Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Masking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00577 v3 pith:SZIZZNIL submitted 2020-10-01 cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML

Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Masking

classification cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML
keywords interpretingedgeedgesmodelmodelsclassifierdifferentiableevery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a popular approach to integrating structural inductive biases into NLP models. However, there has been little work on interpreting them, and specifically on understanding which parts of the graphs (e.g. syntactic trees or co-reference structures) contribute to a prediction. In this work, we introduce a post-hoc method for interpreting the predictions of GNNs which identifies unnecessary edges. Given a trained GNN model, we learn a simple classifier that, for every edge in every layer, predicts if that edge can be dropped. We demonstrate that such a classifier can be trained in a fully differentiable fashion, employing stochastic gates and encouraging sparsity through the expected $L_0$ norm. We use our technique as an attribution method to analyze GNN models for two tasks -- question answering and semantic role labeling -- providing insights into the information flow in these models. We show that we can drop a large proportion of edges without deteriorating the performance of the model, while we can analyse the remaining edges for interpreting model predictions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. B-cos GNNs: Faithful Explanations through Dynamic Linearity

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    B-cos GNNs achieve inherent explainability in graph neural networks by using linear aggregation and B-cos transforms to produce exact per-node per-feature contribution decompositions via dynamic linearity.

  2. FedLAB: Traceable Semantic Codebooks for Federated Multimodal Graph Foundation Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FedLAB organizes multimodal graph knowledge into typed hierarchical codebooks for modality evidence, node semantics, and topology context via federated semantic barycenter pre-training, improving performance by up to ...

  3. Clue-Guided Money Laundering Group Discovery

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Clue2Group recovers laundering groups from initial clues via local context, GNN-based risk fields, and evidence integration on AML benchmarks.

  4. B-cos GNNs: Faithful Explanations through Dynamic Linearity

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    B-cos GNNs replace non-linear message and update functions with B-cos transforms in GNNs to enable exact per-node per-feature explanations from a single forward-backward pass while retaining competitive accuracy.

  5. TACENR: Task-Agnostic Contrastive Explanations for Node Representations

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TACENR introduces a contrastive-learning method that identifies the most influential attribute, proximity, and structural features in node representations in a task-agnostic manner.

  6. Explaining the Explainers in Graph Neural Networks: a Comparative Study

    cs.LG 2022-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Benchmark study of ten GNN explainers on eight architectures and six datasets that isolates usable components and issues practical recommendations.

  7. Towards Faithful Graph Explanations with Synergistic Edge Effects via Granular Balls

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    SeeExplainer explains GNN predictions by decomposing graphs into granular balls and selecting substructures whose removal changes predictions, but its reported stability and fidelity advantages are largely definitiona...