pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.13668 · v3 · submitted 2024-01-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Artificial Precision Timing Array: bridging the decihertz gravitational-wave sensitivity gap with clock satellites

Lucas M. B. Alves , Andrew G. Sullivan , Xingyu Ji , Do\u{g}a Veske , Imre Bartos , Sebastian Will , Zsuzsa M\'arka , Szabolcs M\'arka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords artificial precision timing arraydecihertz gravitational wavessatellite clocksintermediate-mass black holespulsar timinggravitational wave detectionsolar system array
0
0 comments X

The pith

Six satellites carrying 10^{-18} clocks can achieve pristine sensitivity to decihertz gravitational waves and detect intermediate-mass black hole mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes the Artificial Precision Timing Array, a solar-system network of satellites that emit periodic timing signals, to fill the decihertz gap in gravitational-wave detection. It calculates that six satellites equipped with clocks already attainable at 10^{-18} relative uncertainty would suffice to reach the sensitivity needed to observe 10^3 to 10^4 solar-mass black hole mergers and the early inspiral phases of heavier binaries seen by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA. The approach adapts established pulsar-timing methods to artificial sources whose positions and signals can be controlled from Earth. If the required clock performance holds after subtraction of orbital and propagation effects, APTA would open direct access to a frequency band containing sources inaccessible to both ground-based interferometers and proposed space-based detectors.

Core claim

A constellation of six artificial pulsars—satellites carrying precision time references—can form an array whose timing residuals yield gravitational-wave sensitivity in the decihertz band once clock noise reaches 10^{-18} at one-second averaging; this performance level, already demonstrated by ground-based atomic clocks, is projected to capture 10^3–10^4 M_⊙ black-hole mergers and early inspirals of heavier compact binaries.

What carries the argument

The Artificial Precision Timing Array (APTA), a solar-system array of precision-time-reference-carrying satellites that emit periodic electromagnetic signals toward Earth or another receiver constellation.

If this is right

  • APTA with the stated configuration would observe 10^3–10^4 solar-mass black-hole mergers.
  • It would capture the early inspiral of heavy binaries whose final mergers fall in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA band.
  • Future clock technologies expected within the next decade would extend sensitivity to a wider range of sources and surpass other proposed decihertz concepts.
  • The method establishes a new design space for gravitational-wave detectors based on controlled artificial timing sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Multi-band observations could combine APTA decihertz data with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detections to improve source localization and parameter estimation.
  • If clock performance improves further, APTA might also constrain primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds in the same band.
  • Ground-based clock comparisons and orbital ranging tests could serve as incremental validation steps before full constellation deployment.

Load-bearing premise

Clock timing noise remains the dominant limit after orbital motion, propagation delays, and instrumental effects are subtracted or controlled to negligible levels.

What would settle it

An end-to-end simulation or on-orbit test showing that residual orbital or propagation noise exceeds the projected clock-limited strain sensitivity by more than a factor of a few at decihertz frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.13668 by Andrew G. Sullivan, Do\u{g}a Veske, Imre Bartos, Lucas M. B. Alves, Sebastian Will, Szabolcs M\'arka, Xingyu Ji, Zsuzsa M\'arka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Artist’s cartoon illustration of an APTA concept. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dimensionless characteristic strain as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dimensionless characteristic GW strain as a function of frequency for different detectors. We display APTA for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave astronomy has developed enormously over the last decade, with the first detections and continuous development across broad frequency bands. However, the decihertz range has largely been left out of this development. Gravitational waves in this band are emitted by some of the most enigmatic sources, including intermediate-mass binary black hole mergers, early inspiraling compact binaries$\unicode{x2014}$whose mergers are seen by Earth-based detectors$\unicode{x2014}$, and possibly primordial gravitational waves. To tap this exciting band, we propose the construction of a detector based on pulsar timing principles, the Artificial Precision Timing Array (APTA). We envision APTA as a solar system array of artificial ``pulsars''$\unicode{x2014}$precision-time-reference-carrying satellites that emit periodic electromagnetic signals towards Earth or another satellite constellation receiver location. In this fundamental study, we estimate the clock precision needed for gravitational-wave detection with APTA. Our results suggest that 6 satellites and a clock relative uncertainty of $10^{-18}$ at 1~s of averaging, which is currently attainable with ground-based atomic clocks, would be sufficient for APTA to reach pristine sensitivity in the decihertz band and observe $10^3\unicode{x2013}10^4$ $\mathrm{M}_\odot$ black hole mergers and the early inspiral of heavy LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA sources. Future clock and oscillator technologies realistically expected in the next decade(s) would enable the detection of an increasingly diverse set of sources, allowing APTA to reach a better sensitivity than other detector concepts proposed for the decihertz band. This work opens up a new area of research into designing and constructing gravitational-wave detectors relying on principles used successfully in pulsar timing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Artificial Precision Timing Array (APTA), a solar-system constellation of satellites carrying precision clocks that emit periodic electromagnetic signals, to detect gravitational waves in the decihertz band by adapting pulsar-timing-array methods. The central estimate is that 6 satellites with a clock relative uncertainty of 10^{-18} at 1 s averaging time (attainable with current ground-based atomic clocks) would suffice for pristine sensitivity, enabling detection of 10^3–10^4 M_⊙ black-hole mergers and early inspirals of heavy LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA sources; future clock improvements would expand the source reach.

