pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.06245 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-08 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Generalized Perturbed Kepler Problem: Gravitational Wave Imprints from Eccentric Compact Binaries

Rajes Ghosh , R. Prasad , Kabir Chakravarti , Prayush Kumar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords perturbed Kepler problemeccentric binariesgravitational wavesorbital perturbationsgravitational fluxesphase evolutioncompact binaries
0
0 comments X

The pith

A general perturbed potential modifies eccentric binary orbits and imprints on their gravitational wave signals in a source-specific way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a framework for treating departures from Keplerian motion in eccentric compact binaries caused by environmental effects or new physics. It begins with an arbitrary perturbed potential, derives the resulting orbital changes, and then calculates the emitted gravitational wave fluxes together with the accumulated phase evolution. Because the approach ties parameters directly to a specific source rather than using broad expansions, it makes it easier to connect observed deviations in wave data to their physical origins. This matters for analyzing signals from detectors now operating and those planned for the future.

Core claim

Starting from a general perturbed potential, the modified orbit is derived and the associated gravitational fluxes and phase evolution are computed. The framework assesses their observational relevance for both current and future detectors and supplies a general, physically transparent toolkit for probing deviations from standard dynamics in gravitational wave data.

What carries the argument

The unified framework built on a general perturbed potential within the perturbed Kepler problem, which generates the altered orbital motion and the resulting gravitational-wave fluxes and phase for eccentric binaries.

If this is right

  • Modified orbital dynamics produce altered gravitational wave fluxes from the binary system.
  • The accumulated phase evolution encodes the effects of the perturbation over the inspiral.
  • The source-specific parametrization allows direct mapping of wave signatures to particular physical causes.
  • The same fluxes and phase can be used to evaluate detectability thresholds in both present and next-generation detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same perturbative treatment could be specialized to concrete cases such as dark-matter-induced forces or specific modified-gravity corrections to predict distinct waveform deviations.
  • The framework might be combined with numerical-relativity simulations of eccentric mergers to test consistency of the analytic phase evolution.
  • Similar methods could address other environmental influences on binary dynamics, such as gas drag or external tidal fields, by choosing appropriate forms of the perturbed potential.

Load-bearing premise

A general perturbed potential can be introduced and treated perturbatively to produce observable gravitational-wave effects whose physical origins can be traced in a source-specific manner.

