Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Zero energy modes with Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay: Exact solutions in hermitian and nonhermitian regimes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that faster-than-exponential, exponential, and slower-than-exponential zero modes are classified by whether the mass diverges, stays finite, or vanishes at large distances, with exact solutions constructed by inverse…

desk verdict Useful exact-solution catalog, but the Sec IX classification overreaches: constant nonzero mass plus linearly diverging velocity already gives a Gaussian mode. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14255 v2 pith:EWF223OU submitted 2024-12-18 hep-th cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.supr-conmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Pasquale Marra , Angela Nigro This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.supr-conmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords zero-energymodesJackiw-RebbiequationMajoranazerotopologicalinsulatorssuperconductorsinversemethodsnon-Hermitianphysicsdecaylocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Zero-energy boundary modes in topological insulators, superconductors, and superfluids are usually pictured as exponentially localized, but the same modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation also admits Gaussian and polynomially decaying modes. This paper tries to establish that the decay class is controlled by the asymptotic behavior of the mass term: a mass that diverges at large distances gives faster-than-exponential decay, a finite nonzero mass gives exponential decay, and a mass that vanishes gives polynomial decay. Using inverse methods, the authors take each candidate wavefunction and derive the exact position-dependent mass, Dirac velocity, and Schrödinger potential that admit it, so every displayed mode is a genuine zero-energy solution. The scheme extends to non-Hermitian equations and gives conditions under which real modes can coexist with complex fields. If correct, the classification provides a practical way to distinguish topologically protected exponential Majorana modes from disorder-induced near-zero modes with weaker localization.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the inverse method for the modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation. Instead of solving the second-order equation $\varphi''+2sv\varphi'-m\varphi=0$ for $\varphi$ given $m$ and $v$, one fixes a normalizable $\varphi$ and algebraically recovers the fields from $m(x)=\varphi''/\varphi+2sv\,\varphi'/\varphi$ and $V(x)-E=\varphi''/\varphi$; reversing the roles gives $sv(x)=-(\varphi''-m\varphi)/(2\varphi')$. A reduction-of-order formula $\varphi^s_2(x)=\varphi^s_1(x)\int^x e^{-2s\int^y v\,dz}/(\varphi^s_1(y))^2\,dy$ produces the second same-pseudospin solution, and for constant $v$ the duality $\varphi^{-s}=e^{2svx}\varphi^{s}$ gives the opposite-pseudospin partner. A two-mode version solves for $m(x)$ and $v(x)$ from a pair of prescribed modes. This inversion is what lets the paper assert that each displayed Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial wavefunction is an exact solution rather than an approximation, and it is what makes the asymptotic mass the quantity that selects the decay class.

What would settle it

Find a normalizable zero mode of $\varphi''(x)+2s v(x)\varphi'(x)-m(x)\varphi(x)=0$ with $m(x)$ tending to a finite nonzero constant as $|x|\to\infty$ but with slower-than-exponential polynomial decay; the central claim predicts that such a mode cannot exist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a three-way correspondence between the asymptotic behavior of the mass term $m(x)$ and the localization class of zero modes of $\varphi''(x)+2s v(x)\varphi'(x)-m(x)\varphi(x)=0$. Gaussian modes $\varphi\sim e^{-\beta x^2/2}$ are exact zero modes when the mass diverges quadratically at infinity, or when the Dirac velocity diverges linearly; exponentially decaying modes $\varphi\sim e^{-\alpha x}/\cosh^\gamma(\beta x)$ correspond to finite nonzero asymptotic masses; polynomially decaying modes $\varphi\sim(\beta^2 x^2+1)^{-n/2}$ correspond to a mass that dips and vanishes at infinity, with the localization length diverging as the topological gap closes. The same inverse construction yields the Schrödinger potential $V(x)-E=\varphi''/\varphi$, produces a second linearly independent mode by reduction of order, and extends to non-Hermitian fields where real eigenmodes can coexist with complex masses, velocities, or potentials. The authors also construct pairs of modes centered at finite distance and periodic modes peaked on an evenly spaced array, and they argue that the presence and number of zero modes still follow the bulk-boundary correspondence even when the localization law is set by the far-field data.

