pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.07057 · v2 · pith:ZLFVPUN3new · submitted 2024-06-11 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.CV· cs.LG

MultiTrust: A Comprehensive Benchmark Towards Trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Models

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords mllmsmultimodaltrustworthinessbenchmarkmodelsrisksacrosscomprehensive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite the superior capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across diverse tasks, they still face significant trustworthiness challenges. Yet, current literature on the assessment of trustworthy MLLMs remains limited, lacking a holistic evaluation to offer thorough insights into future improvements. In this work, we establish MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by the multimodality and underscoring the necessity for advanced methodologies to enhance their reliability. For instance, typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks; MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images in inference, indicating that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base LLMs. Additionally, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, aiming to facilitate future advancements in this important field. Code and resources are publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VISE is the first benchmark for sycophancy in Video-LLMs, with two training-free mitigation strategies based on key-frame selection and internal representation steering.

  2. Investigating Adversarial Robustness of Multi-modal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Robust vision encoders from multimodal adversarial pretraining transfer to MLLMs and deliver large gains in adversarial captioning and VQA performance, while test-time stochastic transformations provide an effective b...

  3. Retrievals Can Be Detrimental: Unveiling the Backdoor Vulnerability of Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    BadRDM is a backdoor attack on retrieval-augmented diffusion models that poisons the retrieval database with toxicity surrogates and uses multimodal contrastive learning to force toxic generations from text triggers w...