REVIEW 16 cited by
MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning
read the original abstract
The recently released GPT-4 Code Interpreter has demonstrated remarkable proficiency in solving challenging math problems, primarily attributed to its ability to seamlessly reason with natural language, generate code, execute code, and continue reasoning based on the execution output. In this paper, we present a method to fine-tune open-source language models, enabling them to use code for modeling and deriving math equations and, consequently, enhancing their mathematical reasoning abilities. We propose a method of generating novel and high-quality datasets with math problems and their code-based solutions, referred to as MathCodeInstruct. Each solution interleaves natural language, code, and execution results. We also introduce a customized supervised fine-tuning and inference approach. This approach yields the MathCoder models, a family of models capable of generating code-based solutions for solving challenging math problems. Impressively, the MathCoder models achieve state-of-the-art scores among open-source LLMs on the MATH (45.2%) and GSM8K (83.9%) datasets, substantially outperforming other open-source alternatives. Notably, the MathCoder model not only surpasses ChatGPT-3.5 and PaLM-2 on GSM8K and MATH but also outperforms GPT-4 on the competition-level MATH dataset. The dataset and models will be released at https://github.com/mathllm/MathCoder.
Forward citations
Cited by 16 Pith papers
-
Assessing Coherency and Consistency of Code Execution Reasoning by Large Language Models
LLMs achieve 81% coherent execution simulation on HumanEval but show mostly random or weak consistency across tests, with frontier models relying on natural language shortcuts instead of true program analysis.
-
Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training
An RL agent learns domain re-weighting policies from evaluation feedback to improve balanced performance in continual pre-training of LLMs across source and target domains.
-
CodeMind: Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Reasoning
CodeMind evaluates ten LLMs on four benchmarks using three new code reasoning tasks, finding performance varies by model size and drops with complexity while showing no correlation with bug repair ability.
-
Agent Explorative Policy Optimization for Multimodal Agentic Reasoning
AXPO addresses the Thinking-Acting Gap in agentic RL training by targeted resampling of tool calls in all-wrong subgroups, delivering +1.8pp gains over GRPO on nine multimodal benchmarks with an 8B model beating a 32B...
-
When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning
ATTC reduces 'Tool Ignored' errors in tool-integrated reasoning by adaptively trusting tool results according to generated code confidence, yielding 4.1-7.5% gains across models and datasets.
-
DeepEyesV2: Toward Agentic Multimodal Model
DeepEyesV2 uses a two-stage cold-start plus reinforcement learning pipeline to produce an agentic multimodal model that adaptively invokes tools and outperforms direct RL on real-world reasoning benchmarks.
-
ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs
ReTool uses outcome-driven RL to train 32B LLMs to dynamically use code tools during reasoning, reaching 72.5% accuracy on AIME and surpassing o1-preview.
-
Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personas
A curated set of one billion personas enables scalable, diverse synthetic data generation for LLM training across reasoning, instructions, knowledge, NPCs, and tools.
-
Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs
Step-DPO performs preference optimization on individual reasoning steps rather than complete answers, producing nearly 3% accuracy gains on MATH for 70B+ parameter models with 10K preference pairs.
-
Code as Agent Harness
A survey that organizes existing work on LLM-based agents around code as the central harness, structured in three layers of interfaces, mechanisms, and multi-agent scaling, with applications across domains and listed ...
-
A Replicate-and-Quantize Strategy for Plug-and-Play Load Balancing of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
Replicate-and-Quantize copies the busiest MoE expert as a quantized duplicate and compresses the least important expert, lowering a new Load-Imbalance Score by up to 1.4x while accuracy varies by roughly -1.2 to +3.0 points.
-
Semantic-Aware Logical Reasoning via a Semiotic Framework
LogicAgent uses a semiotic-square-guided approach to enhance logical reasoning in LLMs on the new RepublicQA benchmark and others, reporting average gains of 6.25% and 7.05% respectively.
-
InternLM2 Technical Report
InternLM2 is a new open-source LLM that outperforms prior versions on 30 benchmarks and long-context tasks through scaled pre-training to 32k tokens and a conditional online RLHF alignment strategy.
-
SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Models
SPHINX improves multi-modal LLMs through joint mixing of weights, tasks, and visual embeddings from varied sources to achieve stronger alignment and multi-purpose capabilities.
-
Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Security
This survey discusses key components and challenges for Personal LLM Agents and reviews solutions for their capability, efficiency, and security.
-
Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning
Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.