Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Language Models, Agent Models, and World Models: The LAW for Machine Reasoning and Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.05230 v1 pith:V4YSCVKF submitted 2023-12-08 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGcs.RO

Language Models, Agent Models, and World Models: The LAW for Machine Reasoning and Planning

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGcs.RO
keywords modelsreasoninglanguageworldagentplanningcapabilitieselements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite their tremendous success in many applications, large language models often fall short of consistent reasoning and planning in various (language, embodied, and social) scenarios, due to inherent limitations in their inference, learning, and modeling capabilities. In this position paper, we present a new perspective of machine reasoning, LAW, that connects the concepts of Language models, Agent models, and World models, for more robust and versatile reasoning capabilities. In particular, we propose that world and agent models are a better abstraction of reasoning, that introduces the crucial elements of deliberate human-like reasoning, including beliefs about the world and other agents, anticipation of consequences, goals/rewards, and strategic planning. Crucially, language models in LAW serve as a backend to implement the system or its elements and hence provide the computational power and adaptability. We review the recent studies that have made relevant progress and discuss future research directions towards operationalizing the LAW framework.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cracking the Code of Juxtaposition: Can AI Models Understand the Humorous Contradictions

    cs.CL 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces YesBut benchmark showing state-of-the-art multimodal models lag humans on interpreting humorous contradictions in comics.

  2. Building Social World Models with Large Language Models

    cs.SI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SWM framework uses LLMs to model social belief dynamics from events via temporal pattern mining and ELBO optimization, outperforming time-series models on a new 12k-point benchmark from Kalshi and Polymarket predictio...

  3. Efficient Agentic Reasoning Through Self-Regulated Simulative Planning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SR²AM achieves competitive Pass@1 accuracy on diverse tasks with 25.8-95.3% fewer reasoning tokens than much larger models by using self-regulated simulative planning trained via supervised learning and RL.

  4. Memory in the Age of AI Agents

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper maps agent memory research via three forms (token-level, parametric, latent), three functions (factual, experiential, working), and dynamics of formation/evolution/retrieval, plus benchmarks and future directions.

  5. General Agentic Planning Through Simulative Reasoning with World Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SiRA uses LLM world models for simulative reasoning to achieve up to 124% higher task completion and 32.2% navigation success versus reactive baselines in web environments.

  6. When 'YES' Meets 'BUT': Can Large Models Comprehend Contradictory Humor Through Comparative Reasoning?

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Presents YesBut (V2) benchmark and shows state-of-the-art VLMs significantly underperform humans on tasks requiring comparative reasoning for contradictory humor in comics.

  7. Toward World Modeling of Physiological Signals with Chaos-Theoretic Balancing and Latent Dynamics

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NormWear-2 encodes physiological signals and interventions into a shared latent space, models their joint evolution as a dynamical system, and uses chaos-theoretic balancing during pretraining to achieve superior mult...

  8. A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.

  9. AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users

    cs.CV 2023-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AppAgent lets large language models operate diverse smartphone apps via visual interactions and learns app usage from exploration or demonstrations.

  10. A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 accept novelty 3.0

    A survey compiling RL methods, challenges, data resources, and applications for enhancing reasoning in large language models and large reasoning models since DeepSeek-R1.

  11. Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems

    cs.AI 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This survey frames foundation agents using brain-inspired modular architectures and reviews challenges in evolution, collaboration, and safety.