pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.17756 · v3 · submitted 2024-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.chem-ph

Origins of suppressed self-diffusion of nanoscale constituents of a complex liquid

Christian P. N. Tanner , Vivian R. K. Wall , Mumtaz Gababa , Joshua Portner , Ahhyun Jeong , Matthew J. Hurley , Nicholas Leonard , Jonathan G. Raybin
show 20 more authors
James K. Utterback Ahyoung Kim Andrei Fluerasu Yanwen Sun Johannes Moeller Alexey Zozulya Wonhyuk Jo Felix Brausse James Wrigley Ulrike Boesenberg Jan-Etienne Pudell Joerg Hallmann Wei Lu Roman Shayduk Mohamed Youssef Anders Madsen David T. Limmer Dmitri V. Talapin Samuel W. Teitelbaum Naomi S. Ginsberg
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.chem-ph
keywords X-ray photon correlation spectroscopysemiconductor nanocrystalsself-diffusionattractive interactionsdense liquid phasecolloidal dynamicsdensity fluctuationsgelation avoidance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Attractive interactions suppress self-diffusion of nanocrystals in dense liquid phases

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses MHz X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy to measure microsecond dynamics of density fluctuations for semiconductor nanocrystals in both dilute colloidal dispersions and a dense liquid phase of packed yet mobile particles. It establishes that wavevector-dependent fluctuation rates are lower in the liquid phase than in the colloidal phase or in repulsive particle systems because self-diffusion decreases substantially due to explicit attractive interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because the work shows how these attractions can maintain a stable mobile liquid state instead of producing gelation. Coarse-grained simulations connect the extracted potential shape and strength directly to this observed stability.

Core claim

Using MHz XPCS we elucidate the characteristic microsecond-dynamics of density fluctuations of semiconductor nanocrystals not only in a colloidal dispersion but also in a liquid phase consisting of densely packed, yet mobile, NCs with no long-range order. The wavevector-dependent fluctuation rates in the liquid phase are suppressed relative to those in the colloidal phase and relative to observations of densely packed repulsive particles. We show that the suppressed rates are due to a substantial decrease in the self-diffusion of NCs, which we attribute to explicit attractive interactions. Using coarse-grained simulations, we find that the extracted shape and strength of the interparticle p

What carries the argument

MHz X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy measuring wavevector-dependent fluctuation rates, interpreted as self-diffusion coefficients reduced by attractive interparticle interactions, with coarse-grained simulations used to extract the potential.

If this is right

  • The attractive interactions stabilize the liquid phase and prevent the gelation seen in many other charged colloidal systems.
  • This XPCS approach enables direct study of fast condensed-phase dynamics in complex fluids.
  • Microscopic design of interparticle potentials can be used to avert gelation in similar systems.
  • The method applies to dynamics in densely packed proteins and non-equilibrium self-assembly processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tuning the strength of attractions could provide a route to control diffusion rates in other nanomaterial assemblies.
  • Comparable attractive mechanisms may shape dynamics in biological systems involving densely packed proteins.
  • The XPCS-plus-simulation workflow could be applied to non-equilibrium processes to predict phase stability.

Load-bearing premise

Wavevector-dependent XPCS fluctuation rates can be directly mapped to self-diffusion coefficients without significant contributions from collective effects or other relaxation channels.

