pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.02736 · v1 · submitted 2023-09-06 · 🧬 q-bio.BM · cond-mat.soft· cond-mat.stat-mech

Stochastic nucleosome disassembly mediated by remodelers and histone fragmentation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 07:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.BM cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords nucleosome disassemblyremodelershistone fragmentationstochastic kineticsMarkov chain modelDNA binding competitionprocessive motorsdetachment time
0
0 comments X

The pith

Remodelers reduce nucleosome detachment time only if their DNA affinities match histone contacts, and processive motors make the rate equal to the single-bond dissociation constant times motor speed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors build stochastic models of a nucleosome where histone-DNA contacts break one by one until the histone detaches from DNA. Competitive binding by remodeler proteins shortens the average time to detachment, but only when the remodelers bind DNA with strength comparable to the histone contacts themselves. When processive motors act, the detachment rate becomes directly proportional to the product of the single-contact dissociation constant and the motor's procession speed. The model is extended to allow histone subunits to dissociate separately, showing that free histones in solution can rebind and rescue partially disassembled nucleosomes while remodeler binding favors release of the intact histone over fragmented paths.

Core claim

In the monomeric model, eigenvalue analysis of the master equation for the number of broken contacts shows that remodeler competition lowers mean detachment time only for comparable binding affinities; for processive motors the detachment rate equals the single-bond dissociation constant multiplied by motor speed. The multimeric extension demonstrates that complete disassembly times depend on subunit-DNA contact energies, that bulk histone concentrations rescue partial nucleosomes by rebinding, and that higher remodeler binding rates bias the kinetics toward intact-histone detachment rather than fragmentation.

What carries the argument

Continuous-time Markov chain whose states track the number of intact histone-DNA contacts; mean detachment times are obtained from the smallest eigenvalue of the transition-rate matrix, with multimeric states added to allow independent subunit detachment and rebinding from bulk solution.

If this is right

  • Competitive remodeler binding shortens typical detachment time only when affinities are comparable to histone-DNA contacts.
  • Processive-motor detachment rate equals histone single-bond dissociation constant times motor procession speed.
  • Multimeric disassembly times depend on the individual subunit-DNA contact energies.
  • Bulk histone subunit concentrations can rescue and thereby slow the net disassembly of partially disassembled nucleosomes.
  • Higher remodeler binding rates bias the disassembly pathways toward release of the intact histone rather than fragmented subunits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cells might tune chromatin accessibility by expressing remodelers whose binding strengths are matched to specific histone contacts.
  • Varying motor speed or contact strength in single-molecule experiments could directly test the predicted linear dependence of detachment rate on those two quantities.
  • The rescue effect implies that local histone concentration near chromatin could act as a buffer against rapid nucleosome loss during remodeling.

Load-bearing premise

The disassembly proceeds through a sequence of independent contact breaks whose rates depend only on the current number of remaining contacts, without cooperative interactions between contacts.

