Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

Limitations of the NTK for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10012 v1 pith:D2N46AEY submitted 2022-06-20 cs.LG cs.AI

Limitations of the NTK for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords neuralempiricalnetworksscalinggeneralizationntksrealwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The ``Neural Tangent Kernel'' (NTK) (Jacot et al 2018), and its empirical variants have been proposed as a proxy to capture certain behaviors of real neural networks. In this work, we study NTKs through the lens of scaling laws, and demonstrate that they fall short of explaining important aspects of neural network generalization. In particular, we demonstrate realistic settings where finite-width neural networks have significantly better data scaling exponents as compared to their corresponding empirical and infinite NTKs at initialization. This reveals a more fundamental difference between the real networks and NTKs, beyond just a few percentage points of test accuracy. Further, we show that even if the empirical NTK is allowed to be pre-trained on a constant number of samples, the kernel scaling does not catch up to the neural network scaling. Finally, we show that the empirical NTK continues to evolve throughout most of the training, in contrast with prior work which suggests that it stabilizes after a few epochs of training. Altogether, our work establishes concrete limitations of the NTK approach in understanding generalization of real networks on natural datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Defense of the Quadratic Model

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Local Taylor-expanded quadratic models reproduce a 150M-parameter LLM's validation loss for up to 10% of training late in the run, and LLM pretraining operates within a factor of 2 of a stochastic or deterministic edg...

  2. The Cost of Discretization in Functional Linear Regression: Minimax Rates and Adaptation

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Matching minimax prediction rates for discretely observed functional linear regression are n^{-ν/(ν+1)}+(nm)^{-ν/κ} under independent design, and those two terms plus m^{-ν}+m^{-4α} under common design.

  3. Pointwise Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Proposes pointwise Riemannian Dimension from feature eigenvalues to derive tighter, representation-aware generalization bounds for deep networks in the nonlinear regime.

  4. Feature Learning in Linear-Width Two-Layer Networks: Two vs. One Step of Gradient Descent

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the linear-width regime, the second GD step yields a spiked random matrix whose number of outliers is floor(alpha2 / (1/2 - alpha1)), and batch reuse enables learning directions with information exponent greater th...

  5. Feature Learning in Linear-Width Two-Layer Networks: Two vs. One Step of Gradient Descent

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Two steps of gradient descent on first-layer weights in linear-width two-layer networks produce a spiked random matrix with floor(alpha2/(1/2-alpha1)) outliers, each a learned direction, and batch reuse allows capturi...

  6. How to Scale Mixture-of-Experts: From muP to the Maximally Scale-Stable Parameterization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The authors derive a Maximally Scale-Stable Parameterization (MSSP) for MoE models that achieves robust learning-rate transfer and monotonic performance gains with scale across co-scaling regimes of width, experts, an...

  7. Spectral Dynamics in Deep Networks: Feature Learning, Outlier Escape, and Learning Rate Transfer

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A two-level DMFT predicts width-consistent outlier escape and hyperparameter transfer under μP in deep networks, with bulk restructuring dominating for tasks with many outputs.

  8. Second-Order Path Kernel Interpolation Formulas in Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives second-order path-kernel interpolation formulas for gradient descent, SGD, and momentum training, adding curvature terms and a concentration estimate around the expected prediction.

  9. Spectral Dynamics in Deep Networks: Feature Learning, Outlier Escape, and Learning Rate Transfer

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-level DMFT tracks bulk and outlier spectral dynamics in wide networks, predicting width-consistent outlier growth and hyperparameter transfer under muP scaling for deep linear nets while noting bulk restructurin...

  10. A Theory of How Pretraining Shapes Inductive Bias in Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    In diagonal linear networks, fine-tuning generalization is governed by a tunable per-dimension penalty whose sparsity and pretraining dependence define four regimes and a trade-off between feature reuse and new-featur...

  11. Harnessing Optimization Dynamics for Curvature-Informed Model Merging

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Optimization Trajectory Aware merging uses Adam second moments as a curvature proxy, first pruning task-vector edits with Fast Fisher Grafting, then reweighting survivors with a compressed curvature preconditioner.

  12. There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning

    stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A mechanics of the learning process is emerging in deep learning theory, characterized by dynamics, coarse statistics, and falsifiable predictions across idealized settings, limits, laws, hyperparameters, and universa...