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on the three chosen ansatz families, and the paper does not prove that every normalizable zero mode of Eq. (3) belongs to one of those families.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mass profile of a nanowire or superconductor is measured or engineered, the decay profile of its zero-energy modes is fixed, so the classification can be checked directly in local-density-of-states experiments.
  • Gaussian zero modes arise naturally in harmonic traps, so cold-atom superfluids and harmonic-shell models of nuclei are settings where the predicted divergent mass should produce superexponential Majorana-like modes.
  • The bulk-boundary correspondence still dictates the number of zero modes even when their localization is faster or slower than exponential; only the decay law, not the mode count, depends on the far-field behavior of the mass and velocity.
  • In the non-Hermitian regime, real zero modes can survive even when the mass, velocity, or potential is complex, provided the appropriate reality condition such as $V(x)-E\in\mathbb{R}$ holds.
  • Periodic zero modes localized on an equally spaced array of points are exact solutions, offering a mechanism for zero-energy modes at multiple sites without the energy splitting normally expected from overlapping modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to use the same inverse construction with stretched-exponential trial wavefunctions $e^{-|x|^\nu}$; the paper's logic predicts the mass would have to decay algebraically or logarithmically, and finding such families would interpolate between the polynomial and exponential classes.
  • Because the periodic modes are normalized on the finite interval $-\pi\le x\le\pi$ while the operators are treated on the infinite line, a reader should regard the infinite-array interpretation as an open question; a fully periodic boundary treatment would settle whether these are true localized zero modes on an infinite lattice.
  • The classification suggests a diagnostic for trivial versus topological bound states: measure the spatial decay exponent of near-zero-energy peaks, with exponential decay and finite asymptotic mass as the protected signature and Gaussian or polynomial profiles indicating a confining trap or a vanishing gap rather than a genuine topological transition.
  • Extending the inverse method to lattice models or to dispersions with higher-order momentum terms could reveal whether the mass-asymptotic correspondence persists when the quadratic-momentum approximation is abandoned.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an inverse-method approach to construct exact zero-energy solutions of the modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation (Eq. 3) and eigenstates of the associated Schrödinger equation (Eq. 4). For three families of wavefunctions with Gaussian (faster-than-exponential), exponential, and polynomial (slower-than-exponential) decay, the authors derive the corresponding mass m(x), Dirac velocity v(x), and potential V(x) that make those wavefunctions exact solutions. They also construct second linearly independent modes with the same pseudospin via reduction of order (Eq. 10), modes with opposite pseudospin when v(x) is constant (Eq. 11), and fields supporting two modes at finite separation (Eqs. 12-13). Periodic analogues are treated in Sec. VIII F, and the constructions are extended to non-Hermitian fields. The central classification claim, stated in the abstract and Sec. IX, is that faster-than-exponential decay corresponds to a divergent mass term, exponential decay to finite nonzero asymptotic mass, and slower-than-exponential decay to a mass vanishing at infinity.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful catalogue of exact analytical zero-mode solutions with controlled asymptotic behavior, extending the authors' earlier smooth-domain-wall results to Gaussian and power-law localization. The explicit formulas for companion fields and for second linearly independent modes are valuable and are, as far as the displayed algebra shows, correct. Several of the constructed pairs are consistent with bulk-boundary correspondence expectations, and the non-Hermitian extensions are a distinct contribution. The main weakness is that the general classification in Section IX is stated more broadly than what the inverse construction actually proves; this is fixable but currently affects the paper's central message.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IX and abstract; Eqs. (14)-(18)] The unqualified statement that 'faster-than-exponential modes correspond to the divergence of the mass term' is contradicted by the paper's own Gaussian example. Taking phi(x) = exp(-beta x^2/2 - alpha x) with m(x) = m_* = -beta and s v(x) = (beta x + alpha)/2, Eq. (18), satisfies Eq. (3) exactly, yet m is constant and nonzero while the velocity diverges linearly. The qualification 'for uniform Dirac velocity' appears in Section II but is missing from the abstract and Section IX. The classification should be restated as a joint statement about the asymptotic behavior of both m(x) and v(x), or explicitly restricted to the uniform-velocity case.
  2. [Section IX; also Eqs. (21)-(23) and (33)-(35)] The conclusions present the decay-class/mass-asymptotics correspondence as a general classification of zero modes, but the paper analyzes only three ansatz families and explicitly notes that these wavefunctions solve Eq. (3) only for special coefficient choices, not for general polynomial fields. No theorem is given that every normalizable zero mode of Eq. (3) has one of the Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial asymptotics, and mixed decays such as stretched exponentials are not discussed. The classification should be scoped to the inverse-constructed families with stated companion-field asymptotics, not to all zero modes of the modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation.