What would settle it

In vitro measurement of nucleosome detachment times using remodelers whose DNA-binding affinities are varied across a range both above and below histone-DNA affinity; the model predicts a sharp drop in detachment time only near equal affinities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2309.02736 by Tom Chou, Xiangting Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A schematic of simple, intact-histone detachment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of a hypothetical attached-histone [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows numerically computed eigenvalues of W for different values of s = ε. For sufficiently small ε, they fall into the three clusters governed by A. FIG. 3. Eigenvalues λ of the dimensionless transition matrix W = W˜ /kon associated with Ω for N = 14 and ε = s = 0.1, 0.03, 0.01, 0.003, 0.001, 0.0003, and 0.0001. The principal dimensionless eigenvalues are λ0 ≲ 0, while two other groups cluster near −1 and… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A simple coarse-grained approximation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic of the multimeric nucleosome disas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Illustration of the geometric trial process. Dimer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The monomeric disassembly pathway usually oc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dimensionless rates of remodeler-free, multimeric nucleosome disassembly measured by the principal eigenvalue and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Schematic of the two general pathways of nucleosome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Principal eigenvalues – an estimate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The fraction of disassembly pathways that lead to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Principal eigenvalue of the linear facilitated detach [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. A schematic of possible macrostates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct and analyze monomeric and multimeric models of the stochastic disassembly of a single nucleosome. Our monomeric model predicts the time needed for a number of histone-DNA contacts to spontaneously break, leading to dissociation of a non-fragmented histone from DNA. The dissociation process can be facilitated by DNA binding proteins or processing molecular motors that compete with histones for histone-DNA contact sites. Eigenvalue analysis of the corresponding master equation allows us to evaluate histone detachment times under both spontaneous detachment and protein-facilitated processes. We find that competitive DNA binding of remodeling proteins can significantly reduce the typical detachment time but only if these remodelers have DNA-binding affinities comparable to those of histone-DNA contact sites. In the presence of processive motors, the histone detachment rate is shown to be proportional to the product of the histone single-bond dissociation constant and the speed of motor protein procession. Our simple intact-histone model is then extended to allow for multimeric nucleosome kinetics that reveal additional pathways of disassembly. In addition to a dependence of complete disassembly times on subunit-DNA contact energies, we show how histone subunit concentrations in bulk solution can mediate the disassembly process by rescuing partially disassembled nucleosomes. Moreover, our kinetic model predicts that remodeler binding can also bias certain pathways of nucleosome disassembly, with higher remodeler binding rates favoring intact-histone detachment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs monomeric and multimeric stochastic models of nucleosome disassembly as continuous-time Markov chains whose states track the number of broken histone-DNA contacts. Eigenvalue analysis of the associated master equations is used to compute characteristic detachment times for spontaneous dissociation as well as for processes facilitated by competitive DNA-binding remodelers and processive motors. The central predictions are that remodelers reduce typical detachment time only when their affinities are comparable to those of histone-DNA contacts, that motor-assisted detachment rate is proportional to the product of the single-bond dissociation constant and motor speed, and that the multimeric extension introduces additional pathways whose selection depends on subunit-DNA energies, bulk subunit concentrations, and remodeler binding rates.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies quantitative, parameter-based predictions for how remodelers and motors modulate nucleosome disassembly kinetics and pathway selection. The proportionality relation for processive motors and the affinity-threshold condition for remodelers are directly falsifiable and relevant to chromatin-remodeling mechanisms. The multimeric extension and rescue-by-concentration effect add biological realism. The modeling approach is standard and internally consistent, with results obtained from rate-matrix eigenvalues rather than fitted outputs.

minor comments (2)
  1. The explicit form of the rate matrix (or the characteristic equation solved for the eigenvalues) should be displayed in the main text or a clearly referenced supplementary section so that the detachment-time expressions can be reproduced without ambiguity.
  2. Numerical illustrations or parameter tables listing the histone-DNA contact energies, remodeler affinities, and motor speeds used to generate any plotted detachment times would improve clarity and allow readers to assess sensitivity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the manuscript, the clear summary of our modeling approach and predictions, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs monomeric and multimeric continuous-time Markov chain models for nucleosome disassembly, defines states by the number of broken histone-DNA contacts, and applies standard eigenvalue analysis to the master equation to compute characteristic detachment times. All reported predictions, including effects of competitive remodeler binding and the proportionality of detachment rate to the product of single-bond dissociation constant and motor procession speed, follow directly as mathematical consequences of the defined transition rates and rate matrix without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The model is self-contained, with results derived from the stated assumptions and equations rather than inputs renamed as outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on several kinetic rate parameters introduced to define the models rather than derived from first principles, along with the standard mathematical framework of master equations.

free parameters (4)
  • histone-DNA contact energies
    Determines complete disassembly times in the multimeric model
  • remodeler DNA-binding affinities and rates
    Control reduction in detachment time and pathway bias
  • motor procession speed
    Enters the proportionality for histone detachment rate
  • histone single-bond dissociation constant
    Multiplies with motor speed to set detachment rate
axioms (2)
  • standard math The nucleosome disassembly process is governed by a continuous-time Markov chain whose probabilities obey a master equation
    Enables eigenvalue analysis to extract detachment times
  • domain assumption Histone-DNA contacts break according to specified rates with possible coupling in multimeric cases
    Required to construct the state space and transition rates

