pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17906 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-25 · 🌀 gr-qc

Telling tails and quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Dymnikova regular black hole

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasinormal modesDymnikova black holeregular black holesmassive scalar fieldsquasi-resonanceslate-time tailsgrey-body factors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Massive scalar fields around Dymnikova regular black holes show rising frequencies and falling damping with increasing mass, indicating quasi-resonances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies quasinormal modes, late-time tails, and grey-body factors for massive scalar perturbations propagating in the Dymnikova regular black hole geometry. Using time-domain integration together with the WKB method improved by Padé approximants, it demonstrates that the spectrum changes qualitatively once the field mass μ becomes appreciable. The real frequency of the dominant mode grows with μ while the imaginary part shrinks, which the authors interpret as the onset of quasi-resonances at large mass. Late-time signals develop oscillatory tails whose power-law decay agrees with analytic expectations, and grey-body factors fall sharply as mass rises. These mass-dependent signatures are presented as potential discriminants between regular and singular black holes.

Core claim

In the Dymnikova regular black hole spacetime the quasinormal spectrum of massive scalar fields is qualitatively different from the massless case: the oscillation frequency of the dominant mode increases with the field mass μ while the damping rate decreases, pointing to the existence of quasi-resonances at sufficiently large μ. Time-domain evolution produces late-time oscillatory tails with a power-law envelope whose decay rate matches analytic predictions, and grey-body factors exhibit strong suppression when the mass is increased.

What carries the argument

Quasinormal modes of massive scalar fields extracted by time-domain integration and by the WKB approximation with Padé improvements in the Dymnikova metric.

If this is right

  • Dominant oscillation frequencies increase with field mass, producing higher-frequency ringdown signals.
  • Damping rates decrease with μ, implying longer-lived modes at larger field masses.
  • Late-time evolution develops oscillatory tails whose power-law envelope differs from the massless decay law.
  • Grey-body factors are strongly suppressed at higher mass, reducing the fraction of radiation that escapes to infinity.
  • These mass-dependent features supply observable distinctions between regular and singular black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Massive fields could be used to test near-horizon regularity in other non-singular black hole models that share similar metric structures.
  • The same qualitative shift may appear for vector or gravitational perturbations, extending the probe beyond scalars.
  • Astrophysical ringdown observations at sufficiently high sensitivity might detect the reduced damping as a signature of regular cores.

Load-bearing premise

The WKB method with Padé improvements and the time-domain integration accurately reproduce the qualitative behavior of massive scalar modes without introducing numerical artifacts or truncation errors in the Dymnikova geometry.

What would settle it

A high-resolution computation or observation in which the imaginary part of the dominant frequency increases rather than decreases as μ is raised, or in which the late-time tail fails to show the predicted oscillatory power-law decay, would falsify the claimed qualitative difference from the massless spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17906 by Bekir Can L\"utf\"uo\u{g}lu, Bekzod Rahmatov, Fayzullo Shayimov, Ikram Davletov, Javlon Rayimbaev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Effective potential as a function of the tortoise coor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Effective potential and logarithmic time-domain pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Effective potential and logarithmic time-domain pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effective potential and logarithmic time-domain pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Grey-body factors for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate quasinormal modes, late-time tails, and grey-body factors for massive scalar perturbations in the background of the Dymnikova regular black hole. By applying both the time-domain integration and the WKB method with Pad\'e improvements, we show that the spectrum of massive fields differs qualitatively from the massless case. The oscillation frequency of the dominant mode grows with the field mass $\mu$, while the damping rate decreases, suggesting the existence of quasi-resonances at sufficiently large $\mu$. In the time domain, the late-time signal exhibits oscillatory tails with a power-law envelope, whose decay rate matches analytic expectations. Grey-body factors are also computed, showing strong suppression of radiation when mass is increased. Taken together, these results indicate that massive fields provide distinctive signatures of regular black holes and may serve as probes of near-horizon quantum corrections in the Dymnikova geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines quasinormal modes, late-time tails, and grey-body factors for massive scalar perturbations in the Dymnikova regular black hole. Using time-domain integration and the WKB method with Padé improvements, it claims that the spectrum differs qualitatively from the massless case: the dominant mode's oscillation frequency grows with field mass μ while the damping rate decreases, suggesting quasi-resonances at large μ. Late-time signals show oscillatory tails with power-law envelopes matching analytic expectations, and grey-body factors exhibit strong suppression with increasing mass.