  3. [Sec. VIII F and Sec. IX (periodic modes)] The periodic modes in Eqs. (60)-(62) are described as modes localized on an infinite equally spaced array of points. These wavefunctions are periodic and bounded but not normalizable on the real line; they are normalizable only on a finite interval such as -pi <= x <= pi or on a circle. On the infinite line they do not decay, so the assertion that they are localized zero modes on an infinite array is unsupported. The domain of integration and the boundary conditions for these solutions should be stated explicitly, and the corresponding claim in Section IX should be qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Schödinger' for 'Schrödinger' in Section II and other headings, 'satysfing' in Section VII, 'wronksian' in Section V, and 'Schrôdinger' in Section VIII C.
  2. [Eq. (20)] The argument of the erfi function in Eq. (20) appears inconsistent with the preceding expression and with the statement that this mode decays as approximately 1/x; the normalization and argument should be checked.
  3. [Section II] The phrase 'at large distances |x| > infinity' should read 'at large distances |x| -> infinity'.
  4. [Section IV] The inverse method is definitional: Eq. (5) constructs m(x) so that the chosen phi solves Eq. (3) by construction. Stating this explicitly would help readers distinguish the exact solution-generating nature of the method from a predictive derivation of mode asymptotics from general field profiles.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the inverse construction is explicit and self-contained; the central weakness is overgeneralization of the ansatz classification, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper is a genuinely inverse construction: Section IV explicitly reinterprets Eq. (3) as an equation for the unknown fields and gives m(x) = (phi'' + 2sv phi')/phi (Eq. 5) and the analogous formula for V - E (Eq. 7). Statements such as "phi solves Eq. (3) with the derived fields" are therefore identities by construction, but the paper does not disguise this as an independent prediction; every displayed field is an explicit closed form that can be checked by substitution. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the ansatz limitation, stating after Eqs. (21)-(23) and (33)-(35) that the wavefunctions considered are only special cases and do not describe the general solutions, so no uniqueness theorem is being imported. The only self-citation of possible concern is Ref. [40] for the duality relation phi_SC = e^{s integral v} phi_JR with V - E = v^2 + s v' + m; that relation is elementary and can be verified by direct differentiation of Eq. (3), so it is real evidence rather than circular support. What remains is a correctness and generality concern, not a circularity: the Sec. IX summary unqualifiedly asserts that faster-than-exponential modes correspond to divergence of the mass term, whereas the paper's own Gaussian example with v(x) = (beta x + alpha)/2 and m = -beta (Eqs. 14 and 18) decays faster than exponentially with constant nonzero mass and linearly diverging velocity. That overstatement concerns the domain of the classification, but the derivation chain itself is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows the paper's inputs are analytic ansatze and arbitrary parameters, not measured data. The only imported physical input is the modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation itself and the self-cited duality relation. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • alpha (ansatz shift and linear phase) = arbitrary, e.g. 0
    Controls the linear phase or exponential tilt in the chosen wavefunction; chosen by hand, not fitted.
  • beta (inverse width) = arbitrary with Re(beta) > 0 for Gaussian
    Sets localization width in Gaussian, hyperbolic, and polynomial ansatze; chosen by hand.
  • gamma (sech exponent) = arbitrary
    Sets the decay exponent in the exponential ansatz Eq. (24); chosen by hand.
  • n (polynomial decay exponent) = n > 0
    Sets the power-law decay in Eq. (41); chosen by hand.
  • a (half-distance between two modes) = arbitrary
    Separates the two centers in Sec. VIII E; chosen by hand.
  • constant field values v or m in inverse contexts = arbitrary constants
    When constructing m(x) with constant velocity or v(x) with constant mass, the constant is an input parameter, not a fit.
  • special mass values m_* (e.g. m* = -beta, (alpha^2 - beta^2 gamma^2)/gamma, -2 beta^2) = expressions ensuring continuity of v(x)
    Chosen by hand to remove poles in v(x) at specific points; they are fine-tuning inputs.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard second-order ODE theory, including reduction of order and the Wronskian criterion, is used without proof.
    Invoked in Eqs. (10)-(13) and Sections V-VII.
  • domain assumption Zero-energy modes of the modified Jackiw-Rebbi Hamiltonian are eigenstates of tau_x with pseudospin s = +/-1.
    This is the starting point of Eqs. (2)-(3); the paper does not prove that all zero modes in the physical models with inhomogeneous fields have this form, though E = 0 and the anticommuting structure make it natural.
  • domain assumption The duality relation V - E = v^2 + s v' + m between the Jackiw-Rebbi and Schrödinger equations is imported from the authors' prior work [40].
    Used in Sections VI and VIII to relate opposite-pseudospin modes and to compute Schrödinger potentials; not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The chosen ansatz families (Gaussian, sech, inverse-polynomial, periodic) are representative of faster-than-exponential, exponential, and slower-than-exponential decay classes.
    The general classification in Sections II and IX is inferred from these families; no exhaustiveness proof is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zero energy modes with Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay: Exact solutions in hermitian and nonhermitian regimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EWF223OU