What would settle it

High-precision gravitational-wave observations of an eccentric compact binary that show phase evolution and fluxes indistinguishable from the unperturbed Keplerian case, with no measurable room for the derived corrections, would falsify the claim that such perturbations yield observable imprints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06245 by Kabir Chakravarti, Prayush Kumar, Rajes Ghosh, R. Prasad.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Variation of the ratio |nk|/νk with frequency for k = {1, · · · , 6} for some arbitrarily chosen values of nk (only one at a time) for a GW150914-like system with masses 36M⊙ and 29M⊙. The solid cyan line represents a reference line where the ratio is 10−5 , which is well within the domain of our approach. where nk = Nk/(c 2 r k ⊙) is a dimensionless quantity, r⊙ = G M⊙/c2 , f⊙ = 64.3 kHz, and f = π −1p N0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Orbits (x = r(ϕ) cos ϕ, y = r(ϕ) sin ϕ) with r(ϕ) given by Eq. (9) for k = {3, 5} (only one at a time) and e = 0.2. Twenty cycles are shown and orbit sizes are normalized to unity (aˆ = 1). which we have also checked directly from Eq. (4) via Poincaré–Lindstedt method [76]. This motivates us to rewrite the orbit in the following suggestive manner so that the precession rate become very apparent: r(ϕ) = aˆ(… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Variation of GW energy flux differences from the corresponding Keplerian value as a function of GW frequency for a GW150914-like system. We have chosen {k = 2, · · · , 6} (only one at a time) represented by the same colored lines as indicated in the upper-left subplot. The corresponding values of n¯k are fixed such that n¯k/νk = 10−5 at fISCO = 67.26 Hz. Similarly, one can compute the angular momentum flux… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Instantaneous dephasing for a GW150914-like system for different k values with n¯k/νk = 10−5 at fISCO. The vertical axis shown is minus dephasing. We have chosen e0 = 0.1 at f0 = 4 Hz. For k = 2, 3, 5, 6, dephasing is negative, whereas for k = 4 it is positive. For k = 2, 3, 4 it decreases with frequency, whereas for k = 5, 6 it increases with increase in frequency. There is a switch over at k = 4. 250 500… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cumulative dephasing for a GW150914-like system for different k values as a function of different n¯k’s (only one at a time) and with e0 = 0.1 (solid) and e0 = 0.4 (dashed) at f0 = 4 Hz. These n¯k-ranges are chosen in a window around the corresponding values of n¯k for which n¯k/νk = 10−5 . For the cases shown, increasing eccentricity results in a decrease in the net cumulative dephasing. However, the case… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cumulative dephasing for a GW150914-like system for different k values as a function of initial eccentricity e0 at f0 = 4 Hz and n¯k/νk = 10−5 at fISCO. The amount of absolute cumulative dephasing being O(10−2 ) is an artifact of the ratio n¯k/νk being 10−5 . n3 n3 + n6 n3 + n2 Perturbing Terms in Phase 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 n 3 / n 3 Uncertainty in n3 n6 n6 + n3 n6 + n5 Perturbing Terms in Phase 0.00 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) Fractional uncertainty in n¯3 estimated using Fisher analysis for GW150914-like system for three scenarios: (i) GW phase including only the n¯3 perturbation term, (ii) including both n¯3 and a k < 4 term, i.e., n¯2, and (iii) including n¯3 along with a k > 4 term, i.e., n¯6. (Right) Fractional uncertainty in n6 for the same three scenarios. The uncertainty is more strongly influenced when perturbati… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations of astrophysical binaries may reveal departures from pure Keplerian orbits due to environmental influences, modifications to the underlying gravitational dynamics, or signatures of new physics. In this work, we develop a unified framework to systematically study such perturbations in the ambit of the perturbed Kepler problem and explore their impact on eccentric orbital dynamics and gravitational wave emission. Unlike traditional parametrized frameworks such as post-Newtonian and post-Einsteinian expansions, our approach offers a more source-specific modeling strategy, making it more natural to trace the physical origins of eccentric binary model parameters. Starting from a general perturbed potential, we derive the modified orbit and compute the associated gravitational fluxes and phase evolution, assessing their observational relevance for both current and future detectors. This framework thus offers a general and physically transparent toolkit for probing such subtle deviations from standard dynamics in gravitational wave data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified framework for the perturbed Kepler problem applied to eccentric compact binaries. Starting from a general perturbed potential, it derives the modified orbit, computes the associated gravitational-wave fluxes and phase evolution, and assesses observational relevance for current and future detectors. The approach is positioned as more source-specific and physically transparent than traditional post-Newtonian or post-Einsteinian parametrizations.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the framework supplies a physically transparent toolkit for modeling deviations from Keplerian dynamics in gravitational-wave signals from eccentric binaries. It enables tracing the physical origins of model parameters in a source-specific manner, which could aid interpretation of environmental influences or new-physics signatures in data from LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA and future detectors such as LISA.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a single illustrative equation (e.g., the form of the perturbed potential or the leading-order flux correction) to convey the concrete output of the framework.
  2. Section 2 (or equivalent): the transition from the general perturbed potential to the explicit orbit solution should include a brief statement of the small-parameter ordering and the domain of validity.
  3. The comparison of phase evolution to unperturbed or post-Newtonian cases is mentioned but would be strengthened by a short table or plot showing the fractional difference for representative eccentricities and perturbation strengths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review of our manuscript on the generalized perturbed Kepler problem. We appreciate the recognition that our framework provides a physically transparent, source-specific approach to modeling deviations from Keplerian dynamics in eccentric compact binaries and their gravitational-wave signatures, as an alternative to traditional post-Newtonian or post-Einsteinian parametrizations. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we will incorporate any necessary clarifications in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper begins with an arbitrary general perturbed potential as an explicit input assumption and proceeds to derive the modified orbit, gravitational fluxes, and phase evolution using standard perturbative methods in orbital mechanics. No equation or step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rely on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The framework is presented as a source-specific modeling strategy distinct from PN/PE expansions, with all outputs traceable to the initial potential without renaming known results or smuggling ansatze. This constitutes a normal, non-circular perturbative derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of perturbation theory in orbital mechanics and general relativity; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Small deviations from Keplerian orbits can be treated using perturbative methods to obtain modified orbital elements and gravitational-wave fluxes.
    Invoked when moving from the general perturbed potential to the derived orbit and fluxes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1239 out tokens · 59151 ms · 2026-05-19T00:22:25.180297+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Distinguishability of magnetic massive black holes from environmental mimics with inspiral gravitational waves

