Pith. sign in

REVIEW 19 cited by

Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.10702 v2 pith:E6M3GHPR submitted 2023-11-17 cs.CL

Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2

classification cs.CL
keywords modelscodeopenreleaseadaptingevaluationfinetunedimproved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since the release of T\"ULU [Wang et al., 2023b], open resources for instruction tuning have developed quickly, from better base models to new finetuning techniques. We test and incorporate a number of these advances into T\"ULU, resulting in T\"ULU 2, a suite of improved T\"ULU models for advancing the understanding and best practices of adapting pretrained language models to downstream tasks and user preferences. Concretely, we release: (1) T\"ULU-V2-mix, an improved collection of high-quality instruction datasets; (2) T\"ULU 2, LLAMA-2 models finetuned on the V2 mixture; (3) T\"ULU 2+DPO, T\"ULU 2 models trained with direct preference optimization (DPO), including the largest DPO-trained model to date (T\"ULU 2+DPO 70B); (4) CODE T\"ULU 2, CODE LLAMA models finetuned on our V2 mix that outperform CODE LLAMA and its instruction-tuned variant, CODE LLAMA-Instruct. Our evaluation from multiple perspectives shows that the T\"ULU 2 suite achieves state-of-the-art performance among open models and matches or exceeds the performance of GPT-3.5-turbo-0301 on several benchmarks. We release all the checkpoints, data, training and evaluation code to facilitate future open efforts on adapting large language models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EvoGM: Learning to Merge LLMs via Evolutionary Generative Optimization

    cs.NE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    EvoGM uses a dual-generator architecture with cycle-consistent learning on winner-loser pairs from search history to optimize LLM merging coefficients inside a multi-round evolutionary pipeline and reports outperforma...

  2. Conditional Equivalence of DPO and RLHF: Implicit Assumption, Failure Modes, and Provable Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    DPO-RLHF equivalence holds only conditionally on the optimal policy preferring human-preferred responses; otherwise DPO optimizes relative advantage and can prefer worse outputs, addressed by introducing CPO.

  3. Distributionally Robust Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Task Sampling

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DRATS derives a minimax objective from a feasibility formulation of MTRL to adaptively sample tasks with the largest return gaps, leading to better worst-task performance on MetaWorld benchmarks.

  4. Beyond LoRA vs. Full Fine-Tuning: Gradient-Guided Optimizer Routing for LLM Adaptation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MoLF routes updates between full fine-tuning and LoRA at the optimizer level to match or exceed the better of either static method, with an efficient LoRA-only variant outperforming prior adaptive approaches.

  5. Leveraging Pretrained Language Models as Energy Functions for Glauber Dynamics Text Diffusion

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pretrained language models are used as energy functions for Glauber dynamics in discrete text diffusion, improving generation quality over prior diffusion LMs and matching autoregressive models on benchmarks and reaso...

  6. Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Magpie synthesizes 300K high-quality alignment instructions from Llama-3-Instruct via auto-regressive prompting on partial templates, enabling fine-tuned models to match official instruct performance on AlpacaEval, Ar...

  7. When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Global calibration metrics like ECE are confounded by accuracy; the proposed ACE framework with three accuracy-controlled views shows many prior calibration advantages weaken or reverse.

  8. Beyond LoRA vs. Full Fine-Tuning: Gradient-Guided Optimizer Routing for LLM Adaptation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MoLF routes updates between full fine-tuning and LoRA at the optimizer level to match or exceed the better of the two static methods on SQL, medical QA, and counterfactual tasks while an efficient variant outperforms ...

  9. AdaRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubrics for Reliable LLM Agent Evaluation and Reward Learning

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    AdaRubric adaptively generates task-specific rubrics via LLM, scores agent trajectories with per-dimension confidence weighting, and produces filtered DPO pairs that raise human correlation to Pearson r=0.79 and downs...

  10. Dr.LLM: Dynamic Layer Routing in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dr. LLM retrofits frozen LLMs with MCTS-supervised per-layer routers for skip/execute/repeat decisions, delivering up to +3.4% accuracy and 5-layer savings on reasoning tasks with strong out-of-domain generalization.

  11. On the Shelf Life of Fine-Tuned LLM-Judges: Future-Proofing, Backward-Compatibility, and Question Generalization

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fine-tuned LLM judges struggle with future-proofing to newer generators but maintain backward-compatibility more easily; DPO training and continual learning improve adaptation while all models degrade on unseen questions.

  12. Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces IFBench benchmark with 58 new constraints and demonstrates RLVR training improves generalization of language models to unseen verifiable output constraints.

  13. DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models

    cs.LG 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DCLM-Baseline dataset lets a 7B model reach 64% 5-shot MMLU accuracy after 2.6T tokens, beating prior open-data models by 6.6 points on MMLU with 40% less compute.

  14. Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive

    cs.CL 2024-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    DPOP is a new loss function that prevents DPO from lowering preferred response likelihoods and outperforms standard DPO on diverse datasets, MT-Bench, and enables Smaug-72B to exceed 80% on the Open LLM Leaderboard.

  15. Model Merging to Evolution: Parameter Space Exploration for Expert Models

    cs.NE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MERGEvolve unifies model merging with evolutionary strategies to explore outside convex parameter space and achieves competitive benchmark performance.

  16. LoRA vs. Full Fine-Tuning: A Theoretical Perspective

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In linear regression, LoRA can achieve lower excess risk than full fine-tuning when the pretraining-downstream difference is low-rank, and small LoRA ranks can improve generalization by acting as regularization.

  17. Can Muon Fine-tune Adam-Pretrained Models?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Constraining fine-tuning updates with LoRA mitigates performance degradation when switching from Adam to Muon on pretrained models.

  18. Step-Video-T2V Technical Report: The Practice, Challenges, and Future of Video Foundation Model

    cs.CV 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Step-Video-T2V describes a 30B-parameter text-to-video model with custom Video-VAE, 3D DiT, flow matching, and Video-DPO that claims state-of-the-art results on a new internal benchmark.

  19. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The book introduces the origins, mathematical setup, and optimization stages of RLHF including reward modeling, reinforcement learning, rejection sampling, and direct alignment algorithms.