arxiv: 0706.1243 · v2 · submitted 2007-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Cosmological Framework for the Co-Evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies: I. Galaxy Mergers & Quasar Activity

Philip F. Hopkins , Lars Hernquist , Thomas J. Cox , Dusan Keres (Harvard/CfA)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 22:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph

keywords galaxy mergersquasarssupermassive black holeselliptical galaxieshalo occupationluminosity functionscosmic evolutiongalaxy clustering

0 comments

The pith

Major gas-rich galaxy mergers drive the observed rise and fall of quasar activity from redshift zero to six.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a model that calculates the rate and properties of major galaxy-galaxy mergers across cosmic time by combining dark matter halo mass functions with empirical models of how galaxies occupy halos. It shows that these merger rates and environments agree with direct observations of merging galaxies. The authors then adopt the simple assumption that such mergers trigger quasar activity in the gas-rich systems involved. This single link reproduces the full observed history of quasar numbers and brightness, their luminosity functions, the colors of their host galaxies, and how they cluster on both large and small scales. The same framework explains why quasars appear in the small-group environments where gas-rich mergers happen most efficiently.

Core claim

Making the simple ansatz that major, gas-rich mergers cause quasar activity, this naturally reproduces the observed rise and fall of the quasar luminosity density from z=0-6, as well as quasar LFs, fractions, host galaxy colors, and clustering as a function of redshift and luminosity. The observed excess of quasar clustering on small scales is a natural prediction of the model, as mergers preferentially occur in regions with excess small-scale galaxy overdensities.

What carries the argument

The ansatz that major, gas-rich galaxy mergers trigger quasar activity, applied to merger rates calculated from halo mass functions and halo occupation models.

If this is right

Quasar luminosity functions and their evolution with redshift match observations at all luminosities and redshifts.
The small-scale excess in quasar clustering arises because mergers occur in locally overdense regions.
Quasar host galaxy colors and morphologies at different redshifts reflect the timing of recent mergers.
Secular processes such as bars can dominate only at Seyfert-level luminosities and contribute little to the bright quasar population at z greater than 1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same merger events that power quasars would simultaneously build the stellar spheroids of elliptical galaxies.
Black hole growth would be tied directly to the assembly history of massive galaxies through repeated merger episodes.
High-resolution imaging of quasar hosts could test the predicted fraction of systems caught in the act of merging.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that major gas-rich galaxy mergers are what trigger quasar activity.

What would settle it

Finding a substantial population of luminous quasars at high redshift hosted by isolated galaxies with no morphological or kinematic signs of recent major mergers.

read the original abstract

(Abridged) We develop a model for the cosmological role of mergers in the evolution of starbursts, quasars, and spheroidal galaxies. Combining halo mass functions (MFs) with empirical halo occupation models, we calculate where major galaxy-galaxy mergers occur and what kinds of galaxies merge, at all redshifts. We compare with observed merger MFs, clustering, fractions, and small-scale environments, and show that this yields robust estimates in good agreement with observations. Making the simple ansatz that major, gas-rich mergers cause quasar activity, we demonstrate that this naturally reproduces the observed rise and fall of the quasar luminosity density from z=0-6, as well as quasar LFs, fractions, host galaxy colors, and clustering as a function of redshift and luminosity. The observed excess of quasar clustering on small scales is a natural prediction of the model, as mergers preferentially occur in regions with excess small-scale galaxy overdensities. We show that quasar environments at all observed redshifts correspond closely to the empirically determined small group scale, where mergers of gas-rich galaxies are most efficient. We contrast with a secular model in which quasar activity is driven by bars/disk instabilities, and show that while these modes probably dominate at Seyfert luminosities, the constraints from clustering (large and small-scale), pseudobulge populations, disk MFs, luminosity density evolution, and host galaxy colors argue that they must be a small contributor to the z>1 quasar luminosity density.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows that merger rates calculated from halo mass functions plus a minimal ansatz for gas-rich major mergers can reproduce the quasar luminosity density evolution and several related observables as a consistency check.

