REVIEW 2 cited by
Leveraging Large Language Models for Scalable Vector Graphics-Driven Image Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in natural language understanding. However, through that enormous semantic representation that the LLM has learnt, is it somehow possible for it to understand images as well? This work investigates this question. To enable the LLM to process images, we convert them into a representation given by Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG). To study what the LLM can do with this XML-based textual description of images, we test the LLM on three broad computer vision tasks: (i) visual reasoning and question answering, (ii) image classification under distribution shift, few-shot learning, and (iii) generating new images using visual prompting. Even though we do not naturally associate LLMs with any visual understanding capabilities, our results indicate that the LLM can often do a decent job in many of these tasks, potentially opening new avenues for research into LLMs' ability to understand image data. Our code, data, and models can be found here https://github.com/mu-cai/svg-llm.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SVGenius: Benchmarking LLMs in SVG Understanding, Editing and Generation
SVGenius benchmarks 22 LLMs on 2,377 SVG tasks across understanding, editing, and generation, finding universal degradation with complexity.
-
GeoLoom: High-quality Geometric Diagram Generation from Textual Input
Natural-language geometry descriptions can be autoformalized into a custom geometry language and converted to coordinates by Monte Carlo optimization, yielding usable diagrams in seconds for about 81-85% of test problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.