Significance. If the reported trends hold, the work identifies potential distinctive signatures of regular black holes in massive-field perturbations that could serve as probes of near-horizon quantum corrections. The dual-method strategy and emphasis on massive scalars add to the literature on QNMs in non-singular spacetimes, though the absence of convergence diagnostics and cross-validation limits immediate reliability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results and WKB analysis] The claim that damping rates decrease with μ (leading to quasi-resonances) rests on WKB-Padé and time-domain results without reported convergence tests, error bars, or explicit side-by-side comparison of the two methods for the massive case; this leaves the qualitative trend only moderately supported given that WKB error estimates calibrated on Schwarzschild do not automatically apply to the Dymnikova core.
  2. [WKB approximation with Padé improvements] For large μ the effective potential height scales with μ² and the imaginary part of ω becomes small, causing turning points to approach; no independent confirmation via Leaver continued fractions or high-resolution Prony fits on the time-domain data is provided to rule out O(1) relative errors in Im(ω) masquerading as the reported damping trend.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that grey-body factors show 'strong suppression' with mass but does not quantify the suppression or specify the μ range studied.
  2. [Perturbation equations] Notation for the effective potential and the precise definition of the Dymnikova parameter should be restated explicitly in the perturbation-equation section for self-contained reading.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the numerical reliability of our quasinormal mode results for massive scalars in the Dymnikova background. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional validation and cross-checks.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Numerical results and WKB analysis] The claim that damping rates decrease with μ (leading to quasi-resonances) rests on WKB-Padé and time-domain results without reported convergence tests, error bars, or explicit side-by-side comparison of the two methods for the massive case; this leaves the qualitative trend only moderately supported given that WKB error estimates calibrated on Schwarzschild do not automatically apply to the Dymnikova core.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript would benefit from more explicit documentation of numerical accuracy. In the revised version we will add a new subsection (and associated figures/tables) that reports (i) convergence of the WKB-Padé frequencies with respect to the order of the Padé approximant for representative values of μ, (ii) direct side-by-side comparison of WKB and time-domain frequencies (real and imaginary parts) together with estimated uncertainties extracted from the time-domain signals, and (iii) a brief justification for the error-control procedure based on the asymptotic Schwarzschild-like behavior of the Dymnikova potential at large r. These additions will make the reported decrease in damping rate with increasing μ more robustly supported. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [WKB approximation with Padé improvements] For large μ the effective potential height scales with μ² and the imaginary part of ω becomes small, causing turning points to approach; no independent confirmation via Leaver continued fractions or high-resolution Prony fits on the time-domain data is provided to rule out O(1) relative errors in Im(ω) masquerading as the reported damping trend.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the WKB approximation requires extra care when Im(ω) becomes small. To provide independent confirmation we will extract the dominant quasinormal frequencies from the time-domain waveforms using high-resolution Prony fits (with explicit fitting windows and residual checks) and present a direct comparison with the WKB-Padé results for a sequence of increasing μ. This cross-validation will be included in the revised manuscript. While a full Leaver continued-fraction implementation for the Dymnikova metric would demand substantial additional coding effort beyond the scope of the present study, the Prony analysis of the same time-domain data supplies a methodologically independent check on the damping trend. We will also add a short discussion of the regime in which WKB accuracy may degrade and how the observed quasi-resonance behavior remains consistent between the two approaches. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard numerical methods applied to external metric yield independent trends

full rationale

The paper takes the Dymnikova metric and the associated massive scalar perturbation equation from prior literature, then applies two independent numerical techniques (time-domain integration and WKB with Padé approximants) to extract frequencies and damping rates. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the computed spectrum and then re-presented as a prediction; the reported growth of Re(ω) and decrease of |Im(ω)| with μ are direct outputs of those solvers. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the qualitative result, and no equation reduces by construction to its own input. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the Dymnikova metric as a fixed background and on the validity of linear perturbation theory for massive scalars; no new entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted to the reported spectra.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Dymnikova metric is an exact regular solution of Einstein gravity with a de Sitter core.
    Used as the fixed spacetime background for the wave equation.
  • domain assumption Linear scalar perturbation theory remains valid for massive fields in this geometry.
    Invoked to derive the wave equation whose solutions are computed numerically.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1329 out tokens · 36120 ms · 2026-05-16T11:04:04.526355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive Scalar Quasinormal Modes, Greybody Factors, and Absorption Cross Section of a Parity-Symmetric Beyond-Horndeski Black Hole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Increasing the mass of a scalar field around a parity-symmetric beyond-Horndeski black hole strongly reduces the damping rate of quasinormal modes while suppressing low-frequency absorption and shifting efficient abso...