Significance. If the noise model is validated, APTA would bridge the decihertz gap between LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA and pulsar-timing arrays, opening observations of intermediate-mass black holes and early binary inspirals with modest hardware. The paper receives credit for grounding the projection in currently attainable clock performance and for applying established PTA timing principles to a new satellite-based architecture rather than inventing new observables.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and sensitivity-estimate section] Abstract and sensitivity-estimate section: the headline claim that 6 satellites and 10^{-18} clock uncertainty yield pristine decihertz sensitivity rests on the premise that clock noise is the sole limiting term after standard PTA-style subtraction of orbital ephemeris, propagation, and instrumental residuals. No quantitative residual spectrum or end-to-end noise budget is supplied showing that the subtracted terms remain below the clock floor; this assumption is load-bearing for both the sensitivity curve and the quoted source-detection rates.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'pristine sensitivity' is used without an explicit definition or comparison to the target strain amplitude in the decihertz band.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report and for recognizing the potential of the APTA concept to address the decihertz gap using established PTA methods with attainable clock performance. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and sensitivity-estimate section] Abstract and sensitivity-estimate section: the headline claim that 6 satellites and 10^{-18} clock uncertainty yield pristine decihertz sensitivity rests on the premise that clock noise is the sole limiting term after standard PTA-style subtraction of orbital ephemeris, propagation, and instrumental residuals. No quantitative residual spectrum or end-to-end noise budget is supplied showing that the subtracted terms remain below the clock floor; this assumption is load-bearing for both the sensitivity curve and the quoted source-detection rates.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not supply a quantitative residual spectrum or full end-to-end noise budget to demonstrate that orbital ephemeris, propagation, and instrumental residuals remain below the clock noise floor after subtraction. This assumption underpins the sensitivity estimates. In the revised version we will add a new subsection to the sensitivity analysis that provides order-of-magnitude estimates for each residual term, drawing on published PTA timing residuals and expected satellite orbit-determination accuracies, to show that they can be kept below the 10^{-18} clock floor for the six-satellite configuration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: sensitivity projection applies standard PTA formalism to new hardware under explicit assumptions

full rationale

The derivation applies established pulsar-timing residual analysis to a satellite constellation. Clock-noise floor is taken as the limiting term by assumption (explicitly stated in the abstract), with no equations shown that define the target sensitivity in terms of itself or rename a fit as a prediction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear in the provided text. The 6-satellite / 10^{-18} claim is therefore a forward projection under stated noise-dominance premises rather than a reduction to the input data by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified translation of ground-based clock performance to space-based timing arrays and the assumption that standard pulsar timing array sensitivity formulas apply directly without additional dominant noise terms.