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Magnetic field corrections to inspiral waveforms appear at -2 PN and -3 PN orders and mimic power-law environmental gravity but can be distinguished above a transition density of about 10^{-4} kg/m^3 for Bonnor-Melvin...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. D100, no.10, 104036 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036 [arXiv:1903.04467 15 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.104036 2019

  2. [2]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. D103, no.12, 122002 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.122002 [arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 2021

  3. [3]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific, VIRGO and KAGRA], [arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. X9, no.3, 031040 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 [arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  5. [5]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev.X11, 021053(2021)doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 [arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  6. [6]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.[KAGRA, VIRGO and LIGO Sci- entific], Phys. Rev. X13, no.4, 041039 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 [arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[KAGRA, LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Living Rev. Rel.19, 1 (2016) doi:10.1007/s41114-020- 00026-9 [arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41114-020- 2016

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Astro- phys. J. Lett.882, no.2, L24 (2019) doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ab3800 [arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041- 2019

  10. [10]

    2021, ApJL, 913, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abe949

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Astrophys. J. Lett.913, no.1, L7 (2021) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 [arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 2021

  11. [11]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.[KAGRA, VIRGO and LIGO Sci- entific], Phys. Rev. X13, no.1, 011048 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 [arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Obser- vatory, VINROUGE and MASTER], Nature551, no.7678, 85-88 (2017) doi:10.1038/nature24471 [arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature24471 2017

  13. [14]

    doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ad6c40

    R. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific, Virgo and KAGRA], Astrophys. J.949, no.2, 76 (2023) doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ac74bb [arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2023

  14. [15]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse,et al., [arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [16]

    A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito, et al.[arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [17]

    Parametric Statistical Inference

    M. Maggiore, Oxford University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0-19-171766-6, 978-0-19-852074-0 doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007

  17. [18]

    Maggiore, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-0- 19-857089-9

    M. Maggiore, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-0- 19-857089-9

    work page 2018

  18. [19]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014) doi:10.12942/lrr- 2014-2 [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr- 2014

  19. [20]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011) doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7 [arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7 2011

  20. [21]

    Banerjee, H

    S. Banerjee, H. Baumgardt, and P. Kroupa, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 371 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [22]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, S. Chat- terjee, C. J. Haster and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no.5, 051101 (2015) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.2, 029901 (2016)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101 [arXiv:1505.00792 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.051101 2015

  22. [23]

    Ishibashi and M

    W. Ishibashi and M. Gröbner, Astron. Astrophys. 639, A108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [24]

    Coogan, G

    A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh and D. A. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D105, no.4, 043009 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043009 [arXiv:2108.04154 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.043009 2022

  24. [25]

    Rowan, T

    C. Rowan, T. Boekholt, B. Kocsis, and Z. Haiman, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 2770 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [26]

    M. A. Sedda, S. Naoz and B. Kocsis, Universe9, no.3, 138 (2023) doi:10.3390/universe9030138 [arXiv:2302.14071 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9030138 2023

  26. [27]

    Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.122003 [arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.122003 2009

  27. [28]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of Gravitational Wave Observation with Future Detectors

    K. Chamberlain and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D96, no.8, 084039 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084039 [arXiv:1704.08268 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.084039 2017

  28. [29]

    T. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Zhao, K. Lin, C. Zhang, S. Zhang, X. Zhao, T. Zhu and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 98, no.8, 083023 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083023 [arXiv:1806.05674 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.083023 2018

  29. [30]

    Battista and V

    E. Battista and V. De Falco, Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, 084067 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084067 [arXiv:2109.01384 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084067 2021

  30. [31]

    De Falco, E

    V. De Falco, E. Battista, D. Usseglio and S. Capozziello, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.2, 137 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12476-4 [arXiv:2401.13374 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12476-4 2024

  31. [32]

    Barsanti, N

    S. Barsanti, N. Franchini, L. Gualtieri, A. Maselli and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D106, no.4, 044029 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.044029 [arXiv:2203.05003 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.044029 2022

  32. [33]

    Payne, M

    E. Payne, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, L. Lehner, Y. Chen and W. M. Farr, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, no.25, 251401 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.251401 [arXiv:2407.07043 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.251401 2024