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5770 in / 1456 out tokens · 35898 ms · 2026-05-24T07:01:59.202049+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schiessel, J

    H. Schiessel, J. Widom, R. F. Bruinsma, and W. M. Gelbart. Polymer reptation and nucleosome repositioning. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 86:4414--4417, 2001

  2. [2]

    Luger, A

    K. Luger, A. W. Mader, R. K. Richmond, DF Sargent, and T. J. Richmond. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 a resolution. Nature , 389(6648):251--260, 1997

  3. [3]

    Lorch, J

    Y. Lorch, J. W. Lapointe, and R. D. Kornberg. Nucleosomes inhibit the initiation of transcription but allow chain elongation with the displacement of histones. Cell , 49(2):203--210, 1987

  4. [4]

    Richmond and Curt A

    Timothy J. Richmond and Curt A. Davey. The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core. Nature , 423(6936):145, 2003

  5. [5]

    C. M. Nolan E. R. Gibney. Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity , 105(1):4--13, 2010

  6. [6]

    Akey and Karolin Luger

    Christopher W. Akey and Karolin Luger. Histone chaperones and nucleosome assembly. Current Opinion in Structural Biology , 13(1):6--14, 2003

  7. [7]

    J. D. Anderson and J. Widom. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites . Journal of Molecular Biology , 296(4):979--987, 2000

  8. [8]

    Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA

    Gu Li, Marcia Levitus, Carlos Bustamante, and Jonathan Widom. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA . Nature Structural & Molecular Biology , 12(1):46, 2005

  9. [9]

    Tomschik, H

    M. Tomschik, H. Zheng, K. V. Holde, J. Zlatanova, and S. H. Leuba. Fast, long-range, reversible conformational fluctuations in nucleosomes revealed by single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 102(9):3278--3283, 2005

  10. [10]

    Forties, Justin A

    Robert A. Forties, Justin A. North, Sarah Javaid, Omar P. Tabbaa, Richard Fishel, Michael G. Poirier, and Ralf Bundschuh. A quantitative model of nucleosome dynamics. Nucleic Acids Research , 39:8306--8313, 2011

  11. [11]

    Why do nucleosomes unwrap asymmetrically? The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 120(26):5855--5863, 2016

    Lennart de Bruin, Marco Tompitak, Behrouz Eslami-Mossallam, and Helmut Schiessel. Why do nucleosomes unwrap asymmetrically? The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 120(26):5855--5863, 2016. PMID: 26991771

  12. [12]

    Tompitak, L

    M. Tompitak, L. de Bruin, B. Eslami-Mossallam, and H. Schiessel. Designing nucleosomal force sensors. Phys. Rev. E , 95:052402, 2017

  13. [13]

    Genomes of multicellular organisms have evolved to attract nucleosomes to promoter regions

    Marco Tompitak, Cédric Vaillant, and Helmut Schiessel. Genomes of multicellular organisms have evolved to attract nucleosomes to promoter regions. Biophysical Journal , 112(3):505--511, 2017

  14. [14]

    Culkin, L

    J. Culkin, L. de Bruin, M. Tompitak, R. Phillips, and H. Schiessel. The role of DNA sequence in nucleosome breathing. European Physical Journal E , 40(11), 2017

  15. [15]

    Ensembles of breathing nucleosomes: A computational study

    Koen van Deelen , Helmut Schiessel, and Lennart de Bruin . Ensembles of breathing nucleosomes: A computational study. Biophysical Journal , 118(9):2297--2308, 2020

  16. [16]

    Mechanisms of protein search for targets on DNA : Theoretical insights

    Alexey Shvets, Maria Kochugaeva, and Anatoly Kolomeisky. Mechanisms of protein search for targets on DNA : Theoretical insights. Molecules , 23(9):2106, 2018

  17. [17]

    Kolomeisky

    Junji Iwahara and Anatoly B. Kolomeisky. Discrete-state stochastic kinetic models for target DNA search by proteins: Theory and experimental applications. Biophysical Chemistry , 269:106521, 2021

