pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.18959 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-22 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Scalar-Mediated Inelastic Dark Matter as a Solution to Small-Scale Structure Anomalies

Zihan Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords inelastic dark matterself-interacting dark matterscalar mediatorsmall-scale structurevelocity-dependent cross sectionZ2 symmetrydirect detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scalar-mediated inelastic dark matter model with Z2 symmetry generates velocity-dependent self-interactions that suppress scattering in ultra-faint satellites while enabling it in dwarfs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a self-interacting dark matter scenario where a light scalar mediator couples to a pseudo-Dirac fermion pair split by 100 eV. A dark Z2 symmetry forbids tree-level elastic scattering and imposes a kinematic threshold, so scattering rates drop sharply at the low velocities typical of ultra-faint satellite galaxies. Resonant enhancement in coupled-channel inelastic processes then boosts the cross section at the higher velocities found in dwarf galaxies, addressing the core-cusp and diversity problems. A dimension-5 magnetic dipole operator lets the heavier state decay to the lighter state plus a photon, satisfying Big Bang nucleosynthesis bounds and producing a distinctive low-threshold recoil signature in direct detection. The authors identify a benchmark region near 40 GeV dark matter mass and 20 MeV mediator mass where non-perturbative dynamics reconcile galactic observations with cosmological annihilation limits.

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of a leptophilic scalar mediator, a 100 eV mass splitting protected by Z2 symmetry, and resonant coupled-channel dynamics produces the precise velocity dependence needed to solve small-scale structure anomalies while remaining consistent with CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation; this occurs without additional parameter tuning at the benchmark point m_χ ≈ 40 GeV, m_φ ≈ 20 MeV.

What carries the argument

The Z2 symmetry that forbids tree-level elastic scattering, thereby creating a kinematic threshold for velocity suppression, together with resonant enhancement in the coupled-channel inelastic scattering amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The model simultaneously satisfies astrophysical core-cusp and diversity observations and cosmological bounds on annihilation.
  • The magnetic dipole operator produces a unique low-threshold direct detection signal with a 1/E_R spectrum.
  • The excited state decays to the ground state plus a photon fast enough to satisfy Big Bang nucleosynthesis constraints.
  • Non-perturbative coupled-channel effects open a viable parameter space without post-hoc velocity adjustments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same velocity-dependent mechanism could be tested in high-velocity systems such as galaxy cluster mergers.
  • Future low-threshold direct detection runs could specifically search for the predicted 1/E_R shape to confirm or exclude the dipole operator.
  • The approach might connect to other small-scale anomalies such as the too-big-to-fail problem through similar kinematic thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The non-perturbative resonant enhancement and kinematic threshold automatically yield the exact velocity dependence required to suppress interactions in ultra-faint satellites while allowing large self-interactions in dwarfs.

What would settle it

A direct detection experiment that either observes or rules out a 1/E_R recoil spectrum at low energy thresholds, or high-resolution measurements of dark matter self-interaction rates in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies that fail to show the predicted suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.18959 by Zihan Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a scalar-mediated Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM) model to address small-scale structure anomalies such as the core-cusp and diversity problems. The model is composed by a leptophilic scalar mediator and a pseudo-Dirac dark matter candidate with a mass splitting of 100ev.We imposed a dark discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry forbids tree-level elastic scattering. Therefore creates kinematic threshold that suppresses scattering in ultra-faint satellite galaxies while enabling large self-interaction cross-sections in dwarf galaxies via resonant enhancement. To satisfy Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) requirements, we introduce a dimension-5 magnetic dipole operator that enable the decay of the excited state ($\chi_2 \rightarrow \chi_1 \gamma$). This operator also provides a unique, low-threshold signal for direct detection experiments, characterized by a distinct $1/E_R$ recoil spectrum. We identify a benchmark parameter space around ($m_\chi \approx 40$ GeV, $m_\phi \approx 20$ MeV) where non-perturbative coupled-channel dynamics successfully reconcile astrophysical observations with cosmological bounds, including CMB constraints on annihilation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a scalar-mediated inelastic self-interacting dark matter model consisting of a leptophilic scalar mediator and a pseudo-Dirac dark matter candidate with a 100 eV mass splitting. A dark Z2 symmetry is imposed to forbid tree-level elastic scattering, creating a kinematic threshold that suppresses interactions in low-velocity ultra-faint satellites while resonant enhancement from non-perturbative coupled-channel dynamics enables large self-interaction cross sections in dwarf galaxies. A dimension-5 magnetic dipole operator is introduced to allow the excited state to decay (satisfying BBN) and to produce a distinct 1/E_R recoil spectrum for direct detection. The authors identify a benchmark point (m_χ ≈ 40 GeV, m_φ ≈ 20 MeV) claimed to reconcile small-scale structure anomalies with cosmological bounds including CMB annihilation constraints.

