open questions: By allowing an $\varepsilon$-scale perturbation on the random initial weights, can we reduce the over-parameterization requirement for the candidate network in the strong LTH? Furthermore, does the weight change by SGD coincide with a good set of such perturbation? We answer the first question by first extending the theoretical result on subset sum to allow perturbation on the candidates. Applying this result to the neural network setting, we show that such $\varepsilon$-perturbation reduces the over-parameterization requirement of the strong LTH. To answer the second question, we show via experiments that the perturbed weight achieved by the projected SGD shows better performance under the strong LTH pruning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.