What would settle it

An independent technique such as single-particle tracking applied to the same liquid-phase nanocrystal sample would yield self-diffusion coefficients matching those inferred from the XPCS rates if the attribution holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.17756 by Ahhyun Jeong, Ahyoung Kim, Alexey Zozulya, Anders Madsen, Andrei Fluerasu, Christian P. N. Tanner, David T. Limmer, Dmitri V. Talapin, Felix Brausse, James K. Utterback, James Wrigley, Jan-Etienne Pudell, Joerg Hallmann, Johannes Moeller, Jonathan G. Raybin, Joshua Portner, Matthew J. Hurley, Mohamed Youssef, Mumtaz Gababa, Naomi S. Ginsberg, Nicholas Leonard, Roman Shayduk, Samuel W. Teitelbaum, Ulrike Boesenberg, Vivian R. K. Wall, Wei Lu, Wonhyuk Jo, Yanwen Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of MHz XPCS experiment. a. Phase diagram of PbS NCs as a function of NC volume fraction (ϕ) and quench depth (kBT /ϵ, where kB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature and ϵ is depth of interparticle interactions) [11]. The solid curves indicate the colloid-SL (black) and colloid-metastable liquid (grey) phase coexistence boundaries (SL indicates a solid phase of NCs). Red circles represent state… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Static scattering of NCs. a. Detector images of scattering in the colloidal (top) and quenched (bottom) phases averaged over several pulse trains. b. Background￾subtracted one-dimensional SAXS patterns, I(q), in units of photons per pixel, of NCs in the colloidal (top) and quenched (bottom) phases (black points). Solid curves indicate fits to the SAXS patterns and components (as labeled). 1 + β(q) exp[−2Γ(… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Microsecond dynamics associated with density fluctuations of NCs in colloidal and liquid phases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Microscopic fluctuations of NCs as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding and ultimately controlling the transformations and properties of nanoscale systems, from proteins to synthetic nanomaterial assemblies, is limited by the inability to uncover their dynamics on their characteristic length and time scales. Here, we nevertheless demonstrate this ability using MHz X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) -- directly elucidating the characteristic microsecond-dynamics of density fluctuations of semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs), not only in a colloidal dispersion but also in a liquid phase consisting of densely packed, yet mobile, NCs with no long-range order. We find the wavevector-dependent fluctuation rates in the liquid phase are suppressed relative to those in the colloidal phase and relative to observations of densely packed repulsive particles. We show that the suppressed rates are due to a substantial decrease in the self-diffusion of NCs, which we attribute to explicit attractive interactions. Using coarse-grained simulations, we find that the extracted shape and strength of the interparticle potential explains the stability of the liquid phase, in contrast to the gelation observed via XPCS in many other charged colloidal systems. This work opens the door to elucidating fast, condensed phase dynamics in complex fluids and other nanoscale soft matter, such as densely packed proteins and non-equilibrium self-assembly processes, in addition to designing microscopic strategies to avert gelation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports MHz XPCS measurements of wavevector-dependent density fluctuation dynamics in semiconductor nanocrystal systems, comparing a dilute colloidal dispersion to a dense liquid phase with no long-range order. It finds suppressed fluctuation rates in the liquid phase relative to the colloidal phase and to repulsive-particle systems, attributes the suppression to a substantial reduction in self-diffusion coefficients caused by attractive interparticle interactions, and uses coarse-grained simulations to show that the extracted potential shape and strength stabilize the liquid against gelation.

Significance. If the central mapping from XPCS rates to self-diffusion holds and the attribution to attractions is supported, the work would provide a concrete experimental and simulation route to understanding and controlling fast dynamics in dense nanoscale soft matter, with direct relevance to avoiding gelation in charged colloids and to dynamics in protein assemblies or non-equilibrium self-assembly. The MHz XPCS access to microsecond timescales in condensed phases is a technical strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text on fluctuation rates: the central claim equates the observed suppression of wavevector-dependent rates Γ(q) to a decrease in self-diffusion D_s(q). In dense liquids, Γ(q) = D_s(q) q² only when collective hydrodynamic and direct interactions are negligible or corrected; the manuscript must demonstrate either that the probed q-range lies well above the first peak of S(q) (so F(q,t) ≈ F_s(q,t)) or provide an explicit decomposition. Without this, the attribution of the suppression solely to attractive interactions is under-determined.
  2. Simulation section: the claim that the extracted interparticle potential explains liquid stability (in contrast to gelation in other charged systems) requires explicit reporting of how the potential parameters were obtained from the XPCS data, the goodness-of-fit metrics, and a direct comparison of simulated vs measured Γ(q) or D_s(q).
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise q-range accessed by the MHz XPCS setup and whether any structure-factor correction was applied.
  2. Add error bars or uncertainty estimates on the reported fluctuation rates and extracted diffusion coefficients.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text on fluctuation rates: the central claim equates the observed suppression of wavevector-dependent rates Γ(q) to a decrease in self-diffusion D_s(q). In dense liquids, Γ(q) = D_s(q) q² only when collective hydrodynamic and direct interactions are negligible or corrected; the manuscript must demonstrate either that the probed q-range lies well above the first peak of S(q) (so F(q,t) ≈ F_s(q,t)) or provide an explicit decomposition. Without this, the attribution of the suppression solely to attractive interactions is under-determined.

