REVIEW 11 cited by
CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsets
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are often augmented with tools to solve complex tasks. By generating code snippets and executing them through task-specific Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), they can offload certain functions to dedicated external modules, such as image encoding and performing calculations. However, most existing approaches to augment LLMs with tools are constrained by general-purpose APIs and lack the flexibility for tailoring them to specific tasks. In this work, we present CRAFT, a general tool creation and retrieval framework for LLMs. It creates toolsets specifically curated for the tasks and equips LLMs with a component that retrieves tools from these sets to enhance their capability to solve complex tasks. For each task, we collect specific code solutions by prompting GPT-4 to solve the training examples. Following a validation step ensuring the correctness, these solutions are abstracted into code snippets to enhance reusability, and deduplicated for higher quality. At inference time, the language model retrieves snippets from the toolsets and then executes them or generates the output conditioning on the retrieved snippets. Our method is designed to be flexible and offers a plug-and-play approach to adapt off-the-shelf LLMs to unseen domains and modalities, without any finetuning. Experiments on vision-language, tabular processing, and mathematical reasoning tasks show that our approach achieves substantial improvements compared to strong baselines. In addition, our in-depth analysis reveals that: (1) consistent performance improvement can be achieved by scaling up the number of tools and the capability of the backbone models; (2) each component of our approach contributes to the performance gains; (3) the created tools are well-structured and reliable with low complexity and atomicity. The code is available at https://github.com/lifan-yuan/CRAFT.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
TRUSTDESC: Preventing Tool Poisoning in LLM Applications via Trusted Description Generation
TRUSTDESC prevents tool poisoning in LLM applications by automatically generating accurate tool descriptions from code via a three-stage pipeline of reachability analysis, description synthesis, and dynamic verification.
-
Generative Skill Composition for LLM Agents
SkillComposer performs task-conditioned skill sequence prediction with a constrained autoregressive decoder to jointly output skill subset, count, and order, raising pass rates by 23.1 and 18.2 percentage points on tw...
-
Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents
ToolHijacker optimizes malicious tool documents via a two-phase strategy to hijack LLM agents' tool selection in no-box settings.
-
MetaPS: Adaptive Programmatic Strategy Selection for Market Agents
MetaPS trains models via simulation rollouts to select from programmatic strategy libraries for market agents, yielding better performance than fixed or direct LLM baselines across model sizes.
-
SEAL: Synergistic Co-Evolution of Agents and Learning Environments
SEAL co-evolves LLM agents and environments via shared turn-level failure diagnoses, yielding +8.25 to +26.25 point gains on tool-use tasks with only 400 samples.
-
Maestro: Reinforcement Learning to Orchestrate Hierarchical Model-Skill Ensembles
Maestro uses outcome-based RL to train a lightweight policy that orchestrates ensembles of frozen expert models and skills, reporting 70.1% average accuracy across ten multimodal benchmarks and outperforming GPT-5 and...
-
From Skill Text to Skill Structure: The Scheduling-Structural-Logical Representation for Agent Skills
SSL representation disentangles skill scheduling, structure, and logic using an LLM normalizer, improving skill discovery MRR@50 from 0.649 to 0.729 and risk assessment macro F1 from 0.409 to 0.509 over text baselines.
-
When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning
ATTC reduces 'Tool Ignored' errors in tool-integrated reasoning by adaptively trusting tool results according to generated code confidence, yielding 4.1-7.5% gains across models and datasets.
-
FlowEvo: Self-Evolving Agents through the Co-Evolution of Workflows and Executable Skills
FlowEvo compiles successful agent workflows into executable skill records and reuses them at inference time, reporting the best accuracy-cost tradeoff across ALFWorld, HumanEval, and GSM8K among tested baselines.
-
AutoTool: Dynamic Tool Selection and Integration for Agentic Reasoning
AutoTool's two-phase SFT/RL plus ranking training lets 8B LLM agents beat larger fixed-tool agents across math, search, code, and vision benchmarks, though unseen-tool gains are asserted, not isolated.
-
Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.