@misc{pith2026241214255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zero energy modes with Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay: Exact solutions in hermitian and nonhermitian regimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EWF223OU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14255}
}
read the original abstract

Topological zero modes in topological insulators or superconductors are exponentially localized at the phase transition between a topologically trivial and nontrivial phase. These modes are solutions of a Jackiw-Rebbi equation modified with an additional term which is quadratic in the momentum. Moreover, localized fermionic modes can also be induced by harmonic potentials in superfluids and superconductors or in atomic nuclei. Here, by using inverse methods, we consider in the same framework exponentially-localized zero modes, as well as Gaussian modes induced by harmonic potentials (with superexponential decay) and polynomially decaying modes (with subexponential decay), and derive the explicit and analytical form of the modified Jackiw-Rebbi equation (and of the Schr\"odinger equation) which admits these modes as solutions. We find that the asymptotic behavior of the mass term is crucial in determining the decay properties of the modes. Furthermore, these considerations naturally extend to the nonhermitian regime. These findings allow us to classify and understand topological and nontopological boundary modes in topological insulators and superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14255 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Modes with real wavefunction and Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay on the infinite interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Same as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Couples of modes with real wavefunction and Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay and associated fields for some choice of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Periodic modes with real wavefunction and Gaussian, exponential, or polynomial decay on the infinite interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 10 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Hasan and C

    M. Hasan and C. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Shen, W.-Y

    S.-Q. Shen, W.-Y . Shan, and H.-Z. Lu, Topological insulator and the Dirac equation, SPIN01, 33 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Wehling, A

    T. Wehling, A. Black-Schaffer, and A. Balatsky, Dirac materials, Adv. Phys.63, 1 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Shen, Topological insulators Dirac equation in condensed matters (Springer, 2017)

    S.-Q. Shen, Topological insulators Dirac equation in condensed matters (Springer, 2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Thouless, M

    D. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. Nightingale, and M. Den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    V olovik, Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral superconductors, JETP Lett.70, 609 (1999)

    G. V olovik, Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral superconductors, JETP Lett.70, 609 (1999)

    work page 1999

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Read, Non-Abelian adiabatic statistics and Hall viscosity in quantum Hall states and px + ipy paired superfluids, Phys

    N. Read, Non-Abelian adiabatic statistics and Hall viscosity in quantum Hall states and px + ipy paired superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 79, 045308 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975)

    1975

  3. [11]

