REVIEW 14 cited by
Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information? In this paper, we analyze whether Pre-Trained Language Models (PLMs) are prone to leaking personal information. Specifically, we query PLMs for email addresses with contexts of the email address or prompts containing the owner's name. We find that PLMs do leak personal information due to memorization. However, since the models are weak at association, the risk of specific personal information being extracted by attackers is low. We hope this work could help the community to better understand the privacy risk of PLMs and bring new insights to make PLMs safe.
Forward citations
Cited by 14 Pith papers
-
Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning
NPO enables stable unlearning of 50%+ training data in LLMs on TOFU by making collapse exponentially slower than gradient ascent, preserving sensible outputs where prior methods fail.
-
Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling
Pythia releases 16 identically trained LLMs with full checkpoints and data tools to study training dynamics, scaling, memorization, and bias in language models.
-
Probing Memorization of Tabular In-Context Learning
A new probing framework detects moderate parametric memorization signals in tabular in-context learning models under single-task fine-tuning, strongest on low-cardinality tasks, but signals largely disappear under rea...
-
BEAVER: An Efficient Deterministic LLM Verifier
BEAVER is the first practical deterministic verifier that maintains sound probability bounds on LLM safety properties using token tries and frontier data structures, finding 2-3x more violations than sampling at 1/10 ...
-
Unveiling Privacy Risks in Multi-modal Large Language Models: Task-specific Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Challenges
Introduces MM-Privacy dataset and evaluations showing MLLMs leak sensitive data from images in various tasks, highlighting task inconsistency effects.
-
PrivUn: Unveiling Latent Ripple Effects and Shallow Forgetting in Privacy Unlearning
PrivUn shows privacy unlearning in LLMs produces gradient-driven ripple effects and only shallow forgetting across layers, with new strategies proposed for deeper removal.
-
To Lie or Not to Lie? Investigating The Biased Spread of Global Lies by LLMs
LLMs propagate misinformation more in lower-resource languages and lower-HDI countries, with input safety classifiers and retrieval-augmented fact-checking showing cross-lingual and regional gaps.
-
Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agents
A data-centric survey finds that only information-flow control covers compositional and cross-session leakage in LLM agents and that no single benchmark tests an agent across all its data surfaces under one policy.
-
ISACL: Internal State Analyzer for Copyrighted Training Data Leakage
An MLP trained on LLM internal states predicts Rouge-L-defined literal copying leakage with high accuracy, but not paraphrase-level leakage.
-
Revisiting the Past: Data Unlearning with Model State History
MSA performs data unlearning in LLMs by arithmetic operations on prior model checkpoints to remove targeted datapoint influence, with experiments showing competitive or better results than existing unlearning methods.
-
Vision Language Model Helps Private Information De-Identification in Vision Data
VisShield with OPTIC dataset enables VLMs to localize and mask private text in vision data via instruction tuning for privacy preservation.
-
Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
-
A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.
-
Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.