read the letter

The central result is that merger-driven quasar triggering, built on top of standard halo merger calculations, lines up with the observed rise and fall of quasar activity from z=0 to 6 along with luminosity functions, host colors, and clustering. They first compute where major mergers occur and what galaxies are involved by combining halo mass functions with empirical halo occupation distributions, then check those rates against direct observations of merger fractions, mass functions, and environments. That step holds up and provides a concrete baseline. Applying the ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasars then produces the quasar history without further free parameters beyond those already set by the merger side. The small-scale clustering excess emerges automatically because mergers favor overdense regions, and quasar environments match the small-group scale where such mergers are efficient. They also run the same observables through a secular alternative and argue that bars or disk instabilities cannot dominate the bright end at z>1. That contrast is useful and keeps the argument from being one-sided. The soft spot is that the triggering ansatz is chosen to match the luminosity density evolution, so the reproduction is more a successful consistency test than an independent prediction. The model inherits whatever assumptions sit inside the empirical halo occupation inputs, though the separate merger checks mitigate that. No load-bearing internal contradictions appear in the reported comparisons. This is the sort of framework paper that people building galaxy formation models or AGN feedback prescriptions will want to read. It gives a clear way to link observable merger rates to black hole growth and elliptical galaxy assembly on cosmological scales. Readers working on clustering, luminosity functions, or the merger versus secular debate get concrete numbers and tests to engage with. It deserves a serious referee because the calculations are explicit, the claims are falsifiable against existing data, and the contrast with the secular case is laid out directly.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a cosmological model for the co-evolution of quasars, supermassive black holes, and elliptical galaxies. It combines halo mass functions with empirical halo occupation distributions to compute major galaxy-galaxy merger rates, locations, and galaxy types across redshifts, validating these against observed merger mass functions, fractions, clustering, and environments. Under the ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity, the model reproduces the observed quasar luminosity density evolution from z=0-6, luminosity functions, host galaxy colors, fractions, and both large- and small-scale clustering as functions of redshift and luminosity, while arguing that secular processes (bars/disk instabilities) contribute negligibly to the z>1 quasar luminosity density.

Significance. If the central ansatz holds, the work supplies a unified, observationally consistent framework linking mergers to quasar triggering and spheroid formation. It earns credit for using only parameters already fixed by the merger comparison to match multiple independent datasets (luminosity density, LFs, clustering, host colors, merger statistics) and for explicitly contrasting the merger-driven scenario against a secular alternative using the same observables. This strengthens the merger paradigm for black-hole growth and yields falsifiable predictions for quasar environments on the small-group scale.

major comments (1)

[Model construction and quasar triggering ansatz] The central ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity is load-bearing for the claim of natural reproduction of the luminosity-density evolution. The manuscript must clarify whether the merger triggering efficiency (or quasar duty cycle) is fixed solely by the merger-rate comparison or adjusted to match quasar data; without this, the 'no additional free parameters' statement risks circularity in the consistency check.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and model description would benefit from an explicit statement of the numerical values adopted for the halo occupation parameters and merger triggering efficiency so that readers can assess independence from quasar observables.
Figure captions and text should specify the exact redshift bins and luminosity cuts used when comparing model predictions to observed quasar clustering and host colors to facilitate direct reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comment on the manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model construction and quasar triggering ansatz] The central ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity is load-bearing for the claim of natural reproduction of the luminosity-density evolution. The manuscript must clarify whether the merger triggering efficiency (or quasar duty cycle) is fixed solely by the merger-rate comparison or adjusted to match quasar data; without this, the 'no additional free parameters' statement risks circularity in the consistency check.

Authors: We agree that explicit clarification is warranted. The merger rates, locations, and galaxy types are computed from halo mass functions combined with empirical halo occupation distributions. These inputs are calibrated exclusively against observed merger mass functions, fractions, clustering, and small-scale environments, with no adjustments made to match quasar observations. Under the ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity, the quasar luminosity density, luminosity functions, host properties, and clustering then follow directly as predictions from the already-fixed merger rates and the associated black-hole growth. No separate triggering efficiency or duty cycle is introduced or tuned to quasar data. We will revise the model-construction section to state this parameter-fixing sequence explicitly and to note that the quasar matches constitute an a-posteriori consistency check rather than a fit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper first computes major merger rates and properties from halo mass functions combined with empirical halo occupation distributions, then directly compares these predictions to independent observational constraints on merger mass functions, fractions, clustering, and environments, finding agreement. It next adopts the explicit ansatz that major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity and shows that the same merger rates reproduce quasar luminosity density evolution, LFs, host colors, and clustering without introducing new free parameters beyond those already fixed by the merger comparison. This structure is a consistency test of the ansatz against separate external datasets rather than a reduction of the quasar results to the inputs by construction; the paper further contrasts the merger-driven model against a secular alternative using the same observables, confirming that the central claims rest on external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the key ansatz linking mergers to quasars, which is introduced to explain the data. Empirical models are from prior literature but the application is new. Limited info from abstract only.