free parameters (2)
  • number of satellites
    The value 6 is presented as sufficient for the target sensitivity; no derivation shown in abstract.
  • clock relative uncertainty
    10^{-18} at 1 s is used as the performance target; treated as an input rather than derived.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Pulsar timing array response to gravitational waves applies to artificial periodic sources
    The method inherits the timing residual formalism from natural pulsar timing arrays without stated modifications for satellite geometry or signal type.
invented entities (1)
  • APTA satellite constellation no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as artificial pulsars for decihertz gravitational-wave detection
    New hardware concept introduced to bridge the frequency gap; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5894 in / 1513 out tokens · 25635 ms · 2026-05-24T05:09:05.351193+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting Chiral Gravitational Wave Background with a Dipole Pulsar Timing Array

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A dipole pulsar timing array detects chiral nanohertz gravitational waves and extends PTA sensitivity into the microhertz regime.

  2. Artificial Precision Polarization Array: Sensitivity for the axion-like dark matter with clock satellites

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Proposes satellite-based artificial pulsar polarization arrays (APPA) that simulations show can set tighter 95% C.L. upper limits on g_aγ than ground observations for axion masses 10^{-22} to 10^{-18} eV.

  3. Black Hole Binary Detection Landscape for the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Signal-to-Noise Calculations & Science Cases

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LILA can detect IMBH binaries at redshifts 20-30, IMRIs, and provide months-to-years early warnings with high-SNR events for gravity tests.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    the integrated column density of free electrons between an observer and a light source

    contributes to the dispersion measure (DM), i.e. the integrated column density of free electrons between an observer and a light source. While accounting for the effects of the time-dependent DM on the ToAs is not straightforward [120], this problem is easier for APTA than for PTAs, since contributions only come from the solar system and not from the inte...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Accadiaet al.(VIRGO), JINST7, P03012 (2012)

    T. Accadiaet al.(VIRGO), JINST7, P03012 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Akutsu, M

    T. Akutsu, M. Ando, K. Arai, Y. Arai, S. Araki, A. Araya, N. Aritomi, H. Asada, Y. Aso, S. Atsuta, K. Awai, S. Bae, L. Baiotti, M. A. Barton, K. Cannon, E. Capocasa, C.-S. Chen, T.-W. Chiu, K. Cho, Y.-K. Chu, K. Craig, W. Creus, K. Doi, K. Eda, Y. Enomoto, R. Flaminio, Y. Fujii, M.-K. Fujimoto, M. Fukunaga, M. Fukushima, T. Furuhata, S. Haino, K. Hasegawa...

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadiset al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2306.16214 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane, J. Askew, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, M. Cury lo, W. A. Coles, S. Dai, B. Goncharov, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, Y. Levin, M. E. Lower, R. N. Manchester, R. Mandow, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Os lowski, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, S. Zhang, and X.-J. Z...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    A. Zic, D. J. Reardon, A. Kapur, G. Hobbs, R. Mandow, M. Cury lo, R. M. Shannon, J. Askew, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, Z.-C. Chen, S. Dai, V. Di Marco, Y. Feng, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, M. E. Lower, R. Luo, R. N. Manchester, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Os lowski, A. F. Rogers, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, N. Thyagarajan, L. Toomey, S. Wang, L. Zhan...

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    H. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Guo, J. Jiang, B. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Xue, R. Nicolas Caballero, J. Yuan, Y. Xu, J. Wang, L. Hao, J. Luo, K. Lee, J. Han, P. Jiang, Z. Shen, M. Wang, N. Wang, R. Xu, X. Wu, R. Manchester, L. Qian, X. Guan, M. Huang, C. Sun, and Y. Zhu, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs, M. Bailes, W. A. Coles, W. van Straten, M. J. Keith, R. M. Shannon, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Brown, S. G. Burke-Spolaor, D. J. Cham- pion, A. Chaudhary, R. T. Edwards, G. Hampson, A. W. Hotan, A. Jameson, F. A. Jenet, M. J. Kesteven, J. Khoo, J. Kocz, K. Maciesiak, S. Oslowski, V. Ravi, J. R. Reynolds, J. M. Sarkissian, J. P. W. Verbi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Antoniadiset al., Mon

