REVIEW 2 cited by
Neural Machine Translation Inspired Binary Code Similarity Comparison beyond Function Pairs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Neural Machine Translation Inspired Binary Code Similarity Comparison beyond Function Pairs
read the original abstract
Binary code analysis allows analyzing binary code without having access to the corresponding source code. A binary, after disassembly, is expressed in an assembly language. This inspires us to approach binary analysis by leveraging ideas and techniques from Natural Language Processing (NLP), a rich area focused on processing text of various natural languages. We notice that binary code analysis and NLP share a lot of analogical topics, such as semantics extraction, summarization, and classification. This work utilizes these ideas to address two important code similarity comparison problems. (I) Given a pair of basic blocks for different instruction set architectures (ISAs), determining whether their semantics is similar or not; and (II) given a piece of code of interest, determining if it is contained in another piece of assembly code for a different ISA. The solutions to these two problems have many applications, such as cross-architecture vulnerability discovery and code plagiarism detection. We implement a prototype system INNEREYE and perform a comprehensive evaluation. A comparison between our approach and existing approaches to Problem I shows that our system outperforms them in terms of accuracy, efficiency and scalability. And the case studies utilizing the system demonstrate that our solution to Problem II is effective. Moreover, this research showcases how to apply ideas and techniques from NLP to large-scale binary code analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RINSER: Accurate API Prediction Using Masked Language Models
RINSER uses a masked-language model trained on API codeprints (assembly context around API calls) to predict Windows API names, reporting 85.77% accuracy on normal and 82.88% on stripped binaries, and finding 65 APIs ...
-
FlowMalTrans: Unsupervised Binary Code Translation for Malware Detection Using Flow-Adapter Architecture
FlowMalTrans uses normalizing flows to map basic blocks across ISAs, letting a single X86-64-trained malware detector handle code from six other architectures.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.