  2. Two types of quasinormal modes of Casadio-Fabbri-Mazzacurati brane-world black holes

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quasinormal modes of massive scalars in CFM brane-world black holes split into two types, with modes disappearing at critical masses where real or imaginary frequency parts reach zero.

  3. Long-lived massive scalar modes, grey-body factors, and absorption cross sections of the Reissner--Nordstr\"om-like brane-world black hole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Positive tidal charge in this brane-world black hole lowers the effective potential barrier, pushes massive scalar quasinormal modes toward arbitrarily long lifetimes, and increases transmission and absorption.

  4. Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Increasing the mass of a perturbing scalar field around Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes strongly suppresses damping in several quasinormal branches, producing quasi-resonant long-lived oscillations.

  5. Long-lived quasinormal modes, shadows and particle motion in four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Massive scalar quasinormal modes in quasi-topological black holes become long-lived as scalar mass grows, while photon-sphere radius, shadow size, and ISCO exhibit moderate deviations from Schwarzschild.

  6. Long-lived quasinormal modes of Asymptotically de Sitter Black Holes in Generalized Proca Theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Massive scalar perturbations of de Sitter black holes in generalized Proca theory enter a large-mass regime with linearly growing real frequencies and constant damping rates, without true quasi-resonances, plus an ana...

  7. Massive scalar quasinormal modes of an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom Dirac--Born--Infeld field

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Massive scalar quasinormal modes in this DBI-supported regular black hole show higher oscillation frequencies and lower damping as field mass increases, with larger regularity scales producing softer and longer-lived ringing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 180 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    099888 − 0

    025 0 . 099888 − 0. 086984i 0. 096499 − 0. 095897i 7. 20%

  2. [2]

    105662 − 0

    05 0 . 105662 − 0. 088487i 0. 100180 − 0. 090041i 4. 13%

  3. [3]

    107368 − 0

    075 0 . 107368 − 0. 083935i 0. 107368 − 0. 083935i 0. 0002%

  4. [4]

    115004 − 0

    1 0 . 115004 − 0. 080497i 0. 115007 − 0. 080494i 0. 0035%

  5. [5]

    117699 − 0

    125 0 . 117699 − 0. 078705i 0. 122037 − 0. 077845i 3. 12%

  6. [6]

    112190 − 0

    15 0 . 112190 − 0. 069169i 0. 111071 − 0. 066540i 2. 17% ℓ = 1 0 0 . 287007 − 0. 095193i 0. 286621 − 0. 094493i 0. 265%

  7. [7]

    288283 − 0

    05 0 . 288283 − 0. 094278i 0. 287974 − 0. 093852i 0. 173%

  8. [8]

    292014 − 0

    1 0 . 292014 − 0. 091613i 0. 292012 − 0. 091613i 0. 0005%

  9. [9]

    298552 − 0

    15 0 . 298552 − 0. 088438i 0. 297487 − 0. 087829i 0. 394%

  10. [10]

    307787 − 0

    2 0 . 307787 − 0. 082212i 0. 305741 − 0. 083665i 0. 788%

  11. [11]

    315997 − 0

    25 0 . 315997 − 0. 076299i 0. 316383 − 0. 077401i 0. 359%

  12. [12]

    331997 − 0

    3 0 . 331997 − 0. 066147i 0. 329998 − 0. 069558i 1. 17%

  13. [13]

    344611 − 0

    35 0 . 344611 − 0. 057335i 0. 348020 − 0. 057208i 0. 976%

  14. [14]

    364116 − 0

    4 0 . 364116 − 0. 053116i 0. 363439 − 0. 052979i 0. 188%

  15. [15]

    388902 − 0

    45 0 . 388902 − 0. 026066i 0. 389949 − 0. 027174i 0. 391% TABLE I. Fundamental quasinormal modes ( n = 0) obtained with the WKB method at different orders and Padé approx- imants for ℓ = 0 and ℓ = 1 . The mass is M = 1 and the critical value of the parameter is lcr = 1. 137. time-domain evolution and the Prony fitting technique has been discussed extensivel...

