REVIEW 7 cited by
Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models
read the original abstract
Large language models (LM) generate remarkably fluent text and can be efficiently adapted across NLP tasks. Measuring and guaranteeing the quality of generated text in terms of safety is imperative for deploying LMs in the real world; to this end, prior work often relies on automatic evaluation of LM toxicity. We critically discuss this approach, evaluate several toxicity mitigation strategies with respect to both automatic and human evaluation, and analyze consequences of toxicity mitigation in terms of model bias and LM quality. We demonstrate that while basic intervention strategies can effectively optimize previously established automatic metrics on the RealToxicityPrompts dataset, this comes at the cost of reduced LM coverage for both texts about, and dialects of, marginalized groups. Additionally, we find that human raters often disagree with high automatic toxicity scores after strong toxicity reduction interventions -- highlighting further the nuances involved in careful evaluation of LM toxicity.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Ethics Testing: Proactive Identification of Generative AI System Harms
Ethics testing is introduced as a systematic approach to generate tests that identify software harms induced by unethical behavior in generative AI outputs.
-
GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts
GPTFuzz is a black-box fuzzing framework that mutates seed jailbreak templates to automatically generate effective attacks, achieving over 90% success rates on models including ChatGPT and Llama-2.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...
-
A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment
Ranked preference modeling outperforms imitation learning for language model alignment and scales more favorably with model size.
-
Where Does Toxicity Live? Mechanistic Localization and Targeted Suppression in Language Models
Toxicity in language models is disproportionately encoded in early MLP layers and can be localized via activation differentials then suppressed at inference time without gradient descent.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model
Trained the largest monolithic 530B-parameter transformer language model to date and reported new state-of-the-art zero- and few-shot results on multiple NLP benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.