    V olovik, The universe in a helium droplet (Oxford University Press, 2009)

    G. V olovik, The universe in a helium droplet (Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    A. Y . Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp.44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    M. Sato, Y . Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Non-abelian topological order ins-wave superfluids of ultracold fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020401 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    M. Sato, Y . Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Non-Abelian topological orders and Majorana fermions in spin-singlet superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134521 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device, Phys

    J. Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Lutchyn, J

    R. Lutchyn, J. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010). 17

    2010

  11. [19]

    Y . Oreg, G. Refael, and F. V on Oppen, Helical liquids and Majorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Leijnse and K

    M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 124003 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    Tanaka, M

    Y . Tanaka, M. Sato, and N. Nagaosa, Symmetry and topology in superconductors –odd-frequency pairing and edge states–, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011013 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Stanescu and S

    T. Stanescu and S. Tewari, Majorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires: Fundamentals, modeling, and experiment, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 25, 233201 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Beenakker, Search for Majorana fermions in superconductors, Annu

    C. Beenakker, Search for Majorana fermions in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 113 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Elliott and M

    S. Elliott and M. Franz, Colloquium: Majorana fermions in nuclear, particle, and solid-state physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 137 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Sato and S

    M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Majorana fermions and topology in superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 072001 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y . Ando, Topological superconductors: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Aguado, Majorana quasiparticles in condensed matter, Riv

    R. Aguado, Majorana quasiparticles in condensed matter, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 40, 523 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Laubscher and J

    K. Laubscher and J. Klinovaja, Majorana bound states in semiconducting nanostructures, J. Appl. Phys. 130, 081101 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Marra, Majorana nanowires for topological quantum computation, J

    P. Marra, Majorana nanowires for topological quantum computation, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 231101 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Masaki, T

    Y . Masaki, T. Mizushima, and M. Nitta, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Aca- demic Press, 2024), Chap. Non-Abelian anyons and non-Abelian vortices in topological superconductors, pp. 755–794, doi:10.1016/B978- 0-323-90800...

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Tanaka, S

    Y . Tanaka, S. Tamura, and J. Cayao, Theory of Majorana Zero Modes in Unconventional Superconductors, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2024, 08C105 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  27. [35]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y . Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  28. [36]

    Ryu and Y

    S. Ryu and Y . Hatsugai, Topological origin of zero-energy edge states in particle-hole symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 077002 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Teo and C

    J. Teo and C. Kane, Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Z. G. Yuto Ashida and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Marra and A

    P. Marra and A. Nigro, Topological zero modes and bounded modes at smooth domain walls: Exact solutions and dualities, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2025, 023A01 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Zhou and Z

    T. Zhou and Z. D. Wang, Revealing Majorana fermion states in a superfluid of cold atoms subject to a harmonic potential, Phys. Rev. B88, 155114 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Kheirkhah, Y

    M. Kheirkhah, Y . Nagai, C. Chen, and F. Marsiglio, Majorana corner flat bands in two-dimensional second-order topological superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104502 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Wen-Chao, Bound states of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations for scalar and vector harmonic oscillator potentials, Chin

    Q. Wen-Chao, Bound states of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations for scalar and vector harmonic oscillator potentials, Chin. Phys. 11, 757 (2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    Ti-Sheng, L

    C. Ti-Sheng, L. Hong-Feng, M. Jie, Z. Shuang-Quan, and Z. Shan-Gui, Pseudospin Symmetry in Relativistic Framework with Harmonic Oscillator Potential and Woods-Saxon Potential, Chin. Phys. Lett. 20, 358 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    Alberto, R

    P. Alberto, R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, and A. S. de Castro, Tensor coupling and pseudospin symmetry in nuclei, Phys. Rev. C71, 034313 (2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    Akcay, Dirac equation with scalar and vector quadratic potentials and Coulomb-like tensor potential, Physics Letters A 373, 616 (2009)

    H. Akcay, Dirac equation with scalar and vector quadratic potentials and Coulomb-like tensor potential, Physics Letters A 373, 616 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Akcay and C

    H. Akcay and C. Tezcan, Exact solutions of the Dirac equation with harmonic oscillator potential including a Coulomb-like tensor potential, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 20, 931 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Kells, D