  16. [16]

    480345 − 0

    05 0 . 480345 − 0. 094892i 0. 480345 − 0. 094898i 0. 00123%

  17. [17]

    482870 − 0

    1 0 . 482870 − 0. 094180i 0. 482919 − 0. 094220i 0. 0128%

  18. [18]

    487016 − 0

    15 0 . 487016 − 0. 092804i 0. 487041 − 0. 092778i 0. 00726%

  19. [19]

    492606 − 0

    2 0 . 492606 − 0. 090920i 0. 492746 − 0. 090979i 0. 0303%

  20. [20]

    499880 − 0

    25 0 . 499880 − 0. 088664i 0. 500100 − 0. 088749i 0. 0464%

  21. [21]

    508985 − 0

    3 0 . 508985 − 0. 085877i 0. 509173 − 0. 085908i 0. 0370%

  22. [22]

    519774 − 0

    35 0 . 519774 − 0. 082402i 0. 520034 − 0. 082410i 0. 0493%

  23. [23]

    532915 − 0

    4 0 . 532915 − 0. 077963i 0. 532640 − 0. 078218i 0. 0695%

  24. [24]

    547161 − 0

    45 0 . 547161 − 0. 072488i 0. 547139 − 0. 073140i 0. 118%

  25. [25]

    562633 − 0

    5 0 . 562633 − 0. 067449i 0. 563350 − 0. 067077i 0. 143%

  26. [26]

    580664 − 0

    55 0 . 580664 − 0. 060689i 0. 581000 − 0. 060916i 0. 0694%

  27. [27]

    600838 − 0

    6 0 . 600838 − 0. 053336i 0. 600645 − 0. 053113i 0. 0489%

  28. [28]

    624905 − 0

    65 0 . 624905 − 0. 044278i 0. 624880 − 0. 044341i 0. 0109%

  29. [29]

    649139 − 0

    7 0 . 649139 − 0. 033232i 0. 649117 − 0. 033287i 0. 00913% ℓ = 2, n = 1 0 0 . 444805 − 0. 291835i 0. 443861 − 0. 291943i 0. 179%

  30. [30]

    445121 − 0

    05 0 . 445121 − 0. 291389i 0. 444349 − 0. 291458i 0. 146%

  31. [31]

    446084 − 0

    1 0 . 446084 − 0. 290077i 0. 445772 − 0. 290080i 0. 0587%

  32. [32]

    447678 − 0

    15 0 . 447678 − 0. 288036i 0. 447618 − 0. 288026i 0. 0113%

  33. [33]

    449698 − 0

    2 0 . 449698 − 0. 285734i 0. 461988 − 0. 266926i 4. 22%

  34. [34]

    451638 − 0

    25 0 . 451638 − 0. 285548i 0. 461811 − 0. 293391i 2. 40%

  35. [35]

    433006 − 0

    3 0 . 433006 − 0. 285624i 0. 425496 − 0. 286679i 1. 46%

  36. [36]

    445077 − 0

    35 0 . 445077 − 0. 250901i 0. 445378 − 0. 249812i 0. 221%

  37. [37]

    459056 − 0

    4 0 . 459056 − 0. 239639i 0. 460199 − 0. 238694i 0. 286%

  38. [38]

    467964 − 0

    45 0 . 467964 − 0. 228032i 0. 466187 − 0. 229438i 0. 435%

  39. [39]

    480218 − 0

    5 0 . 480218 − 0. 201980i 0. 472202 − 0. 215237i 2. 97%

  40. [40]

    478415 − 0

    55 0 . 478415 − 0. 197762i 0. 478490 − 0. 197759i 0. 0145%

  41. [41]

    492658 − 0

    6 0 . 492658 − 0. 180508i 0. 492177 − 0. 180535i 0. 0919% ℓ = 3, n = 0 0 0 . 672308 − 0. 095427i 0. 672333 − 0. 095698i 0. 0402%

  42. [42]

    672912 − 0

    05 0 . 672912 − 0. 095299i 0. 673145 − 0. 095768i 0. 0771%

  43. [43]

    674726 − 0

    1 0 . 674726 − 0. 094913i 0. 674906 − 0. 094641i 0. 0478%

  44. [44]

    677758 − 0

    15 0 . 677758 − 0. 094262i 0. 677787 − 0. 094127i 0. 0201%

  45. [45]

    682009 − 0

    2 0 . 682009 − 0. 093317i 0. 682000 − 0. 093253i 0. 00933%

  46. [46]

    687415 − 0

    25 0 . 687415 − 0. 092087i 0. 687427 − 0. 092075i 0. 00245%

  47. [47]

    694073 − 0

    3 0 . 694073 − 0. 090642i 0. 694121 − 0. 090609i 0. 00831%

  48. [48]

    702001 − 0

    35 0 . 702001 − 0. 088886i 0. 702044 − 0. 088852i 0. 00787%

  49. [49]