  33. [34]

    Trestini, Phys

    D. Trestini, Phys. Rev. D109, no.10, 104003 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104003 [arXiv:2401.06844 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.104003 2024

  34. [35]

    L. Liu, Ø. Christiansen, W. H. Ruan, Z. K. Guo, R. G. Cai and S. P. Kim, Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.11, 1048 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09849-4 [arXiv:2011.13586 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09849-4 2021

  35. [36]

    Carson and K

    Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D101, 084050 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084050 [arXiv:2003.02374 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.084050 2020

  36. [37]

    Psaltis, C

    D. Psaltis, C. Talbot, E. Payne and I. Mandel, Phys. Rev. D103, 104036 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104036 [arXiv:2012.02117 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104036 2021

  37. [38]

    Gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries with magnetic dipole moments

    K. Ioka and K. Taniguchi, Astrophys. J.537, 327 (2000) doi:10.1086/309004 [arXiv:astro-ph/0001218 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/309004 2000

  38. [39]

    Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang and J. S. Read, Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123016 [arXiv:0911.3535 [astro- ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123016 2010

  39. [40]

    J. P. Bernaldez and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124014 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124014 [arXiv:2303.01398 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124014 2023

  40. [41]

    Prasad, A

    R. Prasad, A. Doke and P. Kumar, [arXiv:2508.08234 [astro-ph.HE]]. 16

    work page arXiv

  41. [42]

    Camilloni, G

    F. Camilloni, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, R. Oliv- eri, M. Orselli and D. Pica, Phys. Rev. D107, no.8, 084011 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084011 [arXiv:2301.04879 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.084011 2023

  42. [43]

    Henry, F

    Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and C. Le Poncin- Lafitte, Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 024020 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024020 [arXiv:2303.17536 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.024020 2023

  43. [44]

    Henry, F

    Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and C. Le Poncin- Lafitte, Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 084048 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084048 [arXiv:2310.03785 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084048 2024

  44. [45]

    Grilli, M

    E. Grilli, M. Orselli, D. Pereñiguez and D. Pica, JCAP02, 028 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/028 [arXiv:2411.08089 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/028 2025

  45. [46]

    1943, ApJ, 97, 255, doi: 10.1086/144517

    S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J.97, 255 (1943) doi:10.1086/144517

    work page doi:10.1086/144517 1943

  46. [47]

    Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 89, no.10, 104059 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.104059 [arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.104059 2014

  47. [48]

    J. M. Fedrow, C. D. Ott, U. Sperhake, J. Black- man, R. Haas, C. Reisswig and A. De Fe- lice, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, no.17, 171103 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.171103 [arXiv:1704.07383 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.171103 2017

  48. [49]

    Cardoso and C

    V. Cardoso and C. F. B. Macedo, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, no.2, 1963-1972 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2396 [arXiv:2008.01091 [astro- ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2396 1963

  49. [50]

    Observable Signatures of EMRI Black Hole Binaries Embedded in Thin Accretion Disks

    B. Kocsis, N. Yunes and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D84, 024032 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.049907 [arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.049907 2011

  50. [51]

    Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals

    N. Yunes, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb and Z. Haiman, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 171103 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.171103 [arXiv:1103.4609 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.171103 2011

  51. [52]

    Toubiana, L

    A. Toubiana, L. Sberna, A. Caputo, G. Cusin, S. Marsat, K. Jani, S. Babak, E. Barausse, C. Caprini and P. Pani, et al.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.10, 101105 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101105 [arXiv:2010.06056 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.101105 2021

  52. [53]

    Cardoso and A

    V. Cardoso and A. Maselli, Astron. Astrophys. 644, A147 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037654 [arXiv:1909.05870 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037654 2020

  53. [54]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no.24, 241103 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.241103 [arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.241103 2022

  54. [55]

    Speeney, A

    N. Speeney, A. Antonelli, V. Baibhav and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D106, no.4, 044027 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.044027 [arXiv:2204.12508 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.044027 2022

  55. [56]

    Boudon, P

    A. Boudon, P. Brax, P. Valageas and L. K. Wong, Phys. Rev. D109, no.4, 043504 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043504 [arXiv:2305.18540 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043504 2024

  56. [57]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 954, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd77d

    A. Vijaykumar, A. Tiwari, S. J. Kapadia, K. G. Arun and P. Ajith, Astrophys. J.954, no.1, 105 (2023) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd77d [arXiv:2302.09651 [astro- ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd77d 2023

