Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10254 v2 pith:BRMTLP6O submitted 2023-09-19 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords platformsframeworkappsplatformsecurityattackcapabilitieschatgpt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) platforms, such as ChatGPT, have recently begun offering an app ecosystem to interface with third-party services on the internet. While these apps extend the capabilities of LLM platforms, they are developed by arbitrary third parties and thus cannot be implicitly trusted. Apps also interface with LLM platforms and users using natural language, which can have imprecise interpretations. In this paper, we propose a framework that lays a foundation for LLM platform designers to analyze and improve the security, privacy, and safety of current and future third-party integrated LLM platforms. Our framework is a formulation of an attack taxonomy that is developed by iteratively exploring how LLM platform stakeholders could leverage their capabilities and responsibilities to mount attacks against each other. As part of our iterative process, we apply our framework in the context of OpenAI's plugin (apps) ecosystem. We uncover plugins that concretely demonstrate the potential for the types of issues that we outline in our attack taxonomy. We conclude by discussing novel challenges and by providing recommendations to improve the security, privacy, and safety of present and future LLM-based computing platforms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Privacy and Security Threat for OpenAI GPTs

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large-scale study finds that over 98.8% of sampled OpenAI custom GPTs leak their system instructions to crafted adversarial prompts, and hundreds of GPTs transmit user conversation data to third parties.

Pith tools