    711175 − 0

    4 0 . 711175 − 0. 086819i 0. 711223 − 0. 086780i 0. 00862%

  50. [50]

    721610 − 0

    45 0 . 721610 − 0. 084429i 0. 721676 − 0. 084373i 0. 0119%

  51. [51]

    733363 − 0

    5 0 . 733363 − 0. 081679i 0. 733419 − 0. 081614i 0. 0117%

  52. [52]

    746489 − 0

    55 0 . 746489 − 0. 078459i 0. 746473 − 0. 078503i 0. 00623%

  53. [53]

    760868 − 0

    6 0 . 760868 − 0. 074863i 0. 760867 − 0. 074961i 0. 0129%

  54. [54]

    776333 − 0

    65 0 . 776333 − 0. 071177i 0. 776619 − 0. 070992i 0. 0436%

  55. [55]

    793776 − 0

    7 0 . 793776 − 0. 066677i 0. 793767 − 0. 066572i 0. 0132%

  56. [56]

    812200 − 0

    75 0 . 812200 − 0. 061858i 0. 812412 − 0. 061819i 0. 0265%

  57. [57]

    832432 − 0

    8 0 . 832432 − 0. 056413i 0. 832355 − 0. 056371i 0. 0105%

  58. [58]

    854290 − 0

    85 0 . 854290 − 0. 050312i 0. 854326 − 0. 050270i 0. 00640%

  59. [59]

    878227 − 0

    9 0 . 878227 − 0. 042843i 0. 878077 − 0. 043113i 0. 0351%

  60. [60]

    902213 − 0

    95 0 . 902213 − 0. 035201i 0. 901985 − 0. 034903i 0. 0417%

  61. [61]

    929717 − 0

    0. 929717 − 0. 026110i 0. 929177 − 0. 026581i 0. 0770% TABLE II. Quasinormal modes obtained with the WKB method at different orders with Padé approximants for ℓ = 2 (n = 0, 1) and ℓ = 3 (n = 0); M = 1, lcr = 1. 137. of the most widely used semi-analytical tools [82–86]. Defining Q(r∗ ) = ω 2 − V (r∗ ), V 0 = V (r∗0), V (k) 0 = dkV drk∗ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ r∗ 0 , (18) w...

  62. [62]

    At asymptotically late times , i.e., when µt ≫ 1/ (µ 2M 2), the dynamics of the massive field changes qualitatively

    Notice that the above intermediate asymptotic [31, 34, 35] is not universal and, for example, for massive fields of other spin the intermediate tails may differ [104]. At asymptotically late times , i.e., when µt ≫ 1/ (µ 2M 2), the dynamics of the massive field changes qualitatively. For various black-hole backgrounds the de- cay law transitions into an osci...

  63. [63]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel. 2, 2 (1999) , arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

  64. [64]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009) , arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhi- denko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793 (2011) , arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol. 31, 423 (2025) , arXiv:2504.05014 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016) , arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017) , arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L44 (2020) , arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

  70. [70]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Living Rev. Rel. 19, 1 (2016) , arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. V. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 609, 377 (2005) , arXiv:gr-qc/0411059

  72. [72]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhi- denko, Phys. Rev. D 88, 024054 (2013) , arXiv:1307.1812 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhi- denko, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084034 (2018) , arXiv:1712.06667 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    Massive scalar field quasi-normal modes of higher dimensional black holes

    A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064017 (2006) , arXiv:gr-qc/0607133

  75. [75]

    Massive quasi-normal mode

    A. Ohashi and M.-a. Sakagami, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 3973 (2004) , 9 arXiv:gr-qc/0407009

  76. [76]

    The longlived charged massive scalar field in the higher-dimensional Reissner--Nordstr\"{o}m spacetime

    M. Zhang, J. Jiang, and Z. Zhong, Phys. Lett. B 789, 13 (2019) , arXiv:1811.04183 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    Aragón, R

    A. Aragón, R. Bécar, P. A. González, and Y. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064006 (2021) , arXiv:2009.09436 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Ponglertsakul and B

    S. Ponglertsakul and B. Gwak, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1023 (2020) , arXiv:2007.16108 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Saave- dra, and Y. Vásquez, JHEP 06, 150 (2022) , arXiv:2204.01570 [gr-qc]

  80. [80]

    Charged scalar perturbations on charged black holes in dRGT massive gravity

    P. Burikham, S. Ponglertsakul, and L. Tannukij, Phys. Rev. D 96, 124001 (2017) , arXiv:1709.02716 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.