Significance. If the claimed velocity-dependent cross sections from the non-perturbative dynamics hold without additional tuning, the model would offer a concrete mechanism to address the core-cusp and diversity problems while evading elastic SIDM tensions with CMB data and providing a testable inelastic direct-detection signature. The approach of using a kinematic threshold plus resonant enhancement is a potentially useful addition to the SIDM literature.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that non-perturbative coupled-channel dynamics at the benchmark (m_χ ≈ 40 GeV, m_φ ≈ 20 MeV) 'successfully reconcile astrophysical observations with cosmological bounds' is unsupported because the manuscript supplies no derivations of the coupled-channel amplitudes, no explicit velocity-dependent cross-section calculations, and no quantitative fits to dwarf or ultra-faint satellite data. This is load-bearing for the reconciliation assertion.
  2. Abstract: the statement that the Z2 symmetry and 100 eV threshold 'suppress scattering in ultra-faint satellite galaxies while enabling large self-interaction cross-sections in dwarf galaxies via resonant enhancement' requires explicit demonstration that the resonant enhancement occurs at the relevant velocities without post-hoc parameter adjustment; no such calculation is provided.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: grammatical errors and awkward phrasing ('We imposed a dark discrete Z2 symmetry forbids tree-level elastic scattering. Therefore creates kinematic threshold') should be corrected for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments. We address the major concerns point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit calculations and demonstrations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that non-perturbative coupled-channel dynamics at the benchmark (m_χ ≈ 40 GeV, m_φ ≈ 20 MeV) 'successfully reconcile astrophysical observations with cosmological bounds' is unsupported because the manuscript supplies no derivations of the coupled-channel amplitudes, no explicit velocity-dependent cross-section calculations, and no quantitative fits to dwarf or ultra-faint satellite data. This is load-bearing for the reconciliation assertion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current version of the manuscript does not provide the explicit derivations and calculations needed to fully substantiate the abstract claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection deriving the coupled-channel amplitudes via the non-perturbative partial-wave formalism, together with explicit velocity-dependent cross-section results for the benchmark point. These calculations show resonant enhancement at dwarf-galaxy velocities while remaining consistent with CMB annihilation limits. We also include a quantitative comparison to observed core radii and diversity data in dwarfs, confirming that the benchmark satisfies the required cross sections. The reconciliation statement is now directly supported by these results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract: the statement that the Z2 symmetry and 100 eV threshold 'suppress scattering in ultra-faint satellite galaxies while enabling large self-interaction cross-sections in dwarf galaxies via resonant enhancement' requires explicit demonstration that the resonant enhancement occurs at the relevant velocities without post-hoc parameter adjustment; no such calculation is provided.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required. The revised manuscript now contains velocity-dependent cross-section plots and analytic arguments showing that the Z2 symmetry plus 100 eV splitting imposes a kinematic threshold that suppresses scattering at the lower velocities characteristic of ultra-faint satellites. At the higher velocities of dwarf galaxies the same parameters produce resonant enhancement through the non-perturbative coupled-channel dynamics. The benchmark values of m_χ and m_φ were selected from the model Lagrangian to place the resonance in the appropriate velocity window; no additional tuning is introduced. These results are presented in new figures and accompanying text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation introduces a Z2-symmetric pseudo-Dirac DM model with a scalar mediator and a dimension-5 dipole operator, then identifies a benchmark point (m_χ ≈ 40 GeV, m_φ ≈ 20 MeV) at which non-perturbative coupled-channel scattering produces the desired velocity dependence. No equation or step reduces by construction to its own input; the benchmark is exhibited as an existence proof within the model's parameter space rather than a tautological fit or self-citation load-bearing claim. The central mechanism (kinematic threshold plus resonant enhancement) follows directly from the imposed symmetries and is not presupposed by the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on several free parameters chosen as benchmarks to match observations and new postulated entities without independent evidence outside the model fitting.

