Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.10683 v1 pith:TZKFZDEO submitted 2022-10-19 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLP

classification cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG
keywords adversarialresearchsecurityadvbenchgoalsmethodsparadigmreal-world
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Textual adversarial samples play important roles in multiple subfields of NLP research, including security, evaluation, explainability, and data augmentation. However, most work mixes all these roles, obscuring the problem definitions and research goals of the security role that aims to reveal the practical concerns of NLP models. In this paper, we rethink the research paradigm of textual adversarial samples in security scenarios. We discuss the deficiencies in previous work and propose our suggestions that the research on the Security-oriented adversarial NLP (SoadNLP) should: (1) evaluate their methods on security tasks to demonstrate the real-world concerns; (2) consider real-world attackers' goals, instead of developing impractical methods. To this end, we first collect, process, and release a security datasets collection Advbench. Then, we reformalize the task and adjust the emphasis on different goals in SoadNLP. Next, we propose a simple method based on heuristic rules that can easily fulfill the actual adversarial goals to simulate real-world attack methods. We conduct experiments on both the attack and the defense sides on Advbench. Experimental results show that our method has higher practical value, indicating that the research paradigm in SoadNLP may start from our new benchmark. All the code and data of Advbench can be obtained at \url{https://github.com/thunlp/Advbench}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FinRED: An Expert-Guided Benchmark Generation and Evaluation Framework for Financial LLM Red-Teaming

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FinRED creates an expert-validated benchmark and rubric for financial LLM safety that maps regulatory standards to specific threats and reduces critical false negatives in evaluation from 28 to 12.

  2. SafeSci: Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models in Science Domains and Beyond

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    SafeSci creates a large objective benchmark and training resource that reveals safety weaknesses in current LLMs for science and demonstrates measurable improvement through targeted fine-tuning.

  3. A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks

    cs.LG 2024-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    StrongREJECT provides a standardized benchmark and evaluator for jailbreak attacks that aligns better with human judgments than prior methods and reveals that successful jailbreaks often reduce model capabilities.

  4. An Empirical Evaluation of Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Across Multilingual and Obfuscated Attack Scenarios

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Empirical tests across six LLMs show systematic prompt injection vulnerabilities, with higher malicious compliance in non-English languages and complex obfuscated prompts.