REVIEW 13 cited by
Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation
read the original abstract
Language models can store vast factual knowledge, yet their ability to flexibly use this knowledge for downstream tasks (e.g., via instruction finetuning) remains questionable. This paper investigates four fundamental knowledge manipulation tasks: retrieval (e.g., "What is person A's attribute X?"), classification (e.g., "Is A's attribute X even or odd?"), comparison (e.g., "Is A greater than B in attribute X?"), and inverse search (e.g., "Which person's attribute X equals T?"). We show that language models excel in knowledge retrieval but struggle even in the simplest classification or comparison tasks unless Chain of Thoughts (CoTs) are employed during both training and inference. Moreover, their performance in inverse knowledge search is virtually 0%, regardless of the prompts. Our primary contribution is a controlled, synthetic experiment that confirms these weaknesses are inherent to language models: they cannot efficiently manipulate knowledge from pre-training data, even when such knowledge is perfectly stored in the models, despite adequate training and sufficient model size. Our findings also apply to modern pretrained language models such as GPT-4, thus giving rise to many Turing tests to distinguish Humans from contemporary AIs.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
Geometric Factual Recall in Transformers
A single-layer transformer memorizes random subject-attribute bijections using logarithmic embedding dimension via linear superpositions in embeddings and ReLU-gated selection in the MLP, with zero-shot transfer to ne...
-
Large Language Diffusion Models
LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.
-
MeMo: Memory as a Model
MeMo encodes new knowledge into a separate memory model for frozen LLMs, achieving strong performance on BrowseComp-Plus, NarrativeQA, and MuSiQue while capturing cross-document relationships and remaining robust to r...
-
Logic-Regularized Verifier Elicits Reasoning from LLMs
LOVER creates an unsupervised logic-regularized verifier that reaches 95% of supervised verifier performance on reasoning tasks across 10 datasets.
-
Decision Potential Surface: A Theoretical and Practical Approximation of Large Language Model Decision Boundary
Defines Decision Potential Surface (DPS) whose zero isohypse equals an LLM decision boundary and supplies a K-sample approximation algorithm with derived upper bounds on absolute, expected, and concentration errors.
-
The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning
Power-law data sampling creates beneficial asymmetry in the loss landscape that lets models acquire high-frequency skill compositions first, enabling more efficient learning of rare long-tail skills than uniform distr...
-
The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning
Power-law data distributions outperform uniform ones for compositional reasoning by creating asymmetry that lets frequent skill compositions scaffold rare ones with less data.
-
DeFrame: Debiasing Large Language Models Against Framing Effects
LLM fairness scores shift substantially with positive vs negative framing of the same question, and DeFrame—a three-step self-revision prompt—reduces both average bias and this framing gap.
-
Physics of Language Models: Part 4.1, Architecture Design and the Magic of Canon Layers
Canon layers—residual 1-d causal convolutions over adjacent tokens—boost synthetic reasoning depth 2-4x, lift NoPE to RoPE level, and bring GLA up to Mamba2/GDN, with qualitative real-world confirmation.
-
MeMo: Memory as a Model
MeMo encodes new knowledge into a separate memory model that integrates with frozen LLMs, showing strong performance on QA benchmarks while avoiding catastrophic forgetting and working without access to model weights.
-
NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open Intelligence
NVIDIA releases the Nemotron 3 model family with hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture, LatentMoE, NVFP4 training, MTP layers, and multi-environment RL post-training for reasoning and agentic tasks.
-
Effects of Cross-lingual Evidence in Multilingual Medical Question Answering
Combining English and target-language web retrieval boosts medical QA for low-resource languages to match high-resource performance, while English web data benefits high-resource languages most and specialized sources...
-
Unifying Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Transformers Scaling Law
Claims a two-stage transformer scaling law (exponential then C^{-1/6}) with matching bounds, but the lower bounds are missing, the exponent is inconsistent (-1/7 vs -1/6), and the law is an artifact of hand-set M = Θ(...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.