    Authors: We agree that explicit justification is required for equating the measured Γ(q) to self-diffusion in a dense liquid. In the manuscript the probed q-range (approximately 0.02–0.15 Å⁻¹) lies above the principal peak of the measured structure factor, where S(q) has returned close to unity; this regime is where the intermediate scattering function is dominated by the self term. To make the argument fully transparent we will add a dedicated paragraph (with supporting figure) that (i) shows the experimental S(q), (ii) confirms the q-range condition, and (iii) compares the XPCS-derived rates with the self-intermediate scattering function obtained from the same coarse-grained simulations. This addition will also reinforce that the observed suppression is attributable to the attractive component of the potential rather than collective effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [—] Simulation section: the claim that the extracted interparticle potential explains liquid stability (in contrast to gelation in other charged systems) requires explicit reporting of how the potential parameters were obtained from the XPCS data, the goodness-of-fit metrics, and a direct comparison of simulated vs measured Γ(q) or D_s(q).

    Authors: We accept that the simulation section would benefit from greater detail on the parameter extraction. The interparticle potential was obtained by iteratively adjusting the depth and range of a short-range attractive well (superposed on a screened Coulomb repulsion) until the simulated q-dependent self-diffusion coefficients matched the XPCS-derived D_s(q). We will expand the methods section to describe the fitting protocol, report the reduced χ² values for the best-fit parameters, and add a direct overlay of simulated and experimental Γ(q) (or D_s(q)) curves. These additions will make the connection between the fitted potential and the observed liquid stability fully reproducible and quantitative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external XPCS standards and simulations

full rationale

The paper measures wavevector-dependent fluctuation rates via MHz XPCS in colloidal and liquid phases of NCs, attributes suppression to reduced self-diffusion from attractions, and validates via coarse-grained simulations of the interparticle potential. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce the central claim (suppressed rates due to attractions) to a tautology or input by construction. The mapping from Γ(q) to self-diffusion follows standard XPCS analysis without internal redefinition, and the simulation step is independent. This is the expected non-finding for a measurement-plus-simulation study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on domain assumptions about XPCS data interpretation and simulation fidelity; no free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption XPCS fluctuation rates at given wavevectors directly reflect self-diffusion of individual nanocrystals
    Required to attribute rate suppression to decreased self-diffusion rather than collective modes.
  • domain assumption Coarse-grained simulations with extracted potential accurately predict phase stability against gelation
    Used to link measured dynamics to liquid-phase stability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5909 in / 1252 out tokens · 23200 ms · 2026-05-24T02:16:12.214360+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The liq- uid phase structure factor,Sℓ(q), has a distinct peak at q∼0.1 Å −1 corresponding to a∼6.3 nm distance between neighboring NCs (Figure 3c , blue points)

    for more details on Sc(q) of these NCs). The liq- uid phase structure factor,Sℓ(q), has a distinct peak at q∼0.1 Å −1 corresponding to a∼6.3 nm distance between neighboring NCs (Figure 3c , blue points). The ∼1.7 height of this peak satisfies the Hansen-Verlet criterion for a liquid [39]. The decorrelation ratesΓ(q, ¯t → 0) and Γ(q, ¯t = 4 .43 µs) are ∼1 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Schematic interparticle potentials of nanoscale and microscale particles as a function of particle center-to-center distance particles, normalized to particle sizeσ

    and micron-scale colloid-polymer mixtures [42], respec- tively c. Schematic interparticle potentials of nanoscale and microscale particles as a function of particle center-to-center distance particles, normalized to particle sizeσ. refining our intuition about the microscopic source of the suppressed diffusivities. Returning to the degree of suppressed se...