free parameters (1)

merger triggering efficiency or quasar duty cycle parameters
The ansatz implies parameters that are likely adjusted to match the observed quasar luminosity density.

axioms (2)

ad hoc to paper Major gas-rich mergers trigger quasar activity
Explicitly stated as the simple ansatz in the abstract.
domain assumption Halo mass functions and empirical halo occupation models accurately predict merger locations and types
Used as the basis for calculating merger rates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5608 in / 1584 out tokens · 74234 ms · 2026-05-10T22:01:02.585349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Close Quasar Pair in a Massive Galaxy Merger at $z=5.7$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

A quasar pair at z=5.7 is confirmed in a galaxy merger via ALMA, setting a lower limit of >1.2% on the pair fraction at 5.5<z<6 and linking it to the PTA gravitational wave background.
The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere
astro-ph.HE 2024-01 accept novelty 8.0

The eRASS1 data release catalogs nearly 930,000 X-ray sources from the first six months of the eROSITA survey, increasing known sources by over 60% and resolving 20% of the 1-2 keV cosmic X-ray background.
Hidden Monsters with SPHEREx I: A goldmine for heavily reddened quasars at cosmic noon
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

SPHEREx data confirm 77 new luminous heavily reddened quasars at 1.5<z<3.9 that are hot-dust poor relative to unobscured quasars, supporting a blow-out feedback phase.
Resolving the Unresolved Galactic Winds in Multi-phase Models. I. Methodology and Application
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

A new fitting methodology applied to UV absorption data recovers radial trends in galactic wind velocities and mass-loading factors by constraining initial hot and cool phase parameters in a multiphase model.
A Census of Na D-traced neutral ISM and outflows at $0.6<z<4$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A JWST census detects neutral ISM absorption in 76 of 309 galaxies at 0.6<z<4 and outflows in 26, indicating AGN-driven neutral outflows dominate in quiescent systems at cosmic noon.
The Broken Similarity: Sinking and Merging of Dark Matter Subhalos Across Hierarchical Levels
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

In LambdaCDM simulations, over 90% of subhalo sinking events occur between adjacent hierarchy levels, satellite-satellite mergers can rival central-satellite rates at low masses, and the overall merger landscape devia...
Kinematic Stratification in Extremely Red Quasars Revealed by JWST
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST observations of ERQs show stratified gas kinematics via deblended optical emission lines, with UV lines dominated by scattered light and optical lines mixing scattered and obscured emission.
ArkenstoneBH. A model for high-specific energy black hole feedback in cosmological simulations
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

ArkenstoneBH is a new subgrid model for the hot phase of black hole feedback that, in isolated galaxy tests, suppresses star formation by counteracting gas inflows from the circumgalactic medium.
Constraining the nature of active galactic nuclei through circumgalactic Lya emission at z=2-3
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Lya nebulae around unobscured quasars are more extended, asymmetric, and show steeper velocity dispersion declines than those around obscured quasars, supporting an evolutionary AGN model at cosmic noon.
DeepDive: Simultaneous Formation of Massive Quiescent Galaxies in High-Redshift Galaxy Proto-clusters
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST data show massive quiescent galaxies in high-redshift proto-clusters formed and quenched simultaneously, with AGN signatures, indicating environmental triggering of quenching.
Dense Ionized Outflow with Five Narrow Components in a Dust-obscured Galaxy
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The dust-obscured galaxy J1010+3725 hosts a complex ionized outflow consisting of five narrow components with velocities from -1475 to +507 km/s and high hydrogen densities above 10^5 cm^{-3}.
The Hubble sequence in JWST CEERS from unbiased galaxy morphologies
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

