REVIEW 10 cited by
Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the field of natural language processing (NLP), providing a highly useful, task-agnostic foundation for a wide range of applications. However, directly applying LLMs to solve sophisticated problems in specific domains meets many hurdles, caused by the heterogeneity of domain data, the sophistication of domain knowledge, the uniqueness of domain objectives, and the diversity of the constraints (e.g., various social norms, cultural conformity, religious beliefs, and ethical standards in the domain applications). Domain specification techniques are key to make large language models disruptive in many applications. Specifically, to solve these hurdles, there has been a notable increase in research and practices conducted in recent years on the domain specialization of LLMs. This emerging field of study, with its substantial potential for impact, necessitates a comprehensive and systematic review to better summarize and guide ongoing work in this area. In this article, we present a comprehensive survey on domain specification techniques for large language models, an emerging direction critical for large language model applications. First, we propose a systematic taxonomy that categorizes the LLM domain-specialization techniques based on the accessibility to LLMs and summarizes the framework for all the subcategories as well as their relations and differences to each other. Second, we present an extensive taxonomy of critical application domains that can benefit dramatically from specialized LLMs, discussing their practical significance and open challenges. Last, we offer our insights into the current research status and future trends in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
TS-Reasoner: Domain-Oriented Time Series Inference Agents for Reasoning and Automated Analysis
TS-Reasoner is a domain-oriented agent using LLMs, computational tools, and error feedback for multi-step time series inference, showing better performance than general LLMs on understanding and reasoning benchmarks.
-
When AI Reviews Its Own Code: Recursive Self-Training Collapse in Code LLMs
Experiments across code LLMs show no-review collapses fastest, human-gated filters slow collapse, and AI self-gates lose effect over time, degenerating to ungated self-training under self-confirming acceptance as prov...
-
When LLM Meets Time Series: Can LLMs Perform Multi-Step Time Series Reasoning and Inference
TSAIA, a new benchmark, tests eight LLMs on 1,054 multi-step time series tasks and finds they cannot reliably complete the required workflows.
-
ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs
A principled reward design for tool selection and application in RL-trained LLMs delivers 17% gains over base models and 15% over SFT across benchmarks.
-
Predicate Importance Estimation and Decoupled Rationale-Score Distillation for Entity Alignment
PIE creates predicate-aware embeddings by weighting subjectless triples and DRSD distills LLM reasoning into an SLM while decoupling confidence from rationales to improve entity alignment and enable human-in-the-loop ...
-
Knowledge-Driven Hallucination in Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Process Modeling
LLMs override explicit source evidence with internal knowledge when modeling business processes, creating a measurable reliability risk in analytical tasks.
-
CEQuest: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Construction Estimation
A new 164-question benchmark shows that current LLMs score between 62% and 75% on construction drawing interpretation and estimation tasks.
-
Assessment of RAG and Fine-Tuning for Industrial Question-Answering-Applications
RAG is more effective and cost-efficient than fine-tuning for industrial QA adaptation on automotive datasets.
-
Improving Topic Modeling of Social Media Short Texts with Rephrasing: A Case Study of COVID-19 Related Tweets
LLM rephrasing of tweets before topic modeling raises Wikipedia-measured coherence (LDA 0.31→0.50) but the abstract's claim of broad improvements is contradicted by the paper's own table for LDA and by the metric choice.
-
Towards EnergyGPT: A Large Language Model Specialized for the Energy Sector
Fine-tuned LLaMA 3.1-8B variants for the energy sector outperform the base model on domain QA benchmarks, with LoRA delivering similar gains at lower training cost.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.