    J. Antoniadiset al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510, 4873 (2022), arXiv:2201.03980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array

    G. Desvignes, R. N. Caballero, L. Lentati, J. P. W. Verbiest, D. J. Champion, B. W. Stappers, G. H. Janssen, P. Lazarus, S. Os lowski, S. Babak, C. G. Bassa, P. Brem, M. Burgay, I. Cognard, J. R. Gair, E. Graikou, L. Guillemot, J. W. T. Hessels, A. Jessner, C. Jordan, R. Karuppusamy, M. Kramer, A. Lassus, K. Lazaridis, K. J. Lee, K. Liu, A. G. Lyne, J. Mc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Bailes, A

    M. Bailes, A. Jameson, F. Abbate, E. D. Barr, N. D. R. Bhat, L. Bondonneau, M. Burgay, S. J. Buchner, F. Camilo, D. J. Champion, I. Cognard, P. B. Demorest, P. C. C. Freire, T. Gautam, M. Geyer, J. M. Griess- meier, L. Guillemot, H. Hu, F. Jankowski, S. John- ston, A. Karastergiou, R. Karuppusamy, D. Kaur, M. J. Keith, M. Kramer, J. van Leeuwen, M. E. Low...

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    J. J. Condon and S. M. Ransom,Essential Radio As- tronomy(2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    D. R. Lorimer, Living Reviews in Relativity11, 8 (2008), arXiv:0811.0762 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Maiorano, F

    M. Maiorano, F. De Paolis, and A. A. Nucita, Symme- try13, 2418 (2021), arXiv:2112.08064 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Dolch, M

    T. Dolch, M. T. Lam, J. Cordes, S. Chatterjee, C. Bassa, B. Bhattacharyya, D. J. Champion, I. Cog- nard, K. Crowter, P. B. Demorest, J. W. T. Hes- sels, G. Janssen, F. A. Jenet, G. Jones, C. Jordan, R. Karuppusamy, M. Keith, V. Kondratiev, M. Kramer, P. Lazarus, T. J. W. Lazio, K. J. Lee, M. A. McLaugh- lin, J. Roy, R. M. Shannon, I. Stairs, K. Stovall, J...

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Dolch, J

    T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, M. T. Lam, C. Bassa, B. Bhattacharyya, D. J. Champion, I. Cognard, K. Crowter, P. B. Demorest, J. W. T. Hessels, G. Janssen, F. A. Jenet, G. Jones, C. Jor- dan, R. Karuppusamy, M. Keith, V. I. Kondratiev, M. Kramer, P. Lazarus, T. J. W. Lazio, D. R. Lorimer, D. R. Madison, M. A. McLaughlin, N. Palliyagur...

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Luo, L.-S

    J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C.-G. Shao, V. T. Toth, H.-B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H.-C. Yeh, M.-S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, and Z.-B. Zhou, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Reitze, R

    D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Bar- sotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne, R. Eisenstein, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, E. D. Hall, A. Laz- zarini, G. Lovelace, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. Shoemaker, J. Smith, C. Torrie, S. Vitale, R. Weiss, C. Wipf, and M. Zucker, inBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. ...

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Huerta and J

    E. Huerta and J. Gair, Physical Review D83(2010), 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044020 2010

  26. [26]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific), Rept. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009), arXiv:0711.3041 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Bar- suglia, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, S. Birindelli, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, T. Bulik, E. Cal- loni, G. Cella, E. C. Mottin, S. Chelkowski, A. Chin- carini, J. Clark, E. Coccia, C. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming, L. Cunningham, E. Cuoco, S. ...