free parameters (3)
  • DM mass splitting = 100 eV
    Chosen to create kinematic threshold for scattering suppression in small galaxies
  • DM mass m_χ = 40 GeV
    Benchmark value selected for the model to satisfy multiple constraints
  • Mediator mass m_φ = 20 MeV
    Benchmark value for enabling resonant enhancement
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence of dark Z2 symmetry
    Forbids tree-level elastic scattering to create kinematic threshold
  • ad hoc to paper Presence of dimension-5 magnetic dipole operator
    Introduced to enable excited state decay for BBN compliance and detection signal
invented entities (2)
  • Leptophilic scalar mediator φ no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates self-interactions between dark matter particles
    New particle postulated to enable the inelastic scattering mechanism
  • Pseudo-Dirac dark matter states χ1 and χ2 no independent evidence
    purpose: Inelastic dark matter candidate with small mass splitting
    New dark matter model component with the required splitting

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1649 out tokens · 41654 ms · 2026-05-16T21:08:27.929713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LensAgent: A Self Evolving Agent for Autonomous Physical Inference of Sub-galactic Structure

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LensAgent is a training-free LLM agent framework that reconstructs mass distributions in SLACS strong lensing systems to extract sub-galactic substructures.

  2. Direct-detection constraints on inelastic dark matter with a scalar mediator

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Xenon data constrain inelastic fermion DM with scalar mediator for sub-MeV mass splittings through endothermic and exothermic DM-electron scattering.

  3. Dark QCD Origin of the NANOGrav Signal and Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A dark QCD model with a first-order phase transition at 5-6 MeV produces the NANOGrav SGWB amplitude while supplying self-interacting dark matter via a 40 GeV baryon and 20-50 MeV dilaton, linked by entropy dilution.

  4. Prospects of boosted magnetic dipole inelastic fermion dark matter at ILC-BDX

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    ILC-BDX can probe inelastic magnetic-dipole dark matter in a relevant parameter space for relative mass splittings of 0.05 and 0.001 over 1-10 years of running with 4e21 electrons on target per year.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 52 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The radial Hamiltonian for a partial wave l is: d2 dr2 + K 2 − l(l + 1) r2 − 2µV (r) ul(r) = 0 , (A1) where ul = ( ul,1, ul,2)T

    Coupled-channel Schrödinger equation Consider the two-body wavefunction Ψ(⃗ r) = (ψ1(⃗ r), ψ2(⃗ r))T , where channel 1 is χ1χ1 and chan- nel 2 is χ2χ2. The radial Hamiltonian for a partial wave l is: d2 dr2 + K 2 − l(l + 1) r2 − 2µV (r) ul(r) = 0 , (A1) where ul = ( ul,1, ul,2)T . The momentum matrix K 2 is diagonal: K 2 = k2 1 0 0 k2 2 , (A2) with k2 1 =...

    work page

  2. [2]

    • At the origin ( x → 0): The wavefunction must be regular, ul,i ∼ xl+1

    Boundary conditions and S-matrix We solve these equations for the S-matrix element S12 describing the transition 1 → 2. • At the origin ( x → 0): The wavefunction must be regular, ul,i ∼ xl+1. • At infinity ( x → ∞ ): The potential vanishes. For an incoming wave in channel 1, we match to the asymptotic form: ul,1 ∼ i 2 h(2) l (k1r) − S11h(1) l (k1r) , (A7...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Cross-section calculation For i → j scattering, the partial-wave amplitude is fij(θ) = 1 2iki ∞X l=0 (2l + 1) S(l) ij − δij Pl(cos θ), (A9) and the differential cross section is dσi→j dΩ = kj ki |fij(θ)|2, (A10) with kj understood as real above threshold and dσi→j = 0 below threshold. We use the standard definitions σi→j T = Z dΩ (1 − cos θ) dσi→j dΩ , (A...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We solve the coupled-channel Schrödinger equation in the basis (χ1χ1, χ2χ2) with reduced mass µ ≃ mχ/2

    Numerical implementation and validation We then specify the numerical procedure used to ob- tain the non-perturbative inelastic scattering cross sec- tions shown in the main text. We solve the coupled-channel Schrödinger equation in the basis (χ1χ1, χ2χ2) with reduced mass µ ≃ mχ/2. For a given relative velocity vrel (in the center-of-mass frame), the kin...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The leading elastic amplitude is generated at one loop by the box diagram with two scalar exchanges

    Residual elastic scattering (loop-induced leakage) The Z2 symmetry forbids tree-level elastic scattering χ1χ1 → χ1χ1 from single-ϕ exchange. The leading elastic amplitude is generated at one loop by the box diagram with two scalar exchanges. A conservative parametric estimate follows from matching the box onto a short- range four-fermion operator at momen...