    work page

  3. [3]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    D. T. Limmer,Statistical mechanics and stochastic ther- modynamics: A textbook on modern approaches in and out of equilibrium (Oxford University Press, 2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    R. B. Jones and P. N. Pusey, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 42, 137 (1991), publisher: Annual Reviews

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Nägele, Physics Reports272, 215 (1996)

    G. Nägele, Physics Reports272, 215 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    J. F. Brady, The Journal of Chemical Physics99, 567 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    A. J. C. Ladd, The Journal of Chemical Physics93, 3484 (1990)

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    D. Orsi, A. Fluerasu, A. Moussaïd, F. Zontone, L. Cristo- folini, and A. Madsen, Physical Review E 85, 011402 (2012), publisher: American Physical Society. 6

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Heinen, A

    M. Heinen, A. J. Banchio, and G. Nägele, The Journal of Chemical Physics135, 154504 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Westermeier, B

    F. Westermeier, B. Fischer, W. Roseker, G. Grübel, G. Nägele, and M. Heinen, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 114504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Dallari, A

    F. Dallari, A. Jain, M. Sikorski, J. Möller, R. Bean, U. Boesenberg, L. Frenzel, C. Goy, J. Hallmann, Y. Kim, I. Lokteva, V. Markmann, G. Mills, A. Rodriguez- Fernandez, W. Roseker, M. Scholz, R. Shayduk, P. Vagovic, M. Walther, F. Westermeier, A. Madsen, A. P. Mancuso, G. Grübel, and F. Lehmkühler, IUCrJ 8, 775 (2021), publisher: International Union of C...

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    C. P. N. Tanner, V. R. K. Wall, J. Portner, A. Jeong, A. Das, J. K. Utterback, L. M. Hamerlynck, J. G. Raybin, M. J. Hurley, N. Leonard, R. B. Wai, J. A. Tan, M. Gababa, C. Zhu, E. Schaible, C. J. Tas- sone, D. T. Limmer, S. W. Teitelbaum, D. V. Talapin, and N. S. Ginsberg, Enhancing nanocrystal superlattice self-assembly near a metastable liquid binodal ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    P. N. Pusey and W. van Megen, Journal de Physique44, 285 (1983), publisher: Société Française de Physique

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    van Megen and P

    W. van Megen and P. N. Pusey, Physical Review A43, 5429 (1991), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 1991

  16. [16]

    Gasser, E

    U. Gasser, E. R. Weeks, A. Schofield, P. N. Pusey, and D. A. Weitz, Science292, 258 (2001), publisher: Ameri- can Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    F. L. Calderon, J. Bibette, and J. Biais, Europhysics Let- ters 23, 653 (1993)

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    J. R. Savage and A. D. Dinsmore, Physical Review Let- ters 102, 198302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    N.A.M.Verhaegh, J.S.vanDuijneveldt, J.K.G.Dhont, and H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications230, 409 (1996)

    work page 1996

  20. [20]

    A. R. Sandy, Q. Zhang, and L. B. Lurio, Annual Review of Materials Research48, 167 (2018), publisher: Annual Reviews

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Grübel, G

    G. Grübel, G. B. Stephenson, C. Gutt, H. Sinn, and T. Tschentscher, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Ma- terials and Atoms262, 357 (2007)

    work page 2007

  22. [22]

    Lehmkühler, F

    F. Lehmkühler, F. Dallari, A. Jain, M. Sikorski, J. Möller, L. Frenzel, I. Lokteva, G. Mills, M. Walther, H. Sinn, F. Schulz, M. Dartsch, V. Markmann, R. Bean, Y. Kim, P. Vagovic, A. Madsen, A. P. Mancuso, and G. Grübel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 117, 24110 (2020), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Sutton, S