    G. Kells, D. Meidan, and P. Brouwer, Near-zero-energy end states in topologically trivial spin-orbit coupled superconducting nanowires with a smooth confinement, Phys. Rev. B 86, 100503 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Stanescu and S

    T. Stanescu and S. Tewari, Disentangling Majorana fermions from topologically trivial low-energy states in semiconductor Majorana wires, Phys. Rev. B 87, 140504 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    C.-X. Liu, J. Sau, T. Stanescu, and S. Das Sarma, Andreev bound states versus Majorana bound states in quantum dot-nanowire- superconductor hybrid structures: Trivial versus topological zero-bias conductance peaks, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075161 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    M. Hell, K. Flensberg, and M. Leijnse, Distinguishing Majorana bound states from localized Andreev bound states by interferometry, Phys. Rev. B 97, 161401 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    C.-X. Liu, J. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Distinguishing topological Majorana bound states from trivial Andreev bound states: Proposed tests through differential tunneling conductance spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214502 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Peñaranda, R

    F. Peñaranda, R. Aguado, P. San-Jose, and E. Prada, Quantifying wave-function overlaps in inhomogeneous Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235406 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Avila, F

    J. Avila, F. Peñaranda, E. Prada, P. San-Jose, and R. Aguado, Non-hermitian topology as a unifying framework for the Andreev versus Majorana states controversy, Commun. Phys. 2, 133 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    A. Vuik, B. Nijholt, A. Akhmerov, and M. Wimmer, Reproducing topological properties with quasi-Majorana states, SciPost Phys.7, 061 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Yavilberg, E

    K. Yavilberg, E. Ginossar, and E. Grosfeld, Differentiating Majorana from Andreev bound states in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. B 100, 241408 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nygård, R. Aguado, and L. Kouwenhoven, From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 575 (2020). 18

    2020

  50. [58]

    Pan and S

    H. Pan and S. Das Sarma, Physical mechanisms for zero-bias conductance peaks in Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013377 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Pan and S

    H. Pan and S. Das Sarma, Crossover between trivial zero modes in Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054510 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Tian and C

    H. Tian and C. Ren, Distinguishing Majorana and quasi-Majorana bound states in a hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire with inhomogeneous potential barriers, Results Phys. 26, 104273 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Cayao and A

    J. Cayao and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Distinguishing trivial and topological zero-energy states in long nanowire junctions, Phys. Rev. B104, L020501 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Liu, Y .-X

    Z.-G. Liu, Y .-X. Huang, G.-C. Guo, and M. Gong, Majorana and non-Majorana modes in a nanowire in partially proximity to a superconductor, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 094301 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Marra and A

    P. Marra and A. Nigro, Majorana/Andreev crossover and the fate of the topological phase transition in inhomogeneous nanowires, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 34, 124001 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Neupert, S

    T. Neupert, S. Onoda, and A. Furusaki, Chain of Majorana states from superconducting Dirac fermions at a magnetic domain wall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 206404 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    S. Rex, I. V . Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Majorana modes in emergent-wire phases of helical and cycloidal magnet-superconductor hybrids, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224501 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Marra, D

    P. Marra, D. Inotani, and M. Nitta, 1D Majorana Goldstinos and partial supersymmetry breaking in quantum wires, Commun. Phys. 5, 149 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Marra, D

    P. Marra, D. Inotani, and M. Nitta, Dispersive one-dimensional Majorana modes with emergent supersymmetry in one-dimensional proximitized superconductors via spatially modulated potentials and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 105, 214525 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Marra, D

    P. Marra, D. Inotani, T. Mizushima, and M. Nitta, Majorana modes in striped two-dimensional inhomogeneous topological superconductors, npj Quantum Materials 9, 59 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Pawlak, M

    R. Pawlak, M. Kisiel, J. Klinovaja, T. Meier, S. Kawai, T. Glatzel, D. Loss, and E. Meyer, Probing atomic structure and Majorana wavefunctions in mono-atomic Fe chains on superconducting Pb surface, npj Quantum Inf. 2, 16035 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.