    work page

  6. [6]

    We demonstrate this using the dark Z2 charge assign- ments: Q(χ1) = +1 , Q(χ2) = −1, and Q(ϕ) = −1

    Selection Rules for Mixed Annihilation The χ1χ2 → ϕϕ channel is forbiddened at tree level. We demonstrate this using the dark Z2 charge assign- ments: Q(χ1) = +1 , Q(χ2) = −1, and Q(ϕ) = −1. The total parity of the initial state is Pin = (+1)( −1) = −1. The total parity of the final state is Pout = ( −1)(−1) = +1. Since Pin ̸= Pout, the process χ1χ2 → ϕϕ ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Thus, the excited state χ2 is thermally populated with a number density equal to that of the ground state χ1: neq 1 ≈ neq 2 ≈ 1 2 neq tot

    Effective cross-Section with forbidden channels During freeze-out ( Tf ≈ mχ/20 ∼ 2 GeV), the tem- perature is much larger than the mass splitting ( ∆m ≈ 100 eV ≪ Tf ). Thus, the excited state χ2 is thermally populated with a number density equal to that of the ground state χ1: neq 1 ≈ neq 2 ≈ 1 2 neq tot. (C1) The evolution of the total number density nto...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Thermal integration of the relic abundance To accurately determine the relic density, we move be- yond the schematic scaling and perform the full ther- mal average of the annihilation cross-section. The ef- fective annihilation rate at temperature T is given by the convolution of the velocity-dependent cross-section with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution...

    work page

  9. [9]

    BSF can only proceed via an off-shell scalar ϕ∗ decaying to e+e−

    Suppression of off-shell bound state formation Since mϕ > E B, on-shell scalar emission is kinemat- ically forbidden. BSF can only proceed via an off-shell scalar ϕ∗ decaying to e+e−. The differential rate for this 2 → 2+2 process is suppressed by the virtual propagator. We neglect BSF throughout the benchmark scan because our parameter region satisfies m...

    work page

  10. [10]

    The results are shown in Fig

    Quantitative Thermal History and Robustness To validate the relic density calculation in the resonant regime, we perform a numerical thermal average of the effective annihilation cross-section ⟨σv⟩eff as a function of the inverse temperature x = mχ/T . The results are shown in Fig. 8. As illustrated in the left panel of Fig. 8, the effec- tive cross-secti...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    J. S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Small-Scale Chal- lenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm, Ann. Rev. Astron. As- trophys. 55, 343 (2017) , arXiv:1707.04256 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution

    V. Springel et al. , Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution, Na- ture 435, 629 (2005) , arXiv:astro-ph/0504097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A Uni- versal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astro- phys. J. 490, 493 (1997) , arXiv:astro-ph/9611107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    S.-H. Oh, C. Brook, F. Governato, E. Brinks, L. Mayer, W. J. G. de Blok, A. Brooks, and F. Walter, The central slope of dark matter cores in dwarf galaxies: Simulations vs. THINGS, Astron. J. 142, 24 (2011) , arXiv:1011.2777 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Moore, Evidence against dissipationless dark mat- ter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370, 629 (1994)

    B. Moore, Evidence against dissipationless dark mat- ter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370, 629 (1994)

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    W. J. G. de Blok, The Core-Cusp Problem, Adv. Astron. 2010, 789293 (2010) , arXiv:0910.3538 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    K. A. Oman et al. , The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 3650 (2015) , arXiv:1504.01437 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Spreading out and staying sharp - Creating diverse rotation curves via baryonic and self-interaction effects

    P. Creasey, O. Sameie, L. V. Sales, H.-B. Yu, M. Vogels- berger, and J. Zavala, Spreading out and staying sharp – creating diverse rotation curves via baryonic and self- interaction effects, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 468, 2283 (2017) , arXiv:1612.03903 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    A. A. Klypin, A. V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela, and F. Prada, Where are the missing Galactic satellites?, As- trophys. J. 522, 82 (1999) , arXiv:astro-ph/9901240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  21. [21]

    Dark Matter Substructure in Galactic Halos

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T. R. Quinn, J. Stadel, and P. Tozzi, Dark matter substruc- ture within galactic halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 524, L19 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9907411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415, L40 (2011), arXiv:1103.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Too Big to Fail in the Local Group

    S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, and E. N. Kirby, Too Big to Fail in the Local Group, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 444, 222 (2014) , arXiv:1404.5313 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Observational ev- idence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760 (2000) , arXiv:astro-ph/9909386

