REVIEW 15 cited by
Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Survey of Resource-Efficient Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Survey of Resource-Efficient Large Language Models
read the original abstract
The burgeoning field of Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by sophisticated models like OpenAI's ChatGPT, represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence. These models, however, bring forth substantial challenges in the high consumption of computational, memory, energy, and financial resources, especially in environments with limited resource capabilities. This survey aims to systematically address these challenges by reviewing a broad spectrum of techniques designed to enhance the resource efficiency of LLMs. We categorize methods based on their optimization focus: computational, memory, energy, financial, and network resources and their applicability across various stages of an LLM's lifecycle, including architecture design, pretraining, finetuning, and system design. Additionally, the survey introduces a nuanced categorization of resource efficiency techniques by their specific resource types, which uncovers the intricate relationships and mappings between various resources and corresponding optimization techniques. A standardized set of evaluation metrics and datasets is also presented to facilitate consistent and fair comparisons across different models and techniques. By offering a comprehensive overview of the current sota and identifying open research avenues, this survey serves as a foundational reference for researchers and practitioners, aiding them in developing more sustainable and efficient LLMs in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
Revisiting the Effectiveness of LLM Pruning for Test-Time Scaling
Unstructured pruning augments test-time scaling reasoning performance in LLMs and can outperform the unpruned model on benchmarks, contrary to expectations from structured pruning studies.
-
When AI Reviews Its Own Code: Recursive Self-Training Collapse in Code LLMs
Experiments across code LLMs show no-review collapses fastest, human-gated filters slow collapse, and AI self-gates lose effect over time, degenerating to ungated self-training under self-confirming acceptance as prov...
-
DrugSAGE:Self-evolving Agent Experience for Efficient State-of-the-Art Drug Discovery
DrugSAGE accumulates cross-task memory of skills, statistical evidence, and recurring errors to let LLM agents achieve top-ranked performance on molecular property prediction tasks with reduced or zero test-time search.
-
Watt Counts: Energy-Aware Benchmark for Sustainable LLM Inference on Heterogeneous GPU Architectures
Watt Counts supplies over 5,000 energy measurements across 50 LLMs and 10 GPUs and shows that hardware-aware selection can reduce server-scenario energy use by up to 70 percent with little effect on user experience.
-
EinSort: Sorting is All We Need for Tensorizing LLM
Sorting tensor indices enables an adaptive tensorization method that discovers low-rank structure in LLM weights and KV caches, yielding better reconstruction quality than baselines.
-
MorphoQuant: Modality-Aware Quantization for Omni-modal Large Language Models
MorphoQuant proposes DABC and MDQFO for 4-bit quantization of omni-modal LLMs, claiming superior performance over SOTA W4A4 methods and even W4A16 baselines on benchmarks like ScienceQA.
-
Revisiting the Effectiveness of LLM Pruning for Test-Time Scaling
Unstructured pruning augments test-time scaling performance in reasoning LLMs on four benchmarks, outperforming structured pruning and at times the unpruned models.
-
Distributed Generative Inference of LLM at Internet Scales with Multi-Dimensional Communication Optimization
BloomBee is a distributed LLM inference system that achieves up to 1.76x higher throughput and 43.2% lower latency than prior decentralized systems by optimizing communication across multiple dimensions in low-bandwid...
-
HAFM: Hierarchical Autoregressive Foundation Model for Music Accompaniment Generation
A three-stage hierarchical AR model with dual-rate HuBERT/EnCodec tokens improves vocal-conditioned accompaniment generation, reaching FAD 1.71 and 51.5% preference vs ground truth on MUSDB18.
-
HAFM: Hierarchical Autoregressive Foundation Model for Music Accompaniment Generation
HAFM uses a hierarchical autoregressive model with dual-rate HuBERT and EnCodec tokens to generate coherent instrumental music from vocals, achieving FAD 2.08 on MUSDB18 while matching prior systems with fewer parameters.
-
Green Prompting: Characterizing Prompt-driven Energy Costs of LLM Inference
Empirical tests on three LLMs show prompt semantics and task keywords drive inference energy costs more than length, with varying patterns by task.
-
AI Safety Landscape for Large Language Models: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, and Future Directions
The paper introduces a taxonomy of AI safety for LLMs organized into Trustworthy AI, Responsible AI, and Safe AI perspectives, accompanied by a review of state-of-the-art methods, challenges, and future directions.
-
Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Survey
A survey that frames data selection, memory optimization, and compute budgeting as coupled bottlenecks in LLM training rather than isolated techniques.
-
Network Edge Inference for Large Language Models: Principles, Techniques, and Opportunities
A survey synthesizing challenges, system architectures, model optimizations, deployment methods, and resource management techniques for large language model inference at the network edge.
-
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.