  57. [58]

    Duque, C

    F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente and V. Car- doso, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, no.12, 121404 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.121404 [arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.121404 2024

  58. [59]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, no.6, L061501 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L061501 [arXiv:2109.00005 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.l061501 2022

  59. [60]

    Speeney, E

    N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 084068 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084068 [arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.084068 2024

  60. [61]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev.131, 435-439 (1963) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.131.435 1963

  61. [62]

    LISA—Mission Summary (2021), https://sci.esa.int/s/ w5qyMBw

    work page 2021

  62. [63]

    Kawamura, M

    S. Kawamura, M. Ando, N. Seto, S. Sato, T. Nakamura, K. Tsubono, N. Kanda, T. Tanaka, J. Yokoyama and I. Funaki,et al.Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094011 (2011) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094011

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094011 2011

  63. [64]

    Cardenas-Avendano, S

    A. Cardenas-Avendano, S. Nampalliwar and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.37, no.13, 135008 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab8f64 [arXiv:1912.08062 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab8f64 2020

  64. [65]

    C. M. Will, Theory and experiments in gravitational physics (Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 1981)

    work page 1981

  65. [66]

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D82, 064010 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.064010 [arXiv:1005.0304 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.064010 2010

  66. [67]

    Gravity: Newtonian, Post- Newtonian, Relativistic,

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will, “Gravity: Newtonian, Post- Newtonian, Relativistic,” Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781107032866 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [68]

    Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity inspiralling compact binaries to 3PN order

    B. Moore, M. Favata, K. G. Arun and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D93, no.12, 124061 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124061 [arXiv:1605.00304 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.124061 2016

  68. [69]

    E. A. Huerta, P. Kumar, B. Agarwal, D. George, H. Y. Schive, H. P. Pfeiffer, R. Haas, W. Ren, T. Chu and M. Boyle,et al.Phys. Rev. D95, no.2, 024038 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024038 [arXiv:1609.05933 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.024038 2017

  69. [70]

    Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects

    A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, W. Del Pozzo, G. Riemenschnei- der, S. Akcay, G. Carullo, P. Fleig, S. Babak, K. W. Tsang and M. Colleoni,et al.Phys. Rev. D98, no.10, 104052 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104052 [arXiv:1806.01772 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.104052 2018

  70. [71]

    van de Meent, A

    M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124038 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124038 [arXiv:2303.18026 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124038 2023

  71. [72]

    2023, Phys

    L. Pompili, A. Buonanno, H. Estellés, M. Khalil, M. van de Meent, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, M. Pürrer, A. Ramos- Buades and A. K. Mehta,et al.Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124035 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124035 [arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124035 2023

  72. [73]

    C. A. Benavides-Gallego and W. B. Han, Symme- try15, no.2, 537 (2023) doi:10.3390/sym15020537 [arXiv:2209.00874 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3390/sym15020537 2023

  73. [74]

    Z. C. Chen, S. P. Kim and L. Liu, Commun. Theor. Phys. 75, no.6, 065401 (2023) doi:10.1088/1572-9494/acce98 [arXiv:2210.15564 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/acce98 2023

  74. [75]

    R. K. Nagle, E. B. Saff, and A. D. Snider,Fundamentals of differential equations and boundary value problems, 6th 17 ed., (Pearson Addison-Wesley, 2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [76]

    Verhulst,Nonlinear Differential Equations and Dynam- ical Systems, Universitext

    F. Verhulst,Nonlinear Differential Equations and Dynam- ical Systems, Universitext. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1996)

    work page 1996

  76. [77]

    Cipollina and G

    M. Cipollina and G. Bertin, Astron. Astrophys. 288, 43 (1994)

    work page 1994

  77. [78]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1719- 1722(1999)doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1719[arXiv:astro- ph/9906391 [astro-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1719 1999

  78. [79]

    Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis

    L. Sadeghian, F. Ferrer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 88, no.6, 063522 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063522 [arXiv:1305.2619 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.063522 2013

  79. [80]

    B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone and D. Gaggero, Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 083006 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083006 [arXiv:2002.12811 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.083006 2020

  80. [81]

    D. A. Nichols, B. A. Wade and A. M. Grant, Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124062 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124062 [arXiv:2309.06498 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124062 2023

Showing first 80 references.