Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Early fault-tolerant simulations of the Hubbard model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.09238 v4 pith:CHKRJYFN submitted 2020-12-16 quant-ph

Early fault-tolerant simulations of the Hubbard model

classification quant-ph
keywords timesquantumtrotterizationcostserrorfault-tolerantfffthubbard
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Simulation of the Hubbard model is a leading candidate for the first useful applications of a fault-tolerant quantum computer. A recent study of quantum algorithms for early simulations of the Hubbard model [Kivlichan \textit{et al.} Quantum 4 296 (2019)] found that the lowest resource costs were achieved by split-operator Trotterization combined with the fast-fermionic Fourier transform (FFFT) on an $L \times L$ lattice with length $L=2^k$. On lattices with length $L \neq 2^k$, Givens rotations can be used instead of the FFFT but lead to considerably higher resource costs. We present a new analytic approach to bounding the simulation error due to Trotterization that provides much tighter bounds for the split-operator FFFT method, leading to $16 \times$ improvement in error bounds. Furthermore, we introduce plaquette Trotterization that works on any size lattice and apply our improved error bound analysis to show competitive resource costs. We consider a phase estimation task and show plaquette Trotterization reduces the number of non-Clifford gates by a factor $5.5\times$ to $9 \times$ (depending on the parameter regime) over the best previous estimates for $8 \times 8$ and $16 \times 16$ lattices and a much larger factor for other lattice sizes not of the form $L=2^k$. In conclusion, we find there is a potentially useful application for fault-tolerant quantum computers using around one million Toffoli gates.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes

    quant-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pinnacle Architecture using QLDPC codes reduces physical qubits needed to factor RSA-2048 to under 100,000 at 10^{-3} error rate.

  2. Fast and Parallel High-Rate STAR Architecture for Megaquop Quantum Simulation

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A symmetry-co-designed high-rate QEC architecture with parallel STAR injection on bivariate bicycle codes achieves ~5.5x space savings for TFIM and Fermi-Hubbard simulations versus surface-code STAR.

  3. Distribution Complexity of Electronic Structure Simulations on Quantum Supercomputers

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An algorithm is presented for estimating distribution complexity of electronic structure Hamiltonians, with O(N^3) entanglement estimation per fragment and quadratic/exponential reductions in distribution cost for qua...

  4. How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

    quant-ph 2024-11 accept novelty 4.0

    A comprehensive review of scaling paths for superconducting quantum computers, with resource and sensitivity analyses for utility-scale applications under realistic error distributions.