Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.05788 v2 pith:23C3AXTJ submitted 2025-02-28 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords abilitiesemergentmodelsreasoninglargetheylanguageleading
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are leading a new technological revolution as one of the most promising research streams toward artificial general intelligence. The scaling of these models, accomplished by increasing the number of parameters and the magnitude of the training datasets, has been linked to various so-called emergent abilities that were previously unobserved. These emergent abilities, ranging from advanced reasoning and in-context learning to coding and problem-solving, have sparked an intense scientific debate: Are they truly emergent, or do they simply depend on external factors, such as training dynamics, the type of problems, or the chosen metric? What underlying mechanism causes them? Despite their transformative potential, emergent abilities remain poorly understood, leading to misconceptions about their definition, nature, predictability, and implications. In this work, we shed light on emergent abilities by conducting a comprehensive review of the phenomenon, addressing both its scientific underpinnings and real-world consequences. We first critically analyze existing definitions, exposing inconsistencies in conceptualizing emergent abilities. We then explore the conditions under which these abilities appear, evaluating the role of scaling laws, task complexity, pre-training loss, quantization, and prompting strategies. Our review extends beyond traditional LLMs and includes Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), which leverage reinforcement learning and inference-time search to amplify reasoning and self-reflection. However, emergence is not inherently positive. As AI systems gain autonomous reasoning capabilities, they also develop harmful behaviors, including deception, manipulation, and reward hacking. We highlight growing concerns about safety and governance, emphasizing the need for better evaluation frameworks and regulatory oversight.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.

  2. Phase Transitions in Attention: A Bayesian Theory of Copy Head Emergence

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bayesian reduction of attention posterior on copy task predicts first-order phase transition for softmax attention and second-order followed by crossover for linear attention.

  3. An In-Vitro Study on Cross-Lingual Generalization in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An in-vitro study with synthetic languages finds cross-lingual transfer depends more on tokenization preserving reusable substructure than on lexical similarity or balance, with transfer emerging in stages.

  4. When transformers learn "impossible" languages, what do they learn?

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Transformers on impossible-language variants show gradual grammatical sensitivity loss but sharp long-sentence generation failures, supporting generative deficiency as a link to non-attestation.

  5. The Illusion of Insight in Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mid-reasoning shifts in reasoning models are rare symptoms of unstable inference that seldom improve accuracy and do not reflect intrinsic self-correction.

  6. Market Design for AI: Beyond the Copyright Binary

    econ.TH 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Game-theoretic analysis shows copyright extremes under-incentivize innovative creators and cause dynamic homogenization in AI data; a data intermediary design is proposed to restore efficiency.

  7. Characterize Then Distill: Mechanistic Reasoning in Large Output Spaces

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reasoning in large output spaces proceeds via shortlisting then fine-grained reasoning; this characterization enables a mechanistic distillation strategy that outperforms standard distillation.

  8. Frozen LLMs as Map-Aware Spatio-Temporal Reasoners for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A framework encodes observed trajectories and HD maps into tokens for frozen LLMs to perform spatio-temporal reasoning and predict future vehicle paths with a linear decoder.

  9. A Large Language Model-Driven Agent-Based Modeling Framework with Multi-Round Communication for Simulating Vaccine Opinion Dynamics

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    An LLM-driven agent-based model with multi-round dialogue reproduces non-linear social influence patterns in vaccination opinion dynamics, with memory increasing resistance and prompt diversity increasing adoption.

  10. Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AI models for automated short answer scoring show substantial mid-range quality degradation in expert agreement that improves with greater task-specific adaptation.

  11. Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AI short-answer scorers show mid-range quality degradation that lessens with more task-specific adaptation, while human agreement stays stable across the quality spectrum.

  12. A Byzantine Fault Tolerance Approach towards AI Safety

    cs.DC 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a fault-tolerance architecture for AI safety by analogizing unreliable AI artifacts to Byzantine nodes and applying consensus mechanisms.

  13. Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Advanced language representations shape LLMs' schemas to improve knowledge activation and problem-solving.