Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.00964 v1 pith:UKHCBCFH submitted 2021-12-02 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO

A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulation

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords testingsystemshigh-fidelityscenario-basedworksautomatedbeendriving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) have seen rapid progress in recent years. To ensure the safety and reliability of these systems, extensive testings are being conducted before their future mass deployment. Testing the system on the road is the closest to real-world and desirable approach, but it is incredibly costly. Also, it is infeasible to cover rare corner cases using such real-world testing. Thus, a popular alternative is to evaluate an ADS's performance in some well-designed challenging scenarios, a.k.a. scenario-based testing. High-fidelity simulators have been widely used in this setting to maximize flexibility and convenience in testing what-if scenarios. Although many works have been proposed offering diverse frameworks/methods for testing specific systems, the comparisons and connections among these works are still missing. To bridge this gap, in this work, we provide a generic formulation of scenario-based testing in high-fidelity simulation and conduct a literature review on the existing works. We further compare them and present the open challenges as well as potential future research directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SinD 2.0: A Multi-City UAV Dataset with Semantic Risk Annotations for SOTIF-Oriented Safety Validation at Signalized Intersections

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A multi-city drone intersection dataset with 53,000 tracks, 32,682 safety-critical events, and semantic risk labels for SOTIF testing of autonomous driving.

  2. Cam2Sim: Neural Scenario Reconstruction for Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving Simulation

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Cam2Sim rebuilds real urban drives as CARLA scenarios with Gaussian-Splatting camera rendering that completes closed-loop DAVE-2 runs where standard CARLA rendering fails.

  3. From Nominal Intensity to Equivalent Rainfall: A Path-Based Credibility Evaluation Framework for Simulated Rainfall in Autonomous-Driving Perception Tests

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a path-based credibility framework using equivalent rainfall intensity, RRD scores from real raindrop spectra, and lidar consistency metrics to identify preferable simulated rainfall paths for AV perception tests.

  4. Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems

    eess.SY 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a paradigm of provable probabilistic safety to enable scalable, safe deployment of embodied AI in critical applications.