REVIEW 4 cited by
ReAGent: A Model-agnostic Feature Attribution Method for Generative Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ReAGent: A Model-agnostic Feature Attribution Method for Generative Language Models
read the original abstract
Feature attribution methods (FAs), such as gradients and attention, are widely employed approaches to derive the importance of all input features to the model predictions. Existing work in natural language processing has mostly focused on developing and testing FAs for encoder-only language models (LMs) in classification tasks. However, it is unknown if it is faithful to use these FAs for decoder-only models on text generation, due to the inherent differences between model architectures and task settings respectively. Moreover, previous work has demonstrated that there is no `one-wins-all' FA across models and tasks. This makes the selection of a FA computationally expensive for large LMs since input importance derivation often requires multiple forward and backward passes including gradient computations that might be prohibitive even with access to large compute. To address these issues, we present a model-agnostic FA for generative LMs called Recursive Attribution Generator (ReAGent). Our method updates the token importance distribution in a recursive manner. For each update, we compute the difference in the probability distribution over the vocabulary for predicting the next token between using the original input and using a modified version where a part of the input is replaced with RoBERTa predictions. Our intuition is that replacing an important token in the context should have resulted in a larger change in the model's confidence in predicting the token than replacing an unimportant token. Our method can be universally applied to any generative LM without accessing internal model weights or additional training and fine-tuning, as most other FAs require. We extensively compare the faithfulness of ReAGent with seven popular FAs across six decoder-only LMs of various sizes. The results show that our method consistently provides more faithful token importance distributions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Attribution Contract: Feature Attribution for Generative Language Models
Introduces the Attribution Contract specification to clarify feature attribution claims in generative language models by naming the output explained, eligible features, generative process, fixed elements, and attribut...
-
What LLMs explain is not what they believe: Evaluating explanation sufficiency under models' own input beliefs
Proposes SCSuff metric for evaluating LLM explanation sufficiency via model-generated alternative inputs, showing explanations are typically insufficient and predictable from hidden states.
-
The Attribution Contract: Feature Attribution for Generative Language Models
The paper proposes the Attribution Contract as a framework to resolve conceptual ambiguities in applying feature attribution to autoregressive and diffusion language models by explicitly specifying what is being explained.
-
Hessian-Enhanced Token Attribution (HETA): Interpreting Autoregressive LLMs
HETA is a new attribution framework for decoder-only LLMs that combines semantic transition vectors, Hessian-based sensitivity scores, and KL divergence to produce more faithful and human-aligned token attributions th...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.