  18. [18]

    Nucleosome breathing facilitates cooperative binding of pluripotency factors Sox2 and Oct4 to DNA

    Anupam Mondal, Sujeet Kumar Mishra, and Arnab Bhattacherjee. Nucleosome breathing facilitates cooperative binding of pluripotency factors Sox2 and Oct4 to DNA . Biophysical Journal , 121(23):4526--4542, 2022

  19. [19]

    Kolomeisky

    Anupam Mondal, Cayke Felipe, and Anatoly B. Kolomeisky. Nucleosome breathing facilitates the search for hidden DNA sites by pioneer transcription factors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , pages 4096--4103, 2023

  20. [20]

    Zhang, W

    B. Zhang, W. Zheng, G. A. Papoian, and P. G. Wolynes. Exploring the free energy landscape of nucleosomes. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 138(26):8126--8133, 2016

  21. [21]

    Lequieu, A

    J. Lequieu, A. Cordoba, D. C. Schwartz, and J. De Pablo. Tension-dependent free energies of nucleosome unwrapping. Acs Central Science , 2(9):660, 2016

  22. [22]

    Molecular mechanism of spontaneous nucleosome unraveling

    David, Winogradoff, Aleksei, and Aksimentiev. Molecular mechanism of spontaneous nucleosome unraveling. Journal of Molecular Biology , 2018

  23. [23]

    Brandani, Cheng Tan, and Shoji Takada

    Giovanni B. Brandani, Cheng Tan, and Shoji Takada. The kinetic landscape of nucleosome assembly: A coarse-grained molecular dynamics study. PLoS Computational Biology , 17(7):e1009253, 2021

  24. [24]

    Peeling and sliding in nucleosome repositioning

    Tom Chou. Peeling and sliding in nucleosome repositioning. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 99:058105, 2007

  25. [25]

    Sheu, Quen J

    Jinsu Kim, Katherine M. Sheu, Quen J. Cheng, Alexander Hoffmann, and German Enciso. Stochastic models of nucleosome dynamics reveal regulatory rules of stimulus-induced epigenome remodeling. Cell Reports , 40(2):111076, 2022

  26. [26]

    Zawadzki, Cara Singer, Nils Elfving, Alexandre V

    Denis Tolkunov, Karl A. Zawadzki, Cara Singer, Nils Elfving, Alexandre V. Morozov, and James R. Broach. Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters. Molecular Biology of the Cell , 22(12):2106--2118, 2011

  27. [27]

    P. T. Lowary and J. Widom. Nucleosome packaging and nucleosome positioning of genomic DNA . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 94(4):1183--1188, 1997

  28. [28]

    P. T. Lowary and J. Widom. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning . Journal of Molecular Biology , 276(1):19--42, 1998

  29. [29]

    The absorbing boundary method

    Sture Nordholm. The absorbing boundary method. II . generalization of the golden rule. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 71(5):2313, 1979

  30. [30]

    Fyodorov and James T

    Dmitry V. Fyodorov and James T. Kadonaga. Dynamics of ATP -dependent chromatin assembly by ACF . Nature , 418(6900):896--900, 2002

  31. [31]

    Regulation of higher-order chromatin structures by nucleosome-remodelling factors

    Patrick D Varga-Weisz and Peter B Becker. Regulation of higher-order chromatin structures by nucleosome-remodelling factors. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development , 16(2):151--156, 2006

  32. [32]

    Mechanism of action of the SWI / SNF family complexes

    Kangjing Chen, Junjie Yuan, Youyang Sia, and Zhucheng Chen. Mechanism of action of the SWI / SNF family complexes. Nucleus , 14(1), 2023

  33. [33]

    Tinka V. M. Clement, Dian Spakman, Andreas S. Biebricher, Graeme A. King, Manika I. Singh, Ian D. Hickson, Erwin J. G. Peterman, and Gijs J. L. Wuite. Pitch-induced nucleosome remodeling studied by dual-trap optical tweezers. Biophysical Journal , 121(3):22a--23a, 2022

