Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.09984 v3 pith:ACTIHA2F submitted 2020-04-21 cs.CL

BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERT

classification cs.CL
keywords adversarialbertmodelsattackbert-attacksampleschallengingdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Adversarial attacks for discrete data (such as texts) have been proved significantly more challenging than continuous data (such as images) since it is difficult to generate adversarial samples with gradient-based methods. Current successful attack methods for texts usually adopt heuristic replacement strategies on the character or word level, which remains challenging to find the optimal solution in the massive space of possible combinations of replacements while preserving semantic consistency and language fluency. In this paper, we propose \textbf{BERT-Attack}, a high-quality and effective method to generate adversarial samples using pre-trained masked language models exemplified by BERT. We turn BERT against its fine-tuned models and other deep neural models in downstream tasks so that we can successfully mislead the target models to predict incorrectly. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art attack strategies in both success rate and perturb percentage, while the generated adversarial samples are fluent and semantically preserved. Also, the cost of calculation is low, thus possible for large-scale generations. The code is available at https://github.com/LinyangLee/BERT-Attack.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pay Less Attention to Function Words for Free Robustness of Vision-Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    FDA differentially subtracts function-word cross-attention from original attention heads to cut attack success rates by 18-90% across models and tasks while dropping performance by at most 0.6%.

  2. When Efficiency Backfires: Cascading LLMs Trigger Cascade Failure under Adversarial Attack

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM cascade systems are vulnerable to a new adversarial attack that simultaneously degrades accuracy and destroys the intended cost savings by targeting both the lightweight models and the escalation decision mechanism.

  3. RefineRAG: Word-Level Poisoning Attacks via Retriever-Guided Text Refinement

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RefineRAG achieves 90% attack success on NQ by generating toxic seeds then optimizing them via retriever-in-the-loop word refinement, outperforming prior methods on effectiveness and naturalness.

  4. SALMAN: Stability Analysis of Language Models Through the Maps Between Graph-based Manifolds

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    SALMAN ranks each text sample's fragility via the distortion between input and output embedding distances and uses the ranking to improve attack success rates and fine-tuning robustness.