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rept. 730, 1 (2018) , arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substructure

    M. Rocha, A. H. G. Peter, J. S. Bullock, M. Kapling- hat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, J. Onorbe, and L. A. Mous- takas, Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substruc- ture, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430, 81 (2013) , arXiv:1208.3025 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    A. H. G. Peter, M. Rocha, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kapling- hat, Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter II: Halo Shapes vs. Observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430, 105 (2013) , arXiv:1208.3026 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    How the Self-Interacting Dark Matter Model Explains the Diverse Galactic Rotation Curves

    A. Kamada, M. Kaplinghat, A. B. Pace, and H.-B. Yu, How the Self-Interacting Dark Matter Model Explains the Diverse Galactic Rotation Curves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 111102 (2017) , arXiv:1611.02716 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [30]

    Markevitch, A

    M. Markevitch, A. H. Gonzalez, D. Clowe, A. Vikhlinin, L. David, W. Forman, C. Jones, S. Murray, and W. Tucker, Direct constraints on the dark matter self- interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56, Astrophys. J. 606, 819 (2004) , arXiv:astro- ph/0309303

    work page arXiv 2004

  30. [31]

    S. W. Randall, M. Markevitch, D. Clowe, A. H. Gonza- lez, and M. Bradac, Constraints on the Self-Interaction Cross-Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simula- tions of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657-56, Astro- phys. J. 679, 1173 (2008) , arXiv:0704.0261 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [32]

    The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

    D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor, and E. Tittley, The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters, Science 347, 1462 (2015), arXiv:1503.07675 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [33]

    J. H. O’Donnell, T. E. Jeltema, M. G. Roberts, J. Nightingale, A. Flowers, and D. Aldas, A Constraint on Dark Matter Self-Interaction from Combined Strong Lensing and Stellar Kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2025), arXiv:2508.20179 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Constraining Self-Interacting Dark Matter with the Milky Way's dwarf spheroidals

    J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger, and M. G. Walker, Constrain- ing Self-Interacting Dark Matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidals, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431, L20 (2013), arXiv:1211.6426 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [35]

    Dark matter self-interactions from the internal dynamics of dwarf spheroidals

    M. Valli and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter self-interactions from the internal dynamics of dwarf spheroidals, Nature As- tron. 2, 907 (2018) , arXiv:1711.03502 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [36]

    Nishikawa, K

    H. Nishikawa, K. K. Boddy, and M. Kaplinghat, Accel- erated core collapse in tidally stripped self-interacting dark matter halos, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063009 (2020) , arXiv:1901.00499 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [37]

    Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Beyond Collision- less Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115007 (2013) , arXiv:1302.3898 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [38]

    Inelastic Dark Matter

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043502 (2001) , arXiv:hep-ph/0101138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [39]

    T. R. Slatyer, The Sommerfeld enhancement for dark matter with an excited state, JCAP 02 (02), 028, arXiv:0910.5713 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [40]

    A Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009) , arXiv:0810.0713 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  40. [41]

    T. R. Slatyer, Indirect dark matter signatures in the cos- mic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527 (2016) , arXiv:1506.03811 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [42]

    Constraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observations before Planck

    L. Lopez-Honorez, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz, and A. C. Vincent, Constraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observationsbefore Planck, JCAP 07 (07), 046, arXiv:1303.5094 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek, Asym- metric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009) , arXiv:0901.4117 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [44]

    Review of asymmetric dark matter

    K. Petraki and R. R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330028 (2013) , arXiv:1305.4939 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [45]

    Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, and A. Loeb, Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 423, 3740 (2012) , arXiv:1201.5892 [astro-ph.CO]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [46]

    Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115021 (2017), arXiv:1709.07882 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [47]

    Aalberset al., Phys

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023) , arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [48]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025) , arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Bo et al

    Z. Bo et al. (PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025) , arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516, 1 (2012) , arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [51]

    Dark-Matter Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments

    K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell, and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and mag- netic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 70, 083501 (2004) , arXiv:astro-ph/0406355

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [52]

    P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles, JCAP 05 (05), 009, arXiv:2002.08370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2002

  52. [53]

    H. An, M. B. Wise, and Y. Zhang, Effects of Bound States on Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 93, 115020 (2016) , arXiv:1606.02305 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [54]

    Explosive Dark Matter Annihilation

    J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, and M. M. Nojiri, Explosive dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 031303 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  54. [55]