  34. [34]

    Multiplexed single-molecule experiments reveal Cas9 nucleosome invasion dynamics

    Kristina Makasheva, Louise Bryan, Martin Jinek, and Beat Fierz. Multiplexed single-molecule experiments reveal Cas9 nucleosome invasion dynamics. Biophysical Journal , 121(3):159a--160a, 2022

  35. [35]

    Becker, Qi Hu, Zelin Shan, Molly H

    Micah McCauley, Joha Joshi, Michael Morse, Nicole A. Becker, Qi Hu, Zelin Shan, Molly H. Nelson Holte, Uma Muthurajan, Ioulia F. Rouzina, Karolin Luger, Dmitry Lyumkis, Georges Mer, L. James Maher, and Mark C. Williams. Nucleosome chaperones facilitate both nucleosome assembly and disassembly. Biophysical Journal , 121(3):3a, 2022

  36. [36]

    Stochastic processes on a lattice and Gibbs measures , volume 11

    Bernard Prum and Jean Claude Fort. Stochastic processes on a lattice and Gibbs measures , volume 11. Springer Science & Business Media, 1990

  37. [37]

    Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B. Shah. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review , 59(1):65--98, 2017

  38. [38]

    Reversible Markov Chains and Random Walks on Graphs

    David Aldous and James Allen Fill. Reversible Markov Chains and Random Walks on Graphs . unpublished monograph, 2002

  39. [39]

    J. O. Thomas and R. D. Kornberg. An octamer of histones in chromatin and free in solution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 72(7):2626--2630, 1975

  40. [40]

    Holding the nucleosome together: A quantitative description of the DNA -histone interface in solution

    Ahmad Elbahnsi, Romain Retureau, Marc Baaden, Brigitte Hartmann, and Christophe Oguey. Holding the nucleosome together: A quantitative description of the DNA -histone interface in solution. Journal of chemical theory and computation , 14(2):1045--1058, 2018

  41. [41]

    S. N. Khrapunov, A. I. Dragan, A. V. Sivolob, and A. M. Zagariya. Mechanisms of stabilizing nucleosome structure. Study of dissociation of histone octamer from DNA . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression , 1351(1):213--222, 1997

  42. [42]

    Hoch, Jessica J

    Duane A. Hoch, Jessica J. Stratton, and Lisa M. Gloss. Protein–protein F\" o rster Resonance Energy Transfer analysis of nucleosome core particles containing H2A and H2A.Z . Journal of Molecular Biology , 371(4):971--988, 2007

  43. [43]

    Alexander Gansen, Alessandro Valeri, Florian Hauger, Suren Felekyan, Stanislav Kalinin, Katalin Tóth, Jörg Langowski, and Claus A. M. Seidel. Nucleosome disassembly intermediates characterized by single-molecule FRET . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 106(36):15308--15313, 2009

  44. [44]

    Nucleosome accessibility governed by the dimer/tetramer interface

    Vera Böhm, Aaron Hieb, Andrew Andrews, Alexander Gansen, Andrea Rocker, Katalin Tóth, Karolin Luger, and Jörg Langowski. Nucleosome accessibility governed by the dimer/tetramer interface. Nucleic acids research , 39:3093--3102, 2010

  45. [45]

    Structural basis of instability of the nucleosome containing a testis-specific histone variant, human h3t

    Hiroaki Tachiwana, Wataru Kagawa, Akihisa Osakabe, Koichiro Kawaguchi, Tatsuya Shiga, Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, and Hitoshi Kurumizaka. Structural basis of instability of the nucleosome containing a testis-specific histone variant, human h3t. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 107(23):10454--10459, 2010

  46. [46]

    W. E. Arnoldi. The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics , 9(1):17--29, 1951

  47. [47]

    Chou and M

    T. Chou and M. R. D'Orsogna. First Passage Problems in Biology , chapter Chapter 13, pages 306--345. World Scientific, 2014

  48. [48]

    Ran Chen and Marc S. Wold. Replication protein a: Single-stranded DNA 's first responder. BioEssays , 36(12):1156--1161, 2014

  49. [49]

