Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Creating Trustworthy LLMs: Dealing with Hallucinations in Healthcare AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.01463 v1 pith:JNWEQRZI submitted 2023-09-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.NE
keywords healthcarehallucinationsllmsmodelstrustworthyadoptioncreatingissues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have proliferated across multiple domains in as short period of time. There is however hesitation in the medical and healthcare domain towards their adoption because of issues like factuality, coherence, and hallucinations. Give the high stakes nature of healthcare, many researchers have even cautioned against its usage until these issues are resolved. The key to the implementation and deployment of LLMs in healthcare is to make these models trustworthy, transparent (as much possible) and explainable. In this paper we describe the key elements in creating reliable, trustworthy, and unbiased models as a necessary condition for their adoption in healthcare. Specifically we focus on the quantification, validation, and mitigation of hallucinations in the context in healthcare. Lastly, we discuss how the future of LLMs in healthcare may look like.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 19 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A global log for medical AI

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MedLog defines a nine-field, syslog-style event log for clinical AI, intended to support real-world surveillance and auditing; the four-deployment validation claimed in the abstract is absent from the body.

  2. Not All Needles Are Found: How Fact Distribution and Don't Make It Up Prompts Shape Retrieval, Reasoning, and Hallucination in Long-Context LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a new extended needle-in-a-haystack benchmark, explicit anti-hallucination prompts and dispersed fact placement cause some long-context LLMs to over-refuse or collapse in accuracy, while others remain robust.

  3. An Agentic Model Context Protocol Framework for Medical Concept Standardization

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An MCP-based LLM agent with mandatory Athena lookups achieved 100% retrieval success on 150 OMOP terms and scored higher on clinical relevance than historical human mappings.

  4. TerraMAE: Learning Spatial-Spectral Representations from Hyperspectral Earth Observation Data via Adaptive Masked Autoencoders

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract proposes TerraMAE, an adaptive channel-grouping masked autoencoder for hyperspectral Earth observation, but the manuscript body is a different paper, leaving the proposal without any supporting method or ...

  5. Trustworthy Agents for Electronic Health Records through Confidence Estimation

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    TrustEHRAgent, an EHR assistant with step-by-step confidence checks, scores 44% and 25% accuracy on MIMIC-III and eICU when only answers it is 70% confident in are counted, while baseline methods score 0%.

  6. Trustworthy Medical Imaging with Large Language Models: A Study of Hallucinations Across Modalities

    eess.IV 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI models hallucinate when reading medical images and when generating them from text, producing false findings and anatomically impossible pictures.

Pith tools