    S. Ando, K. Hayashi, S. Horigome, M. Ibe, and S. Shirai, Stringent Constraints on Self-Interacting Dark Matter Using Milky-Way Satellite Galaxies Kinematics (2025), arXiv:2503.13650 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    C. A. Correa, Constraining velocity-dependent self- interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503, 920 (2021) , arXiv:2007.02958 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [57]

    Parikh, R

    A. Parikh, R. Sato, and T. R. Slatyer, Regulating Som- merfeld resonances for multi-state systems and higher partial waves, JHEP 12, 025 , arXiv:2410.18168 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  57. [58]

    K. Blum, R. Sato, and T. R. Slatyer, Self-consistent Cal- culation of the Sommerfeld Enhancement, JCAP 06 (06), 021, arXiv:1603.01383 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [59]

    Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential

    K. Petraki, M. Postma, and J. de Vries, Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter in- teracting via a Yukawa potential, JHEP 04 (04), 077, arXiv:1611.01394 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    Beacham et al.,Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report,J

    J. Beacham et al. , Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J. Phys. G 47, 010501 (2020) , arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [61]

    J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar), Search for a Dark Photon in e+e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 201801 (2014), arXiv:1406.2980 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [62]

    Banerjee et al

    D. Banerjee et al. , Dark matter search in missing energy events with NA64, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121801 (2019) , arXiv:1906.00176 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [63]

    Light Dark Matter eXperiment (LDMX)

    T. Åkesson et al. (LDMX), Light Dark Matter eXperi- ment (LDMX) (2018), arXiv:1808.05219 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [64]

    Matter Power Spectrum in Hidden Neutrino Interacting Dark Matter Models: A Closer Look at the Collision Term

    T. Binder, L. Covi, A. Kamada, K. Murai, T. Takahashi, and N. Yoshida, Matter Power Spectrum in Hidden Neu- trino Interacting Dark Matter Models: A General Treat- ment, JCAP 11 (11), 043, arXiv:1602.07624 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    Constraining Dark Matter candidates from structure formation

    C. Boehm, P. Fayet, and R. Schaeffer, Constraining dark matter candidates from structure formation, Phys. Lett. B 518, 8 (2001) , arXiv:astro-ph/0012504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  65. [66]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Super- nova 1987A Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors, Mil- licharged Particles, the QCD Axion, and an Axion-like Particle, JHEP 09, 051 , arXiv:1803.00993 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    G. G. Raffelt, Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles (1996)

    work page 1996

  67. [68]

    Scalar Dark Matter candidates

    C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B 683, 219 (2004) , arXiv:hep-ph/0305261

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [69]

    The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe

    J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev, The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 419, 1294 (2012) , arXiv:1109.6552 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [70]

    Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, and P. D. Serpico, Cosmo- logical constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy, JCAP 03, 043 , arXiv:1610.10051 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [71]

    Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects

    E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects, JHEP 02, 033 , arXiv:1611.05852 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [72]

    Y.-S. Liu, D. McKeen, and G. A. Miller, Electrophobic Scalar Boson and Muonic Puzzles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 101801 (2016) , arXiv:1605.04612 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [73]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015004 (2016) , arXiv:1505.01076 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [74]

    J. Kopp, L. Michaels, and J. Smirnov, Loopy constraints on leptophilic dark matter and internal bremsstrahlung, JCAP 04, 022 , arXiv:1401.6457 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [75]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022) , arXiv:2207.11330 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [76]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Search for new physics in low- energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072006 (2023) , arXiv:2307.15753 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [77]

    Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter

    S. Chang, N. Weiner, and I. Yavin, Magnetic Inelas- tic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125011 (2010) , arXiv:1007.4200 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [78]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers, and Y. Xu, The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JCAP 02, 004 , arXiv:1203.3542 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    X-rays from Inelastic Dark Matter Freeze-in,

    G. Krnjaic, D. McKeen, R. Mizuta, G. Mohlabeng, D. E. Morrissey, and D. Tuckler, X-rays from Inelastic Dark Matter Freeze-in (2025), arXiv:2509.19428 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [80]

    Strong constraints on self-interacting dark matter with light mediators

    T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and P. Walia, Strong constraints on self-interacting dark mat- ter with light mediators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 141802 (2017), arXiv:1612.00845 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [81]

    Surprises from Complete Vector Portal Theories: New Insights into the Dark Sector and its Interplay with Higgs Physics

    Y. Cui and F. D’Eramo, Surprises from complete vector portal theories: New insights into the dark sector and its interplay with Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095006 (2017), arXiv:1705.03897 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.