A Hubble-like sequence of galaxy morphologies exists by redshift 4, with low-mass galaxies as persistent star-forming disks and massive galaxies following either stable disk or rapid compaction-quenching paths.
One Merge to Rule Them All: From Galaxy Interactions to Black Hole Mergers Using Horizon-AGN
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Horizon-AGN shows galaxy and black hole merger rates both rise with stellar mass and fall with redshift, peaking near z=2-3, establishing a direct evolutionary link from galaxy interactions to black hole coalescences.
Tracing Radio AGN-Driven Quenching in Post-Starburst Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Post-starburst galaxies at cosmic noon show very low radio detection rates and compact weak sources, consistent with short-lived low-luminosity AGN, while older quiescent galaxies exhibit stronger extended radio emission.
Morphological and Star Formation Properties of Cosmic Noon Massive Quiescent Galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Massive quiescent galaxies at cosmic noon are compact and bulge-dominated with inside-out quenching, where inner regions formed stars ~0.5 Gyr earlier and quenched faster than outskirts.
HI 21-cm absorption in low- and high-excitation radio-loud AGNs at $z<0.5$ from MALS
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Five new HI 21-cm absorption detections in LERGs and HERGs at z<0.5 reveal disturbed gas kinematics with velocity offsets over 350 km/s and a 3% detection rate consistent with lower-redshift samples.
The role of small-scale environments in the quenching of massive galaxies at $1<z<5$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Massive quiescent galaxies at high redshifts show elevated fractions in small-scale overdensities, indicating environmental quenching via galaxy interactions plays a major role.
Radial Distribution of Star Formation and Gas-phase Metallicity in Spiral-Elliptical Galaxy Pairs
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Spirals paired with ellipticals show centrally suppressed star formation and higher gas-phase metallicities than spirals paired with other spirals, with the effect scaling with companion mass and gas kinematics.
A Rare Eddington-Limited, Heavily Obscured Low-Mass Active Galactic Nucleus Likely Triggered by a Galaxy Merger
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

GAMA 376183 is a rare Eddington-limited heavily obscured AGN in a merging low-mass galaxy, triggered by the merger and identified via strong [Ne V] emission.
Massive black holes and their galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted

A review summarizing detection methods, population statistics, and coevolution of supermassive black holes with host galaxies from early universe observations and simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 200 canonical work pages · cited by 20 Pith papers

[1]

L., & Steidel , C

Adelberger , K. L., & Steidel , C. C. 2005, , 630, 50

2005
[2]

L., Steidel , C

Adelberger , K. L., Steidel , C. C., Pettini , M., Shapley , A. E., Reddy , N. A., & Erb , D. K. 2005, , 619, 697

2005
[3]

M., Bauer , F

Alexander , D. M., Bauer , F. E., Chapman , S. C., Smail , I., Blain , A. W., Brandt , W. N., & Ivison , R. J. 2005 a , , 632, 736

2005
[4]

M., Smail , I., Bauer , F

Alexander , D. M., Smail , I., Bauer , F. E., Chapman , S. C., Blain , A. W., Brandt , W. N., & Ivison , R. J. 2005 b , , 434, 738

2005
[5]

D., Driver , S

Allen , P. D., Driver , S. P., Graham , A. W., Cameron , E., Liske , J., & de Propris , R. 2006, , 371, 2

2006
[6]

D., Moustakas , L

Allen , P. D., Moustakas , L. A., Dalton , G., MacDonald , E., Blake , C., Clewley , L., Heymans , C., & Wegner , G. 2005, , 360, 1244

2005
[7]

S., Lambas , D

Alonso , M. S., Lambas , D. G., Tissera , P., & Coldwell , G. 2007, , 375, 1017

2007
[8]

2005, , 358, 1477

Athanassoula , E. 2005, , 358, 1477

2005
[9]

1983, , 127, 349

Athanassoula , E., Bienayme , O., Martinet , L., & Pfenniger , D. 1983, , 127, 349

1983
[10]

Babbedge , T. S. R., et al. 2006, , 370, 1159

2006
[11]

N., Kirhakos , S., Saxe , D

Bahcall , J. N., Kirhakos , S., Saxe , D. H., & Schneider , D. P. 1997, , 479, 642

1997
[12]

W., & Peletier , R

Balcells , M., Graham , A. W., & Peletier , R. F. 2004, , in press [astro-ph/0404381]

work page arXiv 2004
[13]

K., Balogh , M

Baldry , I. K., Balogh , M. L., Bower , R. G., Glazebrook , K., Nichol , R. C., Bamford , S. P., & Budavari , T. 2006, , 373, 469

2006
[14]

M., Loveday , J., Brunner , R

Ball , N. M., Loveday , J., Brunner , R. J., Baldry , I. K., & Brinkmann , J. 2006, , 373, 845

2006
[15]

D., Jogee , S., & Marinova , I

Barazza , F. D., Jogee , S., & Marinova , I. 2006, in Galaxy Evolution across the Hubble Time [astro-ph/0610561], ed. F. Combes & J. Palous

work page arXiv 2006
[16]

Barnes , J. E. 1988, , 331, 699

1988
[17]

1992, , 393, 484

---. 1992, , 393, 484

1992
[18]

E., & Hernquist , L

Barnes , J. E., & Hernquist , L. 1992, , 30, 705

1992
[19]