    Ye, Stephanie C

    Bryan Gibb, Ling F. Ye, Stephanie C. Gergoudis, YoungHo Kwon, Hengyao Niu, Patrick Sung, and Eric C. Greene. Concentration-dependent exchange of replication protein a on single-stranded DNA revealed by single-molecule imaging. PLoS ONE , 9(2):e87922, 2014

  50. [50]

    Nabuan Naufer, Michael Morse, Guðfríður Björg Möller, James McIsaac, Ioulia Rouzina, Penny J

    M. Nabuan Naufer, Michael Morse, Guðfríður Björg Möller, James McIsaac, Ioulia Rouzina, Penny J. Beuning, and Mark C. Williams. Multiprotein E. coli SSB–ssDNA complex shows both stable binding and rapid dissociation due to interprotein interactions . Nucleic Acids Research , 49(3):1532--1549, 2021

  51. [51]

    Cancer-associated mutations of histones H2B, H3.1 and H2A.Z.1 affect the structure and stability of the nucleosome

    Yasuhiro Arimura, Masae Ikura, Risa Fujita, Mamiko Noda, Wataru Kobayashi, Naoki Horikoshi, Jiying Sun, Lin Shi, Masayuki Kusakabe, Masahiko Harata, Yasuyuki Ohkawa, Satoshi Tashiro, Hiroshi Kimura, Tsuyoshi Ikura, and Hitoshi Kurumizaka. Cancer-associated mutations of histones H2B, H3.1 and H2A.Z.1 affect the structure and stability of the nucleosome . N...

  52. [52]

    D. T. Gruszka, S. Xie, H. Kimura, and H. Yardimci. Single-molecule imaging reveals control of parental histone recycling by free histones during DNA replication. Science Advances , 6(38), 2020

  53. [53]

    An exact theory of histone- DNA adsorption and wrapping

    Chou, Tom . An exact theory of histone- DNA adsorption and wrapping. Europhys. Lett. , 62(5):753--759, 2003

  54. [54]

    Parmar, John F

    Jyotsana J. Parmar, John F. Marko, and Ranjith Padinhateeri. Nucleosome positioning and kinetics near transcription-start-site barriers are controlled by interplay between active remodeling and dna sequence. Nucleic Acids Research , 42:128--136, 2013

  55. [55]

    Nucleosome assembly and disassembly in vitro are governed by chemical kinetic principles

    Hongyu Zhao, Mingxin Guo, Fenghui Zhang, Xueqin Shao, Guoqing Liu, Yongqiang Xing, Xiujuan Zhao, Liaofu Luo, and Lu Cai. Nucleosome assembly and disassembly in vitro are governed by chemical kinetic principles. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology , 9, 2021

  56. [56]

    Chereji, Denis Tolkunov, George Locke, and Alexandre V

    R a a zvan V. Chereji, Denis Tolkunov, George Locke, and Alexandre V. Morozov. Statistical mechanics of nucleosome ordering by chromatin-structure-induced two-body interactions. Phys. Rev. E , 83:050903, 2011

  57. [57]

    Replication-coupled chromatin remodeling: A n overview of disassembly and assembly of chromatin during replication

    C\' e line Duc and Christophe Thiriet. Replication-coupled chromatin remodeling: A n overview of disassembly and assembly of chromatin during replication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 22(3):1113, 2021

  58. [58]

    Mathematical modeling of histone modifications reveals the formation mechanism and function of bivalent chromatin

    Wei Zhao, Lingxia Qiao, Shiyu Yan, Qing Nie, and Lei Zhang. Mathematical modeling of histone modifications reveals the formation mechanism and function of bivalent chromatin. iScience , 24:102732, 2021

  59. [59]

    Polach and J

    K.J. Polach and J. Widom. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: A dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. Journal of Molecular Biology , 254(2):130--149, 1995

  60. [60]

    Kuli\' c and Helmut Schiessel

    Igor M. Kuli\' c and Helmut Schiessel. Opening and closing DNA : Theories on the nucleosome. In DNA Interactions with Polymers and Surfactants , pages 173--208. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007