Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Logical Fallacy Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13758 v3 pith:TDL6EBUP submitted 2022-02-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LGcs.LO

Logical Fallacy Detection

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LGcs.LO
keywords logicalfallacieslanguagetaskchallengechangeclimatedataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reasoning is central to human intelligence. However, fallacious arguments are common, and some exacerbate problems such as spreading misinformation about climate change. In this paper, we propose the task of logical fallacy detection, and provide a new dataset (Logic) of logical fallacies generally found in text, together with an additional challenge set for detecting logical fallacies in climate change claims (LogicClimate). Detecting logical fallacies is a hard problem as the model must understand the underlying logical structure of the argument. We find that existing pretrained large language models perform poorly on this task. In contrast, we show that a simple structure-aware classifier outperforms the best language model by 5.46% on Logic and 4.51% on LogicClimate. We encourage future work to explore this task as (a) it can serve as a new reasoning challenge for language models, and (b) it can have potential applications in tackling the spread of misinformation. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/causalNLP/logical-fallacy

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical Fallacies

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LoFa is a new benchmark and LFR@k metric for measuring LLM resistance to sustained logical fallacy attacks via generated question-argument pairs and debate simulations.