1996, , 471, 115

---. 1996, , 471, 115

1996
[20]

E., & Hernquist , L

Barnes , J. E., & Hernquist , L. E. 1991, , 370, L65

1991
[21]

Barthel , P. D. 2006, , 458, 107

2006
[22]

F., & de Jong , R

Bell , E. F., & de Jong , R. S. 2001, , 550, 212

2001
[23]

F., McIntosh , D

Bell , E. F., McIntosh , D. H., Katz , N., & Weinberg , M. D. 2003 a , , 585, L117

2003
[24]

2003 b , , 149, 289

---. 2003 b , , 149, 289

2003
[25]

F., Phleps , S., Somerville , R

Bell , E. F., Phleps , S., Somerville , R. S., Wolf , C., Borch , A., & Meisenheimer , K. 2006, , 652, 270

2006
[26]

F., Wolf , C., Meisenheimer , K., Rix , H.-W., Borch , A., Dye , S., Kleinheinrich , M., Wisotzki , L., & McIntosh , D

Bell , E. F., Wolf , C., Meisenheimer , K., Rix , H.-W., Borch , A., Dye , S., Kleinheinrich , M., Wisotzki , L., & McIntosh , D. H. 2004, , 608, 752

2004
[27]

F., et al

Bell , E. F., et al. 2005, , 625, 23

2005
[28]

2007, , in preparation

Bennert , N., et al. 2007, , in preparation

2007
[29]

1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987)

Binney , J., & Tremaine , S. 1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987)

1987
[30]

W., Chapman , S

Blain , A. W., Chapman , S. C., Smail , I., & Ivison , R. 2004, , 611, 725

2004
[31]

2004, , 355, 713

Blake , C., et al. 2004, , 355, 713

2004
[32]

Blanton , M. R. 2006, , 648, 268

2006
[33]

2006, , 453, 869

Borch , A., et al. 2006, , 453, 869

2006
[34]

C., Blain , A

Borys , C., Smail , I., Chapman , S. C., Blain , A. W., Alexander , D. M., & Ivison , R. J. 2005, , 635, 853

2005
[35]

J., & Combes , F

Bournaud , F., Jog , C. J., & Combes , F. 2005, , 437, 69

2005
[36]

G., Benson , A

Bower , R. G., Benson , A. J., Malbon , R., Helly , J. C., Frenk , C. S., Baugh , C. M., Cole , S., & Lacey , C. G. 2006, , 370, 645

2006
[37]

2006, , 644, 143

Brand , K., et al. 2006, , 644, 143

2006
[38]

2007, , in press [astro-ph/0703003]

---. 2007, , in press [astro-ph/0703003]

work page arXiv 2007
[39]

R., et al

Bridge , C. R., et al. 2007, , in press [astro-ph/0701040]

work page arXiv 2007
[40]

S., et al

Brotherton , M. S., et al. 1999, , 520, L87

1999
[41]

A., Kilborn , V

Brough , S., Forbes , D. A., Kilborn , V. A., & Couch , W. 2006, , 370, 1223

work page 2006
[42]

S., & Conselice , C

Bundy , K., Ellis , R. S., & Conselice , C. J. 2005, , 625, 621

work page 2005
[43]

S., Kodama , T., & Conselice , C

Bundy , K., Fukugita , M., Ellis , R. S., Kodama , T., & Conselice , C. J. 2004, , 601, L123

work page 2004
[44]

2006, , 651, 120

Bundy , K., et al. 2006, , 651, 120

work page 2006
[45]

2001, , 555, 719

Canalizo , G., & Stockton , A. 2001, , 555, 719

work page 2001
[46]

I., et al

Caputi , K. I., et al. 2007, , in press [astro-ph/0701283]

work page arXiv 2007
[47]

M., Stiavelli , M., & Mack , J

Carollo , C. M., Stiavelli , M., & Mack , J. 1998, , 116, 68

work page 1998
[48]

2005, , 357, 903

Cassata , P., et al. 2005, , 357, 903

work page 2005
[49]

J., Hernquist , L., Hopkins , P

Chakrabarti , S., Cox , T. J., Hernquist , L., Hopkins , P. F., Robertson , B., & Di Matteo , T. 2007, , 658, 840

work page 2007
[50]

C., Blain , A

Chapman , S. C., Blain , A. W., Smail , I., & Ivison , R. J. 2005, , 622, 772

work page 2005
[51]

2001, , 556, 562

Chary , R., & Elbaz , D. 2001, , 556, 562

work page 2001
[52]