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    P. L. Bender, Class. Quant. Grav.21, S1203 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Bender and M

    P. Bender and M. Begelman, ESA SP588, 33 (2005)

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    Phinney, P

    S. Phinney, P. Bender, R. Buchman, R. Byer, N. Cor- nish, P. Fritschel, and S. Vitale, NASA mission concept study (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, 4887 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Kawamuraet al., Class

    S. Kawamuraet al., Class. Quant. Grav.23, S125 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Jani and A

    K. Jani and A. Loeb, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2007.08550 (2020), arXiv:2007.08550 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    The lunar gravitational-wave antenna: Mission studies and science case,

    P. Ajith, P. A. Seoane, M. A. Sedda, R. Arcodia, F. Badaracco, E. Belgacem, S. Benetti, A. Bobrick, A. Bonforte, E. Bortolas, V. Braito, M. Branchesi, A. Burrows, E. Cappellaro, R. D. Ceca, C. Chakraborty, S. C. Subrahmanya, M. W. Coughlin, S. Covino, A. Derdzinski, A. Doshi, M. Falanga, S. Foffa, A. Fran- chini, A. Frigeri, Y. Futaana, O. Gerberding, K. ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    M. C. Miller and E. J. M. Colbert, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D13, 1 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0308402 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Accretion onto Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Dense Protogalactic Clouds

    M. Milosavljevi´ c, S. M. Couch, and V. Bromm, ApJ 696, L146 (2009), arXiv:0812.2516 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    McKernan, K

    B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, W. Lyra, and H. B. Perets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society425, 460 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Initial mass function of intermediate mass black hole seeds

    A. Ferrara, S. Salvadori, B. Yue, and D. Schleicher, MNRAS443, 2410 (2014), arXiv:1406.6685 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Y. Yang, I. Bartos, V. Gayathri, K. E. S. Ford, Z. Haiman, S. Klimenko, B. Kocsis, S. M´ arka, Z. M´ arka, B. McKernan, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 181101 (2019), arXiv:1906.09281 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    K. Jani, D. Shoemaker, and C. Cutler, Nature Astron- omy4, 260 (2020), arXiv:1908.04985 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, 2435 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    T. L. Smith, M. Kamionkowski, and A. Cooray, Phys- ical Review D73(2006), 10.1103/physrevd.73.023504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.023504 2006

  43. [43]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba, and N. Sugiyama, Physical Review D79(2009), 10.1103/physrevd.79.103501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.103501 2009

  44. [44]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matar- rese, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 399 (2016), arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Arca Sedda, G

    M. Arca Sedda, G. Li, and B. Kocsis, A&A650, A189 (2021), arXiv:1805.06458 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    R. M. O’Leary, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society395, 2127 (2009), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/395/4/2127/2931749/mnras0395-2127.pdf

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters

    J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Accuracy of Estimating Highly Eccentric Binary Black Hole Parameters with Gravitational-Wave Detections

    L. Gond´ an, B. Kocsis, P. Raffai, and Z. Frei, ApJ855, 34 (2018), arXiv:1705.10781 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Binary black hole mergers from field triples: properties, rates and the impact of stellar evolution

    F. Antonini, S. Toonen, and A. S. Hamers, ApJ841, 77 (2017), arXiv:1703.06614 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Samsing and D

    J. Samsing and D. J. D’Orazio, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society481, 5445 (2018), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/481/4/5445/26075165/sty2334.pdf

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Codazzo, M

    E. Codazzo, M. Di Giovanni, J. Harms, M. Dall’Amico, and M. Mapelli, Phys. Rev. D107, 023023 (2023), arXiv:2207.01326 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    C. D. Ott, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 063001 (2009), arXiv:0809.0695 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [53]

    I. R. Seitenzahl, M. Herzog, A. J. Ruiter, K. Marquardt, S. T. Ohlmann, and F. K. R¨ opke, Phys. Rev. D92, 124013 (2015), arXiv:1511.02542 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Detection Rate Estimates of Gravity-waves Emitted During Parabolic Encounters of Stellar Black Holes in Globular Clusters

    B. Kocsis, M. E. G´ asp´ ar, and S. M´ arka, ApJ648, 411 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603441 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  55. [55]

    Aoyama, R

    S. Aoyama, R. Tazai, and K. Ichiki, Phys. Rev. D89, 067101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    F. B. Estabrook and H. D. Wahlquist, General Relativ- ity and Gravitation6, 439 (1975)

    work page 1975

  57. [57]

    J. W. Armstrong, Living Reviews in Relativity9, 1 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Vutha, New Journal of Physics17, 063030 (2015)

