Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Genie: Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.14367 v1 pith:MQGA2O4Q submitted 2024-01-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Genie: Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets Generation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords datamodelstrainedcontent-groundedgenerationlfqacontentfaithfulness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The lack of high-quality data for content-grounded generation tasks has been identified as a major obstacle to advancing these tasks. To address this gap, we propose Genie, a novel method for automatically generating high-quality content-grounded data. It consists of three stages: (a) Content Preparation, (b) Generation: creating task-specific examples from the content (e.g., question-answer pairs or summaries). (c) Filtering mechanism aiming to ensure the quality and faithfulness of the generated data. We showcase this methodology by generating three large-scale synthetic data, making wishes, for Long-Form Question-Answering (LFQA), summarization, and information extraction. In a human evaluation, our generated data was found to be natural and of high quality. Furthermore, we compare models trained on our data with models trained on human-written data -- ELI5 and ASQA for LFQA and CNN-DailyMail for Summarization. We show that our models are on par with or outperforming models trained on human-generated data and consistently outperforming them in faithfulness. Finally, we applied our method to create LFQA data within the medical domain and compared a model trained on it with models trained on other domains.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Self-Study Reconsidered: The Hidden Fragility of Learning from Self-Generated QA

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-generated QA supervision for language models is fragile due to non-uniform question selection and instruction compliance during answering, with mitigations that reduce compliance from 88% to 13%.

  2. DeepImagine: Learning Biomedical Reasoning via Successive Counterfactual Imagining

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DeepImagine trains LLMs on counterfactual pairs from clinical trials using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to improve outcome prediction by approximating causal mechanisms.

  3. Preserving Knowledge in Large Language Model with Model-Agnostic Self-Decompression

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces Tree Generation (TG-SFT) to generate synthetic instruction-tuning data from LLMs, reducing catastrophic forgetting when fine-tuning MLLMs on domain-specific or multimodal data.