L., Hennawi , J

Coil , A. L., Hennawi , J. F., Newman , J. A., Cooper , M. C., & Davis , M. 2007, , 654, 115

work page 2007
[53]

L., et al

Coil , A. L., et al. 2004, , 609, 525

work page 2004
[54]

2006, , 638, 668

---. 2006, , 638, 668

work page 2006
[55]

1990, , 233, 82

Combes , F., Debbasch , F., Friedli , D., & Pfenniger , D. 1990, , 233, 82

work page 1990
[56]

H., & Kravtsov , A

Conroy , C., Wechsler , R. H., & Kravtsov , A. V. 2006, , 647, 201

work page 2006
[57]

2007, , 654, 153

Conroy , C., et al. 2007, , 654, 153

work page 2007
[58]

J., Bershady , M

Conselice , C. J., Bershady , M. A., Dickinson , M., & Papovich , C. 2003, , 126, 1183

work page 2003
[59]

2005, , 364, 303

Cooray , A. 2005, , 364, 303

work page 2005
[60]

2006, , 365, 842

---. 2006, , 365, 842

work page 2006
[61]

J., Di Matteo , T., Hernquist , L., Hopkins , P

Cox , T. J., Di Matteo , T., Hernquist , L., Hopkins , P. F., Robertson , B., & Springel , V. 2006 a , , 643, 692

work page 2006
[62]

J., Dutta , S

Cox , T. J., Dutta , S. N., Di Matteo , T., Hernquist , L., Hopkins , P. F., Robertson , B., & Springel , V. 2006 b , , accepted [astro-ph/0607446]

work page arXiv 2006
[63]

M., Boyle , B

Croom , S. M., Boyle , B. J., Shanks , T., Smith , R. J., Miller , L., Outram , P. J., Loaring , N. S., Hoyle , F., & da \^A ngela , J. 2005, , 356, 415

work page 2005
[64]

J., Gao , L., & White , S

Croton , D. J., Gao , L., & White , S. D. M. 2007, , 374, 1303

work page 2007
[65]

J., et al

Croton , D. J., et al. 2006, , 365, 11

work page 2006
[66]

2006, , in press [astro-ph/0612401]

da Angela , J., et al. 2006, , in press [astro-ph/0612401]

work page arXiv 2006
[67]

M., et al

Dasyra , K. M., et al. 2006 a , , 638, 745

work page 2006
[68]

2006 b , , in press [astro-ph/0610719]

---. 2006 b , , in press [astro-ph/0610719]

work page arXiv 2006
[69]

De Lucia , G., Kauffmann , G., Springel , V., White , S. D. M., Lanzoni , B., Stoehr , F., Tormen , G., & Yoshida , N. 2004, , 348, 333

work page 2004
[70]

P., Allen , P

De Propris , R., Liske , J., Driver , S. P., Allen , P. D., & Cross , N. J. G. 2005, , 130, 1516

work page 2005
[71]

2007, , submitted, arXiv:0705.2269v1 [astro-ph]

Di Matteo , T., Colberg , J., Springel , V., Hernquist , L., & Sijacki , D. 2007, , submitted, arXiv:0705.2269v1 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[72]

2005, , 433, 604

Di Matteo , T., Springel , V., & Hernquist , L. 2005, , 433, 604

work page 2005
[73]

1987, , 313, 59

Djorgovski , S., & Davis , M. 1987, , 313, 59

work page 1987
[74]

L., Faber , S

Dressler , A., Lynden-Bell , D., Burstein , D., Davies , R. L., Faber , S. M., Terlevich , R., & Wegner , G. 1987, , 313, 42

work page 1987
[75]

P., Allen , P

Driver , S. P., Allen , P. D., Liske , J., & Graham , A. W. 2007, , in press [astro-ph/0701728]

work page arXiv 2007
[76]

R., et al

Eke , V. R., et al. 2004, , 355, 769

work page 2004
[77]

1994, , 95, 1

Elvis , M., et al. 1994, , 95, 1

work page 1994
[78]

K., Steidel , C

Erb , D. K., Steidel , C. C., Shapley , A. E., Pettini , M., Reddy , N. A., & Adelberger , K. L. 2006, , 646, 107

work page 2006
[79]

K., Pagani , C., Scarpa , R., & Treves , A

Falomo , R., Kotilainen , J. K., Pagani , C., Scarpa , R., & Treves , A. 2004, , 604, 495

work page 2004
[80]

2004, , 128, 515

Fan , X., et al. 2004, , 128, 515

work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.