    A. Vutha, New Journal of Physics17, 063030 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Kolkowitz, I

    S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. D94, 124043 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    G. M. Tino, A. Bassi, G. Bianco, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, L. Cacciapuoti, S. Capozziello, X. Chen, M. L. Chio- falo, A. Derevianko, W. Ertmer, N. Gaaloul, P. Gill, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, L. Iess, M. A. Kasevich, H. Katori, C. Klempt, X. Lu, L.-S. Ma, H. M¨ uller, N. R. Newbury, C. W. Oates, A. Peters, N. Poli, E. M. Rasel, G. Rosi, A. Roura, C. Salomon, S...

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Arca Sedda, C

    M. Arca Sedda, C. P. L. Berry, K. Jani, P. Amaro- Seoane, P. Auclair, J. Baird, T. Baker, E. Berti, K. Breivik, A. Burrows, C. Caprini, X. Chen, D. Doneva, J. M. Ezquiaga, K. E. Saavik Ford, M. L. Katz, S. Kolkowitz, B. McKernan, G. Mueller, G. Nar- dini, I. Pikovski, S. Rajendran, A. Sesana, L. Shao, N. Tamanini, D. Vartanyan, N. Warburton, H. Witek, K. ...

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    eLISA eccentricity measurements as tracers of binary black hole formation

    A. Nishizawa, E. Berti, A. Klein, and A. Sesana, Phys. Rev. D94, 064020 (2016), arXiv:1605.01341 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Constraining stellar binary black hole formation scenarios with eLISA eccentricity measurements

    A. Nishizawa, A. Sesana, E. Berti, and A. Klein, MN- RAS465, 4375 (2017), arXiv:1606.09295 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Liu, L.-G

    S. Liu, L.-G. Zhu, Y.-M. Hu, J.-d. Zhang, and M.-J. Ji, Phys. Rev. D105, 023019 (2022), arXiv:2110.05248 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro, and R. Bondarescu, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 011102 (2012), arXiv:1110.0467 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    A. G. Sullivan, L. M. B. Alves, G. O. Spence, I. P. Leite, D. Veske, I. Bartos, Z. M´ arka, and S. M´ arka, MNRAS 520, 6173 (2023), arXiv:2205.13541 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Gamma-Ray Bursts as the Death Throes of Massive Binary Stars

    R. Narayan, B. Paczynski, and T. Piran, ApJ395, L83 (1992), arXiv:astro-ph/9204001 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  68. [68]

    B. P. Abbottet al., ApJ848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    B. P. Abbottet al., ApJ848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Gottlieb, B

    O. Gottlieb, B. D. Metzger, E. Quataert, D. Issa, and F. Foucart, (2023), arXiv:2309.00038 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Sesana, F

    A. Sesana, F. Haardt, P. Madau, and M. Volonteri, The Astrophysical Journal623, 23 (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    P. C. Peters, Phys. Rev.136, B1224 (1964)

    work page 1964

  74. [74]

    Where are the double-degenerate progenitors of type Ia supernovae?

    A. Rebassa-Mansergas, S. Toonen, V. Korol, and S. Torres, MNRAS482, 3656 (2019), arXiv:1809.07158 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Korol, N

    V. Korol, N. Hallakoun, S. Toonen, and N. Karne- sis, MNRAS511, 5936 (2022), arXiv:2109.10972 [astro- 13 ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Y. Kang, C. Liu, J.-P. Zhu, Y. Gao, L. Shao, B. Zhang, H. Sun, Y.-H. I. Yin, and B.-B. Zhang, MNRAS528, 5309 (2024), arXiv:2309.16991 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    L. S. Finn and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D62, 124021 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0007074 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  78. [78]

    S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D61, 084004 (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/9910091 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2000

  79. [79]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    LISA verification binaries with updated distances from Gaia Data Release 2

    T. Kupfer, V. Korol, S. Shah, G. Nelemans, T. R. Marsh, G. Ramsay, P. J. Groot, D. T. H. Steeghs, and E. M. Rossi, MNRAS480, 302 (2018), arXiv:1805.00482 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.