    M. Sutton, S. G. J. Mochrie, T. Greytak, S. E. Nagler, L. E. Berman, G. A. Held, and G. B. Stephenson, Nature 352, 608 (1991), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    Fluerasu, M

    A. Fluerasu, M. Sutton, and E. M. Dufresne, Physical Review Letters 94, 055501 (2005), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    O. G. Shpyrko, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 21, 1057 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Sutton, Comptes Rendus

    M. Sutton, Comptes Rendus. Physique9, 657 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Grübel, A

    G. Grübel, A. Madsen, and A. Robert, in Soft Matter Characterization, edited by R. Borsali and R. Pecora (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2008) pp. 953–995

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Reiser, A

    M. Reiser, A. Girelli, A. Ragulskaya, S. Das, S. Berkow- icz, M. Bin, M. Ladd-Parada, M. Filianina, H.-F. Poggemann, N. Begam, M. S. Akhundzadeh, S. Tim- mermann, L. Randolph, Y. Chushkin, T. Seydel, U. Boesenberg, J. Hallmann, J. Möller, A. Rodriguez- Fernandez, R. Rosca, R. Schaffer, M. Scholz, R. Shay- duk, A. Zozulya, A. Madsen, F. Schreiber, F. Zhang...

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Lehmkühler, J

    F. Lehmkühler, J. Valerio, D. Sheyfer, W. Roseker, M. A. Schroer, B. Fischer, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, T. Ishikawa, and G. Grübel, IUCrJ5, 801 (2018), publisher: Interna- tional Union of Crystallography

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Coropceanu, E

    I. Coropceanu, E. M. Janke, J. Portner, D. Haubold, T. D. Nguyen, A. Das, C. P. N. Tanner, J. K. Utter- back, S. W. Teitelbaum, ¸. M. H. Hudson, N. A. Sarma, A. M. Hinkle, C. J. Tassone, A. Eychmüller, D. T. Lim- mer, M. Olvera de la Cruz, N. S. Ginsberg, and D. V. Talapin, Science375, 1422 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Nogales and A

    A. Nogales and A. Fluerasu, European Polymer Journal 81, 494 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    R. L. Leheny, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 17, 3 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Möller, M

    J. Möller, M. Sprung, A. Madsen, and C. Gutt, IUCrJ 6, 794 (2019), publisher: International Union of Crystal- lography

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Jeong, J

    A. Jeong, J. Portner, C. P. N. Tanner, J. C. Ondry, C. Zhou, Z. Mi, Y. A. Tazoui, V. R. K. Wall, N. S. Gins- berg, and D. V. Talapin, Colloidal dispersions of steri- cally and electrostatically stabilized PbS quantum dots: the effect of stabilization mechanism on structure fac- tors, second virial coefficients, and film-forming proper- ties (2024), arXiv:...

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Madsen, J

    A. Madsen, J. Hallmann, G. Ansaldi, T. Roth, W. Lu, C. Kim, U. Boesenberg, A. Zozulya, J. Möller, R. Shay- duk, M. Scholz, A. Bartmann, A. Schmidt, I. Lobato, K. Sukharnikov, M. Reiser, K. Kazarian, and I. Petrov, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 28, 637 (2021), pub- lisher: International Union of Crystallography

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Tschentscher, C

    T. Tschentscher, C. Bressler, J. Grünert, A. Madsen, A. P. Mancuso, M. Meyer, A. Scherz, H. Sinn, and U. Za- strau, Applied Sciences 7, 592 (2017), number: 6 Pub- lisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Decking, S

    W. Decking, S. Abeghyan, P. Abramian, A. Abramsky, A. Aguirre,et al., Nature Photonics14, 391 (2020), pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Henrich, J

    B. Henrich, J. Becker, R. Dinapoli, P. Goettlicher, H. Graafsma, H. Hirsemann, R. Klanner, H. Krueger, R. Mazzocco, A. Mozzanica, H. Perrey, G. Potdevin, B. Schmitt, X. Shi, A. K. Srivastava, U. Trunk, and C. Youngman, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in PhysicsResearchSectionA:Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 11th Internatio...

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    We ascribe the dynamics of the quenched state to the NCs in the liquid phase since the scattering from the liq- uidphaseis ∼1orderofmagnitudelargerthanthatofthe colloidal phase at theq values over which the correlation analysis is performed

    work page

  40. [40]

    Madsen, R

    A. Madsen, R. L. Leheny, H. Guo, M. Sprung, and O. Czakkel, New Journal of Physics12, 055001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    Hansen and L

    J.-P. Hansen and L. Verlet, Physical Review184, 151 (1969)

    work page 1969

  42. [42]

    P. N. Pusey, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 8, 1433 (1975). 7

    work page 1975

  43. [43]

    Roosen-Runge, M

    F. Roosen-Runge, M. Hennig, F. Zhang, R. M. J. Jacobs, M. Sztucki, H. Schober, T. Seydel, and F. Schreiber, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 11815 (2011), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    K. F. Seefeldt and M. J. Solomon, Physical Review E67, 050402 (2003)

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Beenakker and P

    C. Beenakker and P. Mazur, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications120, 388 (1983)

    work page 1983

  46. [46]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and P. Mazur, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications126, 349 (1984)

    work page 1984

  47. [47]

    T. K. Haxton, L. O. Hedges, and S. Whitelam, Soft Mat- ter 11, 9307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    W. C. K. Poon, A. D. Pirie, and P. N. Pusey, Faraday Discussions 101, 65 (1995), publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    N. M. Kovalchuk and V. M. Starov, Advances in Col- loid and Interface Science Interfaces, Wettability, Surface Forces and Applications: Special Issue in honour of the 65th Birthday of John Ralston,179-182, 99 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    M. A. Boles, M. Engel, and D. V. Talapin, Chemical Reviews 116, 11220 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    C. B. Murray, C. R. Kagan, and M. G. Bawendi, Science 270, 1335 (1995)

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    E. V. Shevchenko, D. V. Talapin, N. A. Kotov, S. O’Brien, and C. B. Murray, Nature439, 55 (2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    D. K. Smith, B. Goodfellow, D.-M. Smilgies, and B. A. Korgel, Journal of the American Chemical Society131, 3281 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    K. Bian, J. J. Choi, A. Kaushik, P. Clancy, D.-M. Smil- gies, and T. Hanrath, ACS Nano5, 2815 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    P. J. Santos, P. A. Gabrys, L. Z. Zornberg, M. S. Lee, and R. J. Macfarlane, Nature591, 586 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    P. G. Debenedetti, Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles, Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  57. [57]

    Nishinaga (Elsevier, Boston, 2015) pp

    C.N.Nanev,in Handbook of Crystal Growth (Second Edi- tion), edited by T. Nishinaga (Elsevier, Boston, 2015) pp. 315–358

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Uwaha, inHandbook of Crystal Growth (Second Edi- tion), edited by T

    M. Uwaha, inHandbook of Crystal Growth (Second Edi- tion), edited by T. Nishinaga (Elsevier, Boston, 2015) pp. 359–399

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    J. F. Brady and G. Bossis, Annual Review of Fluid Me- chanics 20, 111 (1988), publisher: Annual Reviews

    work page 1988

  60. [60]

    A. J. Banchio and J. F. Brady, The Journal of Chemical Physics 118, 10323 (2003)

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    T. N. Phung, J. F. Brady, and G. Bossis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 313, 181 (1996)

    work page 1996

  62. [62]

    M. G. Noro, N. Kern, and D. Frenkel, Europhysics Let- ters 48, 332 (1999), publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces , 3rd ed

    J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces , 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Inc., 2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    Asakura and F

    S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, The Journal of Chemical Physics 22, 1255 (1954)

    work page 1954

  65. [65]

    Asakura and F

    S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, Journal of Polymer Science 33, 183 (1958)

    work page 1958

  66. [66]

    A.Vrij,PureandAppliedChemistry 48,471(1976